Have you not noticed how the United States has changed its tactics since 1991? If during the Soviet era they fought for influence, for control over the countries, then since 1991 everything has changed. In Eastern Europe and in the republics of the former USSR, they, where they brought their agents to power, where they simply bought local elites. Russia was not taken seriously then, all the more so then they actively participated in the robbery of our country. At the same time, steps were taken to further disintegrate and completely transfer Russia to their control. But towards the end of the 90s, the tactics began to change. And the first test of strength - Yugoslavia:
….. “When the first bombs fell on the Serbs on March 24, 1999, a new bloody era has begun. The law of the jungle reigned, the law of brutal violence
and a series of new brutal wars became as inevitable as the nightmare of world
collisions in the 1910s. Throw away the husk of politicians' words about some
there is a "peaceful settlement", "negotiation processes", "humanism" and "the role
UN . That's it, now there is no other right but the right to kill and maim. The UN is dead
how the League of Nations died in 1939. A new series of wars is now inevitable
Promotional video:
because there are no miracles in life. There is an iron law of history: the guns are silent
when there is a balance of forces on the planet. And you just have to break it -
how wars start. So it was and so it will be. …
Maxim Kalashnikov "Battle for Heaven"
By tearing Yugoslavia to shreds, the Americans created a hotbed of tension in Europe. What for? Well, for this you need to make a small excursion into history.
The United States came to the First World War as a secondary country, and left it as the main creditor of all participating countries.
“American billionaires … have made the most of them. They made all countries, even the richest, their tributaries. They have stolen hundreds of billions of dollars."
Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
In addition, they received several waves of emigration from devastated Europe, and from Russia engulfed in the Civil War. In addition to people, capital also migrated, to an island of prosperity for which the States looked then.
The next stage was preparation for the Second World War. The States were actively investing money and technology in Germany to set fire to Europe. They succeeded, blazed. As a result, the United States actually becomes the master of Western Europe. And it is quite natural that they traded with both sides of the conflict. And they intervened when the result was already guaranteed. That is, they solved their economic problems with the help of war. And like the icing on the cake, they organized the signing of the Bretton Woods agreement. Which in turn provided them with financial dominance further. And again, the US received a wave of migration to them.
By the end of the Cold War, the US economy was in trouble. The destruction of the USSR saved them. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, money, technology and development poured into the United States. And the main thing is people. Remember the 90s term - brain drain? But towards the end of the nineties, this began to be lacking. And the problems with the economy have not gone away. And the States decide to solve them in a proven way - a war.
But a world war will certainly lead to the fact that the territory of the States will turn into a lunar surface, and this is not part of their plans. And then they start setting fire to various countries. Ideally, of course, set everything on fire, and remain an island of prosperity ourselves. Yes, in some parts of the world to be "the guarantor of peace." In addition, to crush geopolitical competitors. For example, China has regular epidemics. Remember US presidents urged their businesses to bring manufacturing from Asia back to the US. So they are trying to achieve this. They also throw money into the painful points of China - Tibet and the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. With Russia, there are also options - to pour money into the "fifth column", to initiate unrest. You can organize small wars - by inciting Ukraine or Poland. You can arrange shelling of Russian territory from the Ukrainian side,you can arrange a border conflict in the Kaliningrad region. And when Russia responds, to express moral support for the victims of "excessive use of force." Was it so with Georgia? But this is not enough for them. Europe will face absolutely not happy times. Should they have flooded it with refugees? Due to such a number of migrants, the tension in the EU countries is growing. And then there is the often criminal behavior of migrants, which is covered by the authorities. All this will explode sooner or later. The UK apparently understood something, and therefore sharply darted away from the European Union. They absolutely do not want that a big p … … began on their territory, to please the overseas masters. Most likely, they have agreed on something with the States, they say we do not need to undress. Was it so with Georgia? But this is not enough for them. Europe will face absolutely not happy times. Should they have flooded it with refugees? Due to such a number of migrants, the tension in the EU countries is growing. And then there is the often criminal behavior of migrants, which is covered by the authorities. All this will explode sooner or later. The UK apparently understood something, and therefore sharply darted away from the European Union. They absolutely do not want that a big p … … began on their territory, to please the overseas masters. Most likely, they have agreed on something with the States, they say we do not need to undress. Was it so with Georgia? But this is not enough for them. Europe will face absolutely not happy times. Should they have flooded it with refugees? Due to such a number of migrants, the tension in the EU countries is growing. And then there is the often criminal behavior of migrants, which is covered by the authorities. All this will explode sooner or later. The UK apparently understood something, and therefore sharply darted away from the European Union. They absolutely do not want that a big p … … began on their territory, to please the overseas masters. Most likely, they have agreed on something with the States, they say we do not need to undress.which is covered by the authorities. All this will explode sooner or later. The UK apparently understood something, and therefore sharply darted away from the European Union. They absolutely do not want that a big p … … began on their territory, to please the overseas masters. Most likely, they have agreed on something with the States, they say we do not need to undress.which is covered by the authorities. All this will explode sooner or later. The UK apparently understood something, and therefore sharply darted away from the European Union. They absolutely do not want that a big p … … began on their territory, to please the overseas masters. Most likely, they have agreed on something with the States, they say we do not need to undress.
Well, the rest of the country they will rock and set on fire. And it's nothing personal, it's just business.