Consider another "perpetual" motion machine - Don Smith's magnetic spinner.
According to the author, he has over 50 different models. Allegedly (again, according to his information) some Russian companies bought his invention for small production in Russia. Apparently, Russia is named here in order to make it difficult to verify.
Magnetic spinning circuit. View from above.
Let's briefly describe the principle of operation of the device.
Many talk about the genius of Don Smith and how he is supposedly incredibly talented in the physics of magnetic fields. However, this is somewhat similar. Every self-respecting inventor of "perpetual" engines has their own sites and their fans who write the same thing.
Judge, what is the technical difficulty here? On the plastic disc, strips of neodymium magnet powder are glued. This disc (not necessarily plastic, any dielectric will do) is a rotor. Holes are cut between the strips. Here the meaning is incomprehensible to me, maybe for weight relief? Around the rotor, there are 4 pick-up coils. The rotor drives a small DC motor. You can also add that for simplicity, you can use conventional self-adhesive magnetic flexible tapes. They are now used for decorative magnets, which many bring from Turkey.
The same, side view.
Every engineer understands that when the magnetic field changes, when the rotor rotates, the alternating magnetic flux excites the movement of charges in the collector coils. Here Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction and the associated Lorentz law are in effect. To put it simply, an EMF with a minus sign appears in an alternating magnetic field.
Promotional video:
There is another version of the "perpetual" engine - with a storage capacitor. The magnet (dipole) and the container are installed perpendicularly. A resonant coil is put on a long magnet. During the operation of the device (apparently due to the high-frequency oscillations of the coil), a flow of charged particles arises, which is captured by the capacitor. Maybe I'm formulating something incorrectly, but everywhere the descriptions are extremely vague, most likely on purpose, there are no exact drawings at all.
The voltage is removed from the capacitor.
Magnetic spinner, option 2.
In general, it is known from physics that parasitic currents, the so-called Foucault currents, arise in alternating magnetic fields, which greatly inhibit the processes occurring in "perpetual" motors. How the inventor is fighting them is not explained.
It turns out an interesting picture, even a pattern. When the authors describe their inventions, they use the same methods. Either they do not accurately describe the design, then the special services seize their devices, then multimillion investments are required. The most daring, as it were, mass-produced mechanisms, but they cost fabulous money, and after a certain time, when, apparently, the required amount has been collected, nothing else is heard about the project.
It seems that all this grandiose "razvodilovo" for money, only requires a certain (technical) mindset. And I remember Mavrodi with his hired "praisers" and experts - Lena Golubkov.