Native Americans, i.e. Indians are genetically very close to the peoples of Siberia, Altai and Primorye. There is a slight kinship with Europeans, but this is a product of later "pollution" after the discovery of America by Columbus. The genetic relationship between Siberians and Indians suggests that America was inhabited by people who crossed the Bering Sea when there was dry land in this place. The remains from Siberia, which are from 20 to 45 thousand years old, helped to prove this, and in America itself, on Brighton Beach, many very old basalt stones with obvious traces of processing were found right under our feet. Some of the stones have preserved images of white men with long mustaches and beards, very similar to the Magi in our view …
The skeleton MA-1, found in Altai, is able to clarify the situation. MA-1 lived northwest of Lake Baikal about 24 thousand years ago. Despite the harsh climatic conditions, people not only lived there, but also created: the earliest human images in those places date back to this period.
Attempts to isolate DNA from the remains were crowned with success: the mitochondrial genome was deciphered, as well as the entire nuclear one with an average coverage of 1X. (This means that each base was read once on average. In fact, some regions were not sequenced at all, while others were read dozens of times.) This is not enough to reveal the function of genes, but enough to establish a person's pedigree.
It turned out that the ancestors of MA-1 migrated both to America and in the opposite direction and eventually mastered Europe and Western Asia.
By the way, DNA analysis of a person who lived in approximately the same area 14 thousand years ago suggests that not all went to the west: some remained in Siberia. And there is nothing strange in the fact that these harsh people have conquered half the world. The scientific world gives these peoples different names, and we know them as Cro-Magnons, Sarmatians, Scythians, Sargats, etc.
Recently, scientists have begun to question the origin of the Indians from the Siberians. Some researchers now even express the idea that the very first Americans could well have been … Europeans. And for some reason they are not embarrassed that there was a glacier on the territory of Europe at that time, and people already lived on the territory of Russia.
Promotional video:
Here are the results obtained from the Americans themselves from the laboratory in 2002, where they confirm that the age of the lowest cultural layer of Kostenki 12 may drop to 50,000 years instead of the traditional 40,000 years for the Upper Paleolithic.
The reason for denying the origin of the Indians from the Siberians was a human skeleton found on the shallows of the Columbia River near Kennewick (Washington state). Radiocarbon analysis showed that the age of the remains is 9 thousand years. Who was the Kennewickian man with his distinctly European features, and how did he end up in the New World? Archaeologists from many countries are now puzzling over these questions.
Also archaeologist R. McNash from Boston University back in the 1980s. declared: the hypothesis that "a man crossed the Bering Strait only 12 thousand years ago" - to recognize as untenable, since in South America there are traces of more ancient migrations. Even then, stone tools 18 thousand years old were discovered in the Piaui Cave (Brazil); in Venezuela, a spearhead was found stuck in the pelvic bone of a mastodon 16 thousand years ago.
Some intrepid archaeologists, putting their reputations at stake, claim to have discovered settlements older than Clovis in New Mexico (until recently considered the oldest). The figures are 17 and 30 thousand years old. In the mid-1980s. archaeologist N. Gidon published evidence that the age of the drawings in the cave of Pedra Furada (Brazil) is 17 thousand years old, and the stone tools from there are 32 thousand years old.
It is possible that the New World was colonized a very long time ago, but how the ancient people did it, scientists have yet to establish. It is quite possible that the previously proposed scheme for settling the New World through the Bering Strait 12 thousand years ago corresponded to the second most massive wave of migration, which, having swept across the continent, "left out" the very first conquerors of America. But who were they?
Russian scientists have discovered a human site in Eastern Siberia during the Great Glaciation. According to the British BBC Broadcasting Company, the site, which may have belonged to the ancestors of American Indians, is about twice as old as the first evidence of their existence found in Monte Verde, Chile.
The age of the site discovered on the Yana River is about 30 thousand years, that is, a person lived in Eastern Siberia, when most of Europe, all of Canada and the northern part of the United States were covered with ice.
Further, in Omsk, in 2008, when examining the banks of the Irtysh and its tributaries for fossil remains of animals, a human femur was found. This work was also attended by colleagues from Tyumen and Yekaterinburg - anthropologist Dmitry Razhev (Institute for Problems of Northern Development SB RAS) and paleontologist Pavel Kosintsev (Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch of RAS). At this stage, scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, located in Leipzig (Germany), joined the work. It is they who have been actively studying the DNA of the oldest anthropological finds in Siberia for about ten years, including the famous "Denisovian" man from the cave of the same name in Altai (he lived more than 40 thousand years ago). The final deciphering of the Denisovan man's genome confirmed that it cannot be attributed to Neanderthals,nor to Homo sapiens.
Also, another archaeological find turned into a real sensation for scientists. This is a fragment of a stone bracelet found in the Denisova cave in Altai. Its age is 40-50 thousand years. Earlier it was believed that the production of jewelry began 10-12 thousand years ago. It turns out that the most ancient jewelry was found, and this is on the territory of Russia, in Siberia, but pay attention to the manufacturing technology. Now, in order to belittle the significance of Denisov's man, they are trying to link him almost with the Papuans.
If "Denisovets" was attributed to a separate species, as they say "science has proved", then in 2012 Svante Paabo informed the project participants that the DNA in the found sample from Siberian Ust-Ishim was very well preserved and belongs to a modern man! Shiaomei Fu was directly involved in the analysis of DNA data. It became clear that the sample from Ust-Ishim has such a large completeness of DNA for such an age that its in-depth study will answer many unanswered questions of the early evolution of modern humans that have remained unanswered to this day.
The radiocarbon age of the find was equal, attention !!! - 45 thousand years, and today this is the earliest find of the remains of modern humans (Homo sapiens) in Siberia, for which qualitative information about DNA has also been obtained.
At the annual conference of the Society of Paleoanthropology, held on April 8-9, 2014 in Calgary (Canada), the second presentation on the femur from Ust-Ishim was presented by a group of Russian, German and Chinese colleagues. It presented in expanded form data on anthropology, age and natural conditions of human habitation in the West Siberian Plain about 45 thousand years ago.
Now the Ust-Ishim man is the most ancient man on earth from all those found earlier, whose remains are amenable to laboratory research.
The most important aspect of this message was the fact that at this time a man of the modern type was already able to inhabit the climatic conditions of the center of Western Siberia at a latitude of 58 degrees N. Previously, the northernmost traces of human presence were known about 32.5 thousand years ago in the Siberian Far North (Yanskaya site, 71 degrees N) and about 37.5 thousand years ago in the European northeast (Mamontovaya Kurya site, 67 degrees N).
The latest research by anthropologists is also interesting, who, thanks to computers and developed programs, are able to translate into the language of mathematics the differences in the shapes of the skulls of literally all peoples of the world. Comparison of skulls, known as craniometric analysis, can now be used to trace the ancestry of a given population. Anthropologist Doug Auzley and his colleague Richard Jants have devoted 20 years to craniometric studies of modern American Indians, but when they examined a number of skulls of the most ancient North Americans, to their surprise, they did not find the similarities that were expected. Anthropologists were amazed at how many ancient skulls differed from any modern Native American group. Reconstructions of the appearance of ancient Americans were more reminiscent of residents,for example, Indonesia or even Europe.
Some of the skulls could be attributed to immigrants from South Asia and Australia, and the 9,400-year-old caveman skull, recovered from a dry mountain shelter in Western Nevada, most of all resembled the ancient Ainu (Japan). Where did these people with elongated heads and narrow faces come from? If they are not the ancestors of modern Indians, then what happened to them? These questions are now of concern to many scientists.
It is possible that representatives of different nations colonized America, and this process stretched out over time. In the end, in the "battle" for the New World, one ethnic group survived or won, which became the progenitor of the modern Indians. The first Americans with elongated skulls were probably exterminated or assimilated by other waves of migrants, or perhaps died out from starvation or epidemics. But what is remarkable is that the long-headed Mayan skulls in America correspond to the same skulls from Siberia. Both those and others belong to the priestly caste, this is not a coincidence.
It is possible that the New World was colonized a very long time ago, but how the ancient people did it, scientists have yet to establish. It is quite possible that the previously proposed scheme for settling the New World through the Bering Strait 12 thousand years ago corresponded to the second most massive wave of migration, which, having swept across the continent, "left out" the very first conquerors of America.
The Indians themselves say about their origin, that their ancestors came from the other side of the sea called Tulan, "where they were conceived and born by our mothers and fathers." Tulan in the chronicles of the American Maya and Turan of Russian Siberia is one and the same, because the Maya letters L and R., apparently, did not distinguish between letters. Therefore: Tulan = Turan. Great Turan is the ancestral land of the Aryans, but everything is being done to link it only with the Turks, to divide and alienate the Russians from their legendary heritage.
Attempts to link Atlantis, Hyperborea, Nazi Thule, and so on, lie in the same direction. In Etruscan mythology, "Turan" is the goddess of love and the fertile forces of nature. In translation from Sanskrit, this word simply means "love". For example, in Russian chronicles one can find such phrases: "Brave bo be, yako and tour" or "Bui tour Vsevolod" (this is how it is said about Prince Igor's brother in "The Lay of Igor's Regiment").
And here the most curious thing arises. It turns out that at the time of Julius Caesar (this is referred to by FA Brockhaus and IA Efron in their Encyclopedic Dictionary) the wild bulls of Turov were called “Urus”!.. And today for the entire Turkic-speaking world, Russians are “Uruses”. For the Persians we were "tours", for the Greeks - "Scythians", for the British - "cattle", for the rest - "tartarien" (Tatars, wild) and "Uruses". So, our people have been called Russian for thousands of years. And the memory of this is kept by the languages of the peoples of the world. In the Russian language there is a huge number of old words containing the root "tur": turit (pave the road), vyturit (drive away), turut (do, think), turaskat (roar), etc.
From the territory of Siberia, or as it was then called, the Red Turan, the tribes of the Indo-Europeans (as in the official science they call the Turs or Aryans) spread in different directions and even settled in North and South America, becoming the head of the peoples known today as the Maya and Aztecs.
At first glance, this seems unlikely, but the scientific circles of Khakassia are seriously discussing the hypothesis of the origin of the American Indians from the Khakass. It turns out that this fact was confirmed by the conducted genetic research. And if we take into account the origin of the Khakass themselves, then a lot falls into place. It's simple: both those and others originated from tours by mixing with representatives of other ethnic groups. The Khakass today themselves admit that several centuries ago they were tall, fair-haired and blue-eyed, but the mixture with the Mongoloid race changed their appearance in the same way as among the ancient Kyrgyz.
The University of Michigan confirmed the long-standing hypothesis that the Indians migrated to America from Siberia. This conclusion was made as a result of the largest-scale genetic study, in which the gene codes of 29 Indian tribes living in North, South and Central America, as well as two groups of Siberian aborigines, were compared.
The analysis showed that the tribes of Siberia were the direct ancestors of the Indians. The resettlement to the American continent was accomplished as a result of one or several successive waves of migrations, apparently, passing through Beringia - the isthmus that connected Alaska and Chukotka about 12 thousand years ago and earlier. Siberia was the source of migration.
If we take the above as a basis, then Siberia and America in ancient times should have been a single cultural space, the signs of which we must find today.
Let's take a look at fresh evidence that North America was once part of a single Slavic-Aryan State. On the famous Brighton Beach in New York, our former compatriot Igor Alpatov made out processed megalithic blocks with faces and letters depicted on them.
Among these images there are images of the faces of the Slavic Gods and Magi, typical for Old Russian culture, as we now imagine them. Some see in the images of the Slavic Gods, Perun or Veles. Unfortunately, according to the testimony of the discoverer, many stones have recently begun to disappear from the beach, as this event received wide publicity. Those who destroyed these artifacts, hid the ends in sand and water - are interested in hiding the truth, but the facts remained in the captured photos and videos.
In this case, we see fragments of megalithic structures created from basalt, which contains a high percentage of mica and pyrite. It is thanks to the abundant inclusion of pyrite grains in its composition that the basalt glows with a golden sheen in the sun. By the way, it is this effect that explains the description of the sacral mountain Meru in Hyperborea. It sparkled with pyrite in the sun, and to an observer from the side it seemed golden. The presence of traces of high temperatures suggests that the megalithic structure may have been destroyed as a result of a powerful earthquake, accompanied by a profuse eruption of volcanic lava. Exactly the same signs can be observed in the Stone Town and the Devil's Settlement in the Urals. Either all this is the result of the use of the most powerful weapons comparable to nuclear,but exceeding it in power at times or even orders of magnitude. Can you imagine how powerful an explosion must be to scatter a megalithic city like matchboxes, and at the same time a boiling lava lake was formed at the epicenter, the fiery streams of which, spreading out, melted fragments of slabs and blocks weighing tens and hundreds of tons? The same effect of destruction of ancient cities can be seen in the Siberian taiga, on the Putorano plateau. It seems that this is a matter of the same order. It seems that this is a matter of the same order. It seems that this is a matter of the same order.
The fact that these artifacts are being destroyed in America is not accidental, it is already natural.
It is necessary to recall the attitude of the aborigines to the place on which New York was built. It was sacred for them, which means that they knew a lot of what we would have to rediscover. The residents of New York themselves would have trampled on priceless artifacts for another thousand years, and most likely would not have noticed them. At least we learned at least something, that before the Americans there was something majestic, mysterious and clearly somehow connected with the history of our ancestors who lived on different continents, which undoubtedly had a common, inextricable past.
