The Kergellen Archipelago, then located at a distance of 700 km from the Pole,
was for those times the center of crystallization of glacial masses and the entire ice cover of the South Sea. Modern photographs clearly show the traces of the descent of this glacier.
I don't really hope that the following reasoning is correct, but it can be assumed:
- that the territories of Antarctica, remote from the pole and warmer, resisted icing longer after the pole had moved to the center of the continent;
- if the pole "moved" to the "third-Quaternary Precambrian", then Antarctica should have become icy long ago in a circle and equally;
- if it was not so long ago !!!, then it must freeze unevenly.
Promotional video:
Resolved.
We look at the relief of Antarctica with the help of the Erf program in 3 sections, as they move away from the past pole.
First slice:
We observe a decrease in glacial masses in the direction from the past pole
Second slice:
We observe a distinct decrease in glacial masses in the direction from the past pole.
Slice three:
We again observe a decrease in glacial masses in the direction from the past pole.
The obvious cannot be denied. The ice did not have time to freeze! There was not enough time for snow.
We get a clear confirmation of the version of the periodic change of the poles.
The assumptions were confirmed.
This means that the center of Antarctica icing, after the last pole shift from position "-1" to the current position, "0", became that part of it that was closer to the past South Pole and geographically located at the latitude of Taimyr. In addition, the past center of cold on the Kergellen Archipelago was located on the same side, and its "breath" also froze the "Taimyr" of Antarctica.
"Crimea" got to the very pole and therefore little by little it began to freeze, and it was not warmed up like "Egypt".
But the Antarctic "Egypt" fought to this day …