Many historians and religious leaders note that before Nikon's reform in Russia there was no pure Christianity, and it differed especially strongly from Catholic Judeo-Christianity. Our version of Christianity has absorbed all the best from the teachings of Christ and Vedic Orthodoxy. Even religious historians have to admit this, albeit in a distorted form.
So, N. Kapustin in his work "Features of evolution, religion", based on the materials of ancient beliefs and Christianity, writes: "Historians and religious philosophers are forced to admit that pure Orthodoxy did not exist. It was a mixture of Byzantine, Slavic paganism, the cult of solar deities and the cult of ancestors. Despite centuries of domination, Orthodoxy could not finally establish itself in the minds of the Russian people."
Especially strong resistance was caused among the Russian people by the adoption of the dogmas of Latin Judeo-Christianity, which, along with its other dogmas, imposed the Jewish Old Testament, against which Christ himself opposed, denouncing the satanic faith of the Jews and calling their "Father" (the Jewish Yahweh-Jehovah) - the Devil. This statement of his can be found even in the texts of the canonical Gospels that have been fairly corrected over the centuries.
But the Vatican, as you know, did not put up with such a rejection of Catholic Judeo-Christianity in Russia, and therefore organized a number of crusades against Russia, and when all of them did not bring success, decided to act from within, finding traitors among the ruling elite. After the Rurikovichs refused to betray their people, they were destroyed by the Jesuits and in their place the Vatican managed to put the Romanovs, whose surname clearly indicates to us whose servants they were.
That is why the subsequent reforms of the Russian Church, bringing it closer to the Catholic heresy, were inevitable after the accession of the Romanovs to the throne, and the secular elite and the top of the church in their essence became more and more similar to the Vatican itself. That is why at the end of the 17th century in Russia they began to burn heretics, showing clear signs of the Catholic Inquisition. And such activities were officially provided for by the Cathedral Code of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich. It was under the guise of this tsarist code that the Catholic executioners performed their bloody deeds in Russia, relying on traitors from the ruling "elite" and the church "elite".
However, many priests and monasteries did not agree to accept Catholic innovations. At the same time, the Solovetsky Monastery, which from 1668 to 1676, was besieged by the troops of Western mercenaries, because the Russian people refused to fight against their own, showed especially stubborn resistance to the crabs. In 1676, after the capture of the monastery, all its defenders, including the monks, were hanged. What prompted the defenders of the monastery, led by their abbot, to openly revolt against the secular and church servants of the Vatican?
In a book published by Conceptual Publishing House entitled "How and why scriptures are made sacred." we can read about this:
Thus, the original version of Christianity preached in Russia by the holy fathers is very different from what it was possible to impose on our people over the centuries by all sorts of "reformers" who were essentially servants of the Vatican, spreading the provisions of Latin Judeo-Christianity on the territory of our country and destroying all those who stood up to defend the original Christianity and Vedic Orthodoxy. Vedic Orthodoxy and primordial Christianity, in their luminous essence, did not conflict with each other. That is why the tsarist authorities, together with the churchmen of Judeo-Christianity, together destroyed both Old Believers and Old Believers, placing themselves on the same level with the "holy inquisition" of their Latin masters.
michael101063 ©