The great Russian singer Joseph Davydovich Kobzon. The "master of the Russian stage" has not been able to learn a single new song for thirty years. Lev Valerianovich Leshchenko, another "master", also continues to exploit the repertoire performed in the USSR. The same can be said about the entire modern Russian stage, as well as Russian art in general. I understand why not a single new aircraft or car has been created (Superjet 100 and Kalina do not count, at least the VAZ subcompact has our name, in contrast to the Sukhoi aircraft), it is understandable why nothing was built except supermarkets and export gas pipelines, but somehow it is not clear why there is no development of scientific and technological progress in general, on a global scale.
Would you say it wrong? Is progress “striding by leaps and bounds”? Don't just quote the assurances from the media. See the world with your own eyes, and you will understand that all this is a lie.
Anything that claims to be a great technological leap at the turn of the century is pure bluff and dusting. Let's understand objectively:
Less than twenty years have passed since the widespread distribution of magnetic media - bobbins (if anyone remembers what it is) and cassettes to the advent of digital media.
The "mutation" from the CD to the now massively used flash drives has occurred in a matter of years. Remember how quickly mobile phones from "bricks" with "ON" and "OFF" functions turned into smartphones? It would seem yes … progress. But…!!! All “progress can only be attributed to the improvement of only one industry - DIGITAL. In other words, someone “allowed” only information to develop.
This is important, of course, and outwardly very similar to a revolution, but is it so?
Promotional video:
The discovery of electricity spawned a new world. The world in which we live to this day. In 1827, the world's first power plant was built (the Yedlik dynamo). Can you imagine 1827? Uncles in top hats, carriages, hussars … Romance in one word. And what else did we have at that time?
In 1803, Richard Trevithick's first steam locomotive went to England.
Officially, the Americans are considered the inventors of the aircraft, Wright (1903), but in Russia such an aircraft was back in 1864. Its inventor was Nikolai Afanasyevich Telyashov.
Already in 1812, the telegraph was used in St. Petersburg - the invention of Pavel Petrovich Schilling.
Few people know, by the way, but already during the Crimean War, the “bast shoes” Russian army was fully equipped with telegraph devices and was controlled centrally, by means of technical means of communication, as is the case until now, by the way.
In 1834 the first Russian submarine designed by Karl Andreevich Schilder sank into the Baltic.
Yes Yes!!! I know that someone has already pasted a dozen labels on me like: - "Rodnover", "Russophile", "Hurray-patriot", "Xenophobe", "Chauvinist", etc. It is very important for me that you understand, that clinging to the merits of ancestors is not my method. I will not argue that I do not care if Russia was great or it was the way our official historians describe it. No, I’m still more grateful if the picture of my country is in felt boots, A hat with earflaps, a balalaika and a bottle of vodka is the delirium of rabid Russophobes who are brought up by enemy propaganda. Nevertheless, let's put aside our emotions and face the facts:
More than 70% of all significant inventions that made our world what it is belongs to the subjects of the Russian Empire, citizens of the USSR or inventors of Slavic origin. It is a fact? An undeniable fact. Bicycle, gunpowder, internal combustion engine, all modern chemistry, aviation, astronautics, geographical discoveries, radio, telegraph, automobile, television, metallurgy and welding, all these are the fruits of inventions and discoveries made by our fellow tribesmen. It is a fact.
Even despite the fact that Döbereiner discovered the periodic table according to the western version, and Edison invented Yablochkov's electric lamp, and Popov's radio was Marconi's invention, we all know that all this is nothing more than a part of the information war, which we, alas, are losing like any other war not related to direct combat.
But now it's not even about that. Let's say that the Russians didn't actually invent anything. Moscow was built by Italians, Petersburg by Italians and French, and Skolkovo by Tajiks and Moldovans. Pay attention to the dating of the discoveries.
Localization by time:
Did you understand? XIX century. That same mysterious nineteenth century unknown to us … !!! Those. we live in a world that was created only two hundred years ago. Since then, nothing has changed fundamentally. All that was achieved was the modernization of the technologies of the hussars and serfs.
Localization in space:
I remind you that I am not writing this to give weight to the current worthlessness of the Russian government at the expense of the ancestors, but I argue that this is a concrete fact: Most of the world's greatest achievements have been made on a specific local area of land, and this land has a very specific location on the map. This is where the new castrated, raped, slandered, betrayed, slandered Russia is today.
And now, I propose to correlate these two revealed patterns with the following facts:
1) - In the nineteenth century, the population of the entire continent from Alaska to the British Isles mysteriously declined significantly.
Prague. Czech Republic.
Paris. France.
Sevastopol. Russia.
I saw the mass graves in the Pskov region with my own eyes, but unfortunately I cannot provide a photo. The shooting was done by a friend who took all the material to St. Petersburg and disappeared without a trace. I am describing an archaeological site in Izborsk, Pskov region:
Hundreds of remains are buried near the wall of the St. Nicholas Church of the 17th century. The location of the bones indicates that people died at about the same time, they were buried in a pit, placing one body on top of another neatly, like sleepers, several people on top of each other. Above, there is flat ground without any designation of burial by a hill or a slab, and the depth of the remains at the very top of this terrible pyramid is no more than one meter. In fact, lightly sprinkled only. The burial was discovered by accident, during the restoration of the church's foundations. Archaeologists claim that the dead were buried in this way for several centuries. False!
You don't need to be an expert to notice that the preservation of remains at different depths is identical. The bones were equally preserved, both on the first tier of the burial, and on the uppermost one. The earthen layer between the corpses is no more than 3-4 centimeters. Corpses are ideally oriented in space: feet - to the feet, skulls - to the skulls. On the face - sorting by height, probably for reasons dictated by the size of each hole dug. It follows from this that all these people were buried at the same time and competently. Modern mass graves, in places of fighting or group executions, have a completely different character. The corpses were simply dumped into the existing pit, randomly, like garbage, and when the pit was filled to the brim, a hill was poured over it.
In this case, we are faced with the fact of the simultaneous mass death of people, followed by their careful burial.
All these remains cannot be explained in any way by the wars with Napoleon, so scientists came up with a version of the "Black Plague", and most of the remains date back to the Middle Ages. However, according to the confessions of my friend, an archaeologist, there are practically no remains older than the end of the eighteenth century on the territory of the Pskov region, and earlier than the fifteenth, they simply do not exist. All the so-called sites of ancient man are not "the first stages of the evolution of homo sapiens", but groups of people with different levels of technology proficiency existing simultaneously in the same region.
A simple example: When an Indian village is found in the Amazon jungle, who left it in 1960, what would be the "correct" scientific dating? Right! In accordance with the dating method by analogy, the site will be dated to the fifteenth century. But after all, the found bone sewing needles and primitive beads testify only to the lag in the development of the inhabitants of a particular village in the jungle, and not to the ancient age of the settlement. After all, planes fly over islands in the ocean, the inhabitants of which do not know the wheels, and this is normal, and it has always been so.
In Izborsk, for example, there were cobbled pavements, sidewalks and stone houses, incl. and outbuildings, at a time when Paris was a village of wooden buildings surrounded by a palisade, but this is not a reason for arguing that Paris existed in the ninth century, and Izborsk only in the nineteenth !?
2) The fact on many issues is controversial, but it has every reason to be considered reliable - the almost complete absence of forests in the recent past. This is completely at odds with everything that is known to official science, but the mass of evidence has not found a clear explanation, where on the entire territory of Eurasia are trees older than two hundred years old, with rare exceptions?
So no one answered the question of where the countless deposits of wood ash came from on the territory of Russia, from which potash was brewed - the main strategic product of the Middle Ages, over which the pre-Russia had an exclusive monopoly. (potash is potassium carbonate - a raw material for the production of gunpowders, explosives, detergents, dyes, glass and ceramics). In terms of its importance, it was comparable in importance to modern hydrocarbons.
3) There is another indisputable fact that requires explanation: abrupt climatic changes in Eurasia. There is a sufficient amount of information that in 1817-1819 there was a sharp global cooling of the climate in the northern hemisphere. Judging by engravings from the nineteenth century, even winter uniforms did not exist in the army before the 1800s. More precisely, it was, but it was a cloth made of denser cloth, and nothing more.
There is a wealth of information that can be gleaned from … cookbooks. Those. those who destroyed archives and books did not think that a simple cookbook could contain more valuable information for the historian than the encryption of the general staff of Alexander the Great. For example, what is such information worth: analyzing the recipes of dishes popular in Russia in the 18th century, you involuntarily come to the conclusion that most of the products that we consider exotic today were the most common among pre-Russians. When preparing dishes, both fresh and salted lemons were widely used, which were harvested in barrels! Do you have friends who have a couple of barrels of lemons at their dacha? I do not have. Pineapples were also salted in barrels, which were stewed and fried, as we are now, cabbage, serving as a side dish.
In addition to pineapples and lemons, vegetables such as capers, artichokes, olives, olives were massively used in cooking (the word “fruit” did not exist, everything that does not run itself, but grows on the spot) was called a vegetable, dul, fig, and many others, the names of which can not be remembered now for the reason that they are out of circulation. And they left circulation not because the Ministry of Health does not recommend them, but because they no longer exist at all.
A separate topic is spices. Russian cuisine is replete with such spices as cardamom, cinnamon, bay leaf, nutmeg, cumin, pepper, salt, vinegar, without honey, anywhere.
Of course, cookbooks, as now, were written so that the hostess could surprise guests with delights, but … The amount of products used and the frequency of their use are striking. This indicates their extreme ease of accessibility. Meanwhile, pork is referred to as exotic and appears in recipes spied in Italy and Guispania. Russians ate in huge quantities veal, fish of all kinds, crayfish, and game.
The conclusion is unambiguous. Lemons and pineapples grew everywhere, as did olives and capers. This requires one thing - a radically different climate. It means that the artists were not fools, who painted the warriors naked, only a sword made of clothes. There was no need for clothing and fuel. And, judging by the recipes, the Russians had no idea about the wars for Indian spices.
4) The most weighty argument is the discrepancy between the levels of technologies used in Russia and Russia. The main monument, of course, is St. Petersburg. In order to build this, tens of thousands of skilled workers are needed, not peasants driven from Pskov and Novgorod. Thousands of engineers and middle managers. Dozens of designers and architects in design institutes. In addition, do not forget about the standardization system, and it exists in fact. The naked eye can see similar standard parts, from which entire palaces were assembled like a designer. Add to this the means of mechanization, machinery and equipment and a gigantic army, constituting an infrastructure that includes everything: - From textile factories and canteens, to repair plants and transport. Where are the traces of this activity?
The conclusion also suggests itself: the Russians only repaired and exploited to this day what was inherited from the pre-Russians who lived and worked in the nineteenth century. See for yourself:
Arrows indicate objects that differ by an order of magnitude in the quality of performance. The Sphinxes are masterpieces, and the pedestals on which they are placed were made extremely carelessly, in accordance with the current skills of builders.
Now you don't even need an arrow to discern what was built by our civilization and what was left of the pre-Russians.
But admire the perfection of the construction of the fort "Grand Duke Constantine" in Kronstadt:
Powerful granite walls are reinforced with multi-ton cast iron slabs installed at an angle to create the ricochet of enemy shells. Just become imbued with the realization of how it can be done with such quality and precision! One gets the feeling that the builders did not make a difference from what to cast parts, from cast iron or granite. and the accuracy of execution can be the envy of modern aircraft manufacturers. Deviations from dimensions are not exactly millimeters, but fractions of millimeters. How it is possible without modern machines of the highest precision category with numerical control or without a fantastic laser is not clear. But everything is learned in comparison:
Compare. The Russians were already building in the foreground. The later structure looks simply ridiculous against the backdrop of an elegant fort built a hundred years earlier. Where is the scientific and technological progress? Where is the evolution of technology?
How could this degrade into This:
The same fort, only the builders are different. One could make the opposite conclusion: in the last photo there are older structures of the fort, but the opposite is true. And this paradox cannot be explained except by the loss of knowledge and skills. It would also not be logical if we now gave up sneakers and put on wooden shoes.
Now let's take a look at the photographs taken during the Crimean War of 1853-1856.
Sevastopol. Bay and ship docks.
Sevastopol. Library.
The first thing that catches your eye is the quality of the photo. It is an order of magnitude better than the photographs taken in the early years of Soviet power, for example.
And the second thing that comes to mind: - "Somewhere I have already seen it!" Now let us remember that the allies fighting against Russia attacked, in addition to Crimea, the Caucasus, and St. Petersburg, Murmansk, Arkhangelsk, and even Petropavlovsk Kamchatsky, but everywhere suffered a crushing defeat. The only thing they were able to achieve was to wipe out the analogue of St. Petersburg in Crimea from the face of the earth. Do you understand what Russia has lost in the person of Sevastopol? And if the British fleet had not been prevented by the Baltic forts? We and Petersburg, which we are proud of now, might never know.
So what do we have left?
But the fact that:
- how the "Masters" exploit the repertoire of the eighties without creating anything new, - how russia exploits the remnants created under the USSR, - so the whole world exists due to the achievements of the pre-Russian XIX century.
Apart from the Internet, nothing fundamentally new has been created in two hundred years. You will say: "What about astronautics?"
What is astronautics? Are you so naive that you believe in fairy tales about space?
Better listen to the interviews of Leonov and Grechko of different years, and you are guaranteed a wonderful evening of humor. More professional than TV shows. "Rzhaka until I drop" - that is what awaits an unbiased listener. Our "cosmonauts" have been lying so much that it's time to write collections of tales.
Never and none of the living creatures of the upper layers of the atmosphere left, and this is a fact. Space is the space between the planets, and the place where teikunauts-astronauts-cosmonauts are is not space at all. Stop believing the stories of Soviet and American ideologists. It would be more correct to call them "STRATONAVTS".
So … you have to realize and accept the idea that modern civilization undeservedly uses the achievements of the previous one, and itself is not able to create anything but weapons for extermination and destruction.
So who are we after that?