Darwin's theory is a generally accepted idea of the origin of people, although there is doubt about the postulated version. The theory of the appearance of humans, according to Charles Darwin, assures that the parent of man was a monkey. Another alternative to the origin of mankind is carried by religion - a divine creation.
You must admit that Darwinism is a strange mystery, when a quirk once happened in history: a monkey suddenly became a man! Up to now, no matter how scientists strive and create comfortable conditions for development for monkeys, they do not want to evolve to an intelligent species.
Even worse, Darwinists fail to find a decisive argument, the very "transitional option" between ape and man. And without this it is impossible, otherwise it turns out that one wonderful day the monkey woke up as an intellectual being ready for the feat of development.
Leaving the theory of the origin of mankind according to Darwin aside - for quite obvious reasons - let us turn to the biblical appearance - the creation of God. This version, although an alternative, nevertheless lies closer to the truth. True, under the understanding of God, let's assume a slightly different meaning.
Imitation of unknown gods?
Now we are talking about the offspring of aristocrats and high priests, children of the ruling elite of the ancient world. Why did the poor people have to suffer and endure the pain of the vice on their heads? After all, it was not for nothing that they wanted to have an elongated skull. An explanation of the phenomenon is found in the legends of ancient civilizations, when the royal children were supposed to be like the Gods.
What if, indeed, one day creatures appeared that looked so strange that they were mistaken for gods, making a lot of efforts to be like them? For example, Nefertiti and Akhenaten, a mysterious married couple, are always depicted wearing exceptionally outlandish headdresses: the Atlantean diadems or the Atha crowns.
Promotional video:
These are very large headgear, probably quite heavy to serve as a simple symbol of power. The most interesting thing is that scientists have found lifetime images of the daughters of Nefertiti and Akhenaten, who actually had very elongated skulls. Whereas the fashion for "lengthening the skulls" was not yet popular.
Akhenaten himself also surprises with his figure: long arms, thin musical fingers, large feet, and judging by his appearance he gives the impression of an extraterrestrial being. Experts, after conducting appropriate analyzes, "explained" the appearance of the king: a huge set of genetic abnormalities (the point of view of earthly science), with such diseases supposedly do not live long.
Nevertheless, the ailments did not prevent Akhenaten from having 2 wives, 10 children and a harem with concubines, and even organizing coups. Due to the elongated skull, Akhenaten's brain was twice as large as that of an ordinary person, it is assumed.
But it is possible that this larger brain required a different size of the cranium. By the way, in conditions of less gravity relative to the Earth, the cranial pressure inside changes, as a result of which the volume of the skull becomes larger. So the origin of Akhenaten is more mysterious than we think.
Truth in all assumptions is an unpleasant truth. It is impossible to reliably say what Akhenaten and Nefertiti looked like with their daughters, because no mummies were found. But this is another mystery - significant characters in the story, and the bodies are missing, as are the records about it.
Fortunately, a little more is known about the beautiful Nefertiti, since a bust of the queen is exhibited in the Museum of Germany. The experts obtained an amazing result after examining the bust: if it was made 1 to 1 with the original (and they think so), then the queen had a very long neck (not earthly as they say), and her height reached 3 meters.
An entertaining fact, but nowhere are there images of Akhenaten and Nefertiti without the crown of the Ats. Some scholars believe that in this way the rulers tried to hide their main difference from the people. Yes, until the mummies of the reigning clan have been discovered, one can only speculate. But did they not want to keep their alien origin a secret, including from us, descendants?
Giants vs. Darwin
All ancient civilizations of the planet have legends and myths about people over 3 meters tall, or even taller. An interesting skeleton was discovered in Georgia - according to the remains, the giant's height reached 3 meters. However, he did not suffer from gigantism. A half-forgotten legend tells of the last giant named Ambrius. He was just buried at the place of the find.
There are cases in history when unique, but incomprehensible (unnecessary?) Artifacts are hushed up and are not explained at all - why? Perhaps these are unnecessary difficulties, besides the destruction of the established foundations and theses. Whereas the history of the appearance of man is already based on natural evolution, and there is no place for alien gods in it.
Plato was the first to mention the race of giants. It was a country that lived according to measures of justice and goodness, and even by modern standards it was at the forefront of development. Some researchers consider the Atlantean civilization not of local origin. This is an ancient culture that left its home planet for important reasons.
The death of the rapidly growing and enriching advanced technologies civilization happened as a result of a natural disaster. Another version of events is inclined to think that punishment followed from relatives from the starry worlds. There are other more real evidences that "gods" flew to us, which had a significant impact on the primitive cultures of the Earth.
Coming from Mars?
Let's take a look at the 3 pyramids of the Teotihuacan Inca complex. The distance between them corresponds to the distance between Venus, Earth and Mars. The difference in height between the pyramids "Mars" and "Earth" is the same as the difference in the sizes of the Earth and Mars.
Obviously, such coincidences are far from accidental, the same is not an isolated case that assures of patterns. The pyramid of the god Quetzalcoatl (the Heavenly sage, as his name is interpreted) had an association with Mars among the ancient Incas.
The oldest writings say that the "Heavenly Sage" came from the "red star", we call it "the Red Planet". By the way, the Sphinx in Egypt was also painted red - it personified Mars, like the god Horus, who came from the "Red Choir", as Mars was previously called.
Of course, we have little information to reliably correlate human origins with the stars. But even the available data: archaeological artifacts, documentary records of ancient civilizations, and much more, directly indicate - there was an intervention during evolution., Our roots are among the stars.
A quarter of a century ago, Darwin's idea was accepted as the only correct one, although even then daring scientists doubted it. Many were embarrassed by the lack of evidence. Others readily believed that the monkey made an instant evolutionary leap and became human.
Now a different time has come, and yesterday, an alternative theory of the alien origin of man, today looks more real than the natural rebirth of apes into man. After all, not a single monkey became a man, despite more than sufficient conditions. And again, there is no transitional option from monkey to man.
Our ability to speak is unique to the living world of the planet; there are no other such species on Earth. At the same time, we are losing to the animal world in many nominations; fragile and slow bodies, we do not have claws and fangs for survival in the wild world of nature. Bad sense of smell and we are blind in the dark, we suffer from a monstrously huge number of chronic diseases. Why is that?
A likely explanation lies in the ancient records, among the amazing lines, where it is clearly seen why there is no transitional option between ape and a man. The planet Nibiru and the Anunnaki (the Anunnaki will also be correct), this is the decisive argument for the evolutionary leap from monkey to man, the ancient Sumerian history of life assures.
Somewhere in ancient times, the Anunnaki (revered as gods) flew to Earth. We will not touch on their goals now, but they, through genetic manipulations and their own DNA, gave a noble kick to evolution.
Through genetic tricks with a primitive ape, they created an intelligent person in their own image. Therefore, there is not and cannot be a transitional variant, it simply did not exist in the history of evolution! They created people on the basis of their own blood, which is why the primary product that had worn wool for thousands of years, had fangs and claws, "in the morning" suddenly got up on two legs, discarding atavisms.
Chronic diseases - basically all of them are associated with increased gravity, gravity literally bends us to the ground. We have to accept the fact that our "parents" evolved with less gravity. Otherwise, how else can one explain hundreds of tens of years of life on Earth, and man has not adapted to the conditions of his “native” planet - maybe by the fact that the life code cannot be fooled?
So now what do you think of Darwin's theory? Darwinism has become obsolete as old rubbish? After all, there was no evidence of the origin of man from a monkey, but there are many signs of alien interference in evolution.