NASA Is Testing New Technologies: What Are The Experts Hiding Again? - Alternative View

NASA Is Testing New Technologies: What Are The Experts Hiding Again? - Alternative View
NASA Is Testing New Technologies: What Are The Experts Hiding Again? - Alternative View

Video: NASA Is Testing New Technologies: What Are The Experts Hiding Again? - Alternative View

Video: NASA Is Testing New Technologies: What Are The Experts Hiding Again? - Alternative View
Video: What Is NASA Hiding? | Unveiled 2024, May
Anonim

The American space agency NASA often pleases the public with news of space exploration, preparation of expeditions, and so on. The sponsored organizations of the agency are developing interesting mechanisms. For example, not so long ago it became known about the creation of a humanoid robot, which would have to prepare a place for a base on Mars and help with repairs, a tiny spacecraft in the form of a computer chip (for faster movement in space and, accordingly, a quick study of it) and an airplane with 18 engines, lighter, and also capable of almost vertical takeoff. In short, local scientists know a lot about aerospace technology.

However, some believe that there is something that for some reason NASA is too actively trying to hide. We are talking about anti-gravity technologies, which are believed to greatly facilitate flight to another planet. At the end of last year, it became known that an engine of such a plan seemed to have been developed in China, but it will only be tested and refined. On its basis, artificial earth satellites can be created, as well as, as an option, its own version of the ISS - the existing one in 2024 will be out of service, "worn out", so to speak.

Image
Image

However, some ufologists do not agree that the PRC has developed the first anti-gravity engine. In their opinion, since the last century NASA has possessed the secret of such technology, since it has studied and "adopted" the only fallen alien spacecraft - the city of Roswell, 1947. An interesting detail, however, - firstly, the fact of the ship's wreck has not yet been proven, this, according to some experts, is almost part of local folklore, along with stories about the heroes of the Wild West. Photography in 1947 was already known as a technology, but there are no images indicating that there was reliably an alien object that collapsed on the town.

The second point - even if we take on faith that the spacecraft could still fall, for some reason nothing has been said about antigravity even by the ufologists who studied this issue earlier. The fact is that there was a certain document that alien experts cited as a description of the ship that was obtained from nowhere. The text is quite detailed and entertaining, but surprisingly there are no even suggestions about anti-gravity technologies. It describes how the ship could theoretically move, what was inside and how many pipes / wires there were, but not a single detail was considered as one that helps to overcome the attraction.

Image
Image

So what happens? Ufologists, claiming that NASA learned about anti-gravity technologies from aliens from the wreckage of the ship, brush aside their own "materiel"? Or do they simply prefer to “forget” in order to substitute it for another “conspiracy theory”? An extremely strange position, which in fact shows that there is no truth in the words of such "experts", this is another unproven hypothesis.

Image
Image

Promotional video:

By the way, it was expressed by Marcus Allen, publisher of the "alternative" magazine Nexus. At the same time, he said this during the 27th Glastonbury Symposium - an annual event where paranormal phenomena and conspiracy theories are actively discussed. The publisher added an even stranger statement to the statement that the US space agency allegedly knows anti-gravity since the last century: it was because of this that all six manned expeditions to the moon were falsified. According to Allen, NASA did not want to admit that they found a common language with alien technologies, because in the space race the United States deliberately yielded to the Soviet Union, and it did not fly to our satellite at all, everything in the pavilion was removed.

So, let's start looking for logic here. First, if there is anti-gravity technology, then it should be used at least somewhere to make life easier, so to speak. However, NASA constantly complains about the lack of funding, not all ideas are successfully implemented, the expedition to Mars was completely abandoned, expecting that someone else, Elon Musk, for example, would make a rocket in order to land it with all its cargo on the Red Planet without breaking it. so to speak, content. Are losses being suffered - and all in order to hide the study of extraterrestrial technologies?

This is not to mention the very "cold war" in which the two superpowers tried to show who is cooler. The Soviet Union made many achievements in the field of space, the United States was inferior for a long time - and all this, a decrease in the prestige of the state in the world arena, just so that they would not learn about extraterrestrial technologies? Where is the logic in being aware of antigravity and not using it? It is completely and completely absent. Ufologist Marcus Allen somehow surprisingly missed from his speech an explanation of what NASA did with the allegedly studied alien technologies, which, as mentioned above, were not used even in the opinion of ufologists on the alien spacecraft.

Image
Image

The second point is the falsification of the flight to the moon. Actually, one of the most entertaining topics for fans of conspiracy theories. In fact, not a single one hundred percent proof in support of their theory could not be given by such individuals. It all started with the publication of Bill Kaising's book We Have Never Been on the Moon, where the author claims to have worked as an engineer for a company that made engines for the lunar program. However, it was proven that the individual served in such a firm, but, firstly, was just some kind of librarian, and, secondly, he was fired before the organization was involved in the flight preparation project.

There were also other opinions based on the fact that something did not work out, the radiation had an effect, the remaining traces on the moon were not as they should be, and so on. All these "proofs" are quite successfully refuted by the facts about the structure of our satellite, and how strongly the radiation actually affects, and many others. Even Soviet experts confirm that the signal received from the astronauts came precisely "from the moon, not from Hollywood."

Thus, there can be no question of any falsifications. NASA does not use anti-gravity technologies because the fact of using them at least somewhere has not been proven, and this also contradicts the materiel of the "specialists" who said this.

Irina Letinskaya