Even last year, some independent alternative researchers noticed the fact that in some paintings by artists of the past, dating back to the period of the 1800s - 1820s, an obelisk is depicted next to the building of the Kazan Cathedral in St. Petersburg, which looks very similar to those that were made once on the lands of Egypt, though without the corresponding Egyptian hieroglyphs. Where then did this obelisk disappear? Who dismantled it and why, and who did it interfere with, standing in this place?
One of the versions was expressed by the Russian historian D. Belousov, who suggested that the Romanovs deliberately destroyed all ancient megaliths on the territory of St. Petersburg in order to hide the fact that this city was not built "from scratch", but on the site of ancient settlements. Another version of the alternatives, which I also adhered to, is that when the Romanovs restored the ancient city that existed on the site of St. Petersburg, badly damaged and flooded by the waters of the previous Flood, then they used elements of those buildings that were no longer possible to restore. new construction and restoration of the most surviving buildings.
This is where the embankments of the restored city, now called St. Petersburg, turned out to be lined with these blocks, without any serious material and technical base, which would make it possible to actually create multi-ton granite blocks. Although these works were certainly not carried out "from scratch" either, because the old facing of the embankments of the ancient city should have at least partially survived.
But the fact is that the obelisk near the Kazan Cathedral does not look damaged in the paintings and drawings of that time. Why was he removed from there? Was it only because the Romanovs wanted to hide the secrets of their "construction" of their new capital? The most interesting thing is that one of the videos of the MrRomancorp channel, the author of which is also a person with the same surname, prompted me to guess. This is Alexander Romanov, who is engaged in research on free energy and atmospheric electricity technologies used by previous civilizations.
And in his video "Knowledge of the Ancients," he drew attention to the structural features of the architecture of the square of St. Peter's Cathedral in the Vatican, in the center of which the same obelisk is also installed. And here's what he told about this architectural structure:
It turns out that this whole structure of colonnades with an obelisk standing in the center of the square is a power station for generating atmospheric electricity, which was used to illuminate and heat buildings. And similar devices - obelisks, could be used, according to A. Romanov, even to repel an attack by air ships. Who is interested in the technical nuances of this and other similar technical devices of the past, be sure to watch this interesting video by Alexander.
Promotional video:
In our investigation, it is important that the Kazan Cathedral, of course, was not originally any temple, let alone a Christian, but was exactly the same technical structure for generating atmospheric electricity as the Church of St. Peter in the Vatican. And if we take into account the version of A. Romanov that the obelisk itself could be used as a protective weapon of air defense, then it becomes clear why the Romanovs dismantled this obelisk.
Haven't guessed yet? First, without this element, the whole structure does not work. Having removed the obelisk, they “de-energized” it, at the same time hiding the fact of using atmospheric electricity. And secondly, they deprived the city of protection from enemy aircraft. And was there aviation at that time besides balloons, you ask? That's just the point that was. And these were not necessarily the planes we were used to. Someone bombed many cities around the world in the middle of the 19th century. But it was Russia that got the hardest. The falsifiers of history have reduced the very fact of these destruction to various reasons. Somewhere these were wars (such as the Crimean War), somewhere incomprehensible large-scale fires or earthquakes. And for some reason, almost all trees disappeared on the territory of Russia during this period. But everywhere around the world there were "fillings" - old buildings,with filled up first floors.
Now think why in St. Petersburg this obelisk was forced to be dismantled by the winners, but not in the Vatican? But it is not for nothing that the Vatican, Washington (District of Columbia) and the City of London are considered to be different "centers of power" of the so-called "world government", which rules the world on behalf of the invaders. And what is interesting: an obelisk called "Cleopatra's Needle" is also installed in the City of London. By the way, he appeared there in the same XIX century, in which the obelisk at the Kazan Cathedral disappeared, i.e. just after the last redistribution of the world.
It is not clear just where this St. Petersburg obelisk has gone. It can be assumed that it was he who was taken out by the British and it was he who was called "Cleopatra's Needle". However, there is a photo on the network with the loading of the obelisk from Egypt. And the clothes of the people and the presence of characteristic Egyptian hieroglyphs tell us that Cleopatra's Needle was taken from there. By the way, in modern photos of the obelisk of the City of London, these Egyptian hieroglyphs are quite clearly visible.
But the Vatican obelisk in St. Peter's Square does not have Egyptian hieroglyphs, as well as the obelisk near the Kazan Cathedral, and both of them have a smooth granite surface. True, in Piranesi's painting, made when the Vatican was still covered with silt and soil from the Flood, it is clear that the obelisk survived there. By the way, judging by Piranesi's paintings, there were a lot of obelisks in Rome. And one of them, installed on the People's Square, also has some kind of writing.
Similar obelisks stood near the building of the Roman Pantheon and in other places. And the fact that in Rome all these obelisks, located outside the territory of the Vatican, are now also dismantled, says a lot. But we are still interested in exactly the one that is now paraded on the territory of the Vatican itself.
On an enlarged image of this obelisk from Piranesi's painting, one can see that not only writings are visible on its surface, but also clearly antique images of some figures. But let's look at about the same point at the modern image of this obelisk.
Wow! The surface is completely smooth, as it was on our St. Petersburg obelisk. And where did the antique images and inscriptions go? Could it have been an obelisk from St. Petersburg? Of course he could. But this version cannot be considered proven, although there is an obvious identity of both obelisks and a discrepancy with the image of Piranesi. Of course, all antique images and inscriptions from this Vatican obelisk could knock down and then polish its surface. However, given its height, this would not be so easy.
But what if the Vatican is just the main residence of the invaders? And that is why there are so many signs of insectoid hosts here. It was then that they themselves could have delivered here, and then installed the St. Petersburg obelisk, and the old one with antique inscriptions - hidden in the underground storage of the Vatican library. I will also assume that the invaders needed a properly functioning obelisk to use it not only as a source of illumination and heat, but also as a defense of their residence. And most likely, the one that was here before turned out to be faulty after one of the disasters and planetary war. The invaders, however, had to defend their residence, and therefore it was the St. Petersburg obelisk that was installed here, at the same time depriving the defeated Peter of the same opportunity.
Think also about the fact that the Kazan Cathedral, like many other buildings and structures in the historical part of St. Petersburg, are oriented towards the old antediluvian pole in Greenland. But the Cathedral of St. Paul in the Vatican with all the other Vatican buildings is already at the present pole. Advantageously, it is the Vatican complex that is already a post-disaster construction, i.e. built after the same disaster when the pole was last displaced, i.e. in the inter-flood civilization that existed from the turn of the 16th-17th centuries to the mid-19th century. And don't you think that in this painting by Piranesi, the buildings of the colonnades of St. Peter's Cathedral look somehow very fresh and new in comparison with the rest of the buildings? But in any case, the orientation of both "temples" shows that the Kazan Cathedral is much older than the Cathedral of St. Peter in the Vatican,which was clearly under construction already at the present position of the poles.
Of course, all this is just a hypothesis, and the obelisk, which previously stood near the Kazan Cathedral, could just as well be hidden both in the underground storage of the Vatican and somewhere in Russia. And yet, it is this version that seems to me the most logical, because the sizes of the St. Petersburg and Vatican obelisks are quite comparable, but significantly inferior to the Washington ones. Are the Washington and London obelisks still operational? If A. Romanov's hypothesis is correct, then it is unlikely. For next to them, we do not observe any colonades similar to those in the Vatican (St. Peter's Cathedral) and St. Petersburg (Kazan Cathedral). Therefore, most likely, they are only symbols of the new power that captured the planet in the recent past. Most likely in the middle of the 19th century,for the London and Washington obelisks appeared in their places quite simultaneously at this very time.
Well, we have identified those who betrayed the interests of mankind and serve the invaders who enslaved the Earth. And for the same reason, Britain and the United States, controlled directly by these forces, are pursuing an aggressive policy of conquering world domination and are guilty of unleashing many wars and the death of many millions of earthlings. And it is no coincidence that the main centers of world Russophobia, which gave us a false “official history” and false “official science” to please their masters, also have their localization precisely in these listed “centers of power” of the “world government”, including the Vatican.
And it is very likely that, in fact, these hybrids from the "world elite" created by the invaders have very little relation to humanity itself. But on the other hand, their pathological desire to destroy us and our country, as well as to seize its natural resources, becomes quite understandable. It also becomes clear who, in fact, are all those degraded non-human traitors from the "fifth column" who serve the parasitic satanic force that controls Western civilization.