Jurassic Park Can Be Created In 10-15 Years - Alternative View

Jurassic Park Can Be Created In 10-15 Years - Alternative View
Jurassic Park Can Be Created In 10-15 Years - Alternative View

Video: Jurassic Park Can Be Created In 10-15 Years - Alternative View

Video: Jurassic Park Can Be Created In 10-15 Years - Alternative View
Video: 25 Mysteries and Plot Holes The Jurassic Park/World Franchise Left Hanging 2024, March
Anonim

One of the most controversial dogmas of generally accepted history - both human history and geological history - is the tale of dinosaurs, which represent the lowest branch of biological evolution, which became extinct millions of years ago and with which people did not intersect in any way.

The first contradiction to official dogmas are the so-called Ica stones, found in the area of the Peruvian city of the same name. The stones represent large pebbles, sometimes even andesite boulders, on which some ancient artists not only diligently painted dinosaurs, but also dinosaurs together with modern people.

Image
Image

From the moment these stones were first presented to the public, the officials diligently refute them and talk about a fake. At the same time, they are not at all embarrassed by the fact that there are at least 50,000 such fakes, which implies a whole fake production.

Moreover, this production was very large, since even specialized factories that produce painted plates, teapots and pots - and they have to work for years to make so many products. Moreover: an artist will paint a teapot in a few hours of work, but in order to repeat the same on a stone, this stone needs to be drilled, scraped and chiselled, which takes many days and months. But this fact is not too much for the officials.

The second interesting fact was discovered by ancient miners, tunnellers, geologists, archaeologists and other people who, by occupation, have to either dig the earth or make tunnels in the rocks. From time to time, they come across not the usual layers of fern imprinted on the rock, but rather rare fossils of dinosaur bones. In museums, they are smooth and shiny, sometimes even varnished, but in the “wild nature” such bones have been seen and touched by a few people. And these people unanimously say that bones stink of dead meat. It is very strange that the smell of rotten meat could not disappear in 100 million years or more.

Further, when these stinking bones fell into the hands of all sorts of researchers, they began to look at the samples under a microscope and find there cells of tissues that had not been much damaged for 100 million years. But the officials do not pay any attention to this miracle either.

And now, as reported by the National Science Review on January 12, 2020, a group of histologists mined somewhere a fresh fossil of the so-called Hypacrosaurus, isolated articular cartilage from there and extracted more or less whole cells from this cartilage:

Promotional video:

Image
Image

We did not find a picture of this dinosaur, but its closest relative looks something like this:

Image
Image
Image
Image

Since dinosaur cells had already been isolated many times, histologists went further and, having collected more tissue, began to look for cells where something similar to the nucleus was preserved. And they found such cells:

Image
Image

And then, when the nucleus began to be investigated, practically intact chromosomes and special proteins associated with DNA were found, which gave the shown color reaction.

At the conclusion of their publication, histology writes in almost plain text that they are a little crazy, since no DNA, no proteins can be stored for millions of years. All this will first be devoured by microbes, then these microbes will be devoured by other microbes and, after several billion such cycles of devouring, even dust will not remain from DNA.

And this does not take into account the fact that the DNA molecule is rather flimsy and is much inferior in strength to diamond. If something goes wrong, it falls apart into separate nucleotides. Meanwhile, these molecules survived and now researchers are hatching grandiose plans to reconstruct the DNA of extinct species, after which the obvious consequence of this reconstruction will be Jurassic Park or something like that.

Technically, if someone allocated money for this, then dinosaur cloning could begin in ten years - all the technologies for this are available, but we are no longer interested in this. Much more interesting is something else: why hasn't DNA been searched for in fossils before? Or they searched, found, maybe even cloned some creatures later, but it was a closed topic and was just opened a little just now?

Of course, no one will answer this question to us, and we don't need it. The main thing is that all the paradigms of the officials after this discovery are spreading at the seams.

First, if DNA was preserved in dinosaur fossils, then dinosaurs were contemporaries of mammoths and humans, having disappeared only a few thousand years ago. That is, as if in the official times of some Egyptians.

Somehow it does not fit well with the history of Egypt officialdom, since there are no dinosaurs in the ornaments of the pharaohs. Consequently, this very Egypt, together with the pharaohs, moves very strongly to our time and it may well be that their Ramses the Great lived only about 1,000 years ago.

Second, if DNA is preserved in dinosaur fossils, then such a great scientific dogma as the geochronological scale crumbles.

Image
Image

The scale works like. Geologists make a hole in the ground and accidentally find some kind of bone there. Paleontologists come to the place and ask the geologists: at what depth, that is, in which of the layers the find lay? They explain that the bone was found in sediments, say, the Cretaceous period. And then paleontologists, dipping their index finger in saliva, raise it up and exclaim: the owner of the bone died in the Cretaceous period! Then they write a candidate's or even doctoral dissertation about this matter.

However, as it now turns out, the Cretaceous fossils contain whole DNA, which pushes the Cretaceous period from a distance of 140-60 million years ago to a distance of 140-60 thousand years ago, and most likely even to a distance of 14,000 to 6,000 years ago.

That is, geology itself is falling apart as a science and the Earth, it turns out, not more than four billion years, but at most several million, and maybe even thousands. But if the Earth is, say, about 10,000 years old, then how old is the Sun? It turns out that the kerdyk comes to astronomy, and cosmology, and black holes, and, as a result, to the theoretical physics that invented them. In other words, we are not afraid of this word - kerdyk comes to everyone.

Nevertheless, we believe that the officials will continue to stand firm in faith, denying any common sense, so we follow the development of events and wait for new wonderful discoveries: we do not exclude that they will soon find somewhere a clutch of live dinosaur-laid eggs, but even, probably, and then the officials will be able to explain it all scientifically.