Temples Stand On Crosses. St. Petersburg - Alternative View

2024 Author: Keith Bush | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 14:01

Start: Temples stand on crosses. Velikiy Novgorod.

I was finally convinced that ancient temples and other structures were built earlier on crosses formed by narrow linear biogeophysical anomalies over tectonic faults, and they are all oriented in accordance with the direction of their strike, I was finally convinced in April 2016. During a short visit to St. Petersburg, during an industrial trip to Vyborg to control the drilling of two water wells I had laid for the needs of Gazprom at the Nord Stream 2 facilities. Then I specially devoted a whole day to the study of this issue, walking for this on foot almost the entire city center. I noticed something here before about this, but this time I did my research more fully, trying to go around all the objects of interest to me in order to fix the intersection points with anomalies from all sides using a GPS navigator. And here is what was discovered.

Fig.1 Crosses from anomalies under St. Isaac's Cathedral and the Bronze Horseman.

It was clearly established that St. Isaac's Cathedral was built exactly at the intersection of two fairly powerful (each up to half a meter wide) linear anomalies (Fig. 1). I checked this by walking along two perimeters: directly along its walls and along the sidewalks across the road. The presence and extent of anomalies along each of these routes was confirmed. It turned out that the building is strictly along them and is oriented - these anomalies, like axes in the drawings, intersecting exactly in the center, divided each side of it in half.

It turned out that the "Bronze Horseman" - a monument to a man without pants, whom they decided to consider as Peter I, also stands exactly at the intersection of thin linear anomalies. True, their width is much smaller here than under the cathedral. And after tracing the anomaly of the north-western strike along the Alexander Garden, I found out that it is a gradually narrowing continuation of the corresponding anomaly under St. Isaac's Cathedral.

Fig. 2 Anomaly crosses on Palace Square under the Alexander Pillar and under the Winter Palace.

The check showed that the orientation of the Alexander Pillar on the Palace Square was also determined by the same factor (Fig. 2). This column stands exactly in the center of the intersection in the form of a cross of two intersecting linear anomalies. Moreover, the anomaly of northwestern strike crosses exactly in the middle and the Winter Palace, and on the other side of the pillar - the arch of the General Staff. In the center of the Winter Palace there is also a cross of intersecting anomalies, but less distinct. There is a fountain in the inner courtyard of the palace in the center of the cross. It would be necessary to recheck on occasion, but the lines of anomalies marked by GPS points indicate in this place a certain displacement of tectonic dislocation of the northeastern strike. It seems that I noted something like that for myself in my mind, now I do not remember all the details. But this is how he reflected them.

Fig. 3 Anomalies under the Kazan Cathedral.

Promotional video:

Previously, I already recorded an anomaly opposite the center of Kazan Cathedral, on the other side of Nevsky Prospect This time he walked around it, getting the same picture - a cross made of linear anomalies exactly in the center of the building (Fig. 3). One should not pay attention to the errors of its image here, in nature there all anomalies pass exactly through the middle of the sides.

Somewhat unexpected for me was the fact that the facade of Gostiny Dvor from the side of Nevsky Prospekt, exactly in its center, is also crossed by an anomaly (Fig. 4). There was no time to go around the Dormitory to check, but most likely this complex of buildings was also built taking into account the anomalies under it, and somewhere in its center there is an intersection. Moreover, it is possible that the orientation of its lateral sides at a certain angle in relation to the facade is determined precisely by the direction of the strike of tectonic faults at its base.

Fig. 4 Anomalies under the Millennium Monument of Russia and Gostiny Dvor.

But the next historical object along Nevsky Prospekt - the monument to the Millennium of Russia in Yekaterininsky Square, turned out to be located exactly in the center of the intersection of linear anomalies and oriented exactly along their strike (Fig. 4). What can apparently be considered proof that this monument was erected by the Romanovs on the site of some other one belonging to the civilization that built this city.

It is possible that the layout of the neighboring building complex at the former Palace of Pioneers is also related to the structure of the anomalies at the base of this site. Passing along the avenue opposite him, I crossed a couple of them, but there was no time to deal with this.

Here is also a fragment of a large anomaly passing through the middle of the Fontanka River. I recorded a similar anomaly over the Fontanka on one of the neighboring bridges across it. The presence of a fault, reflected by these anomalies, removes from the agenda the legend that this river, along with the Moika, is of artificial origin and was dug by hand during the time of the Romanovs. The fact is that the channels of almost all rivers formed on the surface of rock strata weakened by faults, and they flow at each of their intervals usually along the strike of the next such fault. Thus, with regard to the Fontanka River, it can be argued that this is a natural river channel formed along a series of faults in the Neva River delta. Figure 2 shows the position of a similar, but larger fault within the Neva channel.

Fig. 5 Anomalies on the Spit of Vasilievsky Island.

An amazing picture of the structure of tectonic faults has opened up on the Strelka of Vasilievsky Island. It turned out that the entire architectural ensemble here was planned precisely in accordance with the position of the linear anomalies reflecting them. Two of them intersect in the center of the Exchange building (there is a hypothesis that in fact it was the ancient temple of U-Peter), forming a kind of cross under it (Fig. 5). The building is oriented according to these anomalies, at the same time, being the center of the composition, which is made up of neighboring buildings and squares. It turned out that both Rostral columns were installed here not in an arbitrary manner, but in accordance with the position of two more crosses from small linear anomalies, located symmetrically to the central anomaly.

A more detailed study of Vasilievsky Island, apparently, will reveal a number of nodes of tectonic disturbances, the crosses of anomalies above which served as the basis for the placement of other noticeable structures. A check on this score of the Church of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary, although only from two sides along the embankment of Lieutenant Schmidt, showed that when choosing its location and orientation, they were also guided by this principle.

Fig. 6 Anomalies under the Mining Institute.

The building of the Mining Institute (Fig. 6), in which I studied at one time, was obviously also planned in accordance with the position and strike of the linear anomalies present here. It was founded in 1773, but most likely, this building was built at a completely different time and for different purposes. A fairly large linear anomaly crosses the majestic portico with columns exactly in the middle, going somewhere inside the territory. It is not easy for even former graduates to get inside now, so they had to continue studying this tectonic knot only by walking around this quarter. And somewhere in the middle of its side on Bolshoy Avenue, I discovered the continuation of this anomaly. Apparently, this fault has a shift along the transverse fracture crossing it, with some reversal (this often happens). I drew the line of anomaly over this crack conditionally,by connecting the points of its intersection along the neighboring streets, which are called lines there. In one of the premises of the building on the 21st line, in the place of its intersection with this anomaly, the institute recently reconstructed the house temple of Macarius of Egypt, originally founded in 1805. I don’t think that at that time and today it was somehow taken into account the presence of this anomaly.

Fig. 7 Anomalies under the Mikhailovsky Castle, Summer Garden and Field of Mars.

I went to the Mikhailovsky Castle to test a hypothesis that I once read on the Internet about the existence of something underground under it. But no cavities underground were recorded by me there. But it turned out that this building is also located on a cross of anomalies (Fig. 7). The linear anomaly above the northwest-striking fault stretches here along the center of the square in front of the castle façade, through the monument to "Great-grandfather from great-grandson" and the entrance gate, to its center. Here it intersects with another anomaly that runs across the castle exactly in the middle of its lateral sides. I checked its extension to the west on the next street, along which I went to the Summer Garden, where I noted the northern continuation of the fault.

In the Summer Garden itself, a slight shift to the east of the continuation of this fault was noted. And further his anomaly along one of the paths of the garden stretched to the north. At the end of the garden I noticed that all the fountains there are also located at the intersection of anomalies. But, unfortunately, in a hurry, these crosses were no longer marked with GPS points. And judging by the photo, I got confused somewhere here, tracing these anomalies around each fountain, not noticing its next shift. With the anomaly noted at the northern entrance, it is not yet clear how and how far it extends across the garden. In short, the structure of anomalies in the Summer Garden still needs to be dealt with. I will do it myself on occasion, but any other local who has a dowsing ability can also do it. In any case, it is already clear that the layout of this garden was carried out strictly in accordance with the structure of such anomalies. Wherein,As can be seen from the next photo (Fig. 8), if you mentally draw the line of the anomaly through the middle of the Mikhailovsky Castle, the direction of the anomaly extending to the north deviated slightly to the east. At the northern entrance of the Summer Garden, she is located slightly west of this thought line.

Fig. 8 View of the Mikhailovsky Castle and the Summer Garden.

An inspection of the nearby Champ de Mars showed that its layout was also carried out strictly taking into account the position and directions of strike of linear anomalies, and the memorial in its center is located in the center of the cross of these anomalies (Fig. 7). But the Church of the Resurrection of Christ, popularly called "Savior on the Blood", can really be attributed to the works of the Romanov period (1881), since there is no cross of anomalies under it. Apparently, they did not even know about the existence of such an ancient tradition - the choice of a place for the construction of temples only in such places.

The rose diagram shown below (Fig. 9) is the result of generalizations of the actual data obtained by its authors for a number of objects in the Northern, Middle and Southern Urals. Each peak on it shows what kind of displacement kinematics are active faults with a certain strike azimuth. These are the azimuths of the strike of faults, which were established by the author of the site with his colleagues, the most characteristic for each territory and are directly related to our topic. Apparently, these azimuths also limit the orientation of all pre-production buildings and structures in each territory. But to become a statement, this likely relationship would have to be statistically tested. Alas, I have no time to do this.

Figure: 9. Rose diagram of the spatial orientation of active tectonic faults. 1 - Expansions and faults; 2 - Left brittle shifts; 3 - Left brittle-plastic shears; 4 - Right brittle shifts; 5 - Right brittle-plastic shears; 6 - Thrusts.

In conclusion, I would like to note the following. Practically on all such objects standing on the crosses, there are bas-reliefs with subjects clearly not related to our civilization (Fig. 10-13), and the monuments were originally dedicated clearly to the wrong heroes, as we are told. This eloquently indicates that the period of their construction does not belong to the time of the reign of the Romanov dynasty. For whom, during the reconstruction (and not construction or construction) of these buildings and monuments, apparently, it became simply a pity to destroy such a delicate work. Therefore, legends were invented about the fashion that allegedly existed at that time for mythical plots. Although on the monuments of this period, all the plots are usually quite modern to him. And the presence of anomalies in the shape of a cross under all such objects finally “puts an end to the Romanov inventions at their expense. They did not guesshow their today's heirs do not know that the pre-flood civilization, almost completely destroyed by the elements and finished off by them during the so-called "peasant wars" under the leadership of Razin and Pugachev and the war of 1812, left an "indelible mark" indicating the real authors of all these grandiose buildings.