Russian Crimea In 1640? - Alternative View

Russian Crimea In 1640? - Alternative View
Russian Crimea In 1640? - Alternative View

Video: Russian Crimea In 1640? - Alternative View

Video: Russian Crimea In 1640? - Alternative View
Video: Что Россия получила от аннексии Крыма? 2024, March
Anonim

Yes, the more you come across various little-known maps of the past, the more you realize that there is clearly something wrong with the official history. Since the information on various maps, which seems to belong to the same era, is very contradictory. And the less known the maps are in the public domain, the more this information contradicts the official version of history.

For example, when you look at the map of Russia in 1640, the first thing that catches your eye is that the territory of Crimea, as well as everything that is today called Ukraine (with the exception of the western part), is already part of Russia. This map is called “1640. Novissima Russiae tabula ", which means" 1640. The Newest of Russian Rule ", ie. clearly indicated the territories that are part of Russia or rather Russia at that time.

Image
Image

I draw your attention to the fact that Russia is designated as "Russiae", and not as "Rvssia" on the fake maps that I talked about earlier. Also, on this map, the territory of Turkey is correctly called Anatolia, and not at all Turkey, and the territory of Iran is called Persia. All this testifies in favor of its reliability.

Image
Image

The territory of present-day Ukraine is designated there as "Okraina" and "Wild Field". So our svidomo "non-brothers" on the one hand can be glad that the concept of "outskirts" in 1640 already existed. But on the other hand, it existed as a part of Russian territory. And this territory, it seems, alternately passed to Poland (the Commonwealth), then to Russia, so hated by the Svidomo part of the modern Ukrainian population.

Image
Image

By the way, in the east, Russia borders on Tartary, which is "non-existent" according to the official version of history, and this border runs slightly east of the Volga. Just where the buried defensive ramparts and fortresses-stars are now found. Not far from this border is located and sung by A. Pushkin in his tales "Lukomorye", which is part of Tartary. And the Caspian Sea is still a single body of water with the Aral Sea and is stretched from west to east.

Promotional video:

Image
Image

Surprisingly, the most densely populated area with many cities and towns on the territory of Russia is located along the coast of the Dvina to the very place where Arkhangelsk is now located. Was not the legendary Gardarika, the land of cities, really here? In general, the entire northern coast does not look deserted and sparsely populated. There are many settlements along the entire coast, starting from the Kola Peninsula (also part of Russia).

And I counted about one and a half dozen of them even on the western coast of Novaya Zemlya, which is designated by one island, located quite close to the coast of the mainland. By the way, two more fairly large islands are plotted on the map not far from the coast, and settlements are also marked on them. So the Russian North in those days was by no means a sparsely populated and wild territory. Why did everything change in a later period?

All this can serve as indirect evidence that at that time the climate in these places was warmer. It can also be concluded that this map was drawn up even before the catastrophe, which almost completely destroyed Tartaria and made the Russian North sparsely populated. And the rest of Russia, it seems, also got a lot from it. So maybe O. Pavlyuchenko is right when he thinks that this catastrophe happened at the end of the 17th century? Well, judging by this map, we can assume that it definitely took place after 1640.

Of course, after the falsification of the official history, they tried to hide all these events from us. And why? Is it because some external force was involved in the catastrophe, which, with the help of its servants, was able to carry out the post-catastrophic redistribution of the world? In any case, after this disaster, the world has changed. And it is quite understandable why this map was hidden away so that it would not confuse the adherents of the religion of official history. And then too many "inconvenient" questions immediately appear.

I, of course, cannot be 100% sure of the reliability of this map. But it does not have all those openly clumsy "jambs" and contradictory "inconsistencies" from various historical periods that I found on some clearly fake and by no means little-known maps. However, I have already written the relevant posts about this. Well, those who are interested in this map can independently study it and draw their own conclusions. The more a person starts to turn on their brains, the sooner we can get to the bottom of the truth. And at the same time, and to answer the question: was Crimea really a Russian territory 380 years ago, which was then temporarily lost after the catastrophe of the 17th century?