Numerous testimonies received from Russian archaeologists about the facts of substitution of ancient drawings and inscriptions in ancient buildings found on the territory of Egypt for a "classic" remake, corresponding to history textbooks, carried out under the pretext of their "restoration" clearly indicates that the official history of Ancient Egypt does not correspond real historical events. But why is the truth so carefully hidden from us? Why are ancient images of fair-haired and light-eyed Caucasians with Vedic swastika symbols on their clothes destroyed? Is it because these Caucasians have nothing to do with the ancestors of the Europeans themselves?
A similar hypothesis is expressed by the Russian researcher Y. Petukhov, who visited many excavations in the Middle East and Egypt. He believes that the creators of the civilization of Ancient Egypt were the Vedic Aryans-Protoruses, who in ancient times came to these lands and on the basis of their communities created the ruling elite of the ancient Egyptian civilization, transferring their knowledge to the local semi-nomadic peoples. Here is what he writes about this in his book "The Origin of the Rus":
But in fact, often official historians openly ignore artifacts that do not fit into the myths from history books, and leave many uncomfortable questions unanswered. One can relate differently to the hypothesis of Yu. Petukhov, however, there is a definite connection between the traditions and culture of Ancient (Vedic) Russia and Ancient Egypt. Where else, besides Egypt and Russia, the ancient ships were called the "boat"? But in Egypt it was the pharaohs and representatives of the ruling elite who used boats. The same applies to the falcon symbolism linking the ruling dynasties of Russia and the "gods" of Ancient Egypt.
In addition, there is an ancient oral Old Russian legend about the house that immediately after the cataclysm that destroyed the Arctic ancestral home of the people of the white race, one of the kings of the ancestors of the ancient Rus with part of his squad went to the lands of Egypt to help the local peoples recover from the consequences of the disaster. And this king ruled Egypt for "thirty years", after which he returned to the north to his people, who had found their new refuge in the "sacred Semirechye". So, oral legends and myths, in contrast to written sources (which can be changed, corrected or rewritten), are based on real events of antiquity, and even the Bible has proven greater historical reliability than "official history."
A typical example is information about the titan giants who lived in antiquity. The same Bible tells about them, but the "official history" is completely silent. So maybe there is no evidence of the existence of these giants in the past? No, there is a lot of this evidence. Firstly. Many buildings and structures have survived, made and intended clearly for people of greater stature. Secondly, many giant skeletons were discovered, the existence of which is hidden by official science. Moreover, many of these skeletons were simply destroyed due to the fact that their very existence is contrary to science and official history. And on this score, for example, there is evidence of the destruction of many such skeletons by scientists at the Smithsonian Institution.
But let me ask you then: how, then, do scientists differ from those religious fanatics who destroy any monuments, monuments and artifacts of other cultures? Nothing? The same fanatical conviction that for the "benefit of faith" it is necessary to hide or destroy everything that contradicts the dogmas of their "religion", in which we are invited to blindly and thoughtlessly believe on the basis of only unsubstantiated statements of dubious "authorities." That is why all this "official history", which is now crumbling at the seams, no longer arouses any confidence in its myths, invented by falsifiers. And these pseudo-historical myths all, without exception, need to be independently verified.