Beginning in the 19th century, people "suddenly" had great opportunities in the study of ancient cultures, thanks to which dozens of discoverers rushed to the expedition. As if someone said "Fas!", In the sense, "You can!" And this continues to this day.
Ethnographers collect information about peoples, folklore, traditions. Culturologists, archaeologists, geologists, ufologists and other "-ologists" work together with them. All together, and sometimes in spite of each other, they more or less clarified the picture of the world, wrote history, giving each nation some kind of conventional heritage.
But at the same time, there are huge dark areas that cover half of this very heritage, and no one tackles them. Researchers shrug their shoulders, they say, "here we did everything we could." For which endless gratitude to them. But without clarifying these dark areas, much is meaningless. After all, these black holes lie in the most important - the worldview.
It makes no sense to find figurines of "gods" without knowing their true meaning. This approach has led now to the fact that there is a huge number of people who can be called "idolaters", something with which the church has fought so hard at all times. She fought not from harm, but from better intentions. After all, worshiping an Object is madness.
Now every person who considers himself a bearer of the "true" faith is ready to chant "My God is Perun!", Completely not understanding the meaning of Perun. Others shout about "manifested in three worlds" (what kind of heresy ?!) Veles, also not really grasping what Veles is. People make themselves tattoos with a Kolovrat, believing that this is a real symbol of their ancestors, which for some reason was not in the infosphere until the books of Levashov, Khinevich and other science fiction writers from history came out. The ecstasy that the "faithful" experienced until recently from the words "Sva" and "Ra" is still fresh in my memory, again without even digging independently at least in dictionaries. What for? After all, there are smart people who explained all this to us!
It's funny, but these same believers actively criticize real scientists, thanks to whom we use the Internet and the toilet.
New "true" terms appear almost every month, leading those who want to know their roots further and further from the truth in the direction of someone's fantasies. And it would be fine if these fantasies were harmless, but the prospect is rather gloomy - people do not want to think! From the last nonsense, from which the head ached, it is possible to single out the newly minted "Agmas", which are "Words of Power" or "Slavic Mantras"! Uffffff, how powerful that sounds! And Fuuuuu, how false it all looks. But people hawala, relish, so it can be used commercially))
Why do all these nasty things arise? From losing the essence. What is older automatically becomes something true. Even if it is a newly created "antiquity". Oh no, don't be afraid, we are not new to this business. Already late antique authors had no idea what legacy they got. And from whom … For example, Hesiod, describing in the "Theogony" a comet that fell into the primary ocean, which brought life to Earth, left readers without specifying the source of his data. Or pointed it out, but no one noticed it? As well as the comet itself….
Promotional video:
Now it is very fashionable to talk about holographs, about subtle worlds, about the Matrix, which is very similar to medieval sermons about a sinful world and paradise, where one should strive. History goes in circles only because no one listens to the teachers in its lessons. Everything that is not understood is immediately recognized as "charming" - another curious word. This is not what our ancestors bequeathed to us.
Unfortunately, there is no such area of historical science that would deal not with subjects or folklore, but with the worldview, the universe. Really, no … Once upon a time these things were dealt with by Mathematics. Now the Etymology bears this burden, but it does it very weakly, since it is burdened with authorities and politics, who do not know what the Word is, how mathematical it is. In fact, the only complete etymological dictionary of the Russian language is the dictionary of Max Vasmer, which is as beautiful as it is terrible. The good thing is that it gives a comparison of different pronunciations of one word in Slavic and nearby languages. But his implementation is bad, because Vasmer seemed to set himself the goal of proving that all Russian words are borrowed from other languages. In English dictionaries, the situation is the same - only there the primogeniture of Latin is proved,and in the case of the authoritative Klein dictionary, Hebrew. Common Indo-European roots are also deduced, rather abstract. They should have the whole point, but … alas. In fact, these PIEs turn out to be useless because they reveal absolutely nothing.
But the common Indo-European language really once existed. This is easy to prove. First, the common roots of words from East to West, in territories lying far from each other and interconnected by lands called "Tartaria" by cartographers. Secondly, any word is revealed brighter and deeper if you look at it in neighboring languages. Put in a row the same root words from Russian, Greek, English, Latin and Sanskrit - then you will see the fullness of the colors of the Word. Moreover, it does not matter who first came up with this word, it is common to all languages and left only its own shades to different peoples.
Strength is in unity, not in the birthright. Only from this position can Humanity be viewed.
The psychology of humanity is reflected in its language. This is perhaps the only honest source of knowledge about the worldview of our distant ancestors, our roots. At the same time, the words differ little from the rest of the symbols given to us - they are simply different languages of the same. Just like binary and verbal languages - all the same, in the end, they express the same thoughts. And the fact that we use words so superficially does not really paint the current generation. However, like other graphic symbols have become tattoos, advertising labels, etc.
Everything from the loss of essence.
But if you work with symbols, myths and words for some time, then the very way of thinking gradually begins to change - otherwise they simply cannot be understood. The point is not that something "cool" opens up there that you can read and be impressed with for a while. Not at all; on the contrary, they often lead to quite everyday things. But the very perception of reality is changing, because the brain finds new connections that did not exist for it before, rebuilds itself, learns to see Matryoshka in seemingly superficial things.
Now imagine that in some distant era, in the period of Indo-European community, people communicated in just such a language, symbolic, figurative. When the painted stone was not just a block of solid substance, but could equally represent, for example, a community.
Another example: take the word "Struggle". What does it mean to you? As a rule, we mean by this a kind of clash of interests, war, attempts to suppress another … However, at the first root of this word lies the concept of "Hold" … Yeah, so I said this, and the reader immediately began to have slightly different associations, right? Contact wrestling, wrestlers grab each other with their hands, cling to their feet - this is the process itself from the point of view of the word "Fight", and not in opposition. And after a couple of minutes the reader says to himself, “I thought so! Nothing new”, deceiving himself. As soon as this fits into the head, then another word immediately becomes clear - "Brother", since it is the same root of "Struggle" in the first part, and why the Greeks used it as a designation for a member of the community (Phratry). Etc.
And in the golden age, this is how every word, every symbol was understood. When something very laconic revealed a good part of the world's concepts, moreover from completely different areas, but united by a common idea. No, modern man cannot understand this. How not to understand all the architectural, everyday, literary and other solutions. How not to understand the true reasons for the creation of this or that. That is why we worship crosses, Peruns, and do not understand why everyday little things were endowed with deep philosophy. And not having dealt with everyday life, we rush to the "higher worlds", reflect on crystals and vibrations.
The idea of Man is partly to control reality. Man is the king of this reality. This is written at least in the Bible:
“And God create man; in the image of God create him: husband and wife create them.
And God bless them, saying: grow and multiply, and fill the earth, and rule over it”(Gen. 1: 27-28).
"Reign", in Greek, "κατακυριεύσατε" from the word "κύριος", which is also a term for "Lord", and means something like "guardian, fencing off." Both words are primarily “paternal” in nature, based on the image of the Master of the House (hus, house, household). And then another blow in the stomach in the form of this "Gos". What is meant by "home" at the root of "state"? And if I tell you that it means "Sheath" ("skin") as something that holds what is inside it, what will be your reaction? "Yes, that's understandable"? I thought so))
The second part of the word "Under" comes from "Span" or "Heel", which here is a symbol of support, and not just support, but its lowest point, the one at the base. The single root word for "Heel" is "Base, Base". The English word "Boss" most likely comes from the same reasons.
The graphic symbol of the Pyramid is partially associated with the root "Pd", which has a square at the base (a quarter, four, a square (as well as a bottom, a root, etc.) - in Sanskrit "पाद" - pada; in Russia, a measure, which was later renamed in “a quarter” and which was a quarter of an arshin, it was called Padyu), and at its top - an all-seeing eye (“mouth” - “watch, guard”, “पाति” - pati - “observe”, “sresio” - “look”) … The pyramid is a symbol of Perun, Zeus, Jupiter - heavenly fathers (not to be confused with grandfathers! The line is rather thin, but serious), guiding the movement of the Earth. The same "stronghold" - "πτρα"
If you look at Sanskrit, you can see all the paternal functions in “party, pa”: protection, protection, food, supervision, management…. In general, "keep on your shoulders." Moreover, this is a function, not a person, since it does not belong to gender. The word "party" could be called both a woman and a man. In English we are left with “Father”, in Latin “Pater”, in Slavic “Dad”, which again is not the same as “Father”. Different words are different concepts, albeit overlapping.
And this is just a superficial analysis that gives us a rough definition of "Lord".
The most understandable, close to the "House" type of "Shell-Skin" (Kaz-Gos) in this case will be the Tent Fabric. We read the definition from Wikipedia: "A tent is a temporary light construction made of fabrics, leather or branches, a kind of tent, from which it differs in its large size"
The tent is shaped like a Pyramid. The pyramid-like roof of Christian temples and towers is called a tent. In Greek, "Tent" is "σκηνή", which is most likely one root with the English "skin" - "skin". The same shell, which is the House (Hata, Kushcha - the same root, most likely)
Building a temple for God is one of the most important things in Scripture:
“And they will make me a sanctuary, and I will dwell in their midst; everything as I show you, and the pattern of the tabernacle and the pattern of all its vessels; do so”(Exodus 25: 8-9)
And accordingly, temples-abodes of the gods were built in the ancient world, and in the Egyptian, and in the Christian, and Muslim, and in the Buddhist, and others.
And the temple-tent must be supported on something, on poles, supports, a cornerstone (if it is a stone temple), walls, which was expressed in the idea of the firmament as a rigid structure supporting the luminaries, moisture, and so on - στερέωμα, firmamentum. This support is the heavenly father - the Lord.
In the family estate, this role is played by the elder of the family - the Husband or Mistress - the one who keeps the entire household on himself; a support that holds the house on itself; the pole that holds the tent, the atlas that holds the sky …
Now apply the obtained data to the role of a person as the current Lord of reality. Should we rush into parallel universes (commercially beneficial to someone), forgetting about our own? And it seems that the word "dominate" says something else …
And when you come to such conclusions, they again seem very simple and well-known to everyone … so well-known that there is supposedly no point in digging into them … But now go back to the middle: pyramids, gods, symbols … - and this even without special excavation of deep motives. Do you understand in what amazing world ancient civilizations lived?
We believe that they were necessarily wiser than us, smarter … But this is not about IQ. They were just different … Fortunately, the connection is not lost at all, you just need to discover it for yourself, then the ancient civilizations will become much closer.