Table of contents:

What Are The Participants Of The Gathering In Montreux Hiding? - Alternative View
What Are The Participants Of The Gathering In Montreux Hiding? - Alternative View
Video: What Are The Participants Of The Gathering In Montreux Hiding? - Alternative View
Video: Marcus Miller - Montreux Jazz Festival 2013 2023, February
Anonim

Bilderberg Club - a bunch of social parasites

The Bilderberg Club is not a mythical center of a "global conspiracy", but a real and important element of the parasitic system of global governance imposed on the countries and peoples of our planet by social parasites …

Elite monopoly as the quintessence of global capitalism.

On the northern shore of Lake Geneva, in the Swiss town of Montreux, which went down in history as the place of signing the Montreux Convention on the Status of the Black Sea Straits (1936), the 67th annual meeting of the Bilderberg Club is coming to an end. 130 representatives of big business, politics, media, think tanks, NATO and a number of other structures from 23 countries of North America and Europe take part in it.

What is Bilderberg?

"Conspiracy theorists", making scary eyes, in response to this question, will tell about the world "Masonic" conspiracy, the Illuminati and other shocking zaum, which has no special relation to reality due to the fact that Freemasonry in this case is only an organizational principle and personnel "filler" … And the functionality is used completely different - supra-Masonic, transnational, which goes beyond the competence of the regular so-called Grand Lodges, the system of which is built on the principle of "one country - one lodge". The "Illuminati" have long been transformed into an irregular lodge of the "Great East" and do not exist in their original form.

Unlike "conspiracy theorists", "statisticians" will boredly list well-known facts from the history of the Bilderberg Club (or group). Created in 1954 in Osterbek, Holland, meets every year in secrecy, media are not allowed at meetings, except for invited information "bosses", the composition of participants is recruited from a pool of approximately 450 people; who specifically of them is attracted depends on the issues discussed, etc. The "Encyclopedists" may recall the internal structure. In addition to this "widest circle" of 450 members, there is a "narrow circle" of 35 people - the Steering Committee and a "very narrow" one - a dozen strictly classified names of the Advisory Committee. This is important information, we will return to it later.

Promotional video:

Image
Image

In the meantime, we note that neither the first, nor the second, nor the third indicate Bilderberg's place in the system of global institutions and the role that this place is assigned to him. And this explains all the shocking "analytical" wanderings in the wilds between reality and fiction. Let's start with this.

When, as a result of the Great October Revolution, the plan of the first globalization, led by the "world government" represented by the League of Nations, collapsed, the conceptual centers in the West had to reconsider their strategy. Another factor was the transformation of the United States as a result of the First World War into the main world creditor, to which all the other victorious powers, including Britain, were in debts. Under these conditions, President Woodrow Wilson's entourage, in which Colonel Edward House, closely associated with the Rothschild clan, played a key role, achieved a bifurcation of conceptual power in the Anglo-Saxon world. This is how the London Chatham House (British and then Royal Institute of International Relations) was linked with the Washington Council on Foreign Relations - CMO (Council on Foreign Relations).KIMO was created on the basis of the "Round Table Society" (OCS), established in 1891 by the founder of the South African colonies, Cecil Rhodes. Rhodes' successors, Alfred Milner and Arnold Toynbee, British Foreign Ministers Edward Gray and Arthur Balfour, as well as Nathaniel Rothschild, the grandson of the founder of the British branch of this Jewish dynasty, who was the first of it to be promoted to aristocracy and inducted into the House of Lord, were involved in it. In 1909-1911, an external, "wide" circle was formed around the OKS - the Round Table (KS), named after the magazine of the same name, published with the money of the British Rothschilds. With the creation in 1913 of the Federal Reserve System (FRS), in which the Rothschilds participated together with the American "oil" clan of the Rockefellers, the United States was also under complete oligarchic control. It was after they did not enter the League of Nations,House insisted on a double-center and on the creation of a CMO, having achieved that it took place on the one hand, with the participation of the Constitutional Court, and on the other, with American staffing and with cross-financing of both centers by both oligarchic clans. Building on the American Geographic Society, House formed the Inquiry, which Wilson entrusted with strategic planning, separate from current foreign policy issues, which he left to the State Department. It was "Inquiry" that served as the foundation of the CFR, and its connection with Chatham House was established through the closest relationship that House developed with the British intelligence resident in Washington, William Wiseman. All these activities were completed in 1919-1921.with American staffing and cross-financing of both centers by both oligarchic clans. Building on the American Geographic Society, House formed the Inquiry, which Wilson entrusted with strategic planning, separate from current foreign policy issues, which he left to the State Department. It was "Inquiry" that served as the foundation of the CFR, and its connection with Chatham House was established through the closest relationship that House developed with the British intelligence resident in Washington, William Wiseman. All these activities were completed in 1919-1921.with American staffing and cross-financing of both centers by both oligarchic clans. Building on the American Geographic Society, House formed the Inquiry, which Wilson entrusted with strategic planning, separate from current foreign policy issues, which he left to the State Department. It was "Inquiry" that served as the foundation of the CFR, and its connection with Chatham House was established through the closest relationship that House developed with the British intelligence resident in Washington, William Wiseman. All these activities were completed in 1919-1921.separated from current foreign policy issues, which he left to the State Department. It was "Inquiry" that served as the foundation of the CFR, and its connection with Chatham House was established through the closest relationship that House developed with the British intelligence resident in Washington, William Wiseman. All these activities were completed in 1919-1921.separated from current foreign policy issues, which he left to the State Department. It was "Inquiry" that served as the foundation of the CMO, and its connection with Chatham House was established through the closest relationship that House developed with the British intelligence resident in Washington, William Wiseman. All these activities were completed in 1919-1921.

In other words, Chatham House - CMO is a bunch of Anglo-Saxon elites, created precisely with the very task of separating strategic planning from current politics, which Wilson, at the suggestion of House, imputed to the functions of CMO. And it is this elite bond that is behind all the events that have fit into the twenty years between the two world wars, including the Great Depression, the Nazi rebirth of Weimar Germany and the outbreak of a new world conflict. But when it culminated in the transformation of the Soviet Union into a superpower and the division of Europe between West and East, it became clear that the Cold War was long and far from repeated attempts at globalization. And the Anglo-Saxon elites faced the need to both control the West European elites and involve them in their further anti-Soviet strategy.It was then that the project of the Chatham House "cell" - SMO in Western Europe appeared, which became Bilderberg.

That is, the Bilderberg Club (group) is a continental-European continuation of Chatham House and the CMO, directed against the USSR, and under current conditions - against the Russian Federation. At its origins was an alliance of followers of Nazism in the Western elites and Western Trotskyists in the person of, respectively, Prince Bernhard of Holland, the grandfather of today's monarch Willem-Alexander II, who appeared at this meeting, and one of the NATO ideologists, Polish Russophobe Joseph Rettinger.

In their correspondence, the basic concept of Bilderberg is set forth, which we will cite, despite its volume, because it is worth it. So, “The Anglo-Saxons as a race are intended to supplant some races, others to assimilate, and so on until the whole of humanity is Anglo-Saxonized,” writes J. Rettinger to Prince Bernhard. - But first of all, it is necessary to establish control over the heart of the globe - Russia. Without this, the world domination of the Anglo-Saxons is unattainable. In order to take possession of Russia … it is necessary to develop a strategy according to which the United States and its allies must, like an anaconda, squeeze Russia from all sides: from the West - Germany and Great Britain, from the East - Japan. In the southern direction it is necessary to create a pro-Anglo-Saxon vassal state, which, stretching between the Caspian, Black, Mediterranean,The Red Seas and the Persian Gulf, would have tightly closed the outlet with which Russia still easily reaches the Indian Ocean. … Considering the problem from geostrategic positions, it is necessary to state that the main and natural enemy of the Anglo-Saxons on the way to world hegemony is the Russian people. Obeying the laws of nature, he uncontrollably strives for the South. Therefore, it is necessary to immediately begin to master the entire strip of South Asia between 30 and 40 degrees C. sh. and from it to gradually push the Russian people back to the North. Since, according to all the laws of nature, with the cessation of growth, decline and slow dying begin, the Russian people, tightly locked in their northern latitudes, will not escape their fate …”. There is nothing to add. In addition, the "non-existent pro-Anglo-Saxon state" in the "southern underbelly" of the USSR-Russia is nothing else,as an international terrorist caliphate. No "conspiracy", pure geopolitics, more precisely, geostrategy.

Image
Image

In the 70s, following Bilderberg, the Trilateral Commission appeared, which extended the influence of this alliance to the elite of Japan, through which in 2000, in turn, expansion into the Asia-Pacific region (APR) went. Example: through the channels of strengthening British-Japanese ties, a Protestant invasion of China began, for which South Korea served as a springboard. The Trilateral Commission was created by Zbigniew Brzezinski, who became its first director. The president of both Bilderberg and Trilaterali was the president of the CFR David Rockefeller, who was originally responsible among the five brothers of the third generation of the dynasty for the banking business, but at the same time "carried his tails" in big politics after his unlucky brother Nelson, the governor of New York, and then vice president USA under Gerald Ford.

In parallel with these processes, the construction of new institutions in the field of public policy proceeded. Together with the Trilateral Commission, the "Group of Seven" - the "Big Seven" emerged, which has become its "mouthpiece". At the turn of the century, with the transformation of the Japanese Trilaterali group into the Asia-Pacific group, the G20 emerged. Having worked as part of the heads of central banks and finance ministries, in 2008, with the onset of the global financial crisis, it was promoted to the format of summits of heads of state and government. And it was then that they gradually began to stick the label of "world economic government". Participation in the G20 of the IMF and the World Bank, which together with the Basel Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the emission centers of reserve currencies form the structure of the "collective world Central Bank"clearly indicated the desire of the puppeteers to form a full-fledged structure of global governance, which is now being talked about more and more. The participation of the same IMF and the World Bank in the UN structure indicates the desire of the puppeteers to return to this international organization the role of the center of global governance, which did not work for the League of Nations and as was conceived after that in 1944-1945. However, the protective mechanisms built at that time by the Soviet side, the most important of which are our country's permanent membership in the Security Council and the right of veto, prevent this.The participation of the same IMF and the World Bank in the UN structure indicates the desire of the puppeteers to return to this international organization the role of the center of global governance, which did not work for the League of Nations and as was conceived after that in 1944-1945. However, the protective mechanisms built at that time by the Soviet side, the most important of which are our country's permanent membership in the Security Council and the right of veto, prevent this.The participation of the same IMF and the World Bank in the UN structure indicates the desire of the puppeteers to return to this international organization the role of the center of global governance, which the League of Nations did not succeed and as was conceived after that in 1944-1945. However, the protective mechanisms built at that time by the Soviet side, the most important of which are our country's permanent membership in the Security Council and the right of veto, prevent this.

In other words, Bilderberg is not a mythological center of a "world conspiracy", but an important element of the system of global governance imposed on countries and peoples, which is a conceptual guide to the unification of North American elites with European ones. The organizers of this system limit themselves in words to economics, but in deeds extend it to the social and political spheres, as well as geopolitics. This is done with the help of the concept of “sustainable development”, introduced into international political discourse against the background and after the collapse of the USSR, but this is a different topic.

A few facts that characterize the current meeting in Montreux:

- country representation: USA, UK and Canada - together under 50 participants; the rest are Europeans (France - 9, Holland - 7, Germany - 6, Switzerland and Turkey - 5 each, others less); from the post-Soviet republics - one Estonian Prime Minister Juri Ratas. International organizations - NATO, UNESCO, OECD and Davos World Economic Forum (WEF);

- the largest representation in large business - transnational companies, banks and investment corporations; it is followed by foundations and think tanks; after - politicians, mainly from the executive branch, then the chiefs of the media, there are representatives of the intelligence community and trade union bosses;

- of the "top" personalities, an unprecedented Dutch representation - King Willem-Alexander and Prime Minister Mark Rutte; besides them and the aforementioned Estonian Prime Minister, President of Switzerland Uli Maurer; among the "incumbent" is also the head of the Bank of England Mark Carney (note that the Fed is not represented), NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and adviser and son-in-law of Donald Trump Jared Kushner, from the "former" - Henry Kissinger, James Baker, Jose Manuel Barroso, David Petraeus;

- there are a lot of top corporations and banks, so let's call the "best" ones: Goldman Sachs, HSBC, Santander, AXA (from her Steering Committee chairman Henry de Castries), Lazard, Total, Daimler, IT giants Google and Microsoft;

- key media: Axel Springer, Economist, NBC, Bloomberg, Washington Post, Financial Times;

- "think tanks": all the main ones, practically without exception, at least from the USA and Britain.

Why is such a Dutch office more German? Because the Netherlands has been a British foothold on the continent since the accession to London at the end of the 17th century by the Dutch, with Jewish roots, the Orange-Nassau dynasty (William III of Orange), which is represented by the current king and his ancestor Bernhard. This representation is proof of the exclusivity of Anglo-Saxon influence in Bilderberg and throughout the West, of which he represents the elite.

King Willem-Alexander and Elizabeth II
King Willem-Alexander and Elizabeth II

King Willem-Alexander and Elizabeth II.

Generally speaking, the entire chain of elite shadow institutions - from the Chatham House and CMO (Anglo-Saxon elites) to Bilderberg (Anglo-Saxon and European elites) and the Trilateral Commission (the same + Japan and Asia-Pacific elites) - is a system of conceptual management of the future system of three "World blocks". Accordingly: western (North and South America), central (Europe, West Asia and Africa) and eastern (APR). Russia's place in this system is still a subject of discussion. One point of view is that the European part of our country should be included in the central block, and the Asian - in the eastern one (the "Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals" project); the other preserves the unity of our country, but completely transforms it into the periphery of the central bloc (the “Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok” project).That is why none of these projects is unacceptable for Russia, and participation in these shadow global governance institutions does not make sense, for it is a de facto consent to surrender. In fairness, at the level of officials, such participation was almost not recorded, but oligarchs, as well as people from liberal circles and representatives of "think tanks" associated with them, were attracted to the meetings of Bilderberg and Trilaterali. Let's call these names, because “the country should know its heroes”: Alexey Mordashov, Anatoly Chubais, Grigory Yavlinsky, Lilia Shevtsova, Dmitry Trenin, Alexey Kudrin, Igor Yurgens, Vladimir Mau, Mikhail Kasyanov, and a number of other figures of the same class. And Dmitry Medvedev, when he was the president of Russia, was noted for a "benefit" in the CMO, and to hide this fact from the general public,Russian TV channels then even confused viewers, distorting the name of this conceptual center.

And one more important point. Over the years, the chain of institutions has developed a practice in which an annual meeting of the Trilateral Commission is held in the spring - in March-April, then, in late May - early June, the G7 summit is held, after which Bilderberg meets in early June. This order has been violated this year. The Bilderberg Summit is the first in this series. Then, in mid-June, with a delay of two to three months from the usual, the Trilateral will meet in Paris. And the G7 will hold its summit in the French town of Biaritz, in the south-west of the country, generally only at the end of August. In addition to this, from the end of the year to the end of June, the G20 summit, which will be held this year in Osaka, Japan, has been postponed. And there is every reason to suspect that this "mixing of cards" is not accidental,but reflects certain events and processes. Which ones?

With some certainty, this can only be judged after the Paris summit of the Trilateral Commission, when its program is published. Then it will be possible to compare it with the themes of the current Bilderberg, as well as the upcoming G7, the topics of discussion of which are already known. From the experience of past years, there will be no doubt that there will be coincidences, but not only the topics are important, but also the posing of questions. There will be no texts of speeches, both reports and discussions - the "Chatham House rule" in action. Everything is classified for "greater frankness", but in fact for the sake of the anonymity of the participants.

Image
Image

The topic of the meeting in Montreux is here. Note that cyber threats are in last place. And it is clear that the accusations against Russia and China in this matter are a cover for concern and actions towards issues from the first half of the list - maintaining a "strategic order" beneficial to the West, control over Europe and Britain (the Brexit theme), "sustainable development" and, of course, that capitalism has a future. Unlike the epigones of the liberal "fifth column" in Russia, who suggest that there is supposedly "no alternative" to capitalist globalization, the real owners of this project are very much concerned about this future. And they do not hide the fact that they consider China and Russia to be its main threats.

Let us compare this with the agenda of the future G7 summit - here. It is easy to see that everything fits together: globalization is the “strategic order”. “Gender inequality, biodiversity, protecting the oceans” are “sustainable development” issues. The problems of “digitalization” that worried the “seven” on the Bilderberg agenda are echoed by the same “cyber threats” and the theme of “social networks”, which openly call for using as a “weapon”, of course, subversive. To complete this puzzle, it remains to wait for the agenda of the Trilateral Commission, where the direct participants in the discussion are usually published - moderators and speakers. As soon as it appears here, I promise the readers that we will return to this topic.

And in conclusion - about the intriguing "supreme" body of Bilderberg, mentioned by the Advisory Committee. Who is it? It is impossible to give a reliable answer to this question - you just need to know, and there are no “leaks” on this topic, as in the composition of the Fed's shareholders or analytical “calculations”, as in the shareholders of the Bank of England. But this does not preclude hypotheses. Having worked with the institutes of global governance for many years and defended his doctoral dissertation on this topic, your humble servant came to the conclusion that methodological approaches to this issue are contained in a study by specialists from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (SHIPT), conducted in 2011-2013. Having analyzed the structure of equity capital and business connections of 43 thousand largest banks and multinational companies (TNCs) around the world,the researchers identified the “broad core” of these ties, comprising 1,318 banks and TNCs. In it, they then identified a "narrow core" of those who decide the fate of the world, counting 147 banks and corporations in it, closely intertwined with each other. Continuing their work, the Swiss - let's pay tribute not only to their professionalism, but also to their civic courage - came to the "super-narrow" center of this core, consisting of 10-12 asset management companies, which they manage for tens of trillions (!) Dollars, and which the author of these lines calls "total investors". Here is a sample list: Barclays, Capital Group, FMR (Fidelity Management Research), AXA, State Street, JP Morgan Chase, Legal & General, Vanguard Group, UBS AG, BlackRock, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Bank of New York Mellon Corporation …who controls the fate of the world, counting 147 banks and corporations in it, closely intertwined with each other. Continuing their work, the Swiss - let's pay tribute not only to their professionalism, but also to their civic courage - came to the "super-narrow" center of this core, consisting of 10-12 asset management companies, which they manage for tens of trillions (!) Dollars, and which the author of these lines calls "total investors". Here is a sample list: Barclays, Capital Group, FMR (Fidelity Management Research), AXA, State Street, JP Morgan Chase, Legal & General, Vanguard Group, UBS AG, BlackRock, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Bank of New York Mellon Corporation …who controls the fate of the world, counting 147 banks and corporations in it, closely intertwined with each other. Continuing their work, the Swiss - let's pay tribute not only to their professionalism, but also to their civic courage - came to the "super-narrow" center of this core, consisting of 10-12 asset management companies, which they manage for tens of trillions (!) Dollars, and which the author of these lines calls "total investors". Here is a sample list: Barclays, Capital Group, FMR (Fidelity Management Research), AXA, State Street, JP Morgan Chase, Legal & General, Vanguard Group, UBS AG, BlackRock, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Bank of New York Mellon Corporation …but also of civic courage - we entered the “super-narrow” center of this core, consisting of 10-12 asset management companies, which they manage for tens of trillions (!) dollars, and which the author of these lines calls “total investors”. Here is a sample list: Barclays, Capital Group, FMR (Fidelity Management Research), AXA, State Street, JP Morgan Chase, Legal & General, Vanguard Group, UBS AG, BlackRock, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Bank of New York Mellon Corporation …but also of civic courage - we entered the “super-narrow” center of this core, consisting of 10-12 asset management companies, which they manage for tens of trillions (!) dollars, and which the author of these lines calls “total investors”. Here is a sample list: Barclays, Capital Group, FMR (Fidelity Management Research), AXA, State Street, JP Morgan Chase, Legal & General, Vanguard Group, UBS AG, BlackRock, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Bank of New York Mellon Corporation …Vanguard Group, UBS AG, BlackRock, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Bank of New York Mellon Corporation.Vanguard Group, UBS AG, BlackRock, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Bank of New York Mellon Corporation.

The largest asset holder is BlackRock with a stake of about $ 7 trillion; within the framework of cross-ownership of shares of each other, experts among the "total investors" single out the Vanguard group, which is closely associated with the CIA. And returning to Bilderberg's Advisory Committee, it should be noted that his "ten" essentially repeats the twelve derived by SHIPT, minus two non-Anglo-Saxon participants - AXA and UBS. Does this mean that the Advisory Committee is made up of the ultimate beneficiaries of “total investors”, of course, hidden from the eyes of the dummies of the alleged “owners” in the respective registers? At the very least, this is not excluded.

But something else is absolutely indisputable: the whole so-called "competitive market economy" is an outright fiction. And the ball under capitalism is ruled by an extreme and cynical monopoly, not even by legal entities, but by individuals, disguised as a "competitive environment." It is in these interests that the system of global governing institutions functions, of which Bilderberg, who gathered in Montreux, is a part. It would be more legitimate to call this system "global feudalism", but this is a completely different story.

Author: Vladimir Pavlenko

Popular by topic