Due to the limited format, I will allow myself to state the problem only in a thesis. If desired, anyone interested can easily find confirmation of the following. Moreover, the topic is vast and there is enough space for it for more than one hundred doctoral dissertations. So:
It is known that Christianity is the foundation of today's European civilization. Russia undoubtedly belongs to it, with the only difference that Orthodoxy (the eastern branch of Christianity) serves as its core. It is also known that Christianity in its present form was mainly formed at the First Council of Nicaea, convened by the emperor Constantine I; it took place in June 325 in the city of Nicaea (now Iznik, Turkey); lasted more than two months and became the first Ecumenical Council in the history of Christianity.
At the council, the Symbol of Faith was adopted, the Arian and other heresies were condemned, separation from Judaism was finally proclaimed, Sunday instead of Saturday was recognized as a day off, the time for the celebration of Easter by the Christian church was determined, and 20 canons were worked out.
However, although Christianity separated from Judaism (now officially), it is still based on the "Pentateuch" (the Old Testament, the Torah, the so-called Mosaic Law - the first five books of the canonical Jewish and Christian Bible, it is from the Pentateuch that we learn about “God's chosen people.” So why, having formalized the power canonically (after all, the emperor is the anointed of God) and consolidating it (power) religiously, the founders nevertheless left some ambiguity in the form of the Mosaic Law, according to which the Jews are the main ones?, taking the "New Testament" as the basis of the foundations, and all the events BEFORE it were not described in some narration or legend? The answer is on the surface, because in addition to the fact that any teaching should be based on something, the main thing here is money,for power and money go hand in hand, and one cannot exist without the other. And it is known that at that time the Jews were the main usurers, lending to emperors and entire states.
So it all continued until 1054. No one then could have imagined that the division that took place between those Churches that would soon be called Orthodox and Roman Catholic would last for centuries.
The schism was based mainly on doctrinal factors related to different ideas about the mystery of the Holy Trinity and about the structure of the Church. Added to these were differences on less important issues related to church customs and rituals. However, this is only what lies on the surface, it is clear to any reader that the main reason for this was only the struggle for Power, and from this moment the Roman Catholic Church declares itself to be the main and only one. And here a whole series of events begins, the most tragic of them was the IV Crusade, which deviated from the main path and ended with the destruction of Constantinople, the proclamation of the Latin emperor and the establishment of the rule of the Frankish lords, who at their own discretion cut the land holdings of the former Roman Empire. Many Orthodox monks were expelled from their monasteries and replaced by Latin monks. This turn of events was a logical consequence of the creation of the Western empire and the evolution of the Latin Church since the beginning of the Middle Ages.
And from 1054 to 1118 there is a struggle for another symbol of power - money. This began with the First Crusade. In July 1099, the crusaders took possession of Jerusalem. A universal robbery began, which had to be formalized into a controlled system.
And in 1118 in Jerusalem, a group of 9 French knights, headed by the knight Hugo de Payen (de Payne), decided to rally into a brotherhood, which set itself the goal of protecting brothers in faith.
Promotional video:
Knight Hugo de Payne became the first master of the order.
The knights take 3 monastic vows: poverty, obedience and chastity, to which they add a fourth, their own: to protect the pilgrims.
Completely beggars, they sometimes have to ride one horse; later this was reflected on the famous seal of the Order.
In January 1120, a small group of knights arrived at the church cathedral in Nablus. All Jerusalem clergy were present at this council.
The question was raised about the recognition of the new brotherhood by the church and such recognition was received.
It was from that moment on that the Templars rapidly subjugated almost the entire financial system that existed at that time. Or rather partially crushed. simply robbing the Jews and gaining the right not to repay their debts, but they did not stop there and, having done colossal work, developed and streamlined financial relations, creating the foundations of banking, which in essence lives and flourishes to this day.
The banking system was created by the Templars, precisely because of their activities to protect the pilgrims. Subsequently, after its founding, the Order began to develop rather quickly, the number of "branches" of the Order - the Commanderships - grew. And the Templars came up with such an interesting thing. Why guard the road along which the pilgrims walk from robbers? The robbers need money - gold, right? You can, after all, take gold from a pilgrim in one commanding office, and give him a check instead of gold, with the signature and fingerprints of the person to whom the check was issued. And in another commandery, this check can be exchanged for gold! Essentially a bank transfer. Money was taken for this service! And it was reliable. Since the commandery was almost never attacked, due to the fact that there were professional soldiers who guarded it,and on top of that, it's like robbing a Temple - was considered a sacrilege in the Middle Ages.
It was possible to take a loan from the Order at 10% - for comparison: credit and loan offices took 40%; Jews - 40%. But since the time of the Crusades, the popes freed the crusaders from "Jewish debts", while the Templars were given them in any case. And the Templars, as it were, did not give "money for growth", they called it a payment for use, somehow, which in turn was approved by the Church. Thus, the Order of the Knights Templar is the first international banking organization where you could store money, make bank transfers or borrow money. And yet they were very honest bankers! Since they earned money not for themselves personally, but for the Order, and the Order served God!
Temple, in fact, meant a certain banker's house, which the Templars set up in every major city. That is, if you start from the MEANING, then "Templar" should be translated as "banker". If we leave both meanings of the word, then we get a temple-bank, living according to the old Jewish pre-Christian rules.
Thus, the two main components of domination - money and power, took shape and concentrated in one hands - in the church. Moreover, although its financial power was administratively headed by the Templars, it was technologically based on the Jews, since in banking houses, all the rough work was done by the Jews, and the general hatred for the crucifixion of Christ was a guarantee of their loyalty and obedience. In today's slang, this meant that the Jews received a "roof" from the Templars.
This situation persisted for several hundred years. And then the thunder struck:
1306 year. Philip IV the Handsome plundered and expelled all French Jews
1306 year. Part of French Jews left for Palestine
1308 year. Seneschal Estella issues act against Jews
1308 year. Strasbourg. Jews are burned alive
1307 year. The Grand Master of the Templars, Jacques de Molay, was burned by order of Philip IV King of France. At least 2,000 knights are killed.
1311-1312 years. After the cathedral in Vienne, there are widespread burnings of the Templars.
The same dates, the same repressions, the same Philip IV. The surviving Templars even chose the region of immigration the same as the surviving Jews - England (Scotland).
Simultaneously with the liquidation of the Order of the Templars, the Vienna Cathedral suddenly became concerned about the fate of the Jews. Dated in 1311: when the financial elite was sent to the fires, the crown suddenly remembered that they needed Jewish hard workers (blacksmiths, shipbuilders, weavers); this happened due to the fact that the system had to function and having changed the top (from the Templars it passed to the Jesuits), the Jews were entrusted with maintaining its performance, since no Templar treasures were found, and banking revenues plummeted.
The Jesuit Order was actually called the Society of Jesus, although there is also the name of the Company of Jesus, and this campaign was engaged not so much in spiritual exercises as in banal commerce:
I imported and exported highly scarce goods: sugar, tea-mate, silver …
Grew up colonial goods by the hands of serfs, in fact, Indians
Traded in slaves
If necessary, fought with competitors
Cranked stock speculation, which got burned in France
Tritely cheated the treasury, evading, for example, the poll tax
Was in a share with the "roof", in this case, with the Pope
The East India Company and the Venetian Company did exactly the same … they themselves hardly differed from the military monastic orders: their own flag, their own oath, rigid mutual guarantee, feudal power over the peasants, kickbacks upward (the kings were in the share) and a mandatory religious symbol and patron saint.
It is very likely that, in the person of the Company of Jesus and the Order of the Temple-Bank, the largest monetary interests collided. As a result, in 1707, the Templars lost, and in 1773 - the Jesuits. And Britain, which bet on the Templars, became a maritime superpower, and Spain, which bet on the Jesuits, ultimately lost almost all of its overseas possessions.
In 1800, the Bank of France was organized in Paris, modeled on the Bank of England. However, Napoleon did not trust the Bank of France and decided that France should finally get rid of its debts. He stated that if the government is financially dependent on bankers, then the country is run not by the government, but by the bankers. “The hand that gives is always higher than the hand that takes. Money has no homeland. The financiers have no patriotism and honesty - their only goal is cash. (Napoleon Bonaparte).
At this time, France received unexpected assistance from the Bank of America. In 1800, Thomas Jefferson defeated John Adams to become the 3rd President of the United States. In 1803, Jefferson and Napoleon made a deal. The US gave Napoleon $ 3 million in exchange for a huge chunk of French-owned American territory west of the Mississippi River. The deal became known as the Louisiana Purchase. With this money, Napoleon quickly equipped an army and began to spread influence throughout Europe, capturing everything in his path. However, the Bank of England immediately decided to prevent this. He provided loans to virtually every country in the camp of Napoleon's opponents, and earned fantastic profits from the war. Prussia, Austria and, ultimately, Russia climbed into debt to him "head over heels" only to stop Napoleon. Four years later, with the backbone of Napoleon's army in Russia, 30-year-old Nathan Rothschild, head of the London office of the Rothschild family bank, came up with a bold plan to get the gold shipment to France to finance the attack on Napoleon by the Duke of Wellington from Spain … Later, at a business dinner in London, Nathan boasted that it was the best deal of his life. However, he was not yet aware that his truly best financial operation was yet to come. Later, at a business dinner in London, Nathan boasted that it was the best deal of his life. However, he was not yet aware that his truly best financial operation was yet to come. Later, at a business dinner in London, Nathan boasted that it was the best deal of his life. However, he was not yet aware that his truly best financial operation was yet to come.
As a result of Wellington's onslaught from the south and a series of military defeats, Napoleon was forced to abdicate in favor of Louis XVIII. Presumably for life, Napoleon was exiled from France to the tiny island of Alba off the Italian coast.
While Napoleon, temporarily defeated by England (with financial assistance from the Rothschilds), was in exile, America also tried to get rid of its central bank.
In 1811, a bill was proposed to Congress to renew the license of the Bank of the United States. A heated debate erupted, and lawmakers in Pennsylvania and Virginia passed a resolution asking Congress to revoke the bank's license. The press corps of the time attacked the bank, openly calling it a rogue, a vulture, a vampire and a cobra. Thus, if anything remained independent in America, it was the press. Congressman Pee Dee Porter launched an offensive against the bank from the rostrum of Congress, saying that if the bank's license was renewed, Congress would (quote) “… won freedoms."
By that time, the 4th American president, James Madison, was in charge of the White House. As we recall, Madison was an ardent opponent of the private central bank. Therefore, his vice president, George Clinton, managed to cut the Gordian knot in the Senate and send the bank into oblivion.
Just 5 months later, England attacked the United States and the war of 1812 began. But the British were at the same time at war with Napoleon, and therefore the war ended in a draw in 1814.
In 1815, a year after the end of the 1812 war in America, Napoleon managed to escape from exile and return to Paris. French troops were sent to capture it. However, this man possessed such charisma that instead, the soldiers gathered again under the flags of their former military leader and proclaimed him emperor. In March 1815 Napoleon gathered an army, which the English Duke of Wellington managed to defeat in less than 19 days at Waterloo.
A number of researchers believe that Napoleon borrowed 5 million pounds from the Bank of England to re-equip the army. However, the money actually came from Hubert's banking house in Paris. However, it was from this historic milestone that it became common practice for private central banks to support opposing sides during the war. Why would the central bank finance both belligerents? The reason is that war is the world's best debt generator. To win the war, the country is ready to borrow any amount. So the alleged loser will be loaned just enough to keep the hope of winning, and the likely winner will be loaned as much as needed to win. In addition, such loans are usually accompanied by a guarantee that the winner will pay the loser's debts.
And so the armies converged at Waterloo. Many sources indicate that it was the Jews who played a major role in the return of Napoleon. They did this in order to carry out the plan for the final takeover of the world financial system and was led by Nathan Rothschild.
He stationed his trusted agent, Rockwood, north of the battlefield, near the English Channel. And as soon as the outcome of the battle was a foregone conclusion, Rockwood crossed the strait and delivered news to Nathan 24 hours before the Duke of Wellington's courier arrived in London.
Rothschild immediately rushed to the stock exchange and took his usual place, next to the old column. All eyes were on him - everyone knew that the Rothschilds had an unrivaled network of informants around the world. If Wellington had lost and Napoleon had won, Britain's financial position would have been rapidly shaken.
Rothschild looked sad. He stood in his place, motionless, with his eyes downcast. Then he suddenly started selling. Seeing this, nervous investors might think that Wellington must have lost the battle. The market plummeted downward. Soon everyone was selling British government bonds. The price of bonds fell sharply. Then Rothschild, through his agents, began to secretly buy them for only a small fraction of the price they had just an hour ago.
“Oh, these myths and legends!” - you say. However, 100 years later, the New York Times published a story about how Nathan's great-grandson tried to remove the chapter with this entertaining story from a book on the stock market. The Rothschild family called this story a lie and unsubstantiated, and filed a lawsuit. However, the court dismissed their claim and ordered them to pay all legal costs.
What is even more interesting - a number of historians write that within a few hours after the Battle of Waterloo Nathan Rothschild seized control not only over the English government bond market, but also over the Bank of England. Whether the Rothschild family gained control of the world's first and largest private central bank of the most powerful nation of the time or not, one thing is certain - by the middle of the 19th century, the Rothschilds had become the richest family in the world. They ruled the government debt market, opening bank branches and manufacturing companies everywhere. It is not for nothing that the remainder of the 19th century is called the "Age of the Rothschilds."
Despite their colossal power, the Rothschilds prefer to keep a low profile. Although the family controls retail chains, industrial, trading, mining and tourism corporations, only a few of them bear the Rothschild name. According to experts, by the end of the 19th century, the Rothschilds owned half of the world's wealth.
The other half is concentrated in the hands of the Fed, the history of its creation is described in detail, so we will omit it for brevity, leaving only a statement that the main ones are the Rockefellers.
Thus, by now, the entire completeness of at least one of the two components of absolute power, namely money, is concentrated in the hands of the Jews. This was facilitated by a series of wars from Napoleon to World War II inclusive. The sacred power is, as it were, blurred, on the one hand, these are European and Middle Eastern monarchies, on the other, these are democracies that are widespread throughout the world, the apotheosis of which is the United States, where the election race is underway, which we are all watching with interest. In its filth and untidiness, it is unprecedented, everyone celebrates it. At the same time, "Brexit" is taking place, and today the news came out: Large UK banks may leave the country because of Brexit at the beginning of 2017, said the head of the British Bankers Association Anthony Brown. He claims,that small banks are ready to move to the EU this year. At the same time, for no apparent reason, UNESCO makes a decision on the Temple Mount, in which it rejects any connection and rights to it (Temple Mount) of the Jews. If we also take into account the fact that more and more publications appear in the media, allegedly backed up by archaeological excavations, that the Wailing Wall is not any foundation of the Temple of Solomon, but only a remnant of the wall of a Roman fortress, then adding two plus two we will clearly see a simultaneous blow to the millennial sacredness power and the global financial system. I personally do not believe in the chance of such coincidences. Obviously, we are witnessing a fight that will shake all the foundations of the world order and the elections in the United States - this is just the tip of the volcano, which has come to life and has begun to throw out ashes so far. But the reason for the eruption is the movement of tectonic plates,that are far below, several tens of kilometers from the surface. What kind of slabs we do not see yet, the more interesting what it will eventually result in and which slab will be at the top. One thing is obvious, in order to preserve their sacredness, the Jews will have to rely on Christianity, because it relies on them. And the Vatican, with its scandals and the almost complete de-Christianization of Europe, is of little use here. However, the Vatican has the largest treasury of our time - the Vatican Library. Can you imagine what could happen if tomorrow he published some of the documents stored there? For example "The Gospel of Jesus" or something similar.in order to preserve their sacredness, the Jews will have to rely on Christianity, for it relies on them. And the Vatican, with its scandals and the almost complete de-Christianization of Europe, is of little use here. However, the Vatican has the largest treasury of our time - the Vatican Library. Can you imagine what could happen if tomorrow he published some of the documents stored there? For example "The Gospel of Jesus" or something similar.in order to preserve their sacredness, the Jews will have to rely on Christianity, for it relies on them. And the Vatican, with its scandals and the almost complete de-Christianization of Europe, is of little use here. However, the Vatican has the largest treasury of our time - the Vatican Library. Can you imagine what could happen if tomorrow he published some of the documents stored there? For example "The Gospel of Jesus" or something similar. Gospel of Jesus "or something similar. Gospel of Jesus "or something similar.
All this will very easily fall on the soil heavily fertilized by Hollywood, where the main character is played by Tom Hanks. Along with millions of newly arrived Muslims, this will kill Christianity in Europe. Thus, the ideological reformatting of the world has already begun, and from history, only partially described above, we know that financial wars follow, which are not inferior to religious wars in cruelty, but are often the same.
Obviously, this very much worries those who are directly concerned, hence the meeting of the Pope with the Russian Patriarch is not accidental, and then the meeting of the latter with the head of the Church of England - the Queen of Great Britain. There will certainly be an answer, but what is it?
In general, I advise everyone to buy a couple of boxes of Belarusian stew, just in case. And for now - we are waiting for the continuation, it will follow very soon. I have no doubt about that.
