Open Questions Of Quantum Mechanics, Completely Solved With The Help Of The Runes Of The Genus (= Hermeticism) - Alternative View

Open Questions Of Quantum Mechanics, Completely Solved With The Help Of The Runes Of The Genus (= Hermeticism) - Alternative View
Open Questions Of Quantum Mechanics, Completely Solved With The Help Of The Runes Of The Genus (= Hermeticism) - Alternative View

Video: Open Questions Of Quantum Mechanics, Completely Solved With The Help Of The Runes Of The Genus (= Hermeticism) - Alternative View

Video: Open Questions Of Quantum Mechanics, Completely Solved With The Help Of The Runes Of The Genus (= Hermeticism) - Alternative View
Video: Don't fall for quantum hype 2024, March
Anonim

Quantum is the minimum portion of radiant energy. The idea that energy can only be emitted in fixed portions, like bullets from a machine gun, and not water from a hose, went against the notions of classical physics and became the starting point on the path to quantum mechanics.

The objects of the microworld - molecules, atoms and elementary particles - refused to obey the mathematical laws that had proven themselves in classical mechanics. Electrons did not want to revolve around nuclei in arbitrary orbits, but were confined only at certain discrete energy levels … moving micro-objects appeared either as point particles or as wave processes covering a significant area of space.

Having become accustomed since the 17th century scientific revolution to the fact that mathematics is the language of nature, physicists staged a real brainstorming session and by the mid-1920s they had developed a mathematical model of the behavior of microparticles. The theory, called quantum mechanics, turned out to be the most accurate of all physical disciplines: so far not a single deviation from its predictions has been found (although some of these predictions come from mathematically meaningless expressions like the difference between two infinite quantities). But at the same time, the exact meaning of the mathematical constructions of quantum mechanics practically defies explanation in everyday language.

Instead of the usual coordinates and velocities, a quantum particle is described by the so-called wave function. It is included in all the equations of quantum mechanics, but its physical meaning has not received an intelligible interpretation. The fact is that its values are expressed not by ordinary, but by complex numbers, and in addition are not available for direct measurement. For example, for a moving particle, the wave function is defined at each point of infinite space and changes in time. The particle is not at any particular point and does not move from place to place like a small ball. It seems to be smeared over space and to one degree or another is present everywhere at once, somewhere concentrating, and somewhere disappearing.

The interaction of such "smeared" particles further complicates the picture, giving rise to the so-called entangled states. In this case, quantum objects form a single system with a common wave function.

It is extremely difficult to think about such strange objects. Human thinking is closely related to language and visual images, which are formed by the experience of dealing with classical objects.

without a correct description of phenomena in the spoken language, it is difficult to conduct research. Physicists often comprehend mathematical constructions, likening them to the simplest objects from everyday life. If in classical mechanics for 2000 years they were looking for mathematical means suitable for expressing everyday experience, then in quantum theory the situation was exactly the opposite: physicists were in dire need of an adequate verbal explanation of a perfectly working mathematical apparatus. For quantum mechanics, an interpretation was required, that is, a convenient and generally correct explanation of the meaning of its basic concepts.

Albert Einstein. His position went down in history under the catchy slogan: "God does not play dice."

Promotional video:

His opponent, Niels Bohr, argued that the wave function contains comprehensive information about the state of quantum objects.

The equations make it possible to unambiguously calculate its changes in time, and in mathematical terms, it is not worse than material points and solids familiar to physicists. The only difference is that it does not describe the particles themselves, but the probability of their detection at one point or another in space. (that's why our runes can be represented as okmplex numbers … !! ???)

Octaves ??:

"… the mathematical apparatus of quantum mechanics works only in a piecewise continuous mode: from one dimension to another. And" at the junctions "the wave function changes abruptly and continues to develop from a fundamentally unpredictable state. For a theory seeking to describe physical reality at a fundamental level, it was a very serious drawback.

And this is generally amazing !!!

This is a scenario of multiple reality events..:

“It turns out that while the box was closed, at least two versions of the story developed in parallel, but one meaningful look inside the box is enough for only one of them to remain real.

How not to recall the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice:

“Whenever I could

He turn around (if he turned around, He did not destroy his deed, Barely-barely accomplished) -see

He could have them following quietly."

("Orpheus. Eurydice. Hermes" PM Rilke).

According to the Copenhagen interpretation, the quantum dimension, like Orpheus's careless gaze, instantly destroys a whole bunch of possible worlds, leaving only one rod along which history moves.

»The observer cannot be viewed in isolation from the observed object, as some kind of external entity.

At the moment of measurement, the observer interacts with the quantum object, and after that neither the state of the observer, nor the state of the object can be described by separate wave functions: their states get entangled, and the wave function can be written only for a single whole - the "observer + observed" system

(The system is one and cognate, there are an infinite number of views on it..!):

… In fact, the quantum world, according to Everett, is exactly one. Since all of its particles directly or indirectly interacted with the surrounding world. To understand the meaning of Everett's interpretation, this analogy helps. Imagine a country with a multimillion population. Each of its inhabitants evaluates the events in their own way. In some, he directly or indirectly takes part, which changes both the country and its views. Millions of different pictures of the world are formed, which are perceived by their carriers as a real reality. But at the same time there is also the country itself, which exists independently of anyone else. then representations, providing an opportunity for their existence. Likewise, a single quantum universe of Everett gives place for a huge number of independently existing classical pictures of the world that arise from different observers. And all these pictures,according to Everett, they are completely real, although each exists only for its observer.

Everett was out of luck. His work was lost in the stream of first-class publications produced at the same time, and it was also too "philosophical". Everett's son, Mark, once said: “Father never, never spoke to me about his theories. He was a stranger to me, existing in some kind of parallel world. I think he was deeply disappointed that he knew about himself that he was a genius, but no one else in the world knew about it. " In 1982, Everett died of a heart attack.

Now it is even difficult to say thanks to whom it was brought out of oblivion. Most likely, this happened when all the same Bryce DeWitt and John Wheeler tried to build one of the first "theories of everything" - a field theory in which quantization would coexist with the general principle of relativity. Then science fiction writers laid eyes on this unusual theory. But only after the death of Everett did the real triumph of his idea begin (albeit already in DeWitt's formulation, which Wheeler categorically disowned a decade later). It began to seem that the many-worlds interpretation has a colossal explanatory potential, allowing one to give a clear interpretation not only of the concept of the wave function, but also of the observer with his mysterious "consciousness". In 1995, American sociologist David Rob conducted a survey among leading American physicists, and the result was stunning:58% called Everett's theory “correct”.

… This reasoning, by the way, is closely related to the idea of the so-called quantum immortality. When you die, this naturally only happens in some Everett worlds. You can always find such a classic projection, in which you stay alive this time. Continuing this reasoning endlessly, we can come to the conclusion that such a moment when all your "clones" in all the worlds of the Multiverse will die will never come, which means, at least somewhere, you will live forever.

version of the experiment using photons. Another 15 years have passed, and John Stuart Bell formulates a clear criterion in the form of an inequality that allows one to experimentally test the presence of hidden parameters in quantum objects. In the 1970s, several groups of physicists set up experiments to test whether Bell's inequalities were met, with conflicting results.

Only in 1982-1985, Alan Aspect in Paris, having significantly increased the accuracy, finally proves that Einstein was wrong. And 20 years later, several commercial firms at once created technologies of top-secret communication channels based on the paradoxical properties of quantum particles, which Einstein considered a refutation of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.

The theme of parallel worlds and weak (in one sense or another) interactions between them has long been present in fantastic fiction. Let us recall at least the grandiose epic of Robert Zelazny, The Chronicles of Amber. However, in the past two decades, it has become fashionable to build a solid scientific foundation for such plot moves.

But the parallel worlds themselves are only half the battle. It is much more difficult to translate into artistic language the second most important idea of the theory - the quantum interference of particles with their counterparts.

time ceases to play the role of an additional coordinate and can no longer flow regardless of what is happening: it unfolds in spontaneous jumps from one layer of the Multiverse to another. The Israeli physicist David Deutsch, one of the main popularizers of Everett's ideas, interpreted the time as the "first quantum phenomenon".

PS Finally, with the help of quantum mechanics (illustrations from the article "Fan of Parallel Universes" I was able to understand what kind of drawing I drew then)) its volume, as always, was hidden in circles))