As the admirers of Darwinism do not try to hang noodles on the ears of gullible philistines with the invented dogmas of their religion, but all their real "evidence", in fact, turn out to be skillful fakes. This is exactly the case with all kinds of "intermediate links" not only between ape and man, but even between different species of representatives of the animal world.
For example, what is the sensational story of the discovery of Archeoraptor - an "intermediate link" between birds and terrestrial dinosaurs from the theropod group? Darwinists were so delighted with this "find" that without even verifying its authenticity, they published in 1999 an article about this "fossil" from China in the prestigious scientific journal National Geographic. However, this "proof" of Darwinists turned out to be a real fake, collected from various parts of fossils of other fossil species.
So, it turned out that the upper part of the body belongs to the fossil bird Yanornis, the tail belongs to a small winged dinosaur microraptor from the dromaeosaurid family, but the lower limbs were never identified. The fact of a fake was confirmed by studies of the instance by several independent researchers. But if it were not for the sensationalism of the statements about finding the next "intermediate link", which entailed a thorough scientific verification, the Archeoraptor, like many other pseudoscientific "proofs" of Darwinists, would have flaunted on the pages of textbooks and encyclopedias as "evidence" of evolutionary transformation dinosaurs into birds.
And this was not the first such case of "finding" such an "intermediate link" between birds and dinosaurs. Already in 1861, just a couple of years after the publication of Darwin's work "The Origin of Species by Natural Selection" in Bavaria, an imprint of the skeleton of a winged lizard was found on a piece of slate, which was named Archeopteryx - an extinct bird of the lizard-tailed subclass. And she really was demonstrated in textbooks for a long time, being considered the progenitor of the entire bird tribe.
However, in 1985, two independent groups of researchers studying this exhibit under the guidance of such scientists as F. Hoyle and L. Spetner discovered a real "scientific" forgery. It turned out that the dinosaur was simply glued to feathers from modern birds. Such "evidence" is in the arsenal of Darwinists, and according to the journal "Science", recently fake fossils have not only flooded the paleontological market, but also penetrated into museums.
Especially many of these fake fossils are "found" in China, where individual dealers have created a real black market for such fakes. The article of this magazine says that in some Chinese museums, up to 80% of the samples of fossil marine reptiles are combined from parts of various skeletons of fossil animals, and in some cases even completed using artificial materials. There are also completely fake skeletons, in which there are no fossils at all.
Most of these exhibits are kept in small provincial museums, but some of them even get into museums in large cities. However, Chinese scientists from the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences regularly identify such fakes, comparing them with food poisoning, which could have serious consequences in the future. Such fakes not only mislead visitors to museums, but also spoil and destroy genuine fossils during their manufacture. In general, as it turns out, all these fraudulent businessmen are akin to Darwinists, who themselves more than once committed such forgeries to prove the "truth" of the dogmas of their religion. But other similar cases will be discussed in another post.
Promotional video:
michael101063 ©
