Behavior of the Earth in "space"
Once again, we repeat: before Copernicus, the Earth seemed flat, after him - spherical. Today, numerous researchers have accumulated extensive material that shows that the shape of the Earth is not spherical, and, most likely, our "planet" is still flat (in the topological sense).
Since this work does not pursue the goal of searching for evidence of a flat Earth, we will restrict ourselves to only stating some data that refute the official theory and confirm the concept of a flat Earth. Although, it should be noted that the shape of our "planet" may be some other.
Figure: 1. Falsification of the "space" flight of astronauts.
In fig. 1 shows a falsification of the "space" flight of American "astronauts". The top photo shows an "astronaut" who is supposedly on board the International Space Station and demonstrates the behavior of a gyroscope in "space". Pay attention to the decorations - the flag, the wires, the cramped "space" module …
The middle photo shows the same "astronaut", but against the background of a chroma key and with a green (chroma key) ball instead of a gyroscope. The bottom photo shows the NASA laboratory at the time of its visit by former US President George W. Bush, when the cameraman recorded the very "astronaut" against the background of the chroma key.
Recall that chroma key is used to create computer special effects. Blue or green "backdrops", panels, blanks are involved in manipulations at the time of shooting. Then these blanks are calculated by the computer, which inserts any object the director needs in place of these blanks. Such technologies are used in film, television and, as we see, in very "scientific" fields.
NASA spread this falsification under the guise of real space images. But this is not the only falsification from the "respected" "space" service. There are a lot of such cartoons, and they all testify against official flights into space and against the official spherical shape of the Earth. Here are just five facts:
Promotional video:
- With all the abundance of "flights" of satellites with an inclination of 80 to 100 degrees, that is, through the poles of our "planet", there is still no photograph - neither the North Pole, nor the South Pole.
- With a huge space flotilla of satellites and other devices, there is still not a single natural photograph of the whole round Earth and not a single natural photograph of the far side of the Moon.
- According to the law of the gyroscope, on a rotating body, which, as it is argued, is our Earth, the existence of another non-axial rotation - tornadoes, cyclones, whirlpools and similar vortices - is impossible. However, such phenomena exist on Earth, therefore, the Earth does not rotate.
- There is a huge amount of amateur photographs and videos showing that the horizon line is straight and not rounded as in the “official” images.
- The propagation of the Sun's rays vertically breaking through the foliage or clouds shows that the distance to the Sun is no more than 3 - 6 kilometers. Calculations made in longitude give the same value.
There is a huge amount of work on the Internet devoted to the topic of a flat earth. But so far there is no final confirmation that the Earth is flat either. The number of refutations of the spherical shape of the Earth is growing.
If we consider the "planets" of the solar system to be analogous to the Earth (which is doubtful), then the chaotic nature of the precession periods associated with them is striking. Note again, the precession period tilts the axis of the "planet", and the tilts of the axes of the "planets" have chaotically different values with the declared one and the same force of attraction of the Sun acting on the "planets" (see table 1).
Table 1. Inclination of the axis of rotation of the most important celestial bodies:
| Body | Axis tilt (°) | Body | Axis tilt (°) |
| Mercury | ~ 0.01 | Saturn | 26.73 |
| Venus | 177.36 | Uranus | 97.77 |
| Earth | 23.5 | Neptune | 28.32 |
| Moon | 1.5424 | Pluto | 119.61 |
| Mars | 25.19 | Ceres | ~ 4 |
| Jupiter | 3.13 | Pallas |
~ 60 |
The gyroscope's law establishes: the axis of rotation of the gyroscope is aligned with the axis of rotation of the system in which it is located. If there are several gyroscopes in the system, directed differently, this means that the system does not rotate, and no single "force" (cause) acts on the gyroscopes in this system. Speaking in this context about the chaotically rotating "planets" and about the confusion reigning among the tilts of their axes, the gyroscope law demonstrates:
- The solar system does not revolve around the center of the galaxy;
- "Planets" do not move around a single Sun and do not form a single system;
- The Earth's climate is not associated with the movement of the Earth in "space" around the Sun.
Therefore, it makes no sense to study the behavior of a spherical Earth in the context of climate change. It is necessary to look for the features of the flat Earth's behavior - those that can affect the periodic climate change of our "planet".
Flat earth concept
Today, two concepts of a flat earth are more or less developed. Let's consider both.
The first concept (1.0) is as follows. The earth is a flat pancake centered on the present-day North Pole and the South Pole along the edge of that pancake. This model provides a clear justification for the flight trajectory of transcontinental airliners, which, with a spherical Earth, look like unreasonable curved lines (Fig. 2)
Figure: 2. A model of a flat Earth with the North Pole in the center: from above - a flight path on a spherical Earth; below - the trajectory of the same flight, but on a flat Earth.
It should be noted that the return to the "flat" views on the Earth was carried out constantly. While the common herd of intelligent people was moving in the direction newly drawn by the shepherds and diligently cramming the spherical dogma, the other part of the planet's population followed a different path. For example, in 1893 the concept of a flat earth was developed, depicting our "planet" as a roulette table (see Fig. 3).
Figure: 3. The flat earth model developed in 1893.
The first concept stems from the fact that the North Pole is postulated unchanged - it, supposedly, has always been in its present place. However, the known data on glaciations (which we cited above) give rise to doubts. In particular, at least the fact that during the corresponding period the glacier covered the whole of Europe. And this is not the North Pole at all. This is the West (in relation to Moscow).
This concept also does not take into account changes in the Earth's axis in any way, including the changes in the position of the Roslin line based on observations (see below), and also does not reflect the climatic periodic changes in any way.
The second concept (2.0) is as follows. The Earth is a flat pancake that can change its position relative to the Sun. Or this change may not be related to the Earth, but to the Sun itself. One way or another, as a result of a certain change in conditions, the position of the Sun in relation to the surface of the earth's pancake changes so that the position of warm and cold zones on the Earth changes
A controversial issue here is the position of the CENTER of such an Earth, or, as it was called in antiquity, the PUPA of the Earth (Execution Ground). This center must either coincide with the North Pole, or must be located at another point of the "planet". And in this vein, there are two options for accounting for the last change.
- The first (2.1) - The earth is movably fixed by its center on a hinge, relative to which it can tilt in one direction or another. The center of the Earth is tied to the Moscow region. The place of this tilt moves around the circle of the Earth for the period we identified of 259.2 years. The place of this tilt is perceived by us as a consequence of the precessional tilt of the Earth's axis. And because of the tilt, the temperature distribution on Earth changes.
- The second option (2.2) - the Earth is movably at rest on a flat surface and periodically, at a speed of one PERIOD in 259.2 years, rotates around its axis in its own horizontal plane. The center of the Earth is tied to the Moscow region. The period may correspond to a 90 degree turn (possibly 60 degrees). In this case, the old north-south axis becomes the new equator, and the old equator becomes the new north-south direction. Climatic zones change accordingly.
In our opinion, it is the second option (2.2) that is the most adequate model. And, if this is so, then the appearance in antiquity of an ice shell in the West, in Europe, is a consequence of just this - the flat rotation of the Earth by 90 degrees in relation to its previous position.
But it should be noted that this turn is carried out either this way (turn of the Earth), or there is a similar adequate turn of Heaven in relation to the motionless Earth in this case.
If option 2.2 is correct, then the situation of climatic periodicity can be described as follows. Every 259.2 years, the Earth rotates 90 degrees counterclockwise when viewed from “space”. Or there is a rotation of the outer "space", the Sky, relative to the motionless Earth by the same amount - but clockwise.
As a result of such a turn, the area of the Earth that was previously the North Pole begins to undergo heating and gradually becomes not the Arctic, but the equatorial system. The area that was the equatorial system gradually freezes and becomes a new pole, on which a new thick cap of perennial ice is gathering. The depth of freezing and warming up of zones is a separate issue.
The center of rotation is the Navel of the Earth, which, according to different versions, is located in different places. One Navel of the Earth is installed on Red Square in Moscow and is called "Execution Ground" (from the word "pubis", that is, the navel). The Navel of the Earth itself is made in the form of a flat Earth model.
Figure: 4. Photo of the Execution Ground in Moscow (late 19th - early 20th centuries). The clergy gathered inside the Execution Ground.
The change in the location of the poles on the Earth is accompanied by corresponding changes both in relation to ice and in relation to the water contained in the World Ocean. Old ice caps are melting, creating a temporary influx of water and raising the level of the World Ocean, and this high level remains until the new poles collect water in new glaciers.
During the transition period, fluctuations in the level of the World Ocean are proportional to the total area of the new and old poles. The larger the area under the new glacier, the lower the level of the World Ocean will be in the post-Flood epoch (see, for example, the higher the ratio of glaciations and changes in the level of the Caspian Sea).
The period when the old glacier has melted, and the new one has not yet taken shape, is perceived as a worldwide FLOOD. (This phenomenon is similar to the spring flood, when the melted water arrives faster than it is carried away by rivers.) After the turn of the sky, the water level rises, the water stands for some time, then begins to subside, freeing the flooded lands. The category of universality is relative. For those people who live near flooded areas, this is really a flood. But for those who live far from the sea, the flood may never happen.
Returning to the point where we described the modern turmoil around the South Pole, it should be noted that perhaps some government forces are aware of the truth of the concept presented here. The expectation of an imminent polarity reversal of the imminent melting of Antarctica glaciers prompts the authorities of states to initiate their rights to this continent.
Andrey Tyunyaev