It is not surprising that many supporters of the Norman theory use as their arguments a certain map called "Antiquissima Orbis Delineatio", which means "Most of the world project" in Latin. And although it is argued that this is an "old map" that shows the world as it was in the Middle Ages and the times of "Antiquity" (and we know that this is actually the same time), but most likely is part of the "big project" of falsifying history, in which the Vatican played the main violin before the disaster of the middle of the 19th century, and after this disaster - Britain and the United States.
It is not by chance that at the bottom of this map you can find the stamp of the Library of Congress of the United States, made on November 9, 1905, and the registration number 47-690001 under which this card was registered in the library. Obviously, then this replica got there. Of course, it is clear that some of the information reflected on this card is more or less reliable and copied from other cards. This was done, probably to make this very map more authentic. But other parts of it cause frank questions and bewilderment by their implausibility. Therefore, the inscription below about that. that the map was supposedly drawn up by a certain Philipus Britius raises strong doubts. But it may indicate that it was made by the Vatican Jesuits.
So, let's take a look at the "shoals" left by the forgers. First, we see that on this map there is still no Giblar Strait, there is no Bosporus with the Dardanelles. It turns out that the level of the Mediterranean, Aegean, Adriatic and Black seas should be lower. But we see that they all have the outlines we are accustomed to in their coastline, and this simply cannot be. Because after the breakthrough of these isthmuses, the level of all these seas rose by about 150-200 meters. This means that even before the flood, this level was much lower, and therefore the coastline should have been completely different. By the way, the Red Sea on this map is also not yet connected to the ocean. Nevertheless, its coastline, as well as the coastline of the Persian Gulf, have quite a modern look. The same can be said about the outlines of the Arabian Peninsula. What,of course also raises strong doubts about the authenticity of the card.
By the way, the dating of this map is also not all right. In one study resource, I found information that this map dates back to the 5-6 centuries BC. and compiled by the ancient cartographer Hecateus.
But this is actually a delusion. For the real map of Hecateus of Miletus looks like this.
And about that. that this particular card belongs to him is evidenced by the corresponding inscription. But what do we see? First, this map is even more primitive than the previous one. But on the other hand, the Black, Aegean, Mediterranean seas are already connected by straits both among themselves and with the Atlantic Ocean. And the Red Sea also connects to the ocean. So what happens? Did these straits already exist under Hecatea? The trouble with these falsifiers. Which of these cartographers is lying? Or maybe the whole history of "ancient" antiquity is completely falsified?
Official historical science claims that the world map of Hecateus is the oldest known. And since all these straits already exist on it, therefore the map of "Philippus Britius" is in fact the result of the activities of history falsifiers. Here is more evidence in favor of this version. We see that Norway and Sweden form one large island, and Finland with Karelia and the Kola Peninsula - another. But why, then, the outlines of the coasts of Spain, France, Britain with Ireland, Denmark and other modern countries are no different from the modern ones? Is it possible that some parts of the land dramatically change their outlines, while others remain unchanged for more than a thousand years? And all this in close and small Europe!
Promotional video:
By the way, pay attention to one more "joint" of counterfeiters. The Apennine Peninsula is designated as "Italy", but Italy itself appeared only in 1861. Maybe this meant the Italians? But no, the term "Italics" is written in Latin in a completely different way, and it was already introduced into circulation by Italian scientists in the second half of the 19th century, i.e. just after the same catastrophe that covered the first floors of old buildings. It was after her that the new elites began a new stage in the falsification of history. By the way, I think that if you wish, you can find other "shoals" of counterfeiters on this map, but the main thing is that for me personally, even without this, the fake of this map is beyond doubt.
Well, why such fakes are thrown in - it is quite understandable that Russophobes of various stripes could put forward their hypotheses like: "Look - Finland with Karelia and even with the Kola Peninsula were one land and under a single administration!", and the Kola Peninsula is a "primordially Finnish land", and completely ignoring all the facts that clearly indicate that the ancestors of the Russians came to this land 1,500 years earlier than the ancestors of the Finns.
There is one more clear sign by which it can be determined that the map, which is officially dated earlier than the 19th century, is a "remake" of forgers, ordering new "masters of the world" after the last disaster of the middle of the 19th century, the existence of which was guessed by many alternative researchers. This is the complete identity of the coastline of the seas with the existing one. For example, let's take a look at the 1525 map of Muscovy by the Italian cartographer Batista Aliese.
It clearly shows how much the Black Sea coastline differs from the current state. And this is quite natural, given the number of centuries and catastrophes separating the time of its creation from the present time. But if someone draws their conjectures on a modern map and then passes it off as "ancient" or "medieval", then such a falsification immediately catches the eye of any person who has not lost the foundations of logic and independent thinking.
Now who benefits from the appearance of such fake cards? Of course, first of all, to the same Anglo-Saxons, who at the very beginning of the 20th century tried to buy the Kola Peninsula from the king, apparently knowing about the finding of artifacts of Arctida-Hyperborea there. When this failed, Britain attempted to occupy the area in 1918-1919 during military intervention. But the power option ultimately also failed. After that, the main stake was precisely on inciting separatist sentiments in the Russian North and in Karelia. Although even before that, this was part of British policy towards Russia.
The servants of the Ziono-Anglo-Saxon Empire diligently instill in the northerners that only they are supposedly descendants of the arctic ancestral home, and therefore have no relation to the rest of the Russians. And for this they need to join Scandinavia (Plan of the Zionoanglossak special services "Nord"). This is where all the myths emanating from the Swedish, Norwegian, Finnish (in relation to Karelia) ruling and scientific "elites", serving the interests of the semitized "elite" of Britain and the banking clan of the Rothschilds from the City of London, come from. But in reality, Britain, inciting chauvinism in these countries and separatism on the territory of Russia, sleeps and sees the Russian North as its own territory, as well as part of Siberia.
As for the historical truth, in fact, the common ancestors of all peoples of the white race emerged from the legendary arctic ancestral home. Well, a certain common genetics of our northerners with the peoples of Scandinavia and the British Isles is associated with migrations from Russia to the West, and not vice versa. Therefore, no "Normans" ever came to Russia, and Rurik was a real Rus, although on his paternal side he was related to Western Russia. And several centuries ago, the state language of the same Sweden (before its Germanization) was Russian.
So the population of Western Russia, which was located on the territory of the GDR, was almost completely destroyed by the Vatican crusaders, and the rest were Germanized and catholicized. And the Vatican is another Russophobic force that, long before the Anglo-Saxons, tried to destroy or catholicize Russia, turning its population into slaves. The latter partly succeeded with the help of the Vatican's henchmen - the Romanovs, whose reign can be called a 300-year-old “German-Romanov yoke”, which, unlike the mythical “Mongol-Tatar” one, was real. So this map could have been falsified not by the Anglo-Saxons, but by the Jesuits from the Vatican. And only then the Anglo-Saxons "planted" it in the Library of Congress.
Let me remind you that the card registration stamp is dated 1905. And the first attempt to occupy the Russian North and Siberia was made by Britain in 1854 during the so-called. "Crimean War", ie immediately after the catastrophe of the middle of the 19th century and a new redivision of the world by new "elites". So Britain has been interested in these territories for over 150 years. Therefore, he fools his head with frank fakes of part of our people.
michael101063 ©