Backward Time. Reverse World. Part Two - Alternative View

Backward Time. Reverse World. Part Two - Alternative View
Backward Time. Reverse World. Part Two - Alternative View

Video: Backward Time. Reverse World. Part Two - Alternative View

Video: Backward Time. Reverse World. Part Two - Alternative View
Video: NASA Researchers Discover a Parallel Universe That Runs Backwards through Time - Alongside Us 2024, May
Anonim

The first part is here.

Hello. In this article, I wanted to continue my consideration of the reverse world hypothesis. That is, a world where time goes backwards. So what did we learn in the vulgar article?

We looked at a spinning wheel that flew at a speed close to the speed of light, and it is a spinning wheel that could outrun light. As a result, we learned that a wheel can have four different states:

1. When the wheel rotates to the right, its time flows as usual. (The wheel also rotates to the right with respect to an outside observer)

2. When the wheel rotates to the left, its time flows as usual (With respect to an outside observer, the wheel also rotates to the left)

3. When the wheel rotates to the right, its time flows in the opposite direction (relative to an outside observer, the wheel rotates in the opposite left side)

4. When the wheel rotates to the left, its time moves in the opposite direction (relative to an outside observer, the wheel rotates in the opposite right direction)

The point is that rotation is movement, and movement is an indicator of time. Time, on the other hand, can change at near-light speeds.

Promotional video:

We were able to compare this spinning wheel with a change in the spin of an electron.

However, in the micro world, motion creates not only the spin of particles, but also their charge.

For example, a positively charged particle is attracted to a negatively charged particle. And the same particle is repelled by another positively charged particle. That is, unlike particles are attracted, while particles of the same name are repelled.

Let's consider particles such as an electron and a positron. Both particles are called leptons in physics. (Leptons are light particles, hadrons like protons and neutrons, heavy particles.) Both particles are the same size. An electron has a negative charge, a positron is positive. According to the laws of physics, they should be attracted, since they have opposite charges. By the way, when they collide, they disappear and two or three photons (particles or light waves) are released.

However, is it true that these are different particles? To understand this, we will again compare them to our abstract superluminal wheel.

In the last article, we assumed that if we saw that something exceeds the speed of light, then it looked as if we see two objects approaching at a speed close to the speed of light to meet each other. That is, we would see two wheels spinning in opposite directions collide with each other.

Now imagine that our spinning wheel is negatively charged. With this charge, it can create movement. If there was a positively charged object next to him, he would be attracted. That is, a movement-attraction was created.

Now imagine that this wheel has jumped the speed of light. Then all his movements will change the vector to the opposite. The same positively charged object that was previously attracted will already be repelled. That is, the movement-attraction became the movement-repulsion. That is, our wheel seems to have changed the charge.

In other words, it turns out that the charge is a derivative that we get at a speed lower than the speed of light and at a speed higher than the speed of light.

If we look from the side at the wheel, which begins to overtake the light, then we will see how two oppositely charged wheels move towards each other.

This is where we can compare an electron and a positron with wheels that move towards each other. In other words, it is one and the same particle. It's just that the electron, having jumped the speed of light, turned into a positron, falling into the reverse world, where time goes backwards. Either the positron entered our world from the opposite one and turned into an electron.

Perhaps in physics, all antiparticles are actually the same particles. It's just that at near-light speeds, such transformations of particles are created due to a change in their arrow of time.

Now imagine we have a spaceship that can outrun light. We, too, are made up of charged particles. If we overtake the light, then the charge of our particles will change. That is, we will become human beings from antimatter. At the same time, from our point of view, all objects in space will become bodies of antimatter. In other words, in the reverse world, we will no longer be able to touch other bodies, since when matter and antimatter collide, an explosion occurs, which is quite strong. To avoid this, we must again gain speed above the speed of light already in the reverse world, so that the charge of our elementary particles changes again. Then we will become again from ordinary matter. And the arrow of time will again turn in our usual direction.

Now let’s notice something. In the second case, we flew in the opposite world. Time went back there. So our spacecraft flew into the past. When he returned to the world with the usual arrow of time, he will already be in the past. That is, there was a movement in time. From the outside it will look as if two spacecraft flew out from the same place in opposite directions. That is, these ships appeared out of nowhere. It turns out strange, isn't it? However, remember: in the first case, two spacecraft flying at each other disappeared into nowhere.

In quantum physics, it is said that various particles in empty space appear from nowhere, and disappear into nowhere. That is, our processes described above are similar to phenomena in quantum physics. This means that the reverse world is able to explain the strange phenomena that occur in quantum physics.

If we draw analogies of the electron and positron with our spacecraft, then we can assume that the spacecraft, when colliding with its counterpart with the opposite charge, will release a huge amount of energy in the form of light. In the case where the spacecraft appears out of nowhere, the energy, logically, should be collected at one point. (Possibly funnel-shaped)

In the first case, mass must turn into pure energy, in the second, on the contrary, energy must turn into mass.

If our hypothesis is correct, then we can assume that in order to find out about the movement in time, we need to conduct experiments with antimatter. Then perhaps we will be able to learn for the first time how time travel can occur in reality.

Then the time machine may not be far off.