First, first of all, we will refer this article to the additions to the "Revelations of the Biblical Texts", and first of all to the chapter "Anti-matter is the essence of the existence of the universe." There I explained that the basis of the existence of stars and planets is the collision of matter and antimatter, which creates the nuclei of stars and planets. The reaction leads to melting and the formation of various materials and metals through the ultra-high temperatures of the periodic table. But it is antimatter, or a reaction to the collision of two objects, that creates a gravitational field around planets and stars, attracting matter to itself, melting it and thereby creating internal magma. An increase in the planet's mass and an increase in the planet's radius reduced the heating of the planet's surface from the inside and cooled its outer surface. I also remembered there the Yakut oral epic “During the Flood,when the Earth turned upside down …”and Biblical texts about the Flood. But questions about the shape of the core inside planets and stars remained open. And now, having opened for everyone the existence of one of the highest waterfalls in Russia, the second highest above sea level 900 meters against 1,600 at the highest, but possibly the highest in Russia and Scandinavia in terms of the height of the flow of the waterfall - about 400 meters or more. But if the height of the wall is known, thanks to the mark on the map, but how to determine the height of the wall of the Raslak Circus, if it starts not from the sea level, but from about 450 meters? If you cannot measure from below, then you must measure from above, but without instruments. What if you throw a stone down and count the number of seconds it falls. But it turned out that the acceleration in free fall on the surface of the planet is uneven. At the pole, it is more than at the equator - 9,832 m / s at the poles versus 9.78 m / s at the equator. I need the speed of free fall at 68 latitude in the northern hemisphere. And it is 9, 82 606 m / sec. That is, if the body falls for five seconds, then 9.82606 * 52 (5 * 5) 25 = 245.65 meters. But it was at this point that it dawned on me - "the muse visited me today …". If the acceleration on the planet's surface is not uniform, then the core inside the planet is not round, but is likened to a supernova.
I chose this picture because it is closest to my understanding of the core of our planet, and the second image shows this core, but from above. The supernova compresses matter to a huge super'atom, where there is no space between the atoms of the molecule and between the molecules, the space that remains after that outside matter is thrown into space at the poles. But inside the planet, space is not ejected from the antimatter of the planet's core. So far, it is still only creating a gravitational ejection into space. First, vertically upward and in a circle returning back, but already to the equator of the planet.
Let's go back to the title of the article. In the picture below, there is text confusing the mind of the reader. Read carefully about the "Coriolis force".
Why don't I like math? If, initially, incorrect data are put into the theorem, then mathematics can quite "reasonably" prove that the speed of light = minus 300,000 km / s, that is, that light does not move away from the star into space, but accumulates in the star from space, therefore The sun is burning.
So that you do not understand anything, he is this Coriolis, divides the movement along the meridian separately from the equator to the north and separately to the south. Let's change the denominators: let's start the movement from the South Pole … sorry, the South magnetic pole of the planet, then the question arises for Coriolis: how, suddenly after the transition of the Equator, can turn against the movement of the planet, affecting a person? After all, if a person moves from pole to pole and does not walk backwards on the Equator, then the effect on him will be the same in both hemispheres. However, I can guess about the origin of the Coriolis problem. He is trying to explain the effect of rotation of water when draining from a container, or rather a whirlpool when draining water, which goes from right to left in the northern hemisphere, and from left to right in the southern hemisphere. I told this in Revelations. This is how the locals show tourists the location of the Equator. Naturally, the speed of rotation of the planet affects the resistance to attraction of gravity, by repulsion. But then the growth of people at the equator should be twice the height of people living closer to the poles. But can you compare the average height of people in Vietnam or Laos with those living in Norway? Here, just the opposite, everything is just the opposite. Although a lot is affected by nutrition. But shouldn't we accept the version expressed in the "Revelations" that the gravitational forces thrown into space at the poles … Here we will bring a little science into our story. But can you compare the average height of people in Vietnam or Laos with those living in Norway? Here, just the opposite, everything is just the opposite. Although a lot is affected by nutrition. But shouldn't we accept the version expressed in the "Revelations" that the gravitational forces thrown into space at the poles … Here we will bring a little science into our story. But can you compare the average height of people in Vietnam or Laos with those living in Norway? Here, just the opposite, everything is just the opposite. Although a lot is affected by nutrition. But shouldn't we accept the version expressed in the "Revelations" that the gravitational forces thrown into space at the poles … Here we will bring a little science into our story.
“According to astronauts, the first signs of weightlessness underfoot begin to be felt from a height of 100 km. After 20 million kilometers from the planet any earthly gravity ceases to act, therefore, “absolute weightlessness cannot be closer than this distance. And in your example with the ISS, when it drops by 100 meters in one day, this is clearly visible. After all, this decrease indicates that the speed of the ISS is falling. During the day, it decreases by about 0.124 m / s. Those. The ISS, and all bodies on it, experience a negative acceleration of 1.44 - 6 meters per second per second. With such an acceleration, an astronaut hanging 80 kg on the Earth will weigh no more than 115 milligrams at the station. " So wrote a person under the nickname "bk.ru [7.3K]
Promotional video:
At a distance of 340,000 km, there is an equilibrium point of the gravitational attraction of the planet Earth and the satellite of the planet, the Moon, now the spacecraft will fall on the Moon 44 393 km with an acceleration of 1.6 m / second.
But there is an opinion that the gravity of the planet Earth completely stops at 2 radii from the surface,”which means at three radii from the center of the Earth. 6,000 * 3 = 18,000 km from the center of the planet and 12 from the surface of the planet.
Here we are talking about the height at which gravitational fields are thrown out before returning to the planet's Equator. Even with field velocities close to the speed of light at 300,000 km per second, a distance of 36,000 km is close to 0.1 seconds. On the surface of the planet it is 185.3 m / s, and 6,000 km closer to the center …? Gravity tends to follow the rotation of the planet's core and creates movement along the Equator, and by this very movement swirls the eddies when water flows in the northern hemisphere from right to left, and in the southern hemisphere from left to right.
This is always the case: when you answer one question, another immediately appears - why does the gravitational field twist following the movement of the planet from west to east? I think … and watch boxing on TV. There is such a habit, thinking about a problem, to look at some kind of movement, even if it is flowing water … And it seems that I found the answer - it is in the picture that I duplicated below … Right below. See? Still think and think: the matter of the planet, revolving around antimatter, throws out gravitational fields, and not the antimatter itself. Gravitational fields are the matter of our space, and is born from our matter, and not from antimatter, and therefore strives to return to its "meridian", if I may say so, from which it was thrown, and at the equator the "meridian" by the time of return,is displaced due to the speed of rotation and the gravitational field makes a spiral motion.
But a new question may arise: why then at the poles the acceleration of gravity is higher than at the Equator? The length of the parallels to the poles is shrinking and hence the concentration of gravitational fields is greater than at the Equator … And the greater the gravity per one kilometer of latitude … and so on.
Author: Pavel Shasherin