The Anthropologist Stated That Aliens Are In Fact Time Travelers - Alternative View

The Anthropologist Stated That Aliens Are In Fact Time Travelers - Alternative View
The Anthropologist Stated That Aliens Are In Fact Time Travelers - Alternative View

Video: The Anthropologist Stated That Aliens Are In Fact Time Travelers - Alternative View

Video: The Anthropologist Stated That Aliens Are In Fact Time Travelers - Alternative View
Video: This Alien Channeler Says He Speaks to Extraterrestrials 2024, April
Anonim

Anthropology professor Michael Masters said that the alien creatures that are constantly described in films, books and news, in fact, may be distant descendants of man.

Mr. Masters explained his theory, and you know, it's pretty logical. He believes that those aliens who supposedly "visit" our Earth, in fact, do not come from other planets, but from the distant future of our own planet. An anthropology professor at the University of Montana called this an amazing phenomenon that will completely change the idea of those UFOs that are constantly observed. Hundreds of books have been written about UFOs, thousands of films and videos have been shot, and millions of people claim to have seen UFOs and even communicated with alien beings. However, Dr. Masters is confident that these may not be guests from other planets, but our own distant descendants who, using time travel technology, travel back in time to study their ancestors.

Image
Image

He believes that all claims that aliens abduct people and conduct examinations and experiments on them are proof that they are ordinary anthropologists, like himself. His theory also explains that aliens are similar to humans, they are usually depicted with two arms, two legs, five-fingered, with eyes and mouth, two-sided symmetry. They can also communicate in a familiar language.

Mr. Masters sticks to his theory, even though science does not even recognize the possibility of the technology of travel in the past. It is possible to go into the future, where it has not yet gone, but not into the past - this contradicts all the laws of nature. However, the anthropologist believes that evolving technologies will come to this, and then the study of human history will be much easier.

Do you think the professor can be right?