Perpetual Motion Machine In The Egyptian Pyramids - Alternative View

Perpetual Motion Machine In The Egyptian Pyramids - Alternative View
Perpetual Motion Machine In The Egyptian Pyramids - Alternative View

Video: Perpetual Motion Machine In The Egyptian Pyramids - Alternative View

Video: Perpetual Motion Machine In The Egyptian Pyramids - Alternative View
Video: Nikola Tesla - Limitless Energy & the Pyramids of Egypt 2024, March
Anonim

One strange feature is noticed behind the Egyptian pyramids: they are capable of destructively affecting the most modern and accurate equipment. According to some reports, up to 80% of electronic devices that have visited the pyramids are out of order. Old Cairo people say that during the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, three Israeli planes that tried to fly at low level over the pyramids of Giza, one after another, for a completely incomprehensible reason, crashed into the sand. Ordinary Arabs explain this by the "curse of the pharaohs", scientists try not to pay attention to such oddities. Independent researchers sometimes tend to believe that a powerful source of electromagnetic radiation is located inside the pyramids.

Very strange results were obtained by studying the pyramids using a thermal imaging system. They showed that there are several powerful heat sources inside the pyramids. What is it? Ancient power plants? The legendary "perpetual motion machine" discovered in time immemorial? The results of this study were almost traditionally attributed to the errors of the instrument itself, especially since after returning from the expedition, it really began to malfunction.

The technology used to build the pyramids seems to be very different from those used by the ancient Greeks or Romans. It was hardly about the tens of thousands of slaves described by the ancient Greek historian Herodotus. And what could he know about ancient Egyptian technologies, if he was separated from the time of the construction of the pyramids in Giza by the same more than two millennia that separate us from the "father of history"? He, in fact, set out only his own judgments and the judgments of the ancient Egyptian priests of his contemporary about how the pyramids could be erected. In accordance with the ideas of their time.

Archaeologist and surveyor Flinders Petrie (1853-1942), having examined the pyramids, made his own conclusions about the technology of their construction. According to Petrie, the ancient craftsmen had tools of a class “which we have only recently reinvented”. The archaeologist and surveyor especially carefully examined the sarcophagus from the Cheops pyramid and said that it was cut from a granite block with straight saws "not less than 2.5 meters in length." Since this granite has a very high strength, one had to assume that the saws were made of bronze, and their cutting edges were equipped with even stronger stones. Perhaps in diamonds.

Even more mystery surrounds the processing of the inner cavity of the sarcophagus, which is much more difficult than cutting out of a block of rock. According to Petri, for this, the Egyptians had to “switch from reciprocating to rotary cutting, as if rolling a saw into a pipe; having made annular grooves with the resulting tubular drill and breaking out the remaining core rods, they could select a large amount of material with minimal labor costs. The diameter of these tubular drills was in the range from 6 to 130 millimeters, and the width of the cutting edge was from 0.8 to 5 millimeters."

Of course, Petrie admits that none of the Egyptologists have been able to find the diamond drills and saws themselves. However, the nature of the surfaces processed by drilling and sawing convinced him of the existence of such tools among the ancient Egyptians.

The deeper Petri investigated the problem, the more mysterious became the stone-cutting technology of the ancient Egyptians. “Worthy of surprise,” the researcher writes, “is the magnitude of the cutting forces, as evidenced by the speed with which the drills and saws passed through the stone; apparently, when drilling granite with 100 mm drills, a load of at least two tons acted on them”.

Isn't it strange that at the so-called dawn of civilization, over 4,500 years ago, the ancient Egyptians had industrial-era drilling machines with a ton or more of a spindle force, which allowed them to cut into hard stones like butter.

Promotional video:

Flinders Petrie and diorite bowls from the 4th dynasty did not pass by their attention. Diorite is one of the hardest stones on the planet and is much harder than iron. However, the hieroglyphs in the bowls were cut with an extremely sharp instrument rather than scratched or ground, as evidenced by the edges of the lines. “Since the width of the lines is only 0.17 millimeters, it is obvious that the hardness of the cutting edge of the tool must be higher than that of quartz; in addition, its material must be sufficiently viscous so as not to crumble at such a sharp edge (about 0.13 mm). It is known that it was possible to engrave parallel lines with a pitch of only 0.8 mm. What kind of instrument it was, how they worked with it, how they maintained such a high accuracy - remains a mystery.

The pyramids were not only built using close to modern technologies. They contain proportions that testify to the brilliant knowledge of the ancient Egyptians in the field of mathematics. The angle of inclination of the side faces of the Cheops pyramid - 52 degrees - was chosen so that the initial height of the monument - 146.6 meters - and the perimeter of its base - 920.85 meters - are in the same relation as the radius of the sphere with its circumference. This ratio is equal to 2 PI. That is, the ancient Egyptians used this number long before its official discovery by the ancient Greeks. In addition, the researchers find that the so-called rule of the golden ratio, officially known to architects since the Middle Ages, was also used in the layout of the Cheops pyramid. The height of the pyramid is exactly one billion times less than the distance from the Earth to the Sun.

If for academic science the age of the pyramids is quite clearly defined and fluctuates within the XXVII-XXV centuries BC, then atlantologists allow much larger deviations from these dates. Among them, they like to quote the Arab historian of the IX century, Ibn Abd Chokmah. He left the following entry relating to the history of the construction of the pyramids: “Most agree that the first pyramids were built by Sorid ibn Solyuk, the pharaoh of Egypt, who ruled three hundred years before the flood. The reason was that he saw in a dream that the whole earth had turned upside down … People lay with their faces down, and the stars fell and hit each other with a terrible crash. Waking up in horror, he gathered the high priests of all the provinces of Egypt, a total of one hundred and thirty people, led by Aklimon, and told them everything. They measured the heights of the stars and, having made calculations,predicted a catastrophe."

Sorid (Zarid) built 30 treasuries, placing them in the pyramid. He filled them with gold, jewelry, gems, vessels and ceramics, stainless weapons, and also, as the ancient author says, shatterproof glass that can be bent. It is clear from this text that an Arab author, 1000 years before the invention of stainless steel and plastics, must have known of their existence.

It is curious, but recently there have been new dating of the age of the sphinx standing next to the pyramids, made by the nature of its water erosion. These dates bring him closer to the hypothetical times of the Great Flood, which may have taken place in the ninth millennium BC. Scientists have noticed that the heavy rains that are necessary to cause the observed erosion of the Sphinx stopped falling in Egypt thousands of years before 2500 BC. e., when, according to Egyptologists, the Sphinx was built. That is, according to the most conservative geological estimates, the construction of the sphinx dates back at least to the period between 7000 and 5000 BC. e. Then, according to Egyptology, the Nile Valley was inhabited only by primitive hunter-gatherers of the Neolithic, whose toolbox was limited to sharpened pieces of flint and sticks …

One gets the impression that the more we learn about the pyramids, the more mysteries around them become.

Victor BUMAGIN