In the difficult times of the bloody communist regime, in the absence of rights and freedoms, democracy, tolerance, Coca-Cola, ecstasy with cocaine and prostitution, life was hard for the common man. Instead of "Jim Beam" I had to choke on the Absheron cognac. Oh, if only to smell it, that wonderful Azerbaijani brandy!
In addition to cognac, there were and still are many wonderful and amazing things in Azerbaijan. I'm not talking about the Maiden's Tower. I'm talking about the prehistoric ruts left by the "wheels of the ancient AZERDES-BUMZ carts", on which the first horsemen on the planet Earth drove. Azerbaijanis, like all other peoples, are convinced that their nation is the most ancient on Earth, and a procession of progress began from their land. Well … the natural desire of every nation, to get the right to teach the mind to the mind of jerks.
Well … let's look at the versions of the origin of these amazing traces of proto-civilization.
Version one - "railway"
Supporters of this version stupidly identify what they see near Baku with the most similar landscape in their opinion. And then they draw a conclusion: the ancient road workers hammered the rails with a stone on the contrary. Not convex, but convex, then you can send a donkey with a cart without a driver, and he will arrive at his destination thanks to a carrot hanging in front of his nose.
Promotional video:
Does not channel. Too short sections of the path, too confusing, many "arrows" and all paths lead to the water.
Version two - "road"
The proponents of this direction are sure that the wooden wheels of the carts, possibly upholstered with iron, and maybe purely stone, have been rolling along the same route for centuries and the tracks are the result of wear and tear of the surface.
Also, in my opinion, complete nonsense. Well, how will you so surely end up in the same place with every trip in order to gouge even a barely noticeable track?
Version three - "Sharotransportnaya"
Quarries are located near all the known tracks, in Azerbaijan, Malta and England. Namely in Malta, numerous finds of stone balls were made. This gave rise to the version that the balls were used as wheels for transporting chipped slabs. This version is as unconvincing as the previous ones. The tracks are of the same width, so it is not possible to place balls under the slabs. The balls would leave traces of various configurations, except for straight and curved parallel tracks.
The fourth version is "ritual"
Allegedly, the ruts were gouged for the administration of religious rites. I have already spoken more than once about the obsession of our "scientists". Everything that they cannot explain a priori is attributed to religious rites. A flat stone is necessarily an altar, a pile of stones is a temple, a urinal is a grail, etc.
The fifth version is "alien"
Special thanks to Eric Denikin. After him, little green men are seen even in a frosty pattern on the glass. I dismiss this version, because aliens have no time to engage in nonsense. They stand on the roads in green vests and irradiate the brains of drivers with a portable blaster that sucks not only the brains of earthlings, but also bills from their wallets.
What is left behind a reasonable explanation of the phenomenon?
Let's compare the facts. What makes the ruts in stones from different parts of the world related?
- Quarries nearby.
- What else?
- The sea is near.
- What else is common?
- The structure of the breed. Always limestone.
- And if you think about it?
- Traces lead to water, or vice versa from water.
- Means what? Dragged stones into the water?
- Nonsense! Unless there are any buildings at the bottom. And they are not!
- Maybe they pulled out of the water?
“What… for centuries?
- In general, did anyone try to drive along the track on a modern cart?
it turns out tried! Nothing turns out, the wheels of the required diameter wedge when cornering!
So they hollowed out ….
- No, not a fact. Once passed and left a deep mark in the stone.
- How can this be?
- No, only if the stone was not soft like plasticine.
That's it! And we have seen this more than once!
Compare with fossilized dinosaur footprints. For some reason, this does not surprise anyone! This is normal. Is the track not normal? Yes, at the first glance, you instantly get the impression of thick clay, on which the first horse train drove!
And then it dawned on me! Yes, they are footprints. But not from the wheels, but from the poles of the drags! People dragged drags into the water, where natural concrete made of lime deposits, silicates and finely dispersed filler from basalt and granite, loaded this natural geopolymer concrete, and pulled it to land, where it can be left to dry. During transportation, the poles left a mark in the clay mass. The weight of the men who pulled the drags is much less than the weight of the loaded "trailer", so there are no traces of their feet. On the shore, as soon as the concrete began to set, all that was not needed was simply cut off from it, and a block was obtained, which remained to be installed in its place, where it would finally set. Moreover, there are no gaps in the masonry at all! Even a hundred bucks does not fit into Sklyarov's crack. This is how the blocks of pyramids were made in Egypt, bottom sediment from the bottom of the Nile,mixed with granite chips and sheep and goat hair. The perfect concrete recipe! This is approximately how the "plasticine" polygonal masonry of Mesoamerica was made. Only those were even smarter. They pressed metal ties into the blocks, sometimes dovetail crosses.
And also, while the block is not frozen, you can draw on it!
Isn't it obvious that this was done on a plastic surface, using wooden patterns?
By the way, doesn't it remind you of anything? In Khokhloma, do they paint it differently? And this is in Malta!
It's difficult to judge the purpose of this sofa, who has any ideas?
But the technique of its execution is quite obvious. It is a petrified clay-like mass. Don't go to grandma!
The question remains with careers. Why are they, if there is such a convenient building material, blind and use? It's simple. Now we see stone quarries. And who saw them in the days of the ruts? It is quite possible that in the quarries in those days there was the same clay, only more viscous. It could be chipped off in layers, in large blocks, without spending a lot of effort to give the desired geometry and use in construction.
“Scientists” claim that in this quarry in Malta, ancient people drove wedges and chipped off blocks of limestone.
At first glance, I thought it was a clayey bank of a river or ravine crumbling. And the first impression is usually true! Yes, the men drove stakes into the wall, walked along them like scaffolding and hollowed vertical holes at a given distance. The layer split off, fell, often broke, but it could be easily divided into blocks of different sizes and shapes to be installed in the right place.
I know what the skeptics will say. Firstly, the age of the stones. Science has measured them for millions of years. Secondly, why do we not have such building materials in our time? The questions are reasonable, I do not argue, but about the scientific nature … eh … We have already had the opportunity to make sure that science is often mistaken, and even more often openly lies. Apparently, the petrification process under certain conditions can occur quite quickly. What other conditions can there be? Climate for example. Composition of the atmosphere. And also the force of gravity, radiation, electromagnetic and acoustic vibrations. There are many factors. And most likely their combined effect took place. I guess those guys would be very surprised to know that water can be solid. Then, in general, the planet could not have guessed that there are negative temperatures,but the hardening of clay under the influence of heat and ultraviolet radiation could be common. And besides, who said that their building material became a stone in a few days or months. Maybe for years it was plastic enough to saw it, drill holes, etc. In general, I said everything. Egyptologists throw rotten eggs at me! (chicken I mean).
