- Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3 - Part 4 - Part 5 - Part 6 - Part 7 - Part 8 - Part 9 - Part 10 - Part 11 - Part 12 - Part 13 - Part 14 - Part 15 - Part 16 - Part 17 - Part 18 - Part 19 -
The version of the use of resonance when creating the movement of megalithic blocks at any distance is very good, and it may well have been actively used. True, there is one significant nuance here. No one today succeeds in replicating this method. Although someone enthusiastically discusses the "levitating" stones that lie near the Hindu temple in the village of Khed Shivapur (Karnataka state in western India).
Megalith! Are your best friends the sun, air and water?
There are two stones. The weight of one is 55 kilograms, the other is about 41. Tourists believe that if eleven people touch the larger of them with their fingers, and nine people touch the smaller, and all together say a magic phrase on a strictly defined note, both stones rise to a height of about two meters and hang in the air for about a second.
I really want to believe that this is so, but … On closer examination, we see that the "naturalists" do not just touch stones with their fingers, but together, on command, raise a stone on the fingers placed under it. The stone does not hang for a moment, and … The stone falls to the ground. Agree that with well-coordinated actions, lifting a load weighing 5.5 kilograms over your head, and 5 kilograms, respectively, is not such a difficult task. A similar attraction can be arranged in any yard, with any heavy objects. Therefore, there is no miracle here. And tourists … Let them believe in miracles. That's why they go to India to admire the miracles.
And we will consider another my version of creating some types of megalithic objects. She is absolutely down to earth, and has not the slightest touch of mysticism.
Promotional video:
For more than a decade in the scientific community, disputes about the origin of stone ruts in Malta have not subsided.
Stone tracks on about. Malta.
But there are actually a great many such formations throughout Eurasia.
Stone ruts of the Absheron peninsula. Azerbaijan. Stone ruts of the Absheron peninsula. Azerbaijan.
Turkey.
Here you should pay attention to scratches on the left, above the track. Their character clearly indicates that they are traces of single or repeated mechanical impact on soft material, but not on hard rock.
There are similar formations in the Crimea.
Crimea. Chufut-Kale.
These photos also clearly show that the rocks were not hollowed out. They were dug and cut out at a time when the mass was not yet hardened, but clay-like.
Here are several versions of the origin of these formations.
The first version is "railway".
Proponents of this version identify what they see with the most familiar object to their eyes. And then they draw a conclusion: - The ancient road builders hammered the “opposite rails” with a stone. Not convex, but "convex". Along them, supposedly, you can send a donkey with a cart without a driver, and the cargo will arrive at its destination thanks to a carrot suspended in front of the nose. Cheap and cheerful, as they say, but the flaws of this version are too obvious to take the time to refute it. No one in their right mind would spend colossal efforts for such a dubious "convenience". The game is not worth the candle.
The second version is “road”.
Proponents of this trend are sure that the wooden wheels of the carts, possibly upholstered with iron, and maybe purely stone, have been rolling along the same route for centuries and the tracks are the result of wear and tear on the surface.
This version, in my opinion, also does not stand up to criticism. It is simply impossible for dozens of years, every trip to get trail in the trail in the same place, so that the stone was worked out with such precision. In addition, the enthusiasts were not too lazy and tried to roll the axle with two wheels on many "ruts". Guess what happened? But nothing!
At the very first turn, the wheelset wedged in the bend. And the point is not in the radius of the wheel, but in the fact that the tracks, if they are traces, were not left by rotating wheels at all, but by something else.
The third version is "balloon transport".
Quarries are located near all the known tracks, in Azerbaijan, Malta and England. Namely in Malta, numerous finds of stone balls were made. This gave rise to the version that the balls were used as wheels for transporting chipped slabs.
This version is as unconvincing as the previous ones. The tracks are of the same width, so it is not possible to place balls under the slabs. The balls would leave traces of various configurations, except for straight and curved parallel tracks.
The fourth version is "ritual".
Allegedly, the ruts were gouged for the administration of religious rites. I have already spoken more than once about the extreme poverty of the imagination of modern scientists. Everything that they cannot explain is a priori attributed to cult and religious buildings. A flat stone is necessarily an altar, a pile of stones is a temple, and a stupa for grinding cereals, arranged in a natural excavation in a stone, is a sacrificial bowl, etc.
The fifth version is "alien".
How much without aliens. Their only worries are to fly their starships across the universe in order to hammer stones on backward planets. But Erich von Deniken in his book "In the footsteps of the almighty gods" quite seriously claims that the "stone rails" are the work of an alien mind.
So what do we have? Let us compare the facts that are common to all stone ruts. They:
- Near the quarries.
- Not far from water bodies.
- They have the character of the rock (limestone, shell rock, sandstone).
- Most often, Footprints lead to water, or, conversely, from water.
In my opinion, this data is already enough to form a very simple, logical version that removes most of the questions:
The sixth version is "clay".
It explains not only the origin of the ruts, but even the way some megalithic structures were built. Everything falls into place if we assume that the ruts were made at a time when the stone was not yet a stone, but was ordinary clay at the bottom of the reservoir. It is officially impossible to accept this version for one reason only. Geologists have a number of axioms according to which rocks are formed over millions and billions of years. But it is enough to admit the fact that ordinary clay turns into stone in just a few hundred years, and all questions will disappear by themselves.
See what happens. It doesn't matter if the stones were transported by people or boats loaded with catch. The bottom line is that with the help of the simplest device, you can significantly facilitate the process of transporting heavy loads. Take two poles. Connect them in several places with crossbeams, and the "transport" is ready. It remains to bring it under the bottom of the boat, which is not far from the shore on the shallows, to raise the front ends of the poles up, like levers, and the boat with the load will be in a kind of cradle, which can be dragged without much effort to the shore. We still use similar ones:
Lodgment for launching and retrieving light rowing and sailing craft ashore.
Of course, the main load will fall on the rear ends of the poles in the water. They also left parallel grooves in the muddy bottom. The ruts are often interrupted and crossed, only for the reason that the bottom was also heterogeneous. Somewhere soft clay, somewhere sand or stones. And traces from the feet of a person have not survived for a simple reason. The man walked through the silt without sinking into the clay bottom. Only a very heavy load, pressing on very small supports, could push the clay to a depth of more than half a meter.
And then either the level of the reservoir dropped, or the level of the coastline increased. The bottom turned out to be in the air, the silt was completely decomposed, the exposed clay with the remaining "scratches" from the drags turned to stone, under the influence of the Sun and the atmosphere, and that's it. End of the tale about aliens.
As for those ruts that are in the mountains and far from the water, the mechanism of their appearance is practically the same. Not only the ruts, but most of the man-made caves were not made by carving out of solid rocks, but by ordinary "earth-moving" tools. For the first time this thought came to me when I saw this rock in Malta:
It is easy to guess what scientists say about this rock: - “in this quarry, ancient people drilled holes, drove in wedges and chipped off blocks of limestone”.
At first glance, I thought it was a clayey bank of a river or ravine crumbling. And the first impression, as a rule, is closest to the truth. Yes, the inhabitants of the island, which supposedly was not an island, before the death of the ancient Mediterranean, discovered a huge mudflow.
Reconstruction of the outlines of the coastline before the flood.
I have marked with a red line the approximate outline of the area of the Mediterranean in question. In accordance with the existing map of the sea depths, it is easy to assume that with a decrease in sea level by only 50 meters, an isthmus will appear, connecting the north of Africa with the Apennines just along the Malta-Sicily line. And if you lower the water level by 200 meters, and this is exactly the depth at which most of the flooded ancient cities are located, then the coastline will look exactly like in the picture with my reconstruction.
So that's it. The surviving "ancient Romans" who escaped on the territory of modern Malta had to somehow improve their life. They quickly realized that much of the lost economy could be temporarily compensated for by constructing the mudflow that covered the island, which had already begun to harden quickly. Then they began to shape the semi-solidified clay massifs. This is how objects appeared that are considered carved out of stone. And they are the ones who baffle world science.
And the ancient Maltese simply mined building materials. They drove stakes into the wall, walked along them like scaffolding and hollowed vertical holes at a given distance. The layer split off, fell, often broke, but it could be easily divided into blocks of different sizes and shapes to be installed in the right place. This is how it appeared:
Malta. Temple of the Eternal Goddess.
The layers of clay that had not yet hardened were enough to be placed vertically, to scrape it somewhere, to grease it somewhere, and let it harden under the scorching sun. And this is not a temple or an observatory. This is an ordinary barrack. Temporary structure to shelter a group of people from rain, wind and sun. What was in Malta before the flood is also preserved. It is believed to be a dungeon, but I believe that everything that is covered from above becomes a dungeon.
Malta. Underground Temple of the Hypogeum.
Even photography is prohibited here. Tourists take photographs of the dungeon illegally, so there are not many detailed photos. Probably, so that no one would guess that once it was a ground structure. Moreover, it was built so high quality that it withstood the most powerful blow of the elements and survived even being buried under a layer of mudflow.
As you can see, just one adjustment to the official dating of the stones puts everything in its place. The petrified mudflow could be the reason for the appearance of such phenomena as Eski-Kermen in the Crimea.
Crimea. Eski-Kermen.
How can you believe that these are the marks of a chisel? But scientists argue that these are traces of the processing of solid rock. But I still remember how in childhood I built fortresses from wet sand.
Crimea. Kyz-Kermen Tower.
In this case, there is even no need to strain your eyes. The influx of petrified clay at the foot of the arch is striking. It was clearly a flowing mass that has turned to stone today.
Crimea Eski-Kermen.
And in this case, there is no doubt that before us is a petrified mudflow. It was possible to dig holes in it and make steps with any piece of wood or flat stone.
Crimea. * Grain pits * Eski-Kermen.
The so-called grain pits are, at first glance, only small holes on the surface of a limestone plateau, surrounded by stone sides. But, looking inside, you can see wide and deep cavities with absolutely smooth, as if polished walls. The most striking thing is that the thickness of the walls between adjacent "jugs" is only a few centimeters. This is impossible if you cut down the containers in a solid rocky monolith. And it is much easier if we assume that these containers were cut out when the rock was still hardening clay.
And everything is perfectly simple to explain, if we assume that initially the vessels were molded from clay, installed in the right order, and filled with a liquid solution of the same clay from which the jugs were made. The solution has hardened, the necessary containers have appeared in humans, and scientists of the XXI century are puzzling over how this is done.
The number of preserved containers and their total volume is striking.
There are hundreds of such storage facilities on the peninsula. The average capacity of each of them is five cubic meters. If you believe that they were all intended for storing grain, then it turns out that the population of Crimea at that time should have been simply huge. And the grain was grown, respectively, in quantities comparable to its industrial production.
True, there are other versions of the purpose of these containers. Some researchers are convinced that these are "giant battery banks", which were a source of constant electric current. I think that we have no right to deny this version, but it seems to me very unlikely. It's much simpler. There was a disaster with a powerful mudflow, which passed from the White and Baltic Seas to the Azov and Black Seas.
The water level rose by two hundred meters, the current Bosphorus Strait appeared, and the waters of the Mediterranean Sea separated Europe from Africa completely, connecting the MEDITERRANEAN Sea with the Atlantic. The people who survived were instantly thrown into a semi-wild state, and began to restore their lives in new conditions, using all the materials at hand, and on the basis of the most primitive technologies. The easiest way was to dig holes in the mud, and create storage facilities for food supplies and fresh water. Therefore, it is most likely that the "grain pits" were used as collectors of fresh rainwater.
Tanks
Exactly. Imagine the aftermath of the disaster in the first weeks and months. The Black Sea, which was a fresh lake, instantly turned into a gigantic sea poisoned by salty sea water. The Bible speaks of bitter water as one of the Egyptian executions. Perhaps this is the result of the breakthrough of salt water in the Mediterranean. There was no way to use the existing wells either, the water in them was also poisoned with sea salt and all kinds of garbage. In addition, thousands of decaying corpses of dead people and animals poisoned everything around for hundreds of kilometers.
This is what caused the migration of survivors to the tops of mud drifts, where the air was purified by constant winds. This was the only way to escape the epidemic. And it was precisely the lack of drinking water that made it necessary to equip tanks for collecting rain. It's simple. No fairy tales. The only thing that prevents this from being recognized is the unshakable postulates of official science. Scientists say that not a single evidence of the existence of the described events has survived. Neither written nor oral. There are only traces of an ancient catastrophe, but it seems to have occurred about five to twelve thousand years ago.
Apparently? And how can this be seen? I see that the single continent Asia, at some point, turned into Eurasia. Why is this division? No scientist has a clear answer to this question. But everything becomes clear if we assume that the ancient cartographers did not lie, and in fact there was a mountain range on the territory of Sarmatia.
Map from * Geography * Claudius Ptolemy.
Where is she now? Why are there only flat steppes in the place of these mountains? The geology of Donbass explains everything very simply, for example. Miners, making their way to the coal deposits, overcome layers of sedimentary rocks of sand and clay up to half a kilometer thick! Of course, the mudflow is unlikely to be able to be so thick. But in a few tens of meters, it's easy. The tops of the mountains could be cut off by a stream, like a giant file, and the rest was leveled by bottom sediments, therefore, in the greater territory of Former Sarmatia, the landscape now resembles the bottom of a dried lake. Moreover, unlike the northwestern part of Russia, where all the soil was completely washed away, far in the south this is the soil, as the lightest of the mudflow fractions sank to the bottom of the very last, thereby creating a thick layer of black soil, which modern people are so proud of to this day residents of these places. But was everything destroyed by that flood? Looks like no…
Krasnodon wall
In the Luhansk region there is an amazing object, with a total length of several kilometers, including the ruptures. A resident of Lugansk Dmitry Sergienko shared photos of this building.
If the official history preserved at least some information about the existence of this wall, it would be much easier. But the fact is that in fact the wall exists, but officially it does not. And most likely the reason is that the wall was bare relatively recently. Natural soil erosion helped this. It is quite possible that half a century ago there was the same level steppe as for hundreds of kilometers around.
Another reason for the "phenomenon of a wall to the people" may be known to everyone, but not fully studied by geologists, the processes that contribute to squeezing out everything foreign from the soil. Everyone must have seen heaps of granite boulders along the edges of agricultural fields. Every spring, peasants are forced to collect stones that have appeared on arable land during the winter and interfere with sowing. Often the earth “pulls out” metal objects from its bowels. From spearheads and arrows, to explosive ordnance and unexploded ordnance, in the fields of war in the twentieth century.
Therefore, it is possible that the wall, no matter whether the fortress or the outcrops, like those we spoke about earlier, was squeezed out to the surface, subject to the same processes that contribute to the appearance of individual stones from the depths on the surface. The main thing is that it exists. And it is located in the area where the mountains and Ptolemy are indicated. But this is not the only fragment that confirms the version that Sarmatia was brought in by a thick layer of sedimentary rocks, under which both mountains and man-made structures made of stone can still rest.
In the place where the mountains come to the sea on the map, now there is a city of Pervomaisk on the Southern Bug, in the Nikolaev region. I have seen these megaliths with my own eyes:
"Bugskiy Gard" - National natural park in the north-west of the Nikolaev region. The park covers the river valley of the Southern Bug and canyon-like valleys of its tributaries - Bolshaya Korabelnaya, Bakshaly, Mertovoda. It stretches 70 km from the southern part of Pervomaisk to the village of Aleksandrovka Voznesenskiy district.
Bugsky Guard. Photo by Anton Minakov.
Bugsky Guard. Photo by Anton Minakov.
Bugsky Guard. Photo by Anton Minakov.
The last photo gives an idea of the destructive power of what destroyed this object. It doesn't matter what it was, a fortress, or a hydrotechnical dam wall. Whether it was a fortification or other structure. Even if they were rocks - outliers. It is important that they, along with the Krasnodon wall, could have been part of that mountain system and the Sarmatian cities indicated by Ptolemy. And most likely there were, but they were destroyed by the elements, or "the war of the gods" (let everyone decide for himself what to mean by this phrase).
But on the same axis there is also a more famous monument, which was especially interested in specialists from "Anerrbe".
Stone grave
It is located in the Molochnaya river valley in the Zaporozhye region. Historians say that this is a remnant of sandstone of the Sarmatian stage of the Tertiary era, which in its original state was a remnant of a sea shallow.
During the melting of the glacier, the border of which reached the area of modern Dnepropetrovsk, the "big water", flowing down to the south, washed out a large stone island, which, due to the deepening of the Molochnaya river channel, appeared on the surface. Under the influence of erosion and weathering, the primary sandstone shield split. The wreckage slid along the sand, forming a kind of stone hill, caves and grottoes.
And here's another story they like to tell tourists: -
This is all, of course, interesting, but it does not seem so believable. The main thing for us is the fact that in the midst of the endless steppes, "flat as a table", in the words of one of the famous film heroes of Soviet cinema, there are a sufficient number of objects that, if not directly, then indirectly confirm the version that the landscape of the territory in question is in the foreseeable the past was completely different, but now it is covered with a thick layer of sediment left by the great unknown flood. A flood, about which no legends have survived. And this already indicates a direct collusion. Deliberately concealing information about our past.
Continued: Part 21
Author: kadykchanskiy