The Plurality Of Egregors And Religious And Spiritual Spaces - Alternative View

The Plurality Of Egregors And Religious And Spiritual Spaces - Alternative View
The Plurality Of Egregors And Religious And Spiritual Spaces - Alternative View

Video: The Plurality Of Egregors And Religious And Spiritual Spaces - Alternative View

Video: The Plurality Of Egregors And Religious And Spiritual Spaces - Alternative View
Video: ATLANTIS. THE ELITE IN SEARCH OF IMMORTALITY 2024, May
Anonim

If we look at the world from the point of view of science, which is mostly materialistic, then we live in 3-dimensional space and time. There is no place for the spiritual realm in this picture. All our spirituality, including consciousness, is explained by physiological processes that occur mainly in the brain. And all kinds of miraculous phenomena, such as healings, incredible deliverances in tragic situations, phenomena, visions, are referred to as self-hypnosis, when the psyche goes into a borderline state, or hallucinations, or even mass hysteria.

Of course, these are unconditional cases of self-hypnosis, when, for example, a portrait of the same Raisa Ryk is cut out from a magazine or newspaper, applied to an aching tooth, and the pain disappears. Or the same sessions of Kashpirovsky and Chumak, which just can be interpreted as mass hysteria and hypnosis. No, no one argues, there are mental abnormalities, obsessive states, manic syndromes, and although medicine is still unable to find any acceptable explanation for them, it can not always treat them, but it can suppress certain manifestations of abnormalities with medication, often bringing a person into a state of semi-vegetable.

But there are many facts that cannot be explained by science in any way, such as prophecies and foresight. We will not consider ancient prophecies and predictions, they were passed down through the centuries and from mouth to mouth, or they were rewritten, not always correctly, and in accordance with the "spoiled phone". This is a game when the players sitting in a row whisper to each other a word or phrase and the last player usually voices something that has very little to do with the original word or phrase. The situation with psychics is also ambiguous. Here's one real-world example that hasn't been covered in the media.

Two former colleagues met, Tanya and Marina (names, of course, have been changed). Marina said that Yulia (who worked at the same enterprise) began to see the future, and gave an example when Yulia correctly predicted an event. Tanya, who had switched to another job, but who had problems, asked Marina to “look” at her from Yulia. The enterprise was a regime, she herself could not contact Yulia. Tanya outlined her problem like this: “I have adhesions on the tubes and a baby's uterus with a bend, I can't get pregnant”. Marina fulfilled the request and conveyed to Yulina the words: "I see adhesions and the surface of the uterus is also covered with bubbles." Tanya Marine says: “You see, she does not see the future, but reads your thoughts. You, as a technologist, remembered the word adhesions well, and the baby uterus with a bend did not stick in your memory. The thing is that I have a womb,according to the gynecologist, healthy as a chocolate”. And this story continued. Somewhat disappointed in Julia's abilities, Marina began to think in front of her: "Oh, Julia, Julia, but you read my thoughts." To which she frightenedly said: “Yes, I hear how people think, but I'm afraid to talk about it, because sometimes I read the thoughts of the leadership. If he finds out about this, I may have problems. " Of course, Julia is a psychic who can catch thoughts as a receiver. This is, of course, an unusual ability, but from the point of view of science, it can be explained. By the way, Yulia had problems with coordination of movements, some problems with the cerebellum. In this regard, I recall the Soviet psychic Rosa Kuleshova, who "saw" her skin, she was investigated in some detail, even a film was made, she died from a brain tumor. And this story continued. Somewhat disappointed in Julia's abilities, Marina began to think in front of her: "Oh, Julia, Julia, but you read my thoughts." To which she frightenedly said: “Yes, I hear how people think, but I'm afraid to talk about it, because sometimes I read the thoughts of the leadership. If he finds out about this, I may have problems. " Of course, Julia is a psychic who can catch thoughts as a receiver. This is, of course, an unusual ability, but from the point of view of science, it can be explained. By the way, Yulia had problems with coordination of movements, some problems with the cerebellum. In this regard, I recall the Soviet psychic Rosa Kuleshova, who "saw" her skin, she was investigated in some detail, even a film was made, she died from a brain tumor. And this story continued. Somewhat disappointed in Julia's abilities, Marina began to think in front of her: "Oh, Julia, Julia, and you read my thoughts." To which she fearfully said: “Yes, I hear how people think, but I'm afraid to talk about it, because sometimes I read the thoughts of the leadership. If he finds out about this, I may have problems. " Of course, Julia is a psychic who can catch thoughts as a receiver. This is, of course, an unusual ability, but from the point of view of science, it can be explained. By the way, Yulia had problems with coordination of movements, some problems with the cerebellum. In this regard, I recall the Soviet psychic Rosa Kuleshova, who "saw" her skin, she was investigated in some detail, even a film was made, she died from a brain tumor.but you read my mind. " To which she fearfully said: “Yes, I hear how people think, but I'm afraid to talk about it, because sometimes I read the thoughts of the leadership. If he finds out about this, I may have problems. " Of course, Julia is a psychic who can catch thoughts as a receiver. This is, of course, an unusual ability, but from the point of view of science, it can be explained. By the way, Yulia had problems with coordination of movements, some problems with the cerebellum. In this regard, I recall the Soviet psychic Rosa Kuleshova, who "saw" her skin, she was investigated in some detail, even a film was made, she died from a brain tumor.but you read my mind. " To which she fearfully said: “Yes, I hear how people think, but I'm afraid to talk about it, because sometimes I read the thoughts of the leadership. If he finds out about this, I may have problems. " Of course, Julia is a psychic who can catch thoughts as a receiver. This is, of course, an unusual ability, but from the point of view of science, it can be explained. By the way, Yulia had problems with coordination of movements, some problems with the cerebellum. In this regard, I recall the Soviet psychic Rosa Kuleshova, who "saw" her skin, she was investigated in some detail, even a film was made, she died from a brain tumor. Julia is a psychic who can, as a receiver, catch thoughts. This is, of course, an unusual ability, but from the point of view of science, it can be explained. By the way, Yulia had problems with coordination of movements, some problems with the cerebellum. In this regard, I recall the Soviet psychic Rosa Kuleshova, who "saw" her skin, she was investigated in some detail, even a film was made, she died from a brain tumor. Julia is a psychic who can, as a receiver, catch thoughts. This is, of course, an unusual ability, but from the point of view of science, it can be explained. By the way, Yulia had problems with coordination of movements, some problems with the cerebellum. In this regard, I recall the Soviet psychic Rosa Kuleshova, who "saw" her skin, she was investigated in some detail, even a film was made, she died from a brain tumor.

But there are many cases that can be explained only by the presence of a collective information field, or egregor. I'm not even talking about Wang, "The Sleeping Prophet Cayce", the prophecies of Rasputin, albeit ambiguous quatrains of Nostradamus, Wolf Messing. All of their science is absurdly trying to present them as charlatans.

If we insert into any search engine the sentence “foresight of the future in the works of writers”, it turns out that they just did not foresee, starting from astronomical discoveries made much later than written works, ending with all kinds of technical systems, partly implemented, partly supposed to be embodied in the future. You can, of course, argue that, according to the theory of probability, there are a finite number of options when, having put a monkey behind a typewriter, you get Tolstoy's novel "War and Peace" (for some reason, this example is given when reviewing the theory of probability). Another thing is that the number of options will be such that even if whole galaxies are populated with these monkeys with cars, then the entire time of the existence of the universe will not be enough to wait for such a happy result.

But what theories can explain the novel by Morgan Robertson, who, 14 years before the Titanic tragedy, described not only the death of the ship, but almost all of its technical characteristics, such as displacement, length, maximum speed, security systems, including the number of boats, not to mention the reason, even the month of the disaster is correctly named.

But what can we say, even if there are foresight in fairy tales. For example, in "The Scarlet Flower" a liquid apple on a platter - what is not the Internet, but a ring with which the characters are transferred - this is already an analogue of future portals with a puncture of space.

Promotional video:

Huge material in favor of the existence of egregors is provided by the most unassuming stories about meetings with the spirits or souls of dead people. And if these are cases when a person, after death in one form or another, came simply to say goodbye, calm down, or express his attitude, then these cases can still be attributed to the emotional state of loved ones. Even in the case when such a spirit proposes to find a certain object hidden by him during his lifetime, or lost in the family, it can be hardly explained by the fact that information about this object was recorded somewhere in the house, on a suitable medium. And as a result of the stress of the loss of a loved one, someone from the family got the opportunity to read this information. But there are many descriptions that the spirits were not family members, maybe friends, or even strangers. They also asked for some kind of action in relation to relatives, or if a person had obligations during his lifetime, it was proposed to fulfill them, and with a possible decision of such.

Thus, we can say with confidence that we live not only in space-time, but also in an egregor. This concept is given in the biblical book of Enoch, if in a simple way, it is the spiritual component of the community of people, or in modern terms - the spiritual information matrix of people and not only. In ancient times, when a person was not yet so separated from nature, he felt it, and could receive some information from it. This does not mean that people were talking to plants, rocks, or water. But they exchanged some energy information. The human mind is designed in such a way that it is more comfortable for it to communicate with anthropomorphic, or humanized, entities. Then they began to endow nature with spirits, goblin, mermaids, dryads, and all of them to one degree or another resembled a person. Moving away from nature, and no longer being able to communicate with her with the same ease,humanity began to endow these entities with some hostility. In Christianity, Islam and Judaism, all these entities have become devils, jinn, harassment and tempters. This does not mean that in ancient times, all nature and the environment were extremely positive in relation to man. No, in the end, in geopathogenic zones or cursed places, a person has never been blessed. Accordingly, he inhabited these places with completely unfriendly entities. And if he could still agree on something with the goblin, mermaids, dryads, then he simply tried not to collide with such. And naturally, he pulled all of them to egregor. But this does not mean that they all remain there or continue to somehow influence this or that community. It may very well be that the Olympic gods are sitting and withering on some corkscrews of a deep egregor. And generally speaking,each society creates the egregor it needs. Even if there is not a single religious confession, because as always there are and will be sects, confessions, trends and trends in religions. In Christianity, these are Orthodox, Catholics, Protestants of all sorts of directions, in Islam, Sunnis, Shiites, and both of them also fall apart into many directions, I am already silent about India with its myriads of gods, and everyone, of course, has their own egregor. Someone clever can say that everything stated smacks of subjective idealism, which, roughly speaking, can be called paganism. But no, there is some force that we do not know that develops everything. Tell me, it is very similar that the development of life on Earth resembles a kind of search, though a result unknown to us. Take the era of the dinosaurs. 250 million years old, a colossal variety of species, and suddenly it was cut. And nobody knows why. If it was some kind of cataclysm, then why only dinosaurs died out. Yes, small mammals have gotten a chance they didn't have with dinosaurs. But small dinosaurs of any color, taste and style were enough. Why did they stop developing? Questions, questions. And here is a question on the topic. Why is there no description of paradise in any of the existing religions? Hell is painted, there is nowhere more colorful, for everyone. Back in Soviet times, an old Christian woman was asked by her grandson: “What is paradise?”, To which she replied that this is a wonderful garden in which they enjoy. To the question: “What are they doing there?” She, already somewhat embarrassed, answered that they were digging and looking after the garden. The young man who asked was a purely city dweller, and therefore he stretched out in disappointment: "Well, it was worth going to heaven to dig in the ground",then my grandmother determined with confidence: "They work in their specialty." This is a real story, not an anecdote, and it would be fun if it weren't so sad.

Recommended: