And until now, the Internet is still in a fever from all sorts of apocalyptic scenarios about the consequences of universal vaccination and, at the same time, chipping of the world's population. They boil down to the fact that in the process of vaccination from 20% to 7 billion of the population will be destroyed, and in the process of chipping, the entire population, except for the notorious "golden billion" will be turned into at least slaves, and at most into zombies.
On the one hand, it is hard to believe in the simultaneous desire of all governments to forcibly benefit their populations, on the other hand, at one time, there were no less heated debates and oppositions when introducing smallpox vaccination. Another thing is that the smallpox vaccine was first tested by the British, and when it paid off, everyone began to do it. And since only the lazy is not talking about the overpopulation of the planet, such an amazing solidarity of all governments arouses quite justified suspicions. We will not talk about the most odious option with the destruction of 7 billion people at once, because, firstly, we still need to get to all these 7 billion, and secondly, people sitting in governments understand perfectly well that they, together with their loved ones, are completely will not necessarily be included in the remaining "golden billion", no matter what guarantees they are given in this. As for the partial destruction of their populations, not everything is so simple. Well, let's say (cynically and inhumanly) that countries such as China and India, as well as countries with a rapidly growing population, from a 20% decrease in the latter, will not lose so much, and maybe even gain. But again, if even in China the state resource is sufficient to vaccinate the entire population, then in India, for example, such an action to thin out peoples may stall. In addition to the fact that there are quite a lot of homeless people (for example, at the beginning of the 2000s in Mumbai, with a declared population of 30 million, a figure of 3 million people living on the street, who, if anything, would simply scatter through the forests, was allowed), it is also quite heterogeneous the composition of the population can cause more substantial opposition. However, China, I think,will not destroy what he is at a given time and is really strong.
As for Europe, Russia and North America, then there is no such overpopulation, the birth rate does not always cover the natural decline in population, so why would this very population be reduced in these territories? Get rid of old people? But the compulsory vaccination is reinforced by the fact that without it it will be impossible to work, study and travel.
Pensioners, for the most part, do not study much, work and travel, so they can easily refuse such vaccination. In the end, they won't be forcibly grabbing old people and injecting them with lethal injections … But who knows, who knows?
Now let's talk a little about chipping. Throughout history, humanity is best able to skillfully destroy themselves and not only their own kind. Therefore, the fact that when chipping the ability to destroy the brain activity of almost the entire population, turning it into a herd, is quite real. Another thing is who might need it? Because such a herd needs to be fed, watered and cleaned out the waste products, and you will not get milk, meat or wool from it. It is possible, probably, to force such a herd to dig from here to death, since it is no longer possible to make such a herd dig from here to death, since it is no longer possible to force such a herd to thread a needle or go down into a mine and extract something, and where to get so many shovels? If there was a possibility by the introduction of chips to force the unreasonable to meaningful activity, then probably alreadywould have long ago adapted various animals to this. It may be perhaps unreasonable to individually force you to do what you need, but this will most likely require such software and direct operator guidance that it is easier and cheaper to go and do this work yourself. Of course, without depriving the intelligence of the chip, it will be possible to manipulate, but still on a very limited scale.
Massively, it will probably be possible to regulate the emotional background (extinguish or intensify aggression, for example). And to chip in order to arrange surveillance, and now with the help of the same mobile and other gadgets, this is quite done for itself. If there is even the slightest opportunity to somehow manipulate at least individually on someone else, then the question of national security immediately arises. Because any government, along with the temptation to get a submissive and loyal population, can also get an army of Trojan horses: chip suppliers will certainly supplement them, even if they are "sleeping" for the time being, viruses, which, if something happens, will wake up with an unpleasant for an unwanted leadership result. Not to mention the fact that any program is hacked, and then terrorists will have complete freedom.
What about turning people into slaves? Here, in addition to the fact that slave labor is not very productive, at least as long as a person realizes his slavery, and even an army of overseers is needed, be it the institution of thieves in law, who, in principle, kept the camps, or there should be a dependence like China - North Korea, because as long as China needs a nuclear fist, from which it can disown if something happens, the dictatorship in North Korea will flourish, or an army of programmers who will have to direct and direct the newly minted slaves. So now, without any chips, it is completely incorrect to call the majority of the world's population very free.
All of the above does not mean that everyone needs to be vaccinated and chipped with songs and dances, but the current almost all-planet quarantine and self-isolation company is very suspicious.
Promotional video:
