Probably, few people know that Jakatra - the capital of Indonesia until 1942 was called Batavia. Where did this name come from? The official history says that this is what the Dutch called this city in the 16th century, having built a fortress here. Well, "Batavia" is the ancient Roman name for Holland itself.
Well, since it was the Dutch who built this city on the site of the ancient small settlement of Sunda Kelala, historians are credited with creating star fortresses and forts. O. Pavlyuchenko has an interesting hypothesis about this, who told in one of his videos about similar Dutch "star fortresses" in Sri Lanka.
But back to Indonesia. On the website of the National University of Australia, you can find a map of the city of Batavia dating from 1662. And judging by this map, this city was protected by similar structures both from the sea and from the land. But, nevertheless, not from all sides.
On the map, they are designated as Ansjol Fort, Jakatra Fort (the current capital of Indonesia is named after him), Northerwick Fort, Riswick Fort, Anke Fort and Five Anguler Fort. It is not for nothing that the last fort bears this name, because unlike all other forts, it is designated as a five-pointed "fortress-star". All the rest, including the largest one located in the city of Batavia, are indicated by four-beam structures.
We see that this city is surrounded by fortress walls and a system of canals. But the "fortress-star" looks rather strange from the point of view of the fortification. Why does it cover the city only from one side, but from the west there is no such structure? Moreover, on the coast to the west of the city, we do not see any forts at all, which is absolutely illogical, in the event that they performed precisely a fortification role.
And look carefully at how the "bastions" of this "fortress-star" are located. Was it really going to shoot from it not only at the enemy, but also at their own city, protected by fortress walls? What nonsense! But it seems that the "Dutch" did not suffer from pathological stupidity. But if we assume that these were some kind of ancient power plants or some other technogenic objects necessary for the life of cities and settlements, then such a placement of “fortifications” no longer looks so ridiculous.
Promotional video:
Unfortunately, all these structures have not survived in modern Jakatra. In honor of some of them, railway stations are named - Anke, Jakatra, Anchol. However, these amazing forts themselves have not survived to this day. Numerous wars, and then new buildings and planning of the city, completely hid even the very traces of their existence.
And, nevertheless, I managed to find signs of the existence of the largest four-pointed star of the fortress of Batavia. Note the fact that most of the buildings and streets within this structure are quite different from the orientation of streets and buildings in the rest of the city, which corresponds to the current position of the geographic poles. Consequently, the "fortress-star" itself is clearly older than the official historians tell us, for it was built even before the cataclysm that destroyed a single world Vedic ancient civilization.
But the Dutch could use the surviving foundation of this "fortress" already as a fortification. Or maybe they even managed to restore it to its intended purpose. After all, it is no coincidence, judging by the surviving "rays", this "fortress" underwent in some period of its history not only destruction, but even partial flooding. And this could only be done by a very destructive weapon or natural disaster.
But would it make sense to use such a weapon if this "fortress-star" were just an ordinary fortress? And why did they try to hide the very fact of its existence from us, however, as in some other parts of the Earth? But in Western Europe, many "fortresses-stars" are quite well preserved. Is it because they were not dealt destructive blows? And why? Maybe the Europeans were allies of this destructive "force"?
So far, there are no unambiguous answers to all these questions, but there are only guesses, versions and hypotheses coming from independent researchers. But the more people are interested in our true past and begin to ask questions "inconvenient" for official history, the sooner we will come closer to solving the secrets that the "powerful of this world" and the caste of hired chatterboxes hired by them, creating textbooks for " common use".
