Surprisingly, in his book "Russian History" N. Kostomarov quotes the following words of Peter I about Russia and its people, which very clearly indicate that only an impostor could say something like that, for whom the real Russian tsar was replaced during his "great embassy »To Western Europe. What did the false Peter say that immediately betrayed his Russophobic essence and clearly non-Russian origin?
And he said literally the following, if you follow the text of N. Kostomarov's book:
As you can see, not a single Russian tsar could say that about the people from which he himself came. For then he would admit that he himself is also the same animal by origin. And all this is very different from the description and behavior of Tsar Peter before his departure to Europe. But for an imposter-Russophobe and similar statements, and the corresponding activities, which led to a colossal decline in the population of Russia, would be completely logical. We will not list all the proofs of its substitution, which have already been described in detail in the corresponding post, especially since many independent researchers adhere to exactly this version, which is different from the myths of the "official history".
So, I am confident in the substitution of Peter by Masons and the candidate of physical and mathematical sciences, Professor S. Sall, who explains by this the presence of numerous Masonic symbols in St. Petersburg, as well as the construction of the city according to a certain layout. And in the same way, centuries later, the current capital of the United States will be "built" by the Freemasons. And here is what S. Sall says about this:
Of course, not everything is so simple in the hypothesis of the Russian scientist. And if the version with the substitution of the king for the English Mason still somehow looks quite plausible, as well as the presence of a large amount of Masonic symbols on the buildings of the city, then the construction of the city almost from scratch by the Freemasons raises many questions. And it is no coincidence that S. Sall says that the bay was already called St. Petersburg, as well as the remains of an ancient ancient city on the island of Kotlin. And not in vain, many independent researchers believe that it was there that its western outskirts were, and the entire space from Kronstadt to present-day St. Petersburg, which has now become a bay, also belonged to the ancient city before the flood.
S. Sall also says that even before the appearance of the false Peter, there existed an ancient fortress-star in this place, as well as settlements and Vedic temples. This means that this place has been inhabited since antiquity, and all this fits very well into the hypothesis of the existence of an ancient ancient city before the Masonic project of false Peter. Another thing is that the Masons, of course, knew very well about the existence of this city, since they had access to the hidden knowledge of the antediluvian civilization. So they decided, after the decreased level of the bay allowed, to dig up ancient buildings and use them for their own purposes, organizing their cosmetic repairs (with the application of Masonic symbols over Vedic ones) and rebuilding those buildings that were severely destroyed.
In favor of this, for example, is indicated by the fact that the architectural style of some buildings does not correspond to their functional purpose. So, the building of the Stock Exchange is clearly a former Vedic temple, as well as St. Isaac's Cathedral, which was beautifully restored by the Freemasons and named so false Peter, as S. Sall explained. But in this cathedral you can still find a clearly Vedic swastika ornament. For example, a Vedic swastika ornament was preserved on the floor of this cathedral.
There are also swastika ornaments in the Hermitage and the Winter Palace. The swastika ornament has also been preserved on the facades of many historical buildings. And, of course, they were clearly not created by the Freemasons, but also by the inhabitants of the Vedic ancient city and even before this city was flooded by the waters of the flood. And now he dug it up in accordance with the Masonic project, absolutely not sparing the population of Russia. Freemason false Peter. It is not known for certain whether his name was really Isaac, but it is quite possible. And it was quite in the spirit of the Freemasons to ascribe to themselves the construction of buildings and even a city that existed long before them.
Of course, in some places they applied Masonic symbols on the outer walls of buildings, and in the same former Vedic temple, which they called St. Isaac's Cathedral, they replaced Vedic mosaics with biblical ones. But note that all these mosaics are again framed by the well-recognized Vedic swastika ornament. And only a blind person can not see him. That is why St. Petersburg could not be built by the Freemasons, they only dug up and restored the heritage of the more ancient Vedic ancient civilization, just as they dug out of the sand of the desert in search of the "weapon of the gods" of the so-called. The Great Pyramids of Giza are the Egyptian pharaohs, after whom these much more ancient structures of the previous civilization are now named.
And all the pseudo-historical myths of the "official history" were just invented just to hide the existence of this "golden age" civilization from us. For comparison with it will clearly not be in favor of the parasite Satanists who seized world power after the cataclysm and ascribed to themselves many of the achievements of the ancient Vedic civilization. For the same reason, it can be argued with a high degree of probability that Washington was also "built by the Freemasons" like St. Petersburg, as well as many other cities with buildings made according to the same standards and in the same architectural antique style. Including in those parts of the world where there were no Masons at all.
michael101063 ©