Russian biophysicist, Doctor of Biological Sciences Valentin Sapunov commented on the published study of British scientists who refute the existence of Bigfoot.
“The conversation on this topic began quite a long time ago - some samples of hair brought from expeditions, in particular from Asia, were later identified as the hair of a Himalayan bear. It is given to me that this is another sensation that is not directly related to the problem of Bigfoot. Of course, it is possible to confirm nature, it is much more difficult to refute it, because there is too much data that is impossible to throw out. We practically proved its reality, but not on the basis of a single find, but on the basis of a set of data: this is evidence, traces, and biological damage. This object is definitely there. But we do not yet have a final proof for world science. Registration places are associated with minimal anthropogenic pressure. Of course, this is in the wilds of Asia, in Central Africa, in Central Australia. This is not a bear, but a person from a biological point of view, but not a person from a social point of view. This is most likely an alternative branch of the evolution of the human race, which has evolved to the biological side as much as possible, having lost the opportunity for social adaptation, the scientist said.
Recall that earlier British scientists said that the Yeti does not exist. For Bigfoot, eyewitnesses took various types of bears. Experts came to this conclusion after conducting a genetic analysis of bones, teeth and other artifacts that are stored in museums and private collections.