The last hundred years can be called without any convention the time of scientific and technological revolutions. There were so many discoveries in various fields of science and inventions that it is difficult to even list them. But for all these decades, it was not possible to find something that can replace gasoline. And therefore nothing more perfect than an internal combustion engine, turbine, jet engine has been invented. No cure has been developed to cure cancer. An option has not been found that would solve the food problem.
Why is that? Are there no such alternatives? Or were you looking in the wrong place? Or maybe the matter is completely different?
Alternative fuel
Discussion of the problem of creating environmentally friendly and cheap fuel has been going on for a long time. But the matter does not go beyond discussions. But there is such fuel. For example, the products of hydrogen combustion are water. In addition, this gas, burning, gives a lot of energy. Getting hydrogen is not difficult. There are various ways that the industry uses.
The reason for not using hydrogen, called by its opponents (or defenders of oil monopolies), is that this gas can explode. In the event of any malfunction, the car's fuel tank will work no worse than a powerful bomb. What, can't a gas tank explode? In addition, if desired and at some cost, you can create a small installation that will split water into components right in the car, sending the resulting hydrogen into the engine cylinders. In this case, there is no need to talk about any explosion.
It is hard to believe that it is not possible to create or mass-produce the necessary equipment. So, the point is different. For what reasons and who does not need cars to drive on water, and not on refined petroleum products, there is probably no need to tell. Here's one example. During the year, 62,000,000 tons of fuel (gasoline and diesel fuel) are burned in various engines in Russia alone. In addition, Russia exports 14,000,000 tons. How many of these millions are burned up in engines around the world? If desired, such information can be found.
Promotional video:
"Incurable" cancer
In September last year, the International Non-Profit Organization "World Cancer Research Background" published indicators characterizing the picture of cancer. Research results say that 12,000,000 cancer cases are recorded on the planet every year. To ensure the treatment of the sick, not a small amount is needed. We are talking about $ 286 billion.
Is there any other way out? He exists. So, back in 1983, the Italian Gennaro Sangermano, was treated by the oncologist Tulio Simoncini. According to doctors involved in traditional methods of treatment, the patient had less than a year to live. With Simoncini, he completely got rid of cancer in a short period. The success of the doctor was officially registered, with the results he turned to the Italian Ministry of Health. The doctor was confident that medical officials would immediately take action to conduct clinical trials of his method.
The result was unexpected. Officials urgently revoked the doctor's license. The media began a company in which Simoncini was subjected to real persecution. It got to the point that the doctor was put behind bars for 3 years. At the same time, the world community was assured that in this case it was about the murder of patients.
The doctor treated patients with sodium bicarbonate, that is, ordinary soda. According to the official version, this method is just "nonsense". What does mainstream medicine offer in return? Proven chemotherapy that is fatal.
Dr. Simoncini continues to work. Using bicarbonate, it relieves people from suffering, even in cases when it comes to the 4th stage of oncology. In this case, the treatment takes from several days to several months. Sometimes the doctor just gives recommendations, explains the sequence of actions. This does not even happen in person, but by phone or via the Internet. The results are positive. Patients are saved by "penny" soda.
"Not enough" food
According to the official version, the planet is overpopulated with people. She simply is not able to feed the entire population.
Such a statement is, to put it mildly, far-fetched. Yes, in the same Africa food is not enough. But this does not mean that the surplus available in Europe, Asia, America should be taken there. Everything is much simpler. L. Ron Hubbard in 1960 made a discovery that provides a manifold increase in yield. All that is needed is a special treatment of the seed material. The research results of the Englishman by the interested parties were rather quickly "hushed up". It became profitable for someone that the world community did not know about them.
Theories and conspiracies
The examples given can support the hypothesis that there is a global conspiracy on the plan. Its goal is to exterminate most of the people. Is it so? Doubtful. Most likely, such a hypothesis is needed so that people feel unprotected, be sure that there is no way out of a difficult situation.
It doesn't matter if such a conspiracy exists. If we are talking about some conspirators, then the matter is completely different. The main reason is selfishness. Billionaires are only interested in the profits that they receive and can receive in the future. And therefore their own well-being is more important for them than the interests of billions of inhabitants of the planet. At the same time, they simply do not want to understand that their egoism leads to the destruction of not only the future of billions of people, but their comfortable existence in the future will also be destroyed.
What do you need to do to change your own future? The answer is simple - at least not to think only of yourself, not to imitate the heroes of stupid serials. All of them, along with "low-quality" detectives, fashion magazines and everything else that is constantly imposed by the electronic and print media, take people away from real life.
A person always has a choice.
Before you make any decision that will affect others, you need to ask the question - what will happen if other people do the same in relation to someone? When making a choice, one must remember that there are always only two options. The third - a neutral "all the same", will lead to a negative result.
If at least every second resident of the country thinks not only about himself but also about others, the situation will change for the better. Incurable diseases will disappear, there will be enough food for everyone, and our industry, cars, trains, airplanes will stop polluting the earth, water, and the atmosphere. Because ecological fuel will replace petroleum products now. Indeed, over the past century, discoveries in this area (artificially forgotten) have been made quite a lot.