Can Western Historical Myths Be Believed? - Alternative View

Can Western Historical Myths Be Believed? - Alternative View
Can Western Historical Myths Be Believed? - Alternative View

Video: Can Western Historical Myths Be Believed? - Alternative View

Video: Can Western Historical Myths Be Believed? - Alternative View
Video: History Myths: Why People Believe Them and What to Do About It 2024, March
Anonim

As the analysis of the “official” version of history falsified under the leadership of the Vatican shows, it reveals many inconsistencies and openly “far-fetched” pseudo-historical myths, the absurdity of which makes them doubt the mental adequacy of all those people who blindly believe in them. One of these invented myths is the assertion of the "savagery and barbarism" of pre-Christian Vedic Russia.

It should be understood that such a myth did not originate from scratch and is suspiciously consonant with the Norman version of the history of Russia, invented by German historians Miller, Schletzer and Bayer by order of the Romanov dynasty. Even from the current situation in the world, it is perfectly clear that the ruling "elites" of the West are suffering from an acute hysterical form of Russophobia and are creating new pseudo-historical myths right before our eyes. But all this did not arise in the last decades, because the information war against Russia, and then Russia, was waged by the West for centuries. That's what all these pseudo-historical myths are for.

One can understand the Western historians, whose task was to raise their culture and belittle the achievements of ancient Russian civilization. But at the same time, it is difficult to understand those Russian historians who (with rare exceptions) in their attack of slavish sycophancy and admiration for the West (just like today's liberals) contributed to the rooting of these openly Russophobic pseudo-historical myths within the framework of a falsified "official" history.

For example, what can you read about the falsification of true Old Russian history in the book of the Conceptual publishing house entitled “How and for what are the scriptures made“sacred”?”:

And is it really "skeptics"? After all, a real skeptic does not believe anything at his word and tries to verify any information himself. And here there is no skepticism, but instead the most real servile admiration for Western historians, who now continue to distort real-life events, and have done this repeatedly in the last century. So things need to be called by their proper names. But, thank God, that among Russian historians not all were and still are pro-Western assholes who curry favor with the enemies of our country and our people for grants generously paid by Western NGOs. And it's time to take a closer look at all these "Jews" who sold their own country and people for their stinking "thirty pieces of silver."