Ludwig Seidler left us an interesting testimony about the death of Atlantis. In his book Atlantis, he writes that in 1869, the library of the city of Levenwaden (North Holland) bought fragments of a copy of an old Frisian manuscript. This is a dead Germanic dialect, close to the Anglo-Saxon languages, already from the 16th century. considered dead. The modern current Frisian language is only vaguely similar to it. When the manuscript was sold, the inscription was made: "in 3449 after the flooding of the country Atland …", i.e. we are talking about a catastrophe that occurred around 3449. - 1869 = approx. 1580 BC (Apparently, the writing of the original manuscript belongs to this time).
The owner of the manuscript, Cornelius Auvers de Linden, claimed that the manuscript had been kept in his family "from time immemorial." Experts found that the copy was made in 1256. The letter used in the manuscript is a kind of Greek. It contains notes made by different authors at a later time.
Hurray Linda Buck, or the book of the Auvers de Linden family, immediately became the subject of lively discussions. Scientists unconditionally recognized the document itself as authentic, but there are still fierce disputes about the reliability of the information contained in the manuscript. And most researchers are inclined to believe that the manuscript is falsification. But only on the grounds that this manuscript … very convincingly confirms the fact of the death of Atlantis. A weighty argument, isn't it? Unfortunately, academic scientists, after the unambiguous message from the French Academy of Sciences to ban the topic of Atlantis, began to consider everything that testifies to the existence of Atlantis as falsification. These are, unfortunately, the hallmarks of "good form" among corporate scientists. But the manuscript is genuine. The question is why, in the thirteenth century, Auvers de Linden, who wrote in a language almost forgotten by God,falsified my copy. Did he know that French academics would read it? (At the indicated time, the Frisians, tillers and sailors, were part of the Roman Empire and lived in northwestern Germany, on the coast of the North Sea.)
Greek Athena or Roman Minerva.
So what does the ancient manuscript say? Here is a small excerpt from Seidler's book. “Ura Linda Buk speaks of a people with white skin and blue eyes, believing in a single god, a people dominated by matriarchy and a priestess of Burgtmaad, also called Min-Erva, played an important role. She was the leader of the Order of the Maidens. There we also meet the name of the Frisian king Minno. Min-Erva resembles the Roman goddess Minerva, and Minno resembles the Cretan king Minos, known from Greek mythology. It also speaks about the trade relations of the Frisians with the Phoenicians, as well as about a sailor-wanderer named Nef-Tuna (Neptune) and his relative Inca. Here is an excerpt from this book.
“Throughout the summer, the Sun hid behind the clouds, as if it did not want to look at the Earth anymore. Eternal silence reigned on Earth, and a damp fog, like a wet sail, hung over the dwellings and fields. The air was heavy and oppressive, people did not know joy and fun. It was then that an earthquake began, as if heralding the end of the world. The mountains spewed fire, sometimes disappearing into the depths, and sometimes rising even higher.
Atland, which sailors call Atlan, disappeared, and the raging waves rose so high above the mountains that those who escaped the fire were swallowed up by the sea abyss.
Promotional video:
The earth burned not only in the country of Finda, but also in Tviskland. The forests were on fire, and when the wind blew from there, the whole country was covered with ash. The rivers changed their course, and new islands of sand and sediment were formed at their mouths. This lasted for three years, then calm reigned, and forests reappeared …
Many countries have disappeared under water, new continents have appeared in a number of places, and half of the forests have died in Tweiskland. The people of Finda settled in uninhabited lands, and the local inhabitants were either exterminated or enslaved …
The Inca ships in the port of Kadik separated from the Nef-Tun flotilla and headed for the western part of the Ocean. The sailors hoped that it would be possible to find some mountainous part of the flooded Atlan country, which, perhaps, was preserved, and that they would be able to settle there …
And Nef-Tuna went to the Middle Sea, but nothing else was heard about the Inca and his comrades …"
The Frisian manuscript ends thus:
“I, Hiddo Tonomat Ovira Linda Vack, give an order to my son Okka: you must protect these books like the apple of your eye. They contain the history of our entire people. Last year, I saved them during the flood with you and your mother. Unfortunately, they got wet, and I had to rewrite them … They were created in Ludverda in 3449 after the flooding of the country Atland."
This is followed by a few more notes by later authors, among them the following appeal signed by Kiko Ovir Linda: “I ask you a thousand times, do not give these ancient records to the monks. They are very insidious and would like to destroy everything that belongs to us, the Friezes."
I have no reason to believe that this manuscript was falsified. Indeed, in the thirteenth century in Europe, no one at all heard anything about the Inca civilization. And if scientists admit that the copy of the manuscript was compiled in the thirteenth century, then the reliability of the information in the manuscript itself should be recognized. I will say more. The word "Inca" did not even exist in the Quechua Indian lexicon. This word began to be used by the conquistadors during the conquest, and only then it began to be used to denote the Inca empire.
Pope Benedict XVI.
In order not to be unfounded, I will refer to the testimony of Ludwig Seidler: “The word“Inca”is absent in the Indian dictionary. European authors translate it as "lord" or "lord", but this is the fruit of reasoning, since in this sense it was found in Peru during the conquest of this country by the Spaniards. It is well known, however, that the Incas were not autochthonous in Peru. The researcher of the culture of the Indians R. X. Nozon writes: “About the place where the Incas come from, we do not know anything reliable. Archaeological excavations have not yet solved this problem, and there is no hope that this problem will be successfully solved."
We are faced with a new riddle that gives wide scope for speculation and fantasy.
In addition, some data, especially the images of the Incas, made by the Quechua Indians during the period of the conquest of the country, indicate a certain similarity with people of the white race of the Caucasian and Semitic types with a characteristic "aquiline nose".
Thus, much evidence suggests that the Frisian Inca may have been a "pre-Columbian" discoverer of America. This issue is worth paying a little attention to.
However, nothing prevents us from fantasizing a little, assuming that the Inca arrived several thousand years before the Inca came to power. Until the time when the Indians mingled with the aliens, many years passed, and in the memory of the people there was only a distant memory of the name of the "white man with a black beard."
Guanabara Bay.
Thus, considering the Hurray Linda Book story to be reliable, we would venture to suggest that the Inca first discovered America. This happened shortly after the death of Atlantis or a little later.
The Inca, like all Frisians of that time, was an excellent sailor. He swam across the Atlantic Ocean, probably following a course more southerly than Columbus, and reached the east coast of South America. But since Peru is located in the western part of this continent, on the Pacific coast, the Inca had to go the rest of the way either by land or by sea around America, from the south, as Magellan did many years later.
Suppose the Inca chose the second path. True, it is longer, but also lighter, especially in the presence of ships. The path by land, especially in the upper reaches of the Amazon, is far from safe even now.
Rio de Janeiro.
Sailing along the coast of South America, the Inca probably would have stopped to rest in the beautiful Guanabara Bay. This name in the language of the Indians means the Hidden Bay. Many years later it was discovered by the Portuguese navigator Andrei Gonçalves and, assuming that this was the mouth of the river, he called it the January River (in honor of January 1, 1502), in Portuguese - Rio de Janeiro. Today, it is said to be the most beautiful city on earth, but during the time of the Inca there may not have even been a trace of human presence. Although…
The entrance to the bay is guarded by rocky mountains. Where the city of Rio de Janeiro was later founded, there rises a cone-shaped rock, the so-called Sugarloaf, and next to the present city, to the south-west of it, there are several rocks called Gavea; the highest of them reaches 840 m above sea level. From a distance of several kilometers from the coast, the contours of these rocks resemble the figure of a reclining man, and therefore the local Indians called them the Sleeping Giant.
On one of these rocks in 1836 some mysterious signs were discovered - drawings or incomprehensible inscriptions. They were deciphered by the Brazilian archaeologist Bernaddo da Silva Ramos.
The inscription, made in Phoenician in Phoenician script, reads: "Badesir of Tire in Phenicia, first son of Et-Baal."
Phoenician ship.
Later I will tell you about the etymology of the word "Inca", and I will reveal the secret of the discovery of the New World by Christopher Columbus, but for now, simply, as a working hypothesis, we will assume that the founders of the Inca empire were the descendants of the Phoenicians, who, during the Cretan cataclysm, somehow miraculously managed get to the shores of the New World. After this cataclysm, the Atlantic Ocean, "because of the silt that left behind a sunken island (Atlantis)", for about three millennia was considered unnavigable. And this time was enough for the Old World to almost forget about the existence of the American continents. However, this story, although written, will be published a little later.
And this assumption, no matter how fantastic it may seem at first glance, makes it possible to logically explain all the mysteries of the similarities between the civilizations of the Old and New Worlds in the Ancient World.