Sumerian Culture Was Artificially Made Ancient In The 19th Century - Alternative View

Sumerian Culture Was Artificially Made Ancient In The 19th Century - Alternative View
Sumerian Culture Was Artificially Made Ancient In The 19th Century - Alternative View

Video: Sumerian Culture Was Artificially Made Ancient In The 19th Century - Alternative View

Video: Sumerian Culture Was Artificially Made Ancient In The 19th Century - Alternative View
Video: Nabonidus Last of the Sumerians | Academics Stupefied By Centuries Old Puzzle Stumble On Major Clues 2024, March
Anonim

From history we know that one of the most ancient cultures and civilizations on Earth were the Sumerians - a people of a non-Semitic group who lived in Mesopotamia (the territory of modern Iraq) from 6-5 thousand BC. up to 2 thousand BC

Image
Image
Image
Image

How they looked - we are told by clay tablets, bas-reliefs on excavated buildings and figurines. Sumerians - translated from their own language: blackheads

Image
Image
Image
Image

The most striking information about the Sumerians is their writing, cuneiform. At first glance, everything looks like some kind of code, information encrypted in triangular and other symbols. But linguists read. Like Egyptian hieroglyphs, they read through phonemes:

Image
Image

Promotional video:

Image
Image
Image
Image

Sumerian alphabet. Try to read, translating at least a line from this table? Who will succeed - write in the comments. For some reason, linguists simply assign some kind of sound to complex symbols built from heaps of triangles. I will not dispute this. But all this looks as tense as the deciphering of Egyptian hieroglyphs, where each symbol has some kind of image, meaning, and not a separate phoneme. I wrote on this topic here.

Many alternatives are convinced that the Sumerians contacted the Gods and depicted them on their wristwatch tablets:

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Did the Sumerian Gods wear watches or are they just bracelets? But what if these tablets are not thousands of years old, but, say, only a couple of hundred! Pocket watches appeared in Europe in the 16th century, and maybe even earlier. And gifts could be given to the kings of Persia. Those. Sumerians are not deep antiquity, but such a culture of the late Middle Ages.

Indeed, why could not there be different cultures and styles in architecture during that period? Why is it imperative that everything be divided into eras, relying on vague dating criteria?

But what about the epic about Gilgamesh, which is written on clay tablets, which were found first several pieces, and then hundreds - historians will say?

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

They contain references to the biblical Flood, which automatically makes the Sumerian epic dated to the dating of biblical events. But some researchers find oddities that accompanied the process of finding these tablets. Falsification is not excluded with the aim of aging the history of the Sumerian kingdom. But about this - in the information on the video at the end of the article.

Gilgamesh is the king of Uruk. Also depicted with a clock, oddly enough
Gilgamesh is the king of Uruk. Also depicted with a clock, oddly enough

Gilgamesh is the king of Uruk. Also depicted with a clock, oddly enough.

Another question: why is the Sumerian civilization attributed precisely to such an ancient period of thousands of years? They supposedly appeared almost 7 or even 8 thousand years ago! And all for one reason - at what depth are excavations:

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

1. The city of Nippur in Mesopotamia. 2. Temple of Enke. 3 Excavations of Khorsabad 1852.

Cultural layers, the consequences of events that historians attribute to the barbaric destruction of the conquerors? Or is it the consequences of a devastating large-scale cataclysm, which archaeologists stubbornly refuse to notice? There were cities, but they were completely destroyed under the layers of clay and sand.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Does it look like cultural layers? Or was the city brought in by the conquerors on purpose? They had nothing to do but dig quarries and transfer cubic kilometers of clay, filling up the Sumerian cities. Oddly enough, it is by the thickness of these layers that archaeologists date the Sumerian culture.

There are many ancient cities in Europe and people still live in them. And this territory has fallen into disrepair. So much so that no one remembered about it for thousands of years - until the beginning of excavations in the 19th century. And then everything was found - both the names of the cities and the tablets with the texts. All this is strange.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

A separate topic is the excavation of Babylon. Or what city was actually excavated. The buildings are already made of baked bricks. Where did the Sumerians get so much wood for burning? Some experts argue that the technology of baking bricks in this area appeared no earlier than the 15th century. Maybe this is the middle of the second millennium AD? But around this period, what we see happened - the destroyed cities, covered with clay. The civilization of Mesopotamia disappeared at once with all the cities that began to be excavated only in the 19th century.

The question arises: can a brick survive, even if burnt and even in the ground for thousands of years? I believe that he will not be able to survive the 500-year mark. And the Sumerian cities are found with the remains of walls in a state as if they were built in the last century.

Image
Image

And the weapons that the Sumerians made of bronze can survive for thousands of years? Even if it is not such a metal susceptible to oxidation, thousands of years are something unreal for any metal to be preserved. Say there is no oxygen in the soil for oxidation. There is moisture, and hence electrochemical corrosion. It oxidizes metals the most. Because of this, many modern iron pipes in wells do not last more than 30 years.

There are a number of oddities, and these observations are described in a video on Yuri Abarin's channel:

After watching the video, one gets the impression that the archeology of the 19th century. and in itself was engaged in the creation of antiquities or antiquity of the history of certain peoples. And if this is so, then it is done very skillfully.

Author: sibved