- Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3 - Part 4 - Part 5 - Part 6 - Part 7 - Part 8 - Part 9 - Part 10 - Part 11 - Part 12 - Part 13 - Part 14 - Part 15 - Part 16 - Part 17 - Part 18 - Part 19 - Part 20 - Part 21 - Part 22 - Part 23 - Part 24 - Part 25 - Part 26 - Part 27 - Part 28 - Part 29 - Part 30 - Part 31 - Part 32 - Part 33 -
Alexandrian pillars
No, this is not a typo. It is the pillars. In plural. ALEXANDER Sergeevich Pushkin predicted glory for himself, which should surpass the fame of the ALEXANDRIAN Pillar, located on Palace Square in St. Petersburg:
The poet mentioned the Column of Montferrand, and, by a strange coincidence, the poem was published in the same year that independent researchers consider the year of the last global catastrophe in Eurasia, the traces of which are clearly visible in the form of buildings with first floors and basements covered with sedimentary rocks.
The windows of the first floor of the building of the Polytechnic Museum in Moscow, which are much lower than the level of the modern pavement.
Promotional video:
There is no information in the historical chronicles about natural disasters that could have occurred in the first half of the nineteenth century. This circumstance gives grounds not even to consider the versions of amateur historians, who are also called "alternative", but the facts convincingly indicate that there are traces of a catastrophic flood, and they are massive, ubiquitous throughout the Eurasian continent. Here is just one of the many confirmations made by official archaeologists:
For some reason, this message does not mention finds with the latest dating. Meanwhile, the public was agitated by leaked reports that a whole glass bottle of wine was found among the shards at the excavations, on which the date of manufacture was indicated - 1841. Therefore, the pub was covered with clay no earlier than this year. How exactly this happened, historians cannot explain. And their silence, as well as vague excuses about the "cultural layer" only reinforce the confidence of those who doubt that science is deliberately hiding information about the flood of the nineteenth century.
Well, historians may not know anything about previous catastrophes, just as they know nothing about the history of the Alexandrian columns, which were once on the territory of the modern Stavropol Territory. First, let's look at what columns or pillars are.
Many years ago, an acquaintance who was a sailor of the fish fleet during the Soviet era told me that in the southern countries Christopher Columbus is called "Krishtobal de Colomn". Even then it seemed to me that the name of the "discoverer of America" can tell a lot. My line of reasoning was something like this: Krishtobal - Christopher - Christopher is nothing but the cross (Christ) + FOR - FAR, that is, the light of Christ.
The word Colomn - Columbus - Columbus is clearly related to the word "column". Hence it follows that the word "colony" is not just similar in sound, but it is one-root word. The realization that I am close to the truth came in the form of confirmation received when thinking about the origin of the toponym Kolomna. If “kolomn” is one of the variants of the pronunciation of the word “column”, then it turns out that everything is correct! But look what historians think about this:
I took only three versions as an example, but take my word for it, the rest are even more ridiculous and ridiculous. Meanwhile, it was enough just to look at the coat of arms of the city:
Coat of arms of Kolomna 1883 Coat of arms of Kolomna 1883
The heraldic description of the coat of arms of Kolomna reads:
This question has cleared up for us, I suppose, now let's try to reflect on the essence of the columns. Columbus was known to be a colonizer. Then, most likely, "Christopher Colonne" is not even a proper name, but rather a position or profession. Christopher Columbus is the one who pillars the captured territories with columns, turning them into colonies, and at the same time brings the light of the teachings of Jesus Christ to the natives. And no matter what modern historians write about the meaning and meaning of the columns scattered all over the world, it is obvious to the initiated that the column is, first of all, a kind of a sign of property, a brand, a brand, like on the skin of cattle. So that everyone understands that it will not be possible to stake out here, the colony has an owner who marked his property in this way. Isn't that what the new owner of the land does in the first place,when it drives in pegs along its borders?
Here, in order to avoid misunderstandings, it is necessary to make a clarification: the column and the stele (obelisk) are only outwardly similar. In fact, they are structurally different, but the main thing is that their meaning and symbolism have nothing in common.
Obelisks are placed "at the end of the path", conventionally speaking, it is a symbol of death, if you will, and the column is always a symbol of triumph, directed to the future, in memory of the past accomplishment.
The column is a symbol that personifies the idea of the world axis, which holds the sky, connecting it to the earth. Very often the column symbolizes the tree of life, stability and solidity. According to Philo of Alexandria (well, we can't hide from Alexandrism anywhere), this symbol expresses the idea of God, who manifests stability in contrast to the changing human nature. A broken column signifies death.
Double columns, or pillars, stand apart. They can be seen everywhere:
Rostral columns in St. Petersburg.
The front gate of the Olympic Stadium in Berlin. Germany.
The two columns at the entrance to the temple symbolize the Heavenly Gates through which believers pass to get inside. This passage means a transition to a new life or to another world.
According to the Masonic version, the two pillars appeared thanks to the biblical king Solomon, who, while equipping his Jerusalem palace, ordered the erection of two copper columns - Boaz and Yakhin.
The Pillar of Jachin (left) and the Pillar of Boaz (right) represent masculine and feminine principles, the principles of signs and symbols. M., 1997; Mythological Dictionary. M., 1991. Pillar Iachin (left) and Pillar Boaz (right) personify masculine and feminine principles, principles of signs and symbols. M., 1997; Mythological Dictionary. M., 1991.
The gate for the initiate, the exit to the light for the seeker, the columns of the temple in Jerusalem. B:. - North Column and Me:. - South Column. The symbolic columns resemble obelisks inscribed with hieroglyphs, which towered in front of Egyptian temples. They are also found in two rounded portals of Gothic cathedrals. These are the two columns of Hercules, indicating the boundaries between which the individual's personality dies. The Masonic initiation ritual includes a warning to the candidate before entering the temple: "If you hold on to human differences, go away - they are not here." The northern column also symbolizes destruction, primordial Chaos; South - creation, orderliness, system, internal interconnection. These are Earth and Space, Chaos and Amber.
However, I believe there is every reason to believe that the two columns are a more ancient symbol, and the Masons were borrowed to emphasize the legitimacy of their succession from an earlier civilization.
When it comes to "pillars", most likely the associative array will continue like this: Krasnoyarsk, Amur, Lensk. But many also remember the Pillars of Hercules.
The Strait of Gibraltar was called the Pillars of Hercules. Probably, that is why on old maps they were designated by pillars - columns:
Pillars of Hercules on a fragment of a medieval map.
According to legend, King Eurystheus ordered the hero to deliver Geryon's cows to Mycenae from the island of Erythia, which was located far to the west in the ocean. Sailing past Tartess, Hercules erected on the northern and southern shores of the strait, which separated Europe from Africa, two steles, which were called the Pillars of Hercules. According to another version, the hero moved apart the mountains that blocked the entrance to the ocean, thus creating the Strait of Gibraltar.
They also say that it was these pillars entwined with a ribbon that became the symbol of the American dollar. And not only. Even the twin towers, the skyscrapers of the World Trade Center in New York, were also the personification of Boaz and Yakhin. But there are other pillars on old maps:
Fragment of the map of Tartary by Bernard Sylvanus 1511. Fragment of the map of Tartary by Bernard Sylvanus 1511.
Colomne Alexander on the map fits perfectly with the modern map. The flow of the Kuban and Manych rivers is clearly visible. And what do we find in the place of the indicated Alexander Colomne in our time? And we find the Alexander Columns in the village of Alexandrovskoye, Stavropol Territory.
The pillars seem to separate the lands of the Sakans, Surans and Amazons from the country of Ti. The mountains form a kind of gate and, by analogy with the Pillars of Hercules, could be a strait.
This is possible only if the sea level was 50 meters higher than today, or the isthmus itself between the Azov and Caspian Seas was at a much lower level. Most likely, both factors could play a role here simultaneously. People settled in the North Caucasus after the flood and after it had risen, rising a good hundred above sea level. Roughly the same situation led to the emergence of a high-mountain lake with sea water, flora and fauna - Titicaca in Peru and Bolivia.
And the columns … The columns could have remained from the antediluvian times. By whose whim they became Aleksandrovsky, it is no longer so important. You will laugh, but this time historians linked this toponym with Alexander Nevsky:
Arguing with science is a thankless task, so let those who feel so calmer take its word for it, and I am very confused by the fact that, unlike the Alexandrovskaya Star Fortress in Ust-Labinsk, the "Alexander Nevskaya" has not survived at all. Not even her scheme. The only thing we know about her is that she existed, had the design of a classic star fortress. Nothing is known about what happened to her, except that it no longer existed in the Azov-Mozdok defensive line in 1830.
But some formations have come down to us, which scientists call "rocky outcrops." This is how they look today:
A goat sucking the udder of its mother - a goat.
It never even occurs to anyone that these might be the surviving foundations of the Alexander columns, often depicted in this place on medieval maps. But in vain! Especially in the light of my version of the existence in the recent past of a strait between the Arctic Ocean and the Azov-Caspian sea basin, where another Bosphorus (Bosporus) was marked by pillars.
In the Middle Ages, three Bospores were known (straits with narrow gates, guarded by a fortress):
- Pillars of Hercules (Strait of Gibraltar);
- The Byzantine Bosporus, which bears this name to this day, is Istanbul;
- Bosporus Cimmerian, this is the Kerch Strait, where Mithridates lived. By the way, in the immediate vicinity of the Alexander Pillars.
And if my guess is correct, then there was also the fourth Bosporus - Alexandria, on the territory of the modern Stavropol Territory, through which a direct sea route from the Black Sea to Asia could exist.
Thanks to a simple experiment, one can easily make sure that the Alexandrian Bosporus could exist, and the place of its alleged location is guessed at first glance:
Fragment of the map - reconstructions by Gordon Michael Scallion.
In my opinion, even a child who has barely learned to recognize the outlines of seas and continents can easily point out the place where the Pillars of Alexandria could have stood. And it will exactly coincide with the place where today we observe the "rocky outcrops".
Moreover, I dare even make an assumption that the channel between the Azov and Caspian Seas in the past could have been built artificially. It is enough just to look at the map with elevation marks, and immediately the gaze stops on a straight, like a highway, Kumo-Manych depression:
But paleogeologists know about all this, only the dates indicate traditional ones, hundreds of thousands and millions of years ago. Although the state of the fossils makes it possible to assert that the strait existed quite recently, some four hundred and fifty years ago.
Continued: Part 35
Author: kadykchanskiy