Many have noticed this year that the spring of 2018 was very late and … abnormally hot. In mid-April in Britain, washed by the warm Gulf Stream, it was snowing heavily throughout the island, and in some places snow and ice on the ground lasted until mid-May. Then came the sharpest warming, which happened so quickly that people immediately jumped from winter to the beach season.
In Europe as a whole, this year strawberries began to ripen at least two weeks earlier than the season, they were in bulk in the markets already in mid-May, although usually the earliest ripened always in early June, and later varieties bore fruit all summer. But this year, in July, there are practically no strawberries, for some unknown reason the plants began to fade in early June.
However, July became even more abnormal. In the first week of the month, temperature records were recorded all over the world, to which even such a media monster as The Washington Post devoted an entire article with a detailed listing of places that broke records of temperature and deaths as a result of heatstroke:
The Dailymail figure shows a very small part of the temperature records, because otherwise the signatures would not fit into the picture. Temperature records were set by Siberia and many other parts of Russia, North and South America, Mexico, Australia, Africa and the Middle East.
Moreover, unlike The Washington Post, the British press devotes several materials a day to the abnormal heat, since the British are terrified of what is happening to their island.
For Britain, all sorts of garden and wild vegetation is a centuries-old brand: Sherwood forest, sheep on green lawns and all that. But in July 2018, green lawns in Britain disappeared and, if Robin Hood lived now, he would have to run through the forest in desert camouflage:
Promotional video:
The official position of climatologists is warm cyclones that blow from nowhere, global warming, and so on, about which they draw beautiful satellite maps:
The theme of global warming is actively promoted by the Roman Catholic Church. In his July address to his flock, Pope Francis called on all governments to fulfill their commitments to curb global warming. Otherwise, people will only have to pray, as global climate change threatens to turn the Earth into "a huge pile of sand, stones and debris."
How global warming can turn the Earth into a heap of stones, the Vatican did not specify, concentrating on the release of an official sermon with the epic title "World on fire", listening to which the governments of the world should be afraid. Especially Donald Trump withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement.
The strange climate changes taking place on Earth have long been obvious to everyone, however, as we have stated many times before, some kind of global warming has nothing to do with it. The question is much more serious, but it will take a long time and in order to explain the answer to it.
The Earth, like other planets of the Solar System, receives a considerable share of its energy from the Sun, therefore the small angle of inclination of the planet to the plane of its orbit (23.5 degrees) definitely plays an important role in the change of seasons and the distribution of climatic zones. However, this small angle is not enough for -90 degrees in Antarctica, and +50 in the shade at the equator. Such sharp fluctuations in the surface temperature due to the inclination of the axis of rotation can only occur on a planet that is not only devoid of atmosphere and hydrosphere, but also makes a complete revolution around its axis in several tens of days, such as, for example, Mercury. Only in this case could Antarctica cool down so much.
Furthermore. If the tilt axis plays such a big role, as the officials tell us, then the hottest place on the planet should be the latitudes of southern Europe, since in summer the Sun shines on this area perpendicularly:
Nevertheless, southern Africa will be hotter than southern Italy, although the southern African continent is generally illuminated tangentially.
This paradox is remarkably explained by the theory of mantle heating of the earth's surface. The mantle is a substance in a straightened and semi-molten state, therefore, when the Earth rotates under the influence of centrifugal force, the planet is deformed, turning from a sphere into a geoid. That is, bulging in the equatorial region and flattening at the poles:
And since the deformation occurs mainly due to the mantle, its hotter, that is, more fluid layers flow towards the equator, while colder layers remain in the region of the poles. Therefore, it is cold at the poles, and hot at the equator. There, the radiation of the mantle is less and it is located a little further from the lithofera.
If it is clear with this question, then we turn to the following: sources of heat released from the bowels of the earth. Officials on this matter explain that the source of heat is the decay of long-lived radioactive elements and friction between the core and the outer layers of the Earth, the rotation of which is gradually slowed down by the tides. This is pure nonsense, especially about the tides.
The ebb and flow, the movement of the mantle under the influence of the Moon - this is a certain amount of such a physical concept as work. Work happens with a loss of energy, in this case - with a loss of the kinetic energy of the Earth and the Moon. According to the law of conservation of this very energy, one fine day the kinetic energy of the flying Moon and the rotating Earth should completely turn into heat, as a result of which the Earth will stop rotating, and the Moon, having lost its speed, will crash into the Earth. This is not observed either in the solar system or anywhere in space, that is, there are no precedents for a satellite that lost its energy to fall on Jupiter, on which the satellite has been moving methane seas and nitrogen clouds for a billion years.
The release of energy due to the decay of mantle uranium is even more interesting. The fact is that the Earth emits about 2.5 times more heat than it should give as a result of the natural decay of radioactive elements in the crust (the so-called radiogenic heat) and primary heating. How it can be the officials do not explain, they do not yet have fabulous formulas on this score.
In addition, the reserves of uranium in the crust are not infinite, and in four billion years (as the Earth exists in theory), all this uranium should have turned into lead. But nevertheless, there is still uranium in the crust and nuclear reactions take place there. Where does this uranium come from?
Finally, there is also such an interesting point as 3He (helium-3) - an extremely rare isotope of helium. In the Earth's atmosphere, one 3He atom accounts for approximately one and a half million 4He atoms. However, in the basalts of the mid-oceanic ridges, the 3He isotope is already 8 times more, and in the freshly ejected lava there is 40 times more 3He. The question arises: where does helium-3 come from? Where is the source?
The officials sing the same song as with the uranium contained in the bark. That is, 3He, located on Earth, was formed on the Sun when the Earth was still a dust cloud, not a planet, and since then it has been released. Therefore, just like with uranium, supposedly decaying in the crust, it remains unclear: why did not all of 3He evolve from the mantle during the 4 billion years of the planet's official existence?
The only acceptable explanation for this situation suggests that the Earth's core is a small thermonuclear reactor, where matter is constantly being synthesized. Due to this synthesis, the Earth has its own autonomous heat source, which heats the lithosphere together with the Sun. This fusion supplies the 3He released from the faults to the atmosphere. The same synthesis ensures the constant growth of the planet, which is recorded even by GPS sensors: Africa and America are moving away from each other.
And besides GPS sensors, there is archaeological data, such as dinosaurs, whose mass characteristics do not allow living in the conditions of existing gravity. The largest land animal today is an elephant, weighing about 5 tons. His sluggishness due to excess mass has become proverbial about the elephant in the china shop. And how could a brontosaurus weighing 30 tons move on Earth !?
If a T-34 tank hits any of the skeletons of the brontos tomorrow, it will grind its bones into powder. And the T-34 just weighs 30 tons. At the same time, the skeleton of any animal has a multiple margin of safety, which allows it to cope with the overload at the time of a jump (landing).
An elephant weighing 5 tons can barely walk and if it jumps, it breaks its legs. And the tyrannosaurus, which weighed 10 tons, could run and jump perfectly. That is, the load on the hind legs of the tyrannosaurus at the time of the jump was 50+ tons, but the bones did not crack. This is impossible biomechanically!
Consequently, during the life of these species, gravity was much less, the planet at that time was small, like Mars.
Now that everything has fallen into place with the Earth's core and the processes taking place there and it is absolutely clear, let us return to the problem of “global warming”. There may be two reasons for it:
a) The Sun has become more active, starting to turn into a supernova.
b) A new celestial body carrying radiation (Nibiru) approached the Earth.
c) The core of the Earth has become more active.
At the moment, everything is in relative order with the Sun. From yellow it turned blue, the radiation from it breaks all records of ten years ago, but so far, it seems, the Sun has not yet exploded.
Nibiru is also a very interesting and very explanatory version. But there is heat on Earth, earthquakes are there, but Nibiru is not yet. We, in any case, have never seen her. Therefore, the version with Nibiru, as it were, freezes until the facts appear.
Therefore, the only remaining cause of global temperature shifts is the processes taking place in the Earth's core. And by an amazing coincidence, simultaneously with an incomprehensible change in climate, an incomprehensible change in volcanic activity occurs on the planet, which also breaks all records. What is this if not a change in the core of the Earth?
If this is so and our theories are correct, then it seems that the Pope was absolutely right in his recommendations: if a thermonuclear reactor goes to pieces, then the one sitting on its shell can only pray, the fight against greenhouse gases will help very little here.