The long history of Bigfoot continues to fascinate fanciers and amateur explorers. Until now, there is no exact evidence for the existence of Bigfoot. However, researchers soon gained access to material that tells about the life history of Bigfoot.
According to the latest sociological polls, the Bigfoot is a creature unproven by science. More than 40% of the respondents think so. The rest of them believe in the existence of the so-called Bigfoot.
The material received by the experts tells the story of Bigfoot's existence according to the Wallace construction company. The events took place in the late 50s in the winter season.
Company employees were building a new road in California. One of the workers who worked as a bulldozer driver discovered atypical tracks in the snow. According to the worker, these footprints were not human-like. The size of the foot was just over 40 centimeters. The distance of steps was more than 100 meters, which is very atypical for humans.
Later, the same stories about a creature called "Big Foot" appeared in information newspapers. Then the story quickly caught the attention of the public. Soon there were even separate versions about the life of a Himalayan man living in the mountains.
In the mid-60s, more versions appeared confirming the existence of Bigfoot. It was during this period that Roger Patterson was able to shoot Bigfoot on camera for the first time. Soon there was a film that tells about the real life of Bigfoot. The entire plot was created based on Patterson's photographs.
However, there was a version where one of the eyewitnesses filmed Bigfoot on film. Ray Wallace, the head of the Wallace construction company, became an eyewitness. However, the authenticity was not recognized, since Wallace's statement was made after the release of Patterson's film.
Later, another version appeared. It is assumed that Wallace, together with his friend, deliberately created large footprints in order to then create a whole material about Bigfoot. Obviously, the trick was used commercially.
Promotional video:
Wallace's family certainly supported him. It soon turned out that Patterson's film was fictional material, with an actor in a suit playing the huge ape-like man.
One of the scientists in the field of anthropology confirmed that the footprints left could indeed belong to a primate. Samples of several dozen primate tracks were shown as evidence. However, the society did not recognize such a statement.
Now Bigfoot remains one of the most popular brands in America. Wallace’s version is still questioned by amateur researchers.
DZHURICH VLADAN