In the information field such concepts as “ontopsychology” and “ontological thinking”, “ontologists” and “ontotechnologies” began to appear more and more often. This was preceded by the appearance of educational institutions of this kind, the spread of which has signs of a systemic nature. This is the “School of Ontological Thinking” under the supervision of the Agency for Strategic Initiatives (ASI), and the Department of Social Ontopsychology at the Faculty of Psychology at the Russian State Social University (Moscow), as well as the Slavic Association of Ontopsychology. An inquisitive reader can independently, using open information sources, continue this list.
In this article, we will tell you for the achievement of which main goals and for the solution of what tasks ontotechnologies are used, how they are used by those who are at the "helm" of power.
What is Ontotechnology?
It must be said that while studying materials on this topic, we encountered not only a rather complicated philosophical language, but also a version of its modern interpretation - ontological language. It is precisely this that is used by ontotechnologists. The concepts and terms they use, by the very fact of their existence, on the one hand, are a barrier to the study of ontotechnologies and understanding of the true meanings, and on the other hand, it is an element of initiation into a small circle of “chosen ones” who supposedly know something that others do not know. In this regard, it is appropriate to recall that in the modern degraded world, people often use any of their superiority in anything for social parasitism. That is why our main assumptions regarding ontotechnologists are thatthat the new "chosen" caste of ontotechnologists is a banal social parasite who will use their knowledge to manipulate society. Moreover, it is impossible to dispel such assumptions with words, you need to show the opposite with your deeds.
In this article, we dismantled the masking screen in the form of an ontological language and concepts, highlighted the real essence of ontotechnologies, and also showed the areas of their practical application. Let's start in order, with the theoretical part of the question.
This definition of ontology is given by the official reference materials:
Promotional video:
Modern schools of ontological thinking put meanings in ontology and endow it with certain features. It is believed that ontology is found in the existential, i.e. the ultimate situation for a person. A person acquires thinking and at the same time ontology, forming an ontological idea. We can say that a person turns to this or that ontology as to a certain religious faith. It is equally important that any ontology is rational, focused on the unity of being and thinking. Let us emphasize that the limit of ontology is the essence of the limit for thinking, since it characterizes not what is thought and can be defined as the boundary of the world, but how it is thought, i.e. thinking itself. Also important is the significant distinction between border and limit. From the point of view of ontologists, overcoming the border should bring freedom and development,but in one way or another it is opposed to the everyday “simple life” in which the overwhelming majority of people live, considering it the only real one. Exceeding the limit of thinking for ontologists is followed by madness, chaos, disintegration of personality, etc. From the above, we can conclude that ontologists by their activities are trying to build some boundaries for their own thoughts and images (ontological thinking), beyond which the exit is taboo in advance.beyond which the exit is taboo in advance.beyond which the exit is taboo in advance.
In fact, ontologists set a tunnel scenario for the formation of a worldview. Taking into account that specialists-ontologists in our country are trained on a systematic basis, they are being prepared for the role of creators of a dynamic tunnel scenario for society in order to predictably manage it. Let us recall the two-part film "Moscow - Cassiopeia" and "Revelations in the Universe", where people first created robots-executors (biorobots) and then robots-executors (a kind of demons-ontologists), who then decided to improve a person, depriving him of all senses. In addition, in the process of training ontotechnologists, they themselves form a tunnel worldview, which means that they will act sincerely and furiously in different areas of the national economic complex.
Ontological principles, scalability, and basic techniques for influencing public institutions will be described below.
Ontotechnologies and application methods
Modern ontologists claim that their knowledge makes it possible to identify cause-and-effect relationships and their possible interactions in various phenomena and processes. As mentioned above, a conceptual and terminological apparatus has been developed for ontotechnologists - an ontological language that reflects the hierarchical structure and subordination within various ontologies. Below, with some generalization and brevity, we describe the scheme of work of various onto specialists.
Let's start with the carrier of basic functions - an ontologist engineer.
An ontologist engineer defines a specific subject area in which he will work. For example, it can be both managing a small commercial enterprise and solving problems at the regional level. Further, all objects and subjects in a given area, their relationships and relationships between them are determined.
Then ontologists-conceptualizers enter the work, whose task is to draw up a “conceptual” map. This process is called "conceptualization", which, in turn, solves two main tasks:
- Construction of "structural relations" (our note - direct and feedback) between subjects and objects (our note is a multilayer map with a whole set of closed systems, where the subject can be considered simultaneously as an object of control).
- Building "inherited relationships" when one object is subordinate to another through property inheritance. The relationships between the properties of objects are revealed (our note is that it is taken into account that information is transmitted not only through culture, but also by genetic means).
Structural and inherited relationships are called by ontologists "relationship ontology." In them, "hard" logic connects objects into one whole, for example: a car and a wheel from it - these objects of various kinds can make up a single whole, but a part of the whole does not have the properties of the whole. A father can have many sons, but a son always has one biological father, and so on.
Next, a conceptual architect enters the work, who is engaged in conceptual design. At this stage, relationships are established between subject locations (our note is relationships between closed systems), which have structural and inherited relationships - this is how a "transdisciplinary" (interdisciplinary) ontology is formed, which is considered the most significant task.
As a rule, all work takes place in a single digital space, on a specially created platform, through dynamic schematization, providing access to it for a large number of ontologist users for collective work using collective intelligence in an online mode, which eliminates the need to find “included” specialists for face-to-face interaction in one place, the flexibility and efficiency of the entire structure increases.
Ontotechnologists, through ontological thinking, identify the interactions of subjects and objects, identifying their boundaries and limits. Structural and inherited ontologies of relations and their descriptions identified in these ranges are the essence of the so-called a priori knowledge.
Unlike ontologists, we believe that only God's predetermination of existence can be a priori knowledge, and a person is engaged in comprehending this multivariate matrix. If the worldview is not God-first, which is typical of ontologists in principle, then the perception and understanding of a priori knowledge has a completely different meaning for them, far from being true, since it is based on the satisfaction and confirmation of their own self-centrism in their distorted kaleidoscopic worldview with a mosaic that disintegrates with distance from the i-center.
Proceeding from the inadequate understanding by ontologists of what a priori knowledge is, the question arises: is it objective that so-called a priori knowledge in general can be identified and be in the field of modern ontological relations?
Even if we assume that knowledge that was once true for someone in ancient times, under the influence of the historical process in a long time interval, significantly transformed, as well as ontological relations. That is, ontological technologists are guided in their activities by historically established ontological relations that have undergone an unknown transformation, which were determined by the transforming social culture. Accordingly, modern ontological relations cannot objectively reflect and confirm the essence and truth of being. In addition, the modern cultural environment is degrading in its essence and forms stereotypes and degradation-parasitic aspirations of people with a corresponding moral and ethical component.
Based on the information presented above, it becomes clear that the so-called "a priori knowledge" is not such, it is just a set of statistics and predetermines obtained in local areas of ontological relations. The development of such statistics and predetermines with their subsequent use in "ontological design" is nothing more than a rather well-disguised way of imitating solutions to socio-economic problems of society, as well as creating conditions for preserving the existing crowd-elite social order …
It should also be noted that ontotechnologies were created and are used to solve special problems, including the global level of significance. Since the issue of creating high-level artificial intelligence is on the active agenda of the global elites, then ontotechnologists play a special role in this matter. They collect structural and inherited transdisciplinary relationships, concentrating and organizing them on one digital platform in order to further fit them into the algorithms of artificial intelligence. Thus, applying ontotechnologies and using collective human intelligence, they saturate machine intelligence with knowledge. So ontotechnologies were included directly in the implementation of the philosophical concept of transhumanism in its practical part.
The beginning of ontopsychology was laid by Antonio Meneghetti - an Italian philosopher, theologian, sociologist, composer, artist and “other, other, other”. Ontopsychology has a project called "Man of the Third Millennium", from which it can be understood that the aspirations of the ontopsychological project are global, and in some respects, ontopsychology will be more abruptly than Scientology, although, like Scientology, it pursues the goal of preserving the crowd- "elite" public devices.
In our understanding, ontopsychology is a “miscarriage” of the Western regional civilization, which occurred in an attempt to generate its own conceptual power, its own acting internal predictor for life in the post-biblical era. The fact is that every society carries in itself the predetermination of management by its full function, i.e. according to the predictor-corrector scheme simply by virtue of the fact that a person is intelligent. In conditions when management according to any concept falls into a crisis, the power of this concept over society decreases, which opens the way for the trend towards the generation of a new predictor in society and the new conceptual power exercised by it.
Ontopsychology appeared precisely in such a period when biblical culture, both in its religiously cultic and openly atheistic secular form, entered a deep systemic crisis. However, ontopsychology is still not a means of solving problems, but an unviable "miscarriage" in an attempt to generate conceptual power for life in the post-biblical era, because:
- She agrees with the crowd-"elitist" organization of the life of society;
- Her pedagogy is aimed at educating the carriers of the demonic type of the psyche, which should form the "elite" of the new society, and not the humane type of the psyche as the norm for all;
- It expresses a self-centered worldview and develops on the basis of a self-centered worldview;
- According to the I-centrism of the worldview, the system of extremely generalizing categories in its understanding of the world is not at all the trinity of matter-information-measure, but "In Se" (analogue of Scientology "Q") - the deep inner true "I" of a person, distorted by the influence of this world, which is default matter, energy in space and time;
- Cultivates demonism that fosters corporate solidarity in grazing the crowd;
- Traditional beliefs are classified as historically transient phenomena, however, the issues of personal relationships between man and God are not classified as the most significant for the individual and society;
- Ontopsychology is characterized by a dual morality, which opens up the possibility of building a system "esotericism - exoterism", exploiting ignorance and delusion and therefore suicidal for society:
The practical application of ontopsychology is expressed in the form of an ideological influence on various onto-specialists. It is ontopsychologists who set the framework consciousness for their adherents, excluding moral guidelines.
For example. Before an onto-engineer is allowed to create a conceptual map that connects objects and subjects in a particular area, he undergoes an intensive ontological thinking training under the guidance of mentors. The student begins to see the marks of thinking, on the basis of which he creates his own map of thinking, which sets the vector of his further actions. At the same time, master mentors insist on the need for mandatory and constant interaction with them within the framework of clubs or schools of ontological thinking. All this is very similar to clearing in Scientology, only with a different conceptual and terminological apparatus.
The student develops the ability to work in different types, ways, methods of thinking - this is called stereo thinking. In stereo thinking, it is fundamentally important to look at what the ontologist creates from different perspectives and roles. Guru-ontologists call the skill of switching between types of thinking the stereo effect. Thinking in this logic acts as a telescope that creates reality in the direction of the ontologist's gaze.
Ontotechnologies in public administration
In order to understand how and for what ontotechnologies are used in public administration, it is necessary to return to some of our earlier publications, since any explanation based only on the facts of the topic of this section, without interconnection with longer intervals of the ongoing management processes, will be a fragment from the whole.
To form a holistic picture, we recommend that readers familiarize themselves with the IAC article “Games in“methodology”or to whose tune do the“technocrats”dance?
In continuation to the article, it should be noted that at present the Scientology "circle" of generous technocrats is still actively working in the Presidential Administration under the visible leadership of First Deputy Chief of Staff S. V. Kirienko. However, the situation in public administration has changed as much as the situation in society has changed. Changing the Government, making amendments to the Constitution is only a visible part of the adaptation period of the state apparatus to changing environmental conditions. Realizing the incapacity of the current system of public administration and having previously assumed the responsibility to transfer public administration to a more advanced program-adaptive control scheme, in which management decisions are formed taking into account feedback from the control object,technocrats are faced with the problem of their own survival in the face of increasing social turbulence. The fact is that the software-adaptive module in the control scheme will be effective when the feedback collected from the control object will be objective in nature with minimal distortion.
But when this condition is fulfilled, the subjectivity of the control object invariably increases through the following algorithm. With an increase in the collection of objective feedbacks from the control object, followed by a timely reaction of the control subject to them in order to correct its control and form the following management decisions, a large part of the population is actively involved in socially significant processes. Here it must be said that, in accordance with the Law of Normal Distribution, healthy social forces are also involved in the processes, since people begin to understand that they can really influence the management processes in their region, municipality, district, etc., confidence appears that something depends on them, that the authorities "hear" them.
This gradually leads to an increase in the awareness and self-organization of the population, an understanding of cause-and-effect relationships and the "exposure" of the true motives and intentions of the authorities when they make certain managerial decisions, which, as it often turns out, run counter to the aspirations and expectations of the people, since these solutions are designed to serve the interests of only a quantitative minority of people - elite groups. As a result, social tension increases, trust in the authorities decreases, and people's discontent increases. The power is experiencing growing pressure from the environment, the stability of management is falling, the prerequisites and necessary conditions are being created to take over control, which is unacceptable for the current "rulers". Not for that clan-bureaucratic groups fought for power in order to give it to someone. For them, the over-pressing task at the present time is to hold on to power as long as possible. In support of these words, it is worth recalling how Leonid Trotsky spoke allegorically at one time: “The time will come - and we will be asked to leave the Earth. But, leaving, we will slam the door so that the sky will collapse! ".
An important point should be pointed out here, which is that in the short and medium term, the potential of the program-adaptive control scheme for Generous Scientologists was known in advance, since such a scenario, at least, was modeled by them through organizational-activity games.
Further, having identified the initial dynamics of a negative scenario for itself, the authorities began to gradually adjust management in order to preserve themselves. It is important to note that the consistency in stages is due to the fact that those in power want to squeeze out the full potential of the existing management scheme. Figuratively speaking, each stage of correction looks like a change of scenery for the people, a kind of screen behind which socially parasitic elements in the form of various bureaucratic oligarchic clans are trying to hide. The control correction has led to the almost complete disappearance of objective feedbacks - either an average is collected, or mutually exclusive statistics are collected on one issue. As a result - an increase in the number of unfulfilled promises and the solution of secondary problems instead of priority ones. The result of this was the ultimate formalization of the technologies and techniques used, included in the software-adaptive module, as a result, imitation activity and the formation of a large-scale illusion of caring for the people and supposedly increasing their comfort in life.
Figuratively, this situation can be imagined as if a patient with an acute attack of appendicitis, but who himself did not know about it, complained to the doctor about abdominal pain, and the doctor, knowing the true picture, began to give daily anesthetic injections and tell the patient that the pain would soon subside and everything will be fine. In this case, the outcome for the patient will be predetermined, but the doctor will remain a doctor for some short time, until the medical crime is disclosed.
With regard to our case, it is important to understand that imitation for the people is created purposefully and deliberately, in order to show pseudo-positive illusory dynamics and continue to possess managerial capabilities.
We recommend our readers to read the article of the IAC “Moscow Region. Breakthrough or abscess"
Since the Moscow region is considered to be the foremost initiator of various kinds of innovations, the negative processes identified in the system of regional governance are of particular interest, since technocrats have prepared a similar path for all regions of the Russian Federation. In the article, using the example of the Moscow region, we reveal the whole process, from the beginning of implementation to the “decline” of the program-adaptive control scheme. In this situation, the further actions of technocrats - generous people are interesting. Having exhausted the potential of the existing control scheme, they set about homework called ontotechnologies. And - right from the federal level. Here it is important to understand that ontotechnologies are designed for longer periods of application of social management in comparison with the program-adaptive scheme and to recognize the imitation component,masking the true motives of technocrats among the general public, and among those who are initiated and involved in the dissemination of these technologies, will be extremely difficult. It is of interest that through the implementation of ontotechnologies a more efficient control scheme is actually introduced, which provides some stability in predictability. But the reality for technocrats is that no matter what tricks they use, trying to stay in power, all this will be only a temporary measure. The fact is that using ontological technologies in public administration, there will be a constant expansion of boundaries and limits in ontological relations, which will inevitably lead to the disclosure of the essence of this scheme of manipulating society with subsequent dismantling.it will be extremely difficult. It is of interest that through the implementation of ontotechnologies a more efficient control scheme is actually introduced, which provides some stability in predictability. But the reality for technocrats is that no matter what tricks they use, trying to stay in power, all this will be only a temporary measure. The fact is that using ontological technologies in public administration, there will be a constant expansion of boundaries and limits in ontological relations, which will inevitably lead to the disclosure of the essence of this scheme of manipulating society with subsequent dismantling.it will be extremely difficult. It is of interest that through the implementation of ontotechnologies a more efficient control scheme is actually introduced, which provides some stability in predictability. But the reality for technocrats is that no matter what tricks they use, trying to stay in power, all this will be only a temporary measure. The fact is that using ontological technologies in public administration, there will be a constant expansion of boundaries and limits in ontological relations, which will inevitably lead to the disclosure of the essence of this scheme of manipulating society with subsequent dismantling.that no matter how tricks they use, trying to stay in power - all this will be only a temporary measure. The fact is that using ontological technologies in public administration, there will be a constant expansion of boundaries and limits in ontological relations, which will inevitably lead to the disclosure of the essence of this scheme of manipulating society with subsequent dismantling.that no matter how tricks they use, trying to stay in power - all this will be only a temporary measure. The fact is that using ontological technologies in public administration, there will be a constant expansion of boundaries and limits in ontological relations, which will inevitably lead to the disclosure of the essence of this scheme of manipulating society with subsequent dismantling.
Conclusion
The managerial schemes, technologies and methods of managing society, which are implemented by liberal technocrats, are designed to keep the latter in power for as long as possible.
Therefore, I would like to turn to ontologists-technocrats. The result of all your possible tricks and manipulations is predetermined and not in your favor. The doors to power are already closed for you. You know that. Your desire to prolong your previous existence is your agony. But having made your moral choice, you can establish a dialogue with your own conscience and start working for the good of Russia - this door is open for you.