In the previous part, I talked about the unexplained (and not explained by shy historians so far) strangeness of the war of 1812, which is presented to us as Patriotic.
Prerequisites
According to the assumptions of numerous researchers, imperial Tartary (read more about it "Tartary - the first great empire"), after the natural cataclysm of the second half of the 18th century, which destroyed its metropolis - the kingdom of Katai, lost its "stability" and began to gradually crumble.
Fragment of the map of Tartary with the Katay region.
Tartary is divided into Moscow (belonging to Muscovy), Chinese-Chinskaya (belonging to China-Chin) and Independent, which is obviously so named due to its independence from neighboring states, for example, Persia, with which it borders. There is also Tartary Malaya, but in the 18th century, together with the Crimea, it belongs to the Ottoman Empire, the ruling dynasty of which is from Tartaria (more precisely, from its region - Turkestan), which can be learned from Latin sources of the Middle Ages. Tibet with Lhasa comes under the jurisdiction of Beijing. On the territory of the Independent and the Chinese-Chinsk Tartary, many hordes (horde) with their local khans are scattered.
Quite quickly, the Tartar kingdoms (like the republics in the USSR at one time) begin to split off and go under the control of neighboring empires: the Siberian lands retreat to Muscovy (by 1730, the border of the conquered Siberia stretches along the Ural River), the Tartar lands near China-China become part of the Chinese Empire, in which the same tartars from the Niuche province have ruled since 1644 (in the official history they are called the Manchus, in old books - always only tartars, for more details read China's Fake Antiquity. White Gods.). Free, or Independent Tartary for some time still remains more or less independent and sovereign. But later, large neighbors divide it among themselves. Since 1452, Little Tartary and Crimea have belonged to the Ottomans (descendants of the Osman / Ottoman commander from the army of the Great Khan of Tartaria).
Promotional video:
Moscow Tartary
The so-called "peasant wars" of Razin and Pugachev ("Suvorov against Pugachev") are considered a continuation of the wars for the heritage of the empire. They weakened, but did not completely eliminate the remaining fragments of Great Tartary.
Another war between Tartary and Europe took place at the beginning of the nineteenth century. In our country it is known as the "Patriotic War of 1812", and in Europe it was called the "Eastern campaign of Napoleon."
It is interesting that for the average person, until the beginning of the 20th century, it was clear who was fighting with whom and for what. And the attitude towards Napoleon Bonaparte was sublime and enthusiastic, he was clearly not considered an aggressor and "the culprit of all the troubles of the people", as they represent now. They wrote poems about him, wrote articles and plays, just a popular and beloved hero!
No one was puzzled or questioned by the monuments to the soldiers of the All-European Great Army, installed in the places of battles, crossings and just stops.
Commemorative and jubilee medals, sets, perfumes and other things depicting the "invader" and "murderer" of hundreds of thousands of Russian soldiers (again, according to the official version) - Bonaparte. That in the Russian army, most of the officers were foreigners who lived and died outside of Russia. The children of impoverished European nobles, finding no other way to make a career, came to St. Petersburg en masse to enlist in the army and navy. And having earned a pension, they returned to their homeland.
No wonder the people called black cockroaches "Prussians", because they, like cockroaches, rushed from Europe through the "window" open in the Baltic to Russia. From the shores of the Baltic, the "Prussians" crawled farther and farther in all directions. In large cities, they founded their settlements, such as existed even before the "opening of the window to Europe", for example, in Pskov and Novgorod. And after all, it is precisely their merit that the Russian city of Pleskov began to be called in the German manner: - Pskow. And immediately after the extermination of the population on the Volga, after the war with the armies of Emelyan Pugachev, ordinary peasants from Europe also rushed to the space "cleaned" of tartar. They, according to the plans of Catherine II, had to completely replace the Tartar population, so that even memories of the past of the Volga region would not remain. Today such a process would be called detartarization.
For the full implementation of the plans of the Holstein-Gottorp dynasty for expansion to the east and southeast, it was necessary to break the last center / city around which the remnants of the once mighty Tartar Empire united - Moscow, the capital of Moscow Tartary.
By the way
If we are correctly told the story of Napoleon's Eastern campaign (note that in this phrase there is not a word about the campaign to Russia, which, as we are told, he was so eager to conquer), then several questions arise about the posthumous honors rendered by the Russian tsars to Bonaparte:
1) Why did Alexander the Third build a bridge in Paris (as a gift) dedicated to Napoleon, where the initial letters of the two countries are woven together inside a laurel wreath - a symbol of victory, and there is also Nike - the goddess of victory in the composition? Is this a kind of trolling of the French by winning the war of 1812? It is unlikely that the French would have appreciated it, and it is too tense … On the other hand, if this is gratitude for the help in the conquest of Moscow Tartary, then everything falls into place and the question does not arise - why did not France give Russia such a bridge, as an apology for " aggression ".
2) Why on the Palace Square in St. Petersburg (it is symbolic that the capital of Russia was called by a German name) they built a reflection of the column installed on the Place Vendome of Paris (in memory of the victories of Napoleon's Great Army), and even crowned with a Catholic cross, pressing with its base either a snake, then or a dragon (did the sculptor hint at the Zilant Snake - the last symbol of Tartary, and more specifically Kazan?). In an early edition of poems, Pushkin calls her Napoleon (and not the Alexandrian) pillar …
3) Why did Nikolai the First give (again a gift - why such generosity?) A 200-ton block of Karelian porphyry for Napoleon's tombstone? Again, the same analogy as in the first question.
4) Why in St. Petersburg and Moscow, built copies of the Triumphal Arches of the Holy Roman Empire, crowned by the Roman goddess Nika (copies of the Roman, Paris and Berlin arches)? Aren't the winners put such arches under their OWN symbols? So who is really the winner in the War of 1812?
5) If they tell us everything correctly and Alexander freed Europe from Napoleon's IGA, then why, in gratitude to the "liberator" (historians give us such a nickname for Alexander, right?), There are no monuments in Europe, and there are a great many to the "enslaver" Bonaparte ?!
In my opinion, from the point of view of the official version of history, all this can be explained with great stretch and abstract theses, but the alternative version explains these and other issues in a simpler and more logical way, but of course, this is ONLY ONE OF THE VERSIONS.
Eastern campaign
As I wrote in a previous article, in France, the war of 1812 is called Napoleon's Eastern campaign (just one of his many military expeditions), for obvious reasons, the researchers did not have and probably will not have access to the true (not falsified) documents. Therefore, everything that follows in this chapter refers to assumptions.
In the middle of the Nemunas.
1807 Alexander and Napoleon in Tilsit sign a peace treaty and a secret on offensive and defensive alliance. The famous top-secret talks between the two emperors strictly in private on a raft in the middle of the Nemunas.
1808 - another meeting between Alexander and Napoleon took place in Erfurt, where a secret convention was signed. Based on the results of the meeting, the final decision was made to invade Moscow Tartary. Alesander begins the formation and training of the people's militia (documentary fact).
In the eighth French bulletin of the Grand Army (this is how the united European army under the command of Napoleon was called in France) dated June 22, 1812, it is said that Emperor Alexander led the Grand Army and took it to Dvina (the chroniclers got it wrong, or vice versa, everything was so - the Russian tsar according to the conditions secret agreement, was also the commander of the Grand Army?).
Perhaps the European and Russian (Russian) troops prepared and began a joint operation, where everyone (Napoleon and Alexander) had to get what he was striving for. Alexander had to destroy Moscow and Moscow Tartary in order to completely subjugate the territories up to the Urals. Napoleon, fighting with Britain, assumed (this is recorded in writing, below will be a link to the materials), after the Eastern campaign, together with the Russian troops (!), Move to India in order to deprive Britain of its richest colony (he had the same plans earlier with Paul, father Alexandra).
Perhaps (this is just a guess!), This was the essence of the secret deal concluded in 1807 and executed in 1808 (see above in the text). In this case, all the absurdities of the course, description, material evidence and logistic inconsistencies of 1812 fall into place:
Linear attack.
1) Despite the beginning of preparations for war in 1810 (a plan of military operations, maps of the terrain, prepared crossings, newly created engineering troops, formed 3 armies and much more), the Russian troops were not united into one army and the first battle was fought in 340 km from the border of the empire (official version) / dispersal of the Russian armies, was a single campaign plan, a strategic plan designed to create threats in different directions and prevent the enemy (Tartar troops) from concentrating forces in one place (alt. version).
2) The Great Army, namely 600 thousand soldiers and hundreds of thousands of horses, fed on the "holy spirit" (it is absurd to carry food and fodder from Europe, and the population of the war zone scattered through the forests without waiting for enemy foragers - official version) / supply armies came from pre-prepared warehouses in the western provinces of allied Russia (remember about two years of training?) (alt. version).
3) The Russian army successfully retreated, with practically no battles, and the French army suffered significant losses in battles with the partisans (while the Russian army suffered losses comparable to the French - official version) / battles took place with the united Tartar army (they are depicted on the old French engravings, like bearded men with pikes, in non-European uniforms and headdresses - hence the loss) (alt. version).
Bearded men with crooked sabers are fighting with Napoleon.
4) The civilian population caught and successfully exterminated the officers of both the French and the Russians because of the inherent denseness of the Russian citizens and the similar form of the military of the two armies (official version) / the allied European and Russian armies, had a common charter, a military uniform proposed to Alexander Napoleon and French as the official language (these are all documentary facts), and the civilians were clearly aware of whom they were slaughtering - the invaders (alt. version).
5) Looting flourished in the Russian army, due to the low moral qualities of the soldiers (but later, in Europe, such cases could be counted on the fingers of one hand - the soldiers were probably re-educated - official version) / foreign territory, defeated population (in Europe there was already “liberated”), Therefore it was robbed by both French and Russian soldiers (alt. Version).
Who are the partisans? Or Tartar warriors?
6) Barclay De Tolly lost the battle for Smolensk, the army retreats, and Kutuzov receives the highest decree "for military merit, military valor and hope of all Europe for deliverance" - 100 thousand rubles, Bagration - 50 thousand rubles, the lower ranks also fell (as after victories - official version) / took cities (Tartar), won battles (Tartar troops), approached the goal of the entire campaign - Moscow, the capital of Moscow Tartary, in general there was something to reward for (alt. version).
7) Moscow was surrendered and burned in accordance with a "brilliant" strategic plan (as well as all civilians, several tens of thousands of wounded, treasury and relics - all on the altar of victory !, official version) / the city was taken by storm (in France there is a medal "For the capture of Moscow”, as well as numerous engravings and drawings by contemporaries depicting the storming of the city), were plundered and burned in order to destroy even the idea of its return from the Tartars (alt. version).
Napoleon in Moscow.
8) Napoleon, in his letter to Alexander, apologizes for entering Moscow (official version) / apologizes for entering the conquered Moscow FIRST, thereby depriving Alexander of the right of triumph (alt. Version).
9) Napoleon sits for a long time in devastated and burned-out Moscow, waiting for Alexander to offer peace (!), And not waiting for him (surprisingly!), He goes back along the "old" road, because Kutuzov (who never defeated him) became on his way and did not let him along another route (never before or after, this did not stop Napoleon) (official version) / according to the campaign plan, the Great Army reached the Volga (in France there is a medal "For the capture of the Volga") and having completed its obligations, turned back (due to Alexander's refusal to fulfill his part of the agreement on India), following the "old" road, because Napoleon was a Great Man who appreciated ordinary people / soldiers, for which he was loved in the "captured" Europe and in Russia (alt. version).
The Great Army leaves Russia.
10) Kutuzov did not attack the leaving army in order to save his soldiers (though this did not help him - the losses of the Russian army were comparable to the French - official version) / Alexander betraying Napoleon (as before his father Pavel), tried to save his “tarnished reputation and ordered not to touch the former ally (and it did not help him - he was despised in Europe) (alt. version).
11) Along the entire route of the military campaign, there are monuments of the Great Army, medals and things are issued depicting Napoleon as an ally - due to the kindness of the soul of the Russian people, who does not remember evil (as well as hundreds of thousands of Russian souls ruined by the war - official version) / French eagles over the monuments, banners and memorials, medals and rave reviews - all this is the gratitude of the authorities for their help in the conquest of Moscow Tartary (alt. version).
Which version most logically explains the intricate events of that time, it is up to everyone to decide for himself. But for completeness, I recommend using the links to previous articles on this topic given above in the text.
Conclusion
In Europe, in the public domain there are many maps of that time, on which the territory of the Russian Empire in its classical form does not exist. Many of them show two countries: Russia - in the north / west and Muscovy in the central part, as well as several different Tartaries in the south and southeast. But there are also maps in the form in which we are used to seeing the Russian Empire. We can talk about falsification or incompetence of cartographers, compilers of atlases, books and encyclopedias, both from one point of view and from another. In my opinion, this is a matter of personal perception.
German map of Russia 1863 - the eastern border runs clearly along the Urals.
Only one thing can be said unequivocally - the history of our country is distorted and requires an honest, unbiased approach. True, we always have problems with this, and in Russia there is always a moment that is not suitable: either turmoil, or war, or perestroika / reform, or the enemies around are stirring - not up to history yet (not to the truth). We "digest" what is given, while it is still being given ….
The alternative version of events set out in the article is a private, personal opinion and does not represent a claim for the only correct one.
PS: There are some not widely known facts that suggest that the war of 1812 was part of the redivision of the world, ending the era of the intercontinental empire of Great Tartary, but more on that in the next article….
Continued: Part 3