… Soon for almost a century, no one has any questions about the confident localization of the Mongols - in present-day Mongolia, Kazakhs - in present-day Kazakhstan, Uzbeks - in present-day Uzbekistan, Kyrgyz - in present-day Kyrgyzstan, Tatars - in present-day Tatarstan, and … well, let there be Yakuts - in present-day Yakutia. These "peoples" invented by the red Jewish sages were literally sewn "profitable" with white threads from just anyone, cut "alive" on a territorial basis, called "like a tortoise god", regardless of their faces, indiscriminately recorded in "Turks", " fraternal peoples "and" Muslims ", well, in the worst case," Buddhists ", and to be Mongoloids, no less! Although one does not need to be a genius to sincerely not understand how the “Kirghiz” differ from the “Kazakhs”, in honor of what holiday, for example, “Turkic Turks” and “Yakut Turks” are fraternal peoples,and how to distinguish "Turkic Uzbeks" from "non-Turkic Tajiks", and what kind of tops is the notorious Pan-Turkism … In general, we will figure it out.
So SKUNK69 represents … Were the real Mongolian Mughals Mongoloid? Are the Tatars Mongoloid? Well, let's just say, very partly Mongoloid. To see what a real Mongolian Mogul looked like, look at the splash screen; the British photographer, so that no one had any doubts, even signed it “Mogul. Delhi”, but these four-cornered pieces on their heads are Uyghur hats, which in a more modest form are known in our country as“Uzbek skullcap”. Those who read part 1 about the Aryans and part 2 about tartar probably suspect that the truth is somewhere nearby, and I would even say that it is not just nearby, but mixed …
I read a lot and constantly stumble upon a lot of literature, from very childish tales, widely replicated by the colossus of the Soviet propaganda machine, to nonsense “tartarists” (or “tartarasts”, I don’t know how to call it more precisely) claiming to be a “breakthrough in historical science”, the flagship of which were selected NIF NHi.
The essence of the meaning of the first: the poor were conquered by the yellow-skinned beastmen Mongols, even riding horses out of need, raping everything that moves, eating babies alive and folding pyramids from their heads, or so that they do not deteriorate, because pyramids have magical properties (glory to the Egyptian pyramidists!), or to take a closer look at the stars from these pyramids, because the beast-men of the Mongols loved to indulge in, you know, mathematics, astrology, after chopping off millions of heads by hand, and finally, having left the dull Buddhist homeland, to convert to Islam.
The essence of the meaning of the second: nifiga (in the word soft Ukrainian "g")! The real Mongols are two-meter-tall, fair-haired, true Aryans-supermen with blue eyes on a nickel, who built a PLANETARY TARTARASTIC EMPIRE, which was controlled with terrible force from Tobolsk, where, apparently, the Death Star from the Star Wars was buried. Episode IV ", not completed yet, but workable, otherwise it was impossible to reach the ever-raging European slaves from Tobolsk, and even the German-fascist hideouts of the Black Seas were dug right on the road, the horses were deep down to me … eyeblocks, and they had heads they didn’t chop, once they had artistic carvings on the body, the planet was in danger, they simply took the corpses to Moscow and let's bury them in the very pits, into which they would later put the corpses in the revolution, in the civil one and in the “thirty-seventh”,buried and again kaaaak let's conquer the planet … and, what is typical, all these Christians are such Mongols, that you shouldn't be spoiled at all …
That is, in a nutshell, the first whine mournfully "us", and the second hysterically yell "we", and neither one nor the other see anything wrong in such an idiom as the "Tatar-Mongol yoke", only the first try to pull it on the cowardly, lazy and, according to the testimony of contemporaries, distinguished by their weakness and general underdevelopment, and even not at all warlike nomads, on whom this dumb nickname was stuck without their knowledge; and the latter are trying to pull this owl all over the globe and prove that the Tatars are Russians, only tartars, and as the teddy bear Winnie the Pooh said: "This solution is not casual!" And I will say right away: I will not beat around the bush and refer to some mysterious Poles who allegedly invented this absurdity in some centuries there, or mythical "Germans" who are now forever responsible for all the troubles that happened and are happening in Russia. Most of what we know today about the "Mongol-Tatar region" is an invention of Soviet historians of 1936-37. No, they were certainly not the first. The father, according to more advanced "reenactors", was the unknown "P. Naumov in 1823 ". Where did they get this? So this is actually written on the title page of the book, printed in 1866, in an even font of the late 19th century by Mr. Vengerov (just before the pogrom of the Kokand Khanate), a native of one of my small homelands, a very, very famous historian and critic from a good Jewish family that makes our story look so goofy at times. But the main collection of delusional "Tatar-Mongol" delusions and fantasies was the book of the great French historian Alfred Rambeau "The Picturesque History of Ancient and New Russia", published in 1884, like everything abroad,It immediately became the icon that those who attributed themselves to historians prayed for for another century … Thus, the universal evil "Tatar-Mongols" were invented very, very late in the day.
What are they for? Well, initially for the same purpose for which American political strategists invented chemical weapons quite recently in Iraq, and then it turned out that this not found chemical weapon teleported to Syria, and the search for it began from the very beginning of the real independent history of the United States in the Hawaiian Islands back in 1893 g, and then in Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines in 1898; however, after losses in this war, the "invincible" Americans decided that it would be better to Honduras the Honduras in Honduras and take the Panamas from the Panamanians in Panama, well, or to push the rest of the banana-island Caribbean trifle, at worst … I do not argue, the USA really, a great country, but it is not great in military glory, mostly invented or stolen from the allies (remember the unforgettable cartoon about the "greatest friend"?
Promotional video:
In the role of a dastardly and cowardly hippopotamus of S. S. America), and not even the huge size and masses of foreigners that make up its population, no … The greatness of the United States is in creating an exemplary consumer paradise and the image of a country where dreams are sold, as well as in the ability to convince the whole world that cut green paper, which for a long time has not had any material support in metal equivalent ("dollar" comes from the Dutch name of the Czech silver coin Thaler - "daldr"), is the measure of EVERYTHING.
Let's go back to our rams, that is, "Tatar-Mongols". Was it possible that before the Mongol-Mongol Tatars were invented by Vengerov in 1866, there were neither Tatars nor Mongols? Well, why not … there were and if the real Aryans are Tajiks, and the real Tartars are Sarts and Uighurs, that is, both real Tatars and real Mongols. Yes, to designate those who are the source material for these peoples in their original sense, I will use labels that have been in use for almost a century, and the so-called "culture shock" is inevitable, but you must admit that truth and reality should be, regardless to what "have long been accustomed to" and what "is considered to be" … After all, it is no longer a secret that the swindlers and crooks of the century before last absolutely randomly called whatever they got,if only to become famous and to make a fortune on the gullibility of narrow-minded inhabitants: one swindler "Troy" "dug up" waste lands bought from the natives cheaply (he mentioned this here), another rogue invented "tutankhamon" (he came up with a name, funny) and, having poisoned accomplices, on the sale of rather amusing jewelry trinkets, allegedly taken from this "jamon", ensured a comfortable existence, and an endless circus and constant profit for the impoverished bankrupt country … With "Ancient Iran" the story is even more fun, as in the famous saying “a thief stole a club from a thief”. Where is the capital of "Ancient Iran" located? Yes, Lord, every dog knows that in the "ancient" Susa, they have already been destroyed, destroyed, but archaeologists, well done, did find this extremely necessary x … in general, they found something. What archaeologists? Ooh, very, well,just very, very competent archaeologists: both sons of horse breeder Abram Tizak Rawlinson, Herodotus, and the elder brother of the “father of history”, Henry, who allegedly shot the Behistun inscription with his own hand for posterity (Oh-oh-oh! this heartbreaking story it is necessary to tell separately, as well as about his brother Herodotus), and not only "found an inscription on the Behistun rock, which he copied at the risk of his life (there was no photography in those years, and he had to climb the rock many times to copy the signs)", and what is typical, “at an altitude of 105 meters from the road” “today you can see the inscriptions and reliefs only from afar - it is impossible to see them from a close distance. More than 2500 years (? !!! damn it, but they tell it as if they saw it yesterday) back the ancient sculptors, having finishedwent down and destroyed the stone steps behind them in order to exclude any possibility of going up to the monument again. Perhaps that is why the Behistun inscription has survived to this day relatively well: no hand touched it. The same circumstance had another turn: after a relatively short time, people forgot what, in fact, is depicted here "… A heartbreaking story … True, these visionaries had a worthy accomplice, another English archaeologist, this time a native of Paris Austin Henry Layard, a lawyer, which is characteristic, is another one, I didn't even have to dig about him for a long time, Wikipedia immediately posted the right one:The same circumstance had another turn: after a relatively short time, people forgot what, in fact, is depicted here "… A heartbreaking story … True, these visionaries had a worthy accomplice, another English archaeologist, this time a native of Paris Austin Henry Layard, a lawyer, which is characteristic, is another one, I didn't even have to dig about him for a long time, Wikipedia immediately posted the right one:The same circumstance had another turn: after a relatively short time, people forgot what, in fact, is depicted here "… A heartbreaking story … True, these visionaries had a worthy accomplice, another English archaeologist, this time a native of Paris Austin Henry Layard, a lawyer, which is characteristic, is another one, I didn't even have to dig about him for a long time, Wikipedia immediately posted the right one:
You can follow the link and read in a nutshell about the wonderful Arundel Society, for those who do not read the text too hard, I will translate the Arundel Society was engaged in mass forgery and distribution of "historical artifacts" and "objects of ancient culture", thanks to which we can touch hands the story that the British adventurers invented. And only now, after the hostilities that led to the destruction of "antiquities", we can contemplate the stuffing of the works of this and similar societies
Armature, magically penetrated into a column hewn from the monolith.
Rails magically materialized after the explosion of historic buildings.
Jeanne Dielafoy.
But again, the "ancient Susa", found a thousand miles from the real, were not his merit, although he did a lot to materialize the "history of ancient Iran", the French played a leading role in finding the "capital of ancient Persia". Yes, the British, with the confidence of professional liars, are trying to convince everyone that there was supposedly some other Loftus, a born British, he allegedly found almost everything a third of a century before the French, but somehow he died unsuccessfully somewhere along the way, and stories about his finds were touchingly preserved by a loving Hindu slave and brought them in his beak to his inconsolable British fellow archaeologists (there were three versions of this nonsense, so I added mine, the fourth, no worse) … In general, all the trump cards, including material ones, in in the hands of the French, and the "ancient Susa" began to "find" in 1886-1888 Marcel-Auguste Dieulafoy and his wife Jeanne,this guy in the photo is that very wife. The French unfolded on a grand scale, Marsik himself was a certified specialist, graduated from the Ecole Polytechnique in 1863, where he studied civil engineering, after completing his studies he began working in the French Bureau of Roads and Bridges, in general, for an archaeologist - the very thing, such an archaeologist you want a monument he concocts antiquities from scrap materials, and even when such a normal kid as his wife Jeanne is at hand. A couple of years later, the French decided to build an "archaeological fortress" under Gyolafoy's successor Jacques de Morgan. After completing his studies, he began to work in the French Bureau of Roads and Bridges, in general, for an archaeologist - the very thing, such an archaeologist will concoct an ancient monument from scrap materials, and even when such a normal kid as his wife Jeanne is at hand. A couple of years later, the French decided to build an "archaeological fortress" under Gyolafoy's successor Jacques de Morgan. After completing his studies, he began to work in the French Bureau of Roads and Bridges, in general, for an archaeologist - the very thing, such an archaeologist will concoct an ancient monument from scrap materials, and even when such a normal kid as his wife Jeanne is at hand. A couple of years later, the French decided to build an "archaeological fortress" under Gyolafua's successor, Jacques de Morgan.
An archaeological fortress … yes, just a little to the north or to the west, and it would now flaunt as “ Babylonian ”, “ Assyrian ” or “ Sumerian ”, and so, no luck, remained French …
straight from artifact bricks, which the predecessor builder and his wife did not use; in general, the French blinded the history of the Persians no worse than the Ottomans, and the very name was presented to the natives: from French Pars (Persia; translated as “part”, since the rest of the parts became Afghanistan and India), or even more straightforward Fars (sense of humor in French has always been original), which they could finally get rid of only in 1936, replacing it with Eran (Iran) …
And in the meantime, the real capital of the truly ancient Eranshahr - Susa - stood still, no one needed, far from this rat fuss, where it should be, in the very heart of Iran, controlling the Great Silk Road, this capital of Aria-Iran-Khorasan- Khorezm is now known as Tus or Susiya … Do not think, I am not loose, and the territory of Iran is very much to do with it. Actually, real Tatars, just like true Aryans, are widespread today across the expanses of Russia, and often illegally and hardly anyone now can think about them that they are the Tatars themselves. Back in the first quarter of the 20th century, they, as they are, were renamed en masse into … Azerbaijanis, and without making any differences in tribal relations, which were still paid attention to in the Russian Empire,but in the national republic with the alien name "Azerbaijan" assigned in 1918 and the Soviet Republic of the same name, there was no longer a place for tats (the indigenous population of Qubya Baku and the main population of the district),
nor Tabasarans (the indigenous population of northern Azerbaijan and southern Dagestan, a conglomerate of heterogeneous tribes united in the 19th century in the Tabasaran Naibat, by the way, their language is recognized as the most difficult language in the world … well, I don't know, Esmira
with Samira
somehow they even sing on it), neither the Talysh (real Azeri-Assyrians are the indigenous population of the real Azerbaijan-Assyria and Gilan), nor the real Kazakhs who inhabited the real Kazakh Sultanate, nor the Tatars … only Azerbaijanis, well, if you don't agree, “we tebya rasstrelyaem, nat chilyaueca, nat prablam …
So, purely technically, the real Tatars are present-day Azerbaijan and the lower Volga, the Tatars of the Astrakhan and Crimean kingdom-khanates, well, maybe some Gagauz; and those Tatars who are considered to be Tatars in our country (they are also originally called the “Volga Tatars”) are a mixture of Mordovians, Bashkirs, comedians and Russians, who only profess the Old Believers in the version of Islam. I have already written about this, I repeat, it is not difficult for me. Tatars are not a people in the genetic sense of the word, just like “Germans” until the middle of the 19th century are a label, a marker that immediately puts any foreigner in the right cell, so, saying “Sweyski Germans” or, for example, "Azibarzhan Tatars" did not imply human origin, it was like a flag of a country,painted on the forehead of a football fan on the road … Francophone De la Gardie (or he, but thrown into the darkness of centuries, De la Gardie) and the Anglophone Hugo Hamilton, as well as the Azeri or Adeiberzhan Tatar could be the heir to the throne of the Muslim faith Eranshahr, a Turanian Feth-Ali, even before 1918, ethnic self-awareness, in particular among Azerbaijanis, as well as among Russians, who treated the column “nationality” with the wording “Orthodox”, was often overshadowed by religious. For example, Uzeyir Hajibeyov writes in one of his articles:those who got around in the column "nationality" with the wording "Orthodox" were often overshadowed by the religious. For example, Uzeyir Hajibeyov writes in one of his articles:those who got around in the column "nationality" with the wording "Orthodox" were often overshadowed by the religious. For example, Uzeyir Hajibeyov writes in one of his articles:
The most capacious, explaining the entire definition of the word "Tatar" at once I met only once:
"The Tatar is a foreigner of the Basurmanian faith …"
ALL! No more explanations are needed !!!
And there is no schizophrenic Mongol-Tatarism at all !!! Why, for example, the slanting Kyrgyz-Kaisaks and Kalmyks are not Tatars, but Azerbaijanis with rather nose-like eyes with olive trees and the Caucasians who hardly distinguish themselves from the Poles are sticky - Tatars, according to the logic of the OI it should be just the opposite, but no … everything rests on faith, Kalmyks are Buddhists, Kirghiz Kaisaks are generally savages, and Islam they were persistently infected by the "big white kings" Chingi-khans through the Kazan mullahs, read the entire second half of the 19th century, in order to somehow control rootless gangs with instinctive faith in Tengri, that is why they are not Tatars, but Azerbaijanis and were Muslims almost immediately, therefore they are Tatars (even though some Islam differs from Islam of others, as Hinduism differs from Confucianism).
Actually, the word "Tatar" carries the word "tat", that is, "farmer", therefore the conglomerate of various Central Asian nomadic and semi-nomadic tribes, collectively called Kurds or Turks (depending on the fantasy), mixed with local natives Tabasarans, was also Tatars, directly called the Tatars (now Azerbaijanis), and the relatively local Iranian-speaking tribes are also of rather mixed origin, as a result of the erosion of the gene pool by various surrounding tribes, and a rather strong localization, divided into Tats, Ossetians, Talysh, Gilyaks, Farsevans and simply Persians … Real Tatar Tatars are Astrakhan Tatars, but this is too complicated a question to dwell on in a review article, but about the "Crimean" ones I have a ready article, and I will publish it here.
Those who are now habitually called Tatars, and even pulled out this name as a label to designate a territorial-state entity that claims to be the first among the Sunnis of Russia, technically, had names that were far from the letter combination "Tatars". They were: Kazanlar (and Kazan was originally and always was a Russian city, those who are now called Tatars were taken there, like the Ukrainians in Lviv-Lemberg, only as low-paid guest workers), mishler, biller, bulgar, chyavash, taper, muslim, byasermyans and even Kryashens, etc., and if the bloody accursed tsarism gave the right to self-determination in religious and tribal terms, then the Soviet government and historians did not understand such trifles: all Tatars, just write them down, shoot the dissatisfied! Yes,in the 20-30s of the twentieth century, most of the current "peoples" were invented and a "story" for everyone was invented from practically scratch, the names were reshuffled until completely unrecognizable … the time was extremely tough and did not tolerate deviations from the "party line", and if if you want to imagine what the real "Tatars" "Kazan" were like, just look at the comedians. Both Zyryans and Bjarms-Permians (the self-designation of both those and others is "Komi-morort", that is, "people from the Kama") are relatively more or less pure representatives of the genetic material that inhabited this huge intersection, which is the Volga-Kama interfluve, where they flocked ALL, as it is fashionable to say now, "haplogroups" within a radius of a thousand miles! And to talk about some kind of purity of the origin of the "Kazan" "Tatars" is no less demagogy,than to tell the duped crowds about the pure true Aryans and their great destiny !!! That primitive story "accidentally found" (read: gouged out of the nose) in the 1880s. about Brother Ku, about the fact that allegedly his son Asparkhuy from the Duplo dynasty, the ruler of the people of the people took him to Balgaria, another son the Cat took the tribes of the Kutiput to the north to Buglar, the third Bayan remained to sit on the stove, waiting for the Khazar Jews to submit, there were two more, well, "nothing at all", not only that, and the grave of this Brother Ku was found in 1912 in the Poltava region, where the place was not occupied … yes, for my youth I re-read tons of such nonsense, thrown far into the invented under it is centuries, and probably, it was still necessary for me at that time, so that I now understand how ridiculous it all looks …That primitive story "accidentally found" (read: gouged out of the nose) in the 1880s. about Brother Ku, about the fact that allegedly his son Asparkhuy from the Duplo dynasty, the ruler of the people of the people took him to Balgaria, another son the Cat took the tribes of the Kutiput to the north to Buglar, the third Bayan remained to sit on the stove, waiting for the Khazar Jews to submit, there were two more, well, "nothing at all", not only that, and the grave of this Brother Ku was found in 1912 in the Poltava region, where the place was not occupied … yes, for my youth I re-read tons of such nonsense, thrown far into the invented under it is centuries, and probably, it was still necessary for me at that time, so that I now understand how ridiculous it all looks …That primitive story "accidentally found" (read: gouged out of the nose) in the 1880s. about Brother Ku, about the fact that allegedly his son Asparkhuy from the Duplo dynasty, the ruler of the people of the people took him to Balgaria, another son the Cat took the tribes of the Kutiput to the north to Buglar, the third Bayan remained to sit on the stove, waiting for the Khazar Jews to submit, there were two more, well, "nothing at all", not only that, and the grave of this Brother Ku was found in 1912 in the Poltava region, where the place was not occupied … yes, for my youth I re-read tons of such nonsense, thrown far into the invented under it is centuries, and probably, it was still necessary for me at that time, so that I now understand how ridiculous it all looks …that allegedly his son Asparkhuy from the Duplo dynasty, the ruler of the people, took him to Balgaria, another son, Kot, took the tribes of the Kutiput north to Buglar, the third Bayan remained sitting on the stove, waiting for the Khazar Jews to submit, there were two more, well "Saaavsem nothing", not only that, and the grave of this Brother Ku in 1912 in the Poltava region was found, where the place was not occupied … yes, for my youth I re-read tons of such nonsense, thrown far away in the centuries invented for him, and probably this still, I needed at that time so that I now understand how ridiculous it all looks …that allegedly his son Asparkhuy from the Duplo dynasty, the ruler of the people, took him to Balgaria, another son, Kot, took the tribes of the Kutiput north to Buglar, the third Bayan remained sitting on the stove, waiting for the Khazar Jews to submit, there were two more, well "Saaavsem nothing", not only that, and the grave of this Brother Ku in 1912 in the Poltava region was found, where the place was not occupied … yes, for my youth I re-read tons of such nonsense, thrown far away in the centuries invented for him, and probably this still, I needed at that time so that I now understand how ridiculous it all looks …not only that, and the grave of this Brother Ku was found in 1912 in the Poltava region, where the place was not occupied … yes, for my youth I re-read tons of such nonsense, thrown far away in the centuries invented for him, and probably it was still necessary me at that time, so that I now understand how ridiculous it all looks …not only that, and the grave of this Brother Ku was found in 1912 in the Poltava region, where the place was not occupied … yes, for my youth I re-read tons of such nonsense, thrown far away in the centuries invented for him, and probably it was still necessary me at that time, so that I now understand how ridiculous it all looks …
You can’t, you mustn’t slap HISTORY like that !!! It is impossible to do from "who was nobody, he will become everything" !!! You can't blow up churches, move mass graves and knock down monuments to Lenin !!! There should be history, and it is not necessary to make a "corrupt girl of imperialism" out of it, and at the "pike's command at my will" !!! The peoples, of course, that the "Tatars", that the "Bulgarians", turned out to be the most ordinary, average, ordinary people, ordinary human needs, but this does not mean that you need to shove in something unproductive and make monsters and scapegoats out of them, and even knead into one cauldron modern peoples are not just with different traditional religions, but also absolutely culturally and genetically different. Yes, I understand that after the war of 1877-1878 it was vital for Russia as a state to tie the population of the newly created "safety cushion" to the new "center of mass",it was necessary to bind not only the Orthodox population, but also the Muslims, who constituted an equal integral part of the local population of the territory, which, like Servia-Serbia, began to proudly bear a rather shameful name from the initial point of view, by "kindred historical ties". For the tsarist dynasty of Russia, that porridge, which was called "Kazan Tatars", and from which it was possible to select the necessary specialists of ANY appearance, was the type of a cat that was allowed into an unknown house before entering itself, this role was never hidden, and I would even said that it was their honorable duty … and yes, the version of Islam developed in Kazan for foreigners is, one might say, the pinnacle in the development of this direction of religion, which explains its extreme attractiveness for the population leading a "primitive" semi-agricultural and cattle breeding economy,and the extraordinary ease and speed of its adoption, here the formula "clearly-understandable-relaxed" was worked out to automatism.
Regarding the dissonance, I didn't want to write about it here, but I think it is necessary, the stupid one will be offended and wake up to yell, and the smart one will figure it out and draw conclusions. About the so-called. “Bulgarians” (or more precisely, as historians say, “Bulgars”), hundreds of volumes have been written about their “greatness” and countless “campaigns-victories”, but none of them contain this carefully omitted information, since reality was blasphemous from the point of view of sanctimonious morality both in the second half of the 19th century and in the newly-born socialist peoples. This is an excerpt from "Materials for medical geography and sanitary description of the Fergana region." Volume II. - New Margelan, 1891. V. I. Kushelevsky:
So I would not want my acquaintances Kazan Tatars and Bulgarians to wave their “Bulgarism” like a flag, as the current Lithuanians and Latvians do, who are proud of being “Leta” and “Lithuania”.
I mentioned a little higher about the real Kazakhs, and also the Mongols were not covered in our country, well, in the end, we need to figure out why exactly the Tatar-Mongols, and not the Indo-Chinese, for example …
Author: SKUNK69