Greetings to all, today I will show you some photos of an Indian temple and give my opinion about its processing.
From the very beginning, please note that the temple is made of basalt. This is a very hard rock, with a strength of 5 to 7 points on the Mohs scale. To process it, you need a tool whose strength exceeds at least 5 points.
However, neither copper nor bronze can reach this value. Even steel and iron have 4-4.5 points. This means that it was almost impossible to process such a grandiose structure with such precision for that time.
I noticed one more nuance that raises many questions. Take a closer look at the top block on the posts.
Whichever side you look at, the processing quality of the upper slab is several times worse than that of the supporting pillars and all the basalt elements nearby.
I can only suggest 2 possible explanations for this fact. Either it was decided to simply hammer on this slab, which I hardly believe, or it was put on earlier pillars by another civilization.
There is no such thing that the level of technology at one facility differs so many times. If we add to this my knowledge, then the option with the secondary use of an ancient object is quite likely.
Promotional video:
Let's continue browsing the photos.
How do you like this architectural masterpiece?
Using primitive tools, the ancient craftsmen managed to knock out such a miracle from a single piece of basalt block. At least that's not what the official versions of the story say.
None of the historians are confused by the quality of basalt processing, which can be compared with our modern technologies.
The most amazing thing is that these are not single columns, but a whole large temple made of similar ones. The creation of one such temple should have taken a huge amount of resources, time and people.
We are talking about tens of years, during which the temple had to be carefully defended so that the invaders would not spoil the whole picture.
If we look at some artifacts near the temple, then questions about the creation of this object by our ancestors will quickly disappear.
Perfect symmetry, the finest petals and even distance from each other - all this is done in a solid piece of basalt. If you take away technology from modern masters, then no one can repeat something like that. And even with technology it won't be an easy task.
Whether you believe in alternative versions of history or not, there are facts that are right in front of us, and the explanation of the official versions does not inspire any confidence.
I want to end this article with a fact in favor of an alternative version of history. All these temples and processing of blocks are evaluated by historians and archaeologists who have a specific specialized education.
To put it more delicately, they do not have the proper competence to unambiguously assert the possibility of creating such objects using the tools they offer.
When we turn to specialists in the relevant field and with the appropriate competence, they say with confidence that they could not do this in those days.
Please accept these facts before drawing an accompanying conclusion about alternative versions of history. At the moment, I believe that these are not temples, but some structures that have survived from an ancient highly developed civilization that were used again.
At the same time, their original purpose was lost over time, like that mysterious civilization that created them.