- Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3 - Part 4 - Part 5 - Part 6 - Part 7 - Part 8 - Part 9 - Part 10 - Part 11 - Part 12 - Part 13 - Part 14 - Part 15 - Part 16 - Part 17 - Part 18 - Part 19 - Part 20 - Part 21 - Part 22 - Part 23 - Part 24 - Part 25 - Part 26 - Part 27 - Part 28 - Part 29 -
"Roman" bridge in the Caucasus
Bridge. A beautiful word. I love the way it sounds. You can hear the ringing of metal in it, despite the fact that it comes from the verb "to pave", which meant: put wooden poles, logs or boards in order to walk on them without getting your feet wet. The bridge is a sacred, almost mystical thing. It connects shores, countries and even worlds. Although it happens that bridges can also divide.
The bridge dug out in Voronezh forever separated the official history from the real one. It is not indicated on any of the city plans. Those. according to the official version, it did not exist at all. But the archaeologists who carried out excavations on the territory of the former estate of Bystzhinsky apparently forgot to warn that no bridges existed at this place.
For most earthlings, the information message about the discovery of the bridge was not just an empty sound, but they did not notice it at all. But for many, what happened was a real shock. Is there at least one case in the history of planet Earth when people themselves buried a stone bridge they built? And the bridge in Voronezh was declared “buried”. When asked why it was buried with clay, scientists only shrug their shoulders. They are also unable to explain the absence of any information about the existence of this bridge. But the most important thing is that the bridge was built of brick from the beginning of the nineteenth century!
Add up two facts: the age of the bridge, and the nature of the soil under which it is buried. The only conclusion that can explain what happened is the flood of the nineteenth century, about which not a single mention has survived in the historical chronicles. Is it any wonder, then, that geologists do not recognize the likelihood of the transformation of calcites into silicon forms? No matter how much we would like to leave the conspiracy theories of the events of the recent past for the amusement of "ignorant alternatives", stubborn facts force us to seriously consider the version of the global flood that occurred in the first half of the nineteenth century.
Promotional video:
And this is not the only bridge that raises a lot of questions for historians, the answer to which they are unable to give. The village of Kamennomostsky in Adygea got its name in honor of the stone bridge across the tributary of the Belaya River - the Dakh River. Inspection of this structure was in the plans of the expedition of the AISPIK channel, and at first glance it became clear to all of us that this was a dark matter …
Built by the Cossacks in 1906? True? Did the Cossacks build a bridge across the river, which you can wade in with ordinary boots below the knee? Well, okay: in the spring, and during the rains, Dakh turns into a roaring stream, and of course it would be very nice to have a bridge across it, but … Could there be people among the Cossacks who had an engineering and construction education? The bridge was built according to all the canons of ancient architecture. Structures of a similar design, bridges, viaducts and aqueducts in huge numbers have been preserved in the Mediterranean, the Alps, and in many other places around the planet.
Guess what the Italians or Albanians would write on the information plate if this bridge was on the territory of their countries? Right. At least II - I century BC, built by legionaries of the commander of such and such, or by order of the emperor of such and such. But Soviet scientists were modest, so only 1906, Cossacks … And this is the very case when, on the contrary, I do not believe in the "youth" of the bridge.
Most likely, the bridge was built in the middle of the twentieth century, and has undergone several repairs. I could not find information about how it looked initially. Everything that is in the public domain is replete with funny tales, like the fact that the solution with which the bridge blocks are fastened was kneaded by the Cossacks on chicken eggs. See for yourself these eggs:
The most common mortar, most likely from Novorossiysk cement, and the joints have joints, made very carelessly. The bulls of the bridge stand on cushions of modern concrete, which means that the bridge was rebuilt from scratch in our time. Moreover, the qualifications of modern builders are several times lower than the qualifications of the true creators of the Stone Bridge. See how the parapets are created:
They are made of raw pieces of granite brought from afar, probably in order to give the bridge the charm of ancient times, but they went too far with cement mortar and reinforcement. The Cossacks could not have this. The parapets were created quite recently, and it would be interesting to see the bridge without them, and without asphalt.
The geometry of the blocks, of which the bulls are made, is striking. Now they don't build like that. They do not know how, and economically it is meaningless. The current pillars of the bridges are made in the form of circular columns, which is clearly demonstrated by the modern bridge, along which traffic across the Dakh is open. Either they are rectangular or square. It never occurs to anyone to bother grinding out blocks of such complex geometry.
Well, what a whim, in general, to build ordinary supports, endowing them with such sophisticated and difficult-to-do elements! The Cossacks on the bridge had to transport carts, artillery pieces, etc. There is absolutely no need for such a bridge to have decorations, the manufacture of which is almost more laborious than the installation of arched spans. It just doesn't make any sense! If only … For the builders, such work was so simple that one could not reckon with either time or expenditure of resources.
There is nothing more ridiculous than a barn with carved marble columns. But historians offer us to believe that the Cossacks were able to do the most complex calculations, requiring special knowledge at least in such areas as:
- physics, - resistance of materials, - maths,
- Materials Science, - geology, - geodesy, - hydrodynamics.
In addition, they had to have skills in designing and precision stone processing. If the Cossacks were so educated and skillful that it would be a snap for them to carve sandstone blocks of the most complicated profile, then why did they then live not in mansions with columns and lions at the entrance, but in wretched huts made of adobe bricks!
One of the main criteria for the scientific character of knowledge is repeatability. I want to ask you, comrades scientists, where is there even one example of the presence of complex architectural structures created by the Cossacks at the beginning of the twentieth century? And there are none, and most likely it could not be. Cossacks did not study at universities. They could do a lot of things, but architectural knowledge for them was like a brake light to a hare.
I draw your attention to the construction of the bridge. It has three arches, with a large arch in the middle and two at the edges. Moreover, the arch, located on the left bank of the Dakh, has an extreme support far from the river bed. This testifies to the fact that since the construction of the bridge, the channel has changed, and the course of the river ran ten meters south of the previous one, which can make it possible to calculate the time of the bridge creation. It is enough just to know the speed of "migration" of the river to the south.
But in this case, this is not the main thing. Let's turn to such a concept as desert tan.
In the photo, I pointed out the blocks with a tan with red arrows. A similar picture is observed on the opposite side of the bridge. What does this indicate? And this can only say one thing:
During the construction of the bridge, some of the structural elements of the supports were not manufactured by the builders. They used blocks found right on the spot. This is what I talked about a little higher: - river beds are closest to the real horizon of the mainland, and it is there that it is necessary to look for traces of the former civilization, buried by the mudflow. The intensity of tanning indicates that it began to form a long time ago. Long before the beginning of the development of the Caucasus by the first settlers.
This assumption is supported by the difference in the quality of the profiles of those blocks that are "tanned" and those that have been created recently. The difference cannot but be striking. It's amazing! Those who created the ancient blocks knew how to process stone orders of magnitude better and better than our civilization. They did not reckon with resources or with time for only one reason: they lived in the Stone Age.
Literally, not according to the classification of historians. This age was stone because people at that time made everything from stone. And such production was much easier for them than metallurgical production for us. Without special machines and devices, they could quickly and for centuries cast structures of any complexity. We are not familiar with such technologies. We have learned to use them only for the production of kitchen countertops made of artificial granite and marble.
However, the story about the traces of antediluvian buildings would be incomplete if I stopped at the description of the Stone Bridge alone.
Continued: Part 31
Author: kadykchanskiy