As Academician Fomenko writes, up to the 18th century, Russia and Bulgaria spoke the same language, including its minor features.
Many interesting things are revealed today when looking at the Bulgarian history from the point of view of the concept of the "New Chronology". For example, the creator of "New Chronology", academician Anatoly Fomenko, with a group of researchers, was surprised to find that the old Bulgarian texts (for example, the same "Nameplate of the Bulgarian Khans") were actually written in exactly the same language as the OLD RUSSIAN texts (not to be confused with Church Slavonic!). They are practically indistinguishable neither in language nor in the shape of the letters! If you do not say in advance what kind of text it is - old Bulgarian or old Russian, then you will hardly guess about its belonging. Knowing the Old Russian language, the specialists read these texts without difficulty, in contrast to the later Bulgarian texts (and even more so modern ones), which an unprepared Russian person already perceives with difficulty.
The text of "The Name of the Bulgarian Khans".
“And that's understandable. The Bulgarian language, starting with Old Russian in about the XIV-XV centuries, eventually moved away from it and began to develop more or less independently. He did not go far, but noticeable differences have already appeared,”explains Academician Fomenko. He also believes that in Bulgaria XIV-XV centuries. was, apparently, just the old Russian language was widespread, "it is the Old Bulgarian or the old language of the" inhabitants of the Volga ". As the language of Russia-Horde. Moreover, it turns out that it was practically unchanged in Bulgaria up to the NINETEENTH CENTURY”.
It is no coincidence that in the XVIII-XIX centuries. it was necessary to carry out a special reform of the language, both in Bulgaria and in Russia. Slightly changed grammar, and as a result, the new languages began to differ markedly from each other. Although these languages are still very close, their complete identity has disappeared.
As Anatoly Fomenko insists in his book “Mathematical Chronology of Biblical Events”, “up to the 18th century, RUSSIA AND BULGARIA SPEAKED THE SAME LANGUAGE, BEFORE ITS SMALL FEATURES. THEN THIS IDENTITY OF THE RUSSIAN AND BULGARIAN LANGUAGES WAS INTENTIONALLY DESTROYED. BULGAR TEACHED (FORCED?) TO SPEAK SOME OTHER WAYS. Why was it done? Apparently, to draw a linguistic border between Bulgarians and Russians. Indeed, in itself, the fact that up to the XVIII-XIX centuries. in Bulgaria and in Russia there was practically one and the same language, clearly contradicting the Scaligerian story, which asserted that the Bulgarians and the Russians ALREADY HUNDREDS LIVED AS DIFFERENT PEOPLES."
Let's clarify: Scaliger is the same mathematician of the 17th century, who "invented" the chronology on which the entire official world paradigm of historiography is based. Peter I, in his desire to imitate the West, forcibly introduced it in Russia. However, Fomenko believes that the Scaligerian chronology in Russia began to be introduced by the ancestors of Peter - the Romanovs, to strengthen their dynastic claims to the Russian throne.
However, the question arises: how did these two peoples, the Russians and the Bulgarians, manage to preserve practically the same language for so long over the centuries? After all, living separately, Bulgarians and Russians would have to speak quite differently rather quickly.
Promotional video:
Anatoly Fomenko answers this question directly and categorically: no doubt, the reform of the Bulgarian language in the epoch of the XVIII-XIX centuries. was carried out CONSCIOUSLY to hide this striking contradiction in the Scaligerian-Romanov history of the Balkans.
In the RECONSTRUCTION-HYPOTHESIS created by Anatoly Fomenko, the explanation for all this is very simple. The Bulgarians, who came to the Balkans as part of the Ottoman (ataman) troops of the Horde in the 15th century, were mostly Russians and, naturally, spoke Old Russian. Until the SEVENTEENTH century, the ties between the Balkans and Russia remained very close, so the language remained practically the same for a long time. That we observe, by the way, for parts of Russia very distant from each other.
Academician Fomenko, in order to avoid confusion, clarifies that we are talking about the identity of the Old Bulgarian and Old Russian languages, and not about Church Slavonic, which is indirectly related to them and, obviously, intended for translation from Greek church literature, primarily the Holy Scriptures, for which it, in fact (as well as the corresponding alphabet), was developed by the great enlighteners Cyril and Methodius.
