Baalbek: Under The Thousand-ton Stone Blocks, Something Incredible Is Hidden - Alternative View

Baalbek: Under The Thousand-ton Stone Blocks, Something Incredible Is Hidden - Alternative View
Baalbek: Under The Thousand-ton Stone Blocks, Something Incredible Is Hidden - Alternative View

Video: Baalbek: Under The Thousand-ton Stone Blocks, Something Incredible Is Hidden - Alternative View

Video: Baalbek: Under The Thousand-ton Stone Blocks, Something Incredible Is Hidden - Alternative View
Video: Baalbek without Aliens? Mystery of the Great Megaliths 2024, May
Anonim

Photos of the new excavations show that something unimaginable is buried under the giant stone blocks.

You've probably already heard about the mysterious 1000-thousandth stones of Baalbek, the (so-called) quarry. However, recent archaeological excavations at this site have shown that the 1,000 ton rock is just the tip of the iceberg. There are even larger stones underneath. Their weight is probably around 3000 tons, judging by these latest images.

They are so huge for this so-called "quarry" that it seems that under Baalbek there is something unimaginably HUGE, perhaps an ancient megalithic wall or some kind of building. We live in exciting times.

From the editor:

The only reason official archeology still calls the site a "quarry" is because they have no explanation for how ancient people could have moved such huge blocks at that time. And so they should call it a career, because by calling it something else, they invalidate all current theories of how human civilization has evolved since ancient times. By calling Baalbek something other than a "quarry", they at the same time admit that their current theories are wrong.

Also, note that we see four megalithic cut stones, all at an angle of 30 degrees, while the rest of Baalbek is flat from Roman times. One would assume that these carved stones also once had a flat layout, but when are we talking about? Could it be that the tectonic plate on which Baalbek is located moved 30 degrees after the stones were carved, and is this proof that the carved stones are older than, for example, a Roman palace?