In what mysterious way does the Moon refract light and direct it exactly into your eye?
First, let's remember the second law of optics:
The second law of geometric optics (Laws of reflection):
1. The reflected ray lies in the same plane with the incident ray and perpendicular to the interface between the two media.
2. The angle of incidence is equal to the angle of reflection (see Fig. 1).
This is how young artists are taught to draw an illuminated sphere, where there is a glare, partial shade, and a reflex.
Promotional video:
These simple rules allow you to depict a volumetric object on a plane.
Photos of the planets of the solar system look quite natural:
Jupiter:
Saturn:
Uranus:
Neptune:
Now look at the full moon:
The most obvious and vivid optical anomaly of the Moon is visible to all earthlings with the naked eye, so it remains only to be surprised that almost no one pays attention to it.
See what the moon looks like in a clear night sky at full moon moments? It looks like a flat round body (like a coin), but not like a ball!
A spherical body with rather significant irregularities on its surface, in the case of its illumination by a light source located behind the observer, should shine to the greatest extent closer to its center, and as it approaches the edge of the sphere, the luminosity should smoothly decrease.
Due to reasons incomprehensible to official physics, the rays of light falling into the edge of the lunar ball are reflected … back to the Sun, which is why we see the Moon at the full moon as a kind of coin, but not as a ball.
"Lunar Scam: Lunar Anomalies or Fake Physics?"
An equally obvious observable thing - the constant value of the luminosity level of the illuminated parts of the Moon for an observer from the Earth - introduces even greater confusion into the minds.
Simply put, if we assume that the Moon has some property of directed scattering of light, then we have to admit that the reflection of light changes its angle depending on the position of the Sun-Earth-Moon system. No one can dispute the fact that even a narrow crescent of a young Moon gives a luminosity exactly the same as the central part of a half Moon corresponding to it in area. And this means that the Moon somehow controls the angle of reflection of the sun's rays so that they are always reflected from its surface to the Earth!
But when the full moon comes, the luminosity of the moon increases in leaps and bounds. This means that the surface of the moon amazingly splits the reflected light into two main directions - towards the Sun and the Earth. From this follows another stunning conclusion that the Moon is practically invisible to an observer from space, which is not on the straight lines Earth-Moon or Solne-Moon. Who and why needed to hide the Moon in space in the optical range? …
To understand what the joke is, in Soviet laboratories they spent a lot of time on optical experiments with lunar soil delivered to Earth by the automatic vehicles Luna-16, Luna-20 and Luna-24. However, the parameters of the reflection of light, including solar, from the lunar soil fit well into all the known canons of optics. The lunar soil on Earth did not want to show the wonders that we see on the Moon. It turns out that materials on the Moon and on Earth behave differently?
Quite possible. After all, an unoxidizable film several iron atoms thick on the surface of any objects, as far as I know, in terrestrial laboratories has not yet been obtained …
The fire was poured into the fire by photographs from the Moon, transmitted by Soviet and American machine guns, which they managed to land on its surface.
Imagine the surprise of the scientists of that time, when all the photographs on the Moon turned out to be strictly black and white - without a single hint of such a rainbow spectrum that is familiar to us.
If only the lunar landscape was photographed, evenly covered with dust from meteorite explosions, this would somehow be understandable.
But even a color calibration plate on the lander body was obtained in black and white! Any color on the lunar surface turns into the corresponding shade of gray, which is impartially recorded by all photographs of the lunar surface, transmitted by automatic devices of different generations and missions to this day.
Now imagine in what deep … puddle the Americans are sitting with their white-blue-red striped flags, allegedly photographed on the lunar surface by the valiant astronauts-"pioneers". Tell me, in their place, would you try hard to resume exploration of the Moon and get to its surface at least with the help of some kind of "pendo rover", knowing that images or videos would only turn out in black and white?
Is it possible to quickly paint them, like old films … But, damn it, in what colors to paint pieces of rocks, local stones or steep mountain slopes!?..
Incidentally, very similar problems awaited NASA on Mars. All researchers have probably already set their teeth on edge by a muddy story with a color mismatch, more precisely, with an obvious shift of the entire Martian visible spectrum on its surface to the red side. When NASA employees are suspected of intentionally
distortion of images from Mars (supposedly hiding blue skies, green carpets of lawns, blue lakes, crawling local residents …), I call to remember the Moon …
Think, maybe different physical laws simply operate on different planets?
Then a lot of things immediately fall into place!
But let's get back to the moon for now. Let's finish with the list of optical anomalies, and then get down to the next sections of Lunar Wonders.
A ray of light passing near the surface of the Moon receives significant scatter in direction, which is why modern astronomy cannot even calculate the time it takes to cover the stars with the body of the Moon. Official science does not express any ideas why this happens, except for the crazy-delusional electrostatic-style reasons for the movement of lunar dust at high altitudes above its surface or the activity of certain lunar volcanoes, which deliberately throw out dust refracting light exactly in the place where the observation is this star. And so, in fact, no one has yet observed lunar volcanoes.
As you know, terrestrial science is able to collect information on the chemical composition of distant celestial bodies by studying molecular emission-absorption spectra.
So, for the celestial body closest to the Earth - the Moon - this method of determining the chemical composition of the surface does not work!
The lunar spectrum is practically devoid of bands that can provide information about the composition of the moon. The only reliable information on the chemical composition of the lunar regolith was obtained, as is known, from the study of samples taken by the Soviet "Lunas". But even now, when it is possible to scan the lunar surface from a low circumlunar orbit using automatic devices, reports of the presence of a particular chemical substance on its surface are extremely contradictory.
Even on Mars - and even then there is much more information.
And one more amazing optical feature of the lunar surface. This property is a consequence of the unique backscattering of light, with which I began my story about the optical anomalies of the Moon. So, almost all light falling on the moon is reflected towards the sun and the earth. Let's remember that at night, under appropriate conditions, we can perfectly see the part of the Moon that is not illuminated by the Sun, which, in principle, should be completely black, if not for … the secondary illumination of the Earth! The earth, when illuminated by the sun, reflects some of the sunlight towards the moon. And all this light that illuminates the shadowy part of the Moon returns back to Earth! Hence, it is completely logical to assume that twilight reigns all the time on the surface of the Moon, even on the side illuminated by the Sun. This guess is superbly confirmed by photographs of the lunar surface,made by Soviet lunar rovers. Look at them carefully on occasion; for everything that can be obtained. They were made in direct sunlight without the influence of distortion of the atmosphere, but they look as if the contrast of the black-and-white picture was tightened in the earthly twilight.
In such conditions, the shadows from objects on the surface of the Moon should be absolutely black, illuminated only by the nearest stars and planets, the level of illumination from which is many orders of magnitude lower than that of the sun. This means that it is not possible to see an object in the shadow of the moon using any known optical means.
To summarize the optical phenomena of the Moon, let us give the floor to the independent researcher A. A. Grishaev, the author of a book about the "digital" physical world, who, developing his ideas, in another article points out:
“Taking into account the existence of these phenomena provides new, deadly arguments in support of those who believe that the films and photographs that allegedly testify to the stay of American astronauts on the lunar surface are fakes. After all, we give the keys to carry out the simplest and ruthless independent examination. If we are shown against the background of sunlit (!) Lunar landscapes of astronauts, on whose spacesuits there are no black shadows from the anti-sun side, or a well-lit figure of an astronaut in the shadow of the "lunar module", or color (!) Frames with a vivid reproduction of the colors of the American flag - then this is all irrefutable evidence, screaming falsification. In fact, we do not know of a single film or photographic documentary depicting astronauts on the moon in real moonlight and with a real lunar color “palette”.
And then he continues:
“The physical conditions on the Moon are too abnormal, and it cannot be ruled out that the space around the moon is destructive for terrestrial organisms. Today we know of the only model that explains the short-range action of lunar gravity, and at the same time the origin of the accompanying anomalous optical phenomena - this is our model of "shaky space". And if this model is correct, then the vibrations of "unsteady space" below a certain height above the surface of the Moon are quite capable of breaking weak bonds in protein molecules - with the destruction of their tertiary and, possibly, secondary structures. As far as we know, the turtles returned alive from the circumlunar space on board the Soviet probe "Zond-5", which circled the Moon with a minimum distance of about 2000 km from its surface. Maybe,that with the passage of the apparatus closer to the Moon, animals would die as a result of denaturation of proteins in their organisms. If it is very difficult to protect oneself from cosmic radiation, but it is still possible, then there is no physical protection from the vibrations of the "shaky space"."
How does the moon do it? And why doesn't anyone notice?