Dear readers, many of you believe that Darwin's theory has long been proven and evolution cannot even be questioned, but let me offer you a few falsifications that may change your opinion.
In 1912, in the vicinity of the small town of Piltdown, in England, amateur paleontologist Charles Dawson discovered a fragment of a human skull. The main difference was that the lower jaw looked more like a monkey's. The scientist was in such joy that he decided to capture this historical moment. The skull he found was dubbed the "Piltdown Man."
This find has been exhibited in all museums around the world, as irrefutable proof of Darwin's theory of evolution. The find had its own characteristics. The skull itself was quite large, but human, and the lower jaw was identical to that of an orangutan. The find was described in newspapers, it was widely studied in the scientific world. The age of the find was estimated at 500,000 years.
Evolutionary scientists were delighted with this find, the joy was transcendental, but the joy was soon replaced by the truth. In 1949, British paleontologist Kenneth Oakley tested a new method for identifying ancient remains. He took samples for the content of fluorine from some of the museum's exhibits, but how can we not get around the find we are talking about? His discovery surprised everyone.
Examination of the Piltdown man's jaw showed no fluoride, and consequently the bone lay in the ground for several years. The skull turned out to be a hundred years old, and the lower jaw really belonged to an orangutan. In 1953, Joseph Weiner finished off this falsification, it turned out that the teeth were specially polished and fitted into the dental wells. But how has such a falsification not been noticed for decades? Someone was clearly interested in this.
Promotional video:
In 1929, another find was discovered in Nebraska, namely a molar that belonged to a person. Later it was stated that the owner of the tooth lived 5,000,000 years ago. Based on one tooth, scientists with incredible accuracy and confidence stated that the tooth belonged to a man-ape, that is, an intermediate link between a man and a monkey. This find was dubbed as follows "the man of Nebraska."
On the basis of one tooth, a reconstruction of the whole skull was created, and then the entire skeleton. Drawings with the alleged appearance of a man-ape began to be drawn in large quantities. But the truth is still found. In 1927, other parts of a skeleton that belonged to an extinct American wild boar were found at the same site.
These are just two examples of falsification of transitional models of human evolution. There are no transitional models of not only human evolution in any museum in the world, but even fish that went out onto land and gradually lost their fins and tails. All that you can come across is only supposed images. Darwin's theory is supported only by speculation, because so far not a single skeleton of a transitional model from monkey to man has been found.