One member of the group on facebook shared unique photographs of the found artifact (handmade by a person), but in a very unusual place. A product made of metal (iron in the photo), poured into stone, was found in waste rock dumps in the Fedorov coal mine near the city of Karaganda (in northern Kazakhstan).
His comment in a personal message. And photos sent to them in good quality:
It can be seen that an iron and obviously artificial product with holes is walled up in stone. At the very least, this find must be hundreds of thousands of years old, or even millions. Moreover, a "spare part" has been extracted from a depth of overburden of tens of meters. On the scale of geochronology, the deeper something is found, the more ancient this find is. Of course, they try to get attached to something else accompanying. For example, organic matter (wood) or other finds that help estimate age. But this is a coal mine, mines and quarries. And coals, as you know, are millions of years old. They belong to the Carboniferous period in the geological history of the Earth.
Unfortunately, geologists and other scientists cannot admit that coals could have been formed literally hundreds of years ago during a global geotectonic catastrophe through outcrops, oil spills on the surface, and the soaking of loose rocks with this oil. And then, by rapid petrification by clay mudflows covering this deposit. The catastrophe was extended over time and had different manifestations. But back to this detail:
Promotional video:
Threads are visible in the holes. It is also a technological product. And the internal thread, as you know, is now cut with tools from more durable alloys. Also pay attention to the structure of the rock in which the metal is located. It is porous. Judging by the fact that the metal inside this rock is also covered with rust, hence the age of the part is not a couple of years.
And it is not a piece of machinery from a mine equipment that fell off or was thrown away. The overburden does not turn to stone like that. And if it turns to stone, then geology clearly does not know this. If we recognize such a rate of fossilization of rocks that do not belong to Portland cements, gypsum, then much needs to be revised at the age of the Earth's rocks.
The rock into which the iron bracket was poured, the part, was either poured into a mold, or was rounded in water flows like pebbles. Those. if we assume that once mudflows (and now overburden rocks) covered the oil outlet, then this "stone" could have been brought by a stream from somewhere far away.
There are many open pits and mines around Karaganda with waste rock dumps from coal mining. In which dump the artifact was found is not reported. But if you wish, you can clarify.
On the surface, some dumps are like this. There are many references to artifacts that were found in coal layers. I gave them in these articles:
Stone artifacts:
Artifacts found in rocks and coals:
So this is not the only such find from this topic. I do not exclude that quite recently people owned high-tech products, but using slightly different laws of physics (or their combinations). Perhaps they knew, understood more deeply the real laws of nature. Including in the field of obtaining artificial rocks.
Either in this place before the flood there was already production, but not coal, but then still unfossilized oil outlets. They used mechanisms made of iron, steel, covered with stone (insulation from corrosion). Perhaps the extraction of this oil, tar (the modern analogue is bituminous sands) was also large-scale. On Google maps, you can see many lakes that look like flooded quarries.
And in conclusion, a thought that I have already repeatedly cited in my articles. Tar is known to be tar, in English. And on ancient maps, this territory was called Tar-tar-Ia. Was it a country of oil tar extraction? What do you think?
Author: sibved2
