So, I continue the theme of the "Viking" raids, hoping for the "enlightened humanity" which should be aware that according to the Official History (OI), the "Vikings" movement allegedly began with the "Anglo-Saxon" raids, who this mysterious beast was and with what we will gradually understand it …
First, at least briefly, you need to familiarize yourself with the official version. I will not particularly "philosophize slyly" and retell in many ways what volumes and volumes have already been written, but I'll tell you better a fairy tale (especially since the next chapter will also be with a fabulous accent), in which I will try to paint as succinctly as possible, with broad strokes the history of the British Isles and, oddly enough, the very notorious OI will help us in this … Well, roughly, what do we know about this part of the land, if we ignore the frivolous references to a hundred thousand years ago?
Well, yes, of course, once, a long time ago, the island was part of the land, then the land was partially submerged, and some people who called them Pictish (that is, "painted") remained on this land and began to live, live, and make money, but only the name "Picts" was given to these people not by neighbors, and they did not call themselves that, but they called themselves that in clever books written in the "ancient" language "Latin", and these people themselves called themselves supposedly "pritans", no, no, not "puritans", namely "pritans", and their neighbors will take, and call them bad, "Britons" …
I will digress a little from the fairy tale and run my eye over the map, from the south of England to the north, after all, the map was drawn up according to the testimony of "knowledgeable" people, well, for example:
- the regna in translation is "royal" and as if by accident it was there that Julius Caesar landed;
- attribates also translated from Latin - "attributed", who are "attributed peasants" I think it will not be difficult to find out in the reference book;
- belgi - well, I beg you, what else is there to translate, they are Belgians and Belgians in Africa;
- Trinovants and Galloway novants occupied the rugged coastlines, I could of course be wrong, but no vantes translates as … "no gear" that is, it is quite possible the descendants of the shipwrecked, and maybe the natives in kayaks and canoes;
- the Silurians from the Dutch "sea bait", I don’t know who they were fishing for;
- demety translates to "meatless" apparently it was very bad with food;
- Ordovician is translated from Latin "instead of order", which was not difficult to imagine for the Welsh highlanders instead of order;
- the Deceangles are also an interesting tribe, that is, the Angles did not exist yet, but the "tenth of the Angles" already existed, and moreover, they were not Germans, but Celts;
- Parisians are "Parisians", the colony of these "ancient Celts" most likely formed after one of the revolutions, quite possibly in 1830, so this is generally a different story, but if you also take into account my statement that ancient Israel is France, the Parisians and the Pharisees are, as it were, one and the same;
- brigandy is simply translated to the point of unpretentiousness - "robbers" and this term was synonymous with the word filibuster; Scotland (Land of Cattle) is replete with explicit names that require almost no translation: Caledons - "rulers of Calais", decants - "titans", deaths - "smerds", lugia - "Luzhitsa", well, texala is a little more complicated, here, like Texas, the root one "texas - the deck superstructure of a river vessel, which houses the officer's wardroom and the wheelhouse" … that's how ancient tribes are molded from such porridge!
And, yes, a fairy tale: "Further - more, the evil people of the Gauls-Celts have reached the islands of paradise …", so what if Galis is "Greek" salt, and the word Celtic directly cries out with its salt root, but no, it turns out if you believe OI had nothing to do with salt, the Gauls-Celts had nothing to do with salt (this is some kind of butter-oil! no-no-no, this cannot be, because it can never be, now!), but they had wives painted Picts, from where they went there are British tribes who spread out across the sea wide across the expanses of Piktland from the lands of the Wotadens (you can hear something like “water” and “dena”, but this is just a hallucination, the Britons are landlocked, and to the Danes and their notorious "Denlo" another thousand years to wait, yes nonsense …) to the very land of the hulkiyev. Did you hear it? No, the German map of the ancient Roman lands also knows them.
There, on the map in the bay, some other Selins lived, and of course they did not have any sideways to some dry villages (in Russian Selins or Selins) that lived on the banks of the Western Dvina, of course, where the Gauls “1st century BC. e. " and where are the Balts "13th century AD" This must be distinguished, and the fact that the current capital of Ireland, Dublin, has the Estonian ending "lin" (city), does not mean anything either …
Promotional video:
“The tale soon tells itself, but not soon, oh, not soon, but the evil Belga came after the Gauls and the shaven Britons could not say anything to them across the street, they came here and brazenly settled on the islands, which are packed with little people, you see them there, you see from the north-west, the villains of the Batavians completely overpowered and the feisty, contemptuous "Germans" of the caninefates, or if in Latin, caninefates, ate."
Of course, I'm not very strong in Latin, but the words "canine fate" are translated as "canine fate", but this is not so, it’s written in the books that this tribe is so Germanic (!) Lived in Holland and it didn’t translated, that is, in no way at all, and even when it is written as cananefate it is not at all similar to the word cananes, well, think for yourself where are the Dutch cananefates, and where are the Palestinian Canaanites, and even the fact that on old maps the Latin s looks more like f at all means DIFFERENT WORDS and that's it …
… There they are, caninefates, in a corner rubbing whining from their dog's share, not like the windeliks that are spread out on the Austrian lands, who are simply not related to the vandals at all, did they see where the Germans drew vandals? That's where they lived, that's where they learned to fascist right and left, from where they are enemies, and in no way can they be related to Ooo very culyutor windeliks, who just about entered the Roman Empire on an almost voluntary basis … What? Why did the vandals attack the Roman empire through the windelite territory? God knows them, I'm saying that they were fascists-fascists, wherever they want, they will attack from there … and indeed they attacked 10 km north of the territory of the winners, but at least look at the map in the atlas for the 5th grade, DO NOT THEY! There, after all, everything is not so, well, who lived next to the windeliks? Gauls Helvetians!And next to the vandals? The Germans are Helveons!
In general, nothing in common, I'm not talking about Burgundy and Burgundy, even the letters are different … There, with vandals in general, some hari lived with a narwhal leg, and next to the windeliks there were solid agri decumates … Okay, I will not confuse the already confused and unconventional explanations of "traditional" historians, back to the official version of the ill-fated island.
"In general, Julius Caesar came for the Belgae, defeated everyone as expected … and went home to take his kingdom, drive her to Egypt in time, otkleopatrit Cleopatra, and so, on the little things …", in general, not a story, but a novel … to be honest these "Roman tales" mixed with "priestly myths", poured back and forth from empty to empty, have already been fed, and some rich Lydian Croesus who was killed by the Persians, and the leader of the triumvirs, the rich Crassus, hammered with tarpaulin boots by the Parthians, is already irritating with his endless cloning, but, for business, I can of course have a little patience, in general …
“And the islanders were already healed like a human, they were imbued with the Roman spirit … but it wasn’t there, the Romans lived and lived on this disgusting swampy islet and didn’t get tired of it, they collected money, and along the path trodden by Julius they piled them into their sunny Rome … Nothing was left to the Britons, thrown to the mercy of fate, as soon as to multiply and multiply, remembering the cultural covenants of the former big brother, until it came to such a motley chaos …
What were these most powerful kingdoms of the Britons, clearly dividing the island into huge rags?
Well, for example, the border Picto-British “kingdom” of Manau-Gododin or Manau-Goutdin (“Manau go then” is “to go to Maine”) had a population of about 300 people and had 60 (!) Fighters (that is, purely technically, EVERY man is a warrior, looks like an outpost or base), and the kingdom of Inis Manau (or "Isle of Man") itself had a population of … 800 people, but the most interesting thing is that the island of Anglesey was also called the same way, where the "kingdom" was later located Meilirion.
The huge kingdom of Britons in the center of Elmet Island had a population of … 600 (!) People, and in the future Wales things were no better, the population of the "kingdom" of Biell was about 600 people, Ferreg numbered 300 people, and the neighboring "kingdom" Pengwern - 1200 people, feel the scale?
One of the most powerful Brito-Roman "kingdoms" was the Cornish "kingdom" of Kerns, which occupied an area of approx. 3.6 thousand km² with a population of approx. 3.9 thousand people (Do you remember the population density map that I am trying hard to convey to understanding so that the numbers are supported visually?
By the way, according to the OI, the "kingdom" was independent from 443 to 1069, more than half a millennium, how!). What was Kernov's power based on?
Well, of course, apart from the powerful charisma of "King" Arthur?
On a standing army built on the "hundredth" system of clans, or in Kornish "keverangs", there were a total of 9 keverangs, each keverang had 100 guides (1 guide - 36-45 acres) of land, and in fact one family had 1 guide land, each keverang fielded one fighter with 5 guides, and since the fertility of the land and the population density of the keverangs were different, the detachments were unequal 18-27 people, and the army of the whole "kingdom" recruited 180 (!) fighters. From the names of the keverangs themselves, listening to their pronunciation, I honestly get delighted, let's start right from the south:
- Kerier (definitely not "quarry" ?!),
- Penuis (kill me, but this is a stupid "penis", and look at the map …),
- Powder (if it's not a Dutch polder - shoot me with a slingshot!),
- Pidera (I have nothing to comment on here),
- Fou,
- Trigord (here "three cities" is written directly in Russian),
- Lisnovit (here it pulls "forest" for a kilometer),
- Riesleg (whatever you want, but for me this word is akin to the Swedish "Ruslagen"),
- and, of course, Stradnes (I can't decide here, here either terpily-stadals, a border area, well, or there the agricultural "suffering" does not subside …).
These are the scales, and probably everyone has already understood for themselves that the indigenous Corvallians are somehow quite sideways to the present-day English … who loves good maps, here is a wonderful English map of 1899 …
I chatted about something with these shaven Celts, in general I continue the tale: "And the fierce Anglo-Saxon enemy fell on the blessed Brito-Saxon (or rather, according to official sources, the Angles, Saxons, Jutes and Frisians, although Frisians are neglected in the most impudent way everywhere), a fierce enemy, an innumerable enemy …"
Moreover, countless in the literal sense of the word, the number of conquerors of the "millionaire island" of Britain was simply ridiculous, and I am even more surprised where this mysterious "million" came from, since I have already quoted the population level of some British "kingdoms" above, and under no circumstance a million of such figures simply cannot come out! Well, God bless them, milen, so milen, in that case, no less amazing is the ability of such insignificant forces of the "Anglo-Saxons" aliens to change this milen by hand, I remind you that there were no machine guns, no tanks, no bombers then …
At the same time, the number of attacking tribes is quite officially and ingenuously described in various "histories of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms" and, as it were, should not be questioned. This data was first published by John Mitchell Campbell (Cambridge Apostle), the father of Anglo-Saxon history, in 1848, when he presented "a list from a lost 7th century manuscript."
To give you an idea of what we are talking about, you need to at least imagine that, for example, the "kingdom" of Bernicia was created by a "squad", or rather an artel of Angles and Frisians (Anhalts and Frisians) of 120 people, the "kingdom" of Sussex created an artel of 90 Saxons on 3 ships under the leadership of the "king" Ellie, a little later I will try to go through the tribes in more detail … Honestly, in the "Anglo-Saxon history" there are more misunderstandings than concepts, so, for example, the Kent kingdom of Kentwara was conquered by the Utes Hengist and Horsa (that is, by Horse and Horse, for the dull ones I will explain, Kent was taken by cavalry!), and North Umbria is generally something with something ("Northern Umbria"), and this "kingdom" came from the merger of "kingdoms" Bernickia, where Bern is the root (by the way, Bern in the "medieval" sources was called not only the Swiss canton of Bern,but also … Verona, located in the Veneto region, founded by the pre-Venetian tribe of Eughauns, akin to the Inghans whose capital was Ingavnuya or Genoa, which in turn in the same sources could mean Swiss … Geneva, this is such a cycle) and Deira or Dei Ra, that is, " God Ra”(are we looking for Egypt at all ?!) And famous as the first victim of the Vikings, Lindisfarne, you know how to spell? Lin des far on here is either in Estonian "Distant city" or Norwegian "Father's linen clothes", but the widest choice is the Galician language in which I liked the interpretation of "sail to the Pharaoh", in general, choose … and you know how to spell the Anglo-Saxon pearl Cambridgeshire with its famous Cathedral of Petersborough (?) - Peterborough, that is, Petersburg, and in the neighborhood was located an integral part of the county of Lincolnshire - Holland, that is, Holland,and now remember where Tsar Petrushka went from St. Petersburg to learn wisdom, and think about whose story they are trying to impose on us, like our early one, in general, Don Pedruchio died for me as a class, long and irrevocably, everything was smaller and bolder …
Probably someone has already noticed that there were so-called kingdoms. "Angles", "Saxons", well, at worst, "Utes", and the Frisians somehow do not exist … maybe it will seem wild, but the Vikings often used the services of carriers, almost no one knows that in the widely advertised Anglo-Saxon invasion, the entire the transportation was carried out on the Frisian sailing and rowing ships "Skuche" and galleys "Kiile".
What is "kiile", well, this is such a rowing boat as the Russian ear, the name most likely comes from the city of Kiel, the capital of Holstein-Holostania, these galleys had a capacity of 20-26 people, 12-15 meters long, about 2 m wide, the height of the side is about 1 m, the mass of a team of 25 people and supplies was 2200 kg, at the rate of 90 kg per person, including weapons. The boat itself weighed about 600 kg. With a displacement of 2800 kg, the draft was 0.36 m, and the freeboard was 0.5 m. And apparently the ships were mostly river, but apparently the people were then so desperate that they cut them across the sea.
The current reenactors even made their replicas, but I would not dare to sail on them.
"Skuche" (in Russian stupidly scooter, cutter or … boat) is a Friesian sea workhorse, they were 9-12 m long, 3-3.6 m wide and a draft of up to half a meter, their carrying capacity reached 12-13 tons and under sail on it it was not an example more pleasant to cut across the sea than on "Kiil", and even "boring" was called … "Scythian".
Very interesting information about the British coast from the North Sea of the Anglo-Saxon times, on the basis of which you can draw interesting conclusions and comparisons. The quasi-kingdom of Sutrig (South Riga?), Which coincidentally coincided on the borders with the county of Surrey, was created by six tribes:
- goodhelmings ("good helmets"),
- Tetings (natives of the North Jutland island of Vendsussel-Tee, which is considered the birthplace of the Vandals and Teutons),
- Wokings (no, not Vikings, namely Wokings, and there were also some of the founders of the Middlesex Vikings' kingdom, in general, choose …),
- Sunning (possibly “sunlings”, but the translation from Welsh Sunni ngas led to the most unexpected result of “Sunita Khojang” (Khojang and Santalas - tribes of Bengal)),
- as well as nox gaga (nox gaga - 5,000 people) and oht gaga (oht gaga - 2,000 people) about which I would like to say that these are the northern Hague and the eastern Hague, in general, such large gangs,
In addition, some British researchers also mention askings ("beggars", and in Warwickshire there were also stoppingas, that is, stupidly "brakes"), whose basing capital is Basingstoke ("Main pivot" or "base base") and ebbings (according to one version the tribe is named after a woman named Ebba, generally without comment). Moreover, this is not the only "obscene" tribe of "nagloseks", there were also hoerings who occupied one of the territories that London swallowed in the twentieth century, but there is nothing wrong with that, and if, for example, the Russians swear in obscene language, the Dutch speak it.
The history of Midlangland (the counties of Lincolnshire and Cambridgeshire), that is, the Middle Angles, is very interesting, who did these Angles consist of? Nupro Lindisfarne (7.000 people (!)) I have already said above, they formed the basis of the "kingdom" of Lindsey, and to the south the incomprehensible belmigi (600 people), spaldings or spaldy (600 people) are just those guys who lived in English Holland, Vigests lived nearby (900 people), but more interesting tribes went further:
- on the map the Witherigga tribe is slightly incorrectly written (600 people); it is written witherigga (probably cheyta about Riga …), well, that's so-so,
- the sveordors (300 people, "Swedish gate") and the Herefins (1200 people, the "Finnish tribe") somehow already clearly hint at eastern Scandinavia,
- It will be more difficult to deal with the tribes north girvas (600 people) and sut girvas (600 people), north and day are north and south, and "girvas" in Estonian means deer, and who has deer on our emblem? Correctly among the Chukhonts of Viruma and Ingermanlandia,
- West Viksna (600 people) and Est Viksna (300 people) live next to them, I think the West and Estonian should not be translated, but “Viksna” in the Selonian dialect (remember the incomprehensible Celtic Celts?) means “elm”, so that the villages have not gone anywhere, just in the new series they have become angles,
- well, the west villa (600 people) and the est villa (600 people), maybe of course it comes from the word "manor" … or maybe it has something to do with Vilnius …
Thus, out of the nearly fifteen thousand inhabitants of the Middle Angles, at least 5,400 are counted on the fingers of settlers of clearly Eastern Baltic origin.
With the Anglo-Saxons, it is still more or less clear to anyone else, but with the Frisians, everything is also about everything is clear, as archaeologists say, the "Jut Kingdom" of Kentwar is culturally similar to the partly Frisian and partly Zeeland artifacts, but differs significantly from the finds of the Isle of Wight, in addition, it occurs the name is not Uty, but Yulla. After thinking it over, crawling over the maps and inquiring about archaeological finds, I came to the conclusion that the casket was quite easy to open, Kent took the Yulls - "Franks" of the Duchy of Julich-Cleve, and the Judei-Utes attacked the Isle of Wight and the adjacent coast.
With the capture of the island, you can read the story straight, I reread them almost all and here I will voice, so to speak, the arithmetic mean: it means that under the Brito-Romans there was a "kingdom" of Inis Waite on the island (who did not understand the translation of "Isle of Wight") with a population of 600 rep (which, as we already understood, was quite solid for those regions) and at the very least it existed, according to OI, from 410 to 536, but suddenly it appeared out of nowhere … no, not who you thought, everything was much more confusing, so now we carefully watch our hands, it all started with the king of the West Saxons Kerdik (or in another transcription of Cerdic), who with his son Cynrik (or Cynric), with the help of Serdyukov's nephew, Wihtgar Stuf, piled dully to the British king Kyr-Gwintguik named Nathanleod,who was often called in the annals … Nathan.
Then Kerdik-Serdik, who smashed the "kingdom" of Kair-Gwyntguik, for some reason created his “kingdom” of Geviss (“Allies”) not on the captured lands of the broken kingdom, but much further north on the lands of Kair-Keri and Calgwynedd (well, you see, they used to earlier, some kicked, and the others settled), but at the same time he was considered the founder of Wessex (how!), well, he died safely … And the son of Yevoniy Kinrik-Sinrik, out of the kindness of his soul, felt deeply and presented the whole kingdom of Inis Waite for helping Vitgar Stuf … which Vitgar Stuf had to conquer (well, everything is like in the joke: “Well, Petka, it's your birthday today and I’ll give you a tank, Petka!” “Visilivanych, real?” “Real !!! And you will get Petka this tank with this grenade ! "). I would like to voice another interesting point, Uncle Serdik was a Saxon, and his nephew Vitgar was …such is the “brotherhood of the end” in the vastness of “middle-earth”, well, these are so little things by and large … So, I can’t be delighted to see Vitgar Stuf in 536 (?), on three ships (well, you probably already saw these “ships” from above) stuffed with Judas, I apologize with Utes, moored to the blessed island at the head of six dozen friends and easily bent ten times the population of the island so easily, as some English aafftar wrote who did not drink yadu, 2-3 dozen Inisuelans were killed, and the rest fled, well then They were probably somehow picked up to proudly announce that at last they became citizens of the Uti "kingdom" of Vihtvar, the size of the Isle of Wight, 147 square miles (380 km2), and opposite the vassal lands of Meonvara (British possession (300 people).) where the princelings-Muggles ruled, such is the harrypoterie …) and Uten-Set (or Juden-set, such as the share of Utes,another 300 muddy rap called "eusta" (or "eufta") of the "mixed population") and this idyll lasted until 661, the "king" of Mercia ("Mercy") Wolfher (that is, Wolf … well, I don't know what the wolves have, in general, someone like a boss) Penda's son did not radically solve the issue in an attempt to baptize the pagans of the island, well, he overdid it a little, including the heirs of the Yut dynasty, about which (except Vitgar Stuf) for a century and a quarter there was not a single sound at all, and those who survived since then went from hand to hand, the fairy tale is over!having nailed, including the heirs of the Yut dynasty, about which (except for Vitgar Stuf) for a century and a quarter there was not a single sound at all, and those who survived since then have gone from hand to hand, the fairy tale is over!having nailed, including the heirs of the Yut dynasty, about which (except for Vitgar Stuf) for a century and a quarter there was not a single sound at all, and those who survived since then have gone from hand to hand, the fairy tale is over!
Interesting? Now it will be even more interesting, let's decompose this sentimental story into parts, put it on the shelves and read the labels more closely. So let's start with the Saxon Serdik - this is Sir Dick ("Mr. Richard"); Sinrik - well, probably "the king's son"; nickname Vitgara Stuf - as they say means "baby", but the Dutch dialects are much tougher to this word (from "stuffing, filling, filler" and to "rubbish, trash, crap"), but now I liked more "cram, shove, shove "; I really liked the Briton Nathan, very much a Juden-Sett name from terpila, and the name of the "kingdom" Juden-Set is translated as "Jewish Share" or "Jewish part" … well, according to philological studies, the name of the Uttian kingdom of Vichtvara comes from the Dutch "wicht" - "little girl"…
I almost forgot a very important moment in Latin Vikhtvara is written as Uictuarii (Victoria) …
Author: SKUNK69
