According to historical information, grapes grew on the Kola Peninsula, and Greenland was green by its name. St. Isaac's Cathedral is oriented not to the cardinal points, as is usually done during the construction of churches, but at an angle. If we assume that before it was oriented strictly to the cardinal points, then the North Pole should be on the line before the climate change. along which are St. Isaac's Cathedral and the Bronze Horseman. The line passes through Greenland and continues on to the Great Lakes in Canada. If we assume that the Kola Peninsula had a subtropical climate and Greenland was moderate, then the pole before the shift should have been somewhere in the Great Lakes region. And in those places we find obvious traces of the most powerful glaciers, there is still glacial water in the lakes that occupy half of Canada.
This is how it looks like on the map.
Just as easily, this version explains the presence of freshly frozen mammoths in Siberia, which moved from the temperate zone to the Arctic Circle within a few hours.
This version also fits the name of Greenland (a green country), which in this case turns out to be approximately at the latitude of Moscow, that is, trees of a temperate strip will grow there. And the Kola Peninsula will be in the tropics, where grapes grow well.
And what about the South Pole? If we look at the opposite point on the surface of the Earth, we will see the following picture not far from it:
It looks exactly the same as Canada, there are many narrow fjords - traces of powerful glaciers sliding into the water - and this is at a distance of 4600 km from the present South Pole, that is, at the latitude of Volgograd! Where are the glaciers from ??? Another indirect confirmation of our version.
Promotional video:
It also becomes clear where the ice-free map of Antarctica came from, since Antarctica was 4,000 km south of its current location.
Here is a quote from the article:
A little over twenty years later, the director of the National Museum in Istanbul, Khalil Edham, was dismantling the library of the Byzantine emperors in the old palace of the sultans. Here, on a dusty shelf, he found a map lying around God knows from what time, made on the skin of a gazelle and rolled into a tube. The compiler depicted the western coast of Africa, the southern coast of South America, and the northern coast of Antarctica. Khalil could not believe his eyes. The coastal edge of Queen Maud Land south of the 70th parallel was free of ice. The compiler marked a mountain range in this place. The name of the compiler, Edham, was well known - the admiral of the Ottoman Navy and the cartographer Piri Reis, who lived in the first half of the 16th century.
The authenticity of the map was not in doubt. A graphological examination of the marginal notes confirmed that they were made by the hand of the admiral.
1949 year. The joint British-Swedish exploration expedition carried out intensive seismic exploration of the southernmost continent through the ice sheet. According to the commander of the 8th technical reconnaissance squadron of the US Air Force Strategic Command (dated 1960-06-07), Lieutenant Colonel Harold Z. Olmeyer, “the geographical details depicted in the lower part of the map (the coast of Antarctica - VA) are in excellent agreement with the seismic data … We we cannot imagine how to reconcile the data of this map with the supposed level of geography in 1513”.
end of quote.
Piri Reis map.
Considering that the area of ice in North America was much larger than the area of the glacier in Antarctica / Greenland, then it is clear that the level of the world ocean was much lower, and Antarctica and South America were one continent, as shown on the map. since a lot of water, several times more than now lies in Antarctica, lay in the form of ice in North America
That is, it turns out that the pole shift did not occur until 1513.
The behavior of migratory birds is also explainable, flying thousands of kilometers each year to places with a cold climate, which were previously tropics.
As well as the legends among very many nations about the worldwide flood, which was this very pole shift. And the water just splashed onto the land in the same way as when it splashes out of a bucket, if it is sharply moved to the side.
In general, it makes sense to remember this version for clarification.
***
Let's try to figure out the exact location of the old North Pole. It is located on the line from St. Isaac's Cathedral. But where exactly on this line? There is such a thing as the polar circle. This is the place around the pole, where the Sun does not rise at least one day a year. It is quite natural that glaciers above the Arctic Circle should be the most massive and, accordingly, leave the clearest traces when they slide into the ocean. Raduis of this circle is 2580 km. If you look at the coastline of Canada and the United States, you will notice the strange distribution of tracks from sliding glaciers. If we superimpose a circle with the diameter of the Arctic circle on Canada so that the brightest and deepest traces will pass inside this circle, then we get a fairly accurate location of the "old" North Pole.
The most interesting thing is that the boundaries of the traces of glaciers on the coastline very accurately fall on this circle. It looks especially strange at points where the coastline is perpendicular to the line of the Arctic Circle. Here the traces from the glacier are abruptly interrupted and this is observed in all four such points (see map, points 1, 2, 3, 4). Another confirmation of our version - everywhere inside the old polar circle, the coastline is dotted with fjords, traces of massive glaciers sliding into the ocean. Even in North Carolina, which is now 6,000 kilometers from the North Pole (point 4).
The strange picture of the extreme north of Canada is also explainable - the continent in the north is simply torn to pieces. When the poles moved, ice a couple of kilometers high plowed this place and dug through such straits. Canada was literally pulled out from under the polar ice cap. This area remained beyond the Arctic Circle even after the movement of the poles, i.e., it was exposed to the impact of glaciers for the longest time, which is observed on the map in the form of wide glades.
And if you look at the "old" South Pole, then our version is confirmed by the map of 1513, which is mentioned in the article. This map shows the land of Queen Maud without ice. So it was this side of Antarctica that was the most northern, that is, the most distant from the "old" South Pole. The distance from the pole to the coast of Antarctica is more than 4700 km (the latitude of the Volgograd region, where we currently do not observe glaciers).
Another interesting coincidence is that the found point of the "old" North Pole is exactly in the middle between the tropic and the pole.
***
Additional interesting information has appeared:
If St. Isaac's Cathedral in St. Petersburg was oriented to the cardinal points, then, probably, other buildings of that time were also oriented according to the same principle. Let's try to find such buildings and by crossing the lines from these buildings to get the exact coordinates of the past north pole of the planet. After a short walk around the globe with the help of Google Earth, interesting results were obtained. The pyramids in Sudan near the city of Marawi, coordinates 18 ° 32'16.54 ″ N 31 ° 49'21.45 ″ E indicate the current US territory as "north". A pyramid in China in the vicinity of the city of Shansi at coordinates 34 ° 14'8.96 ″ N 109 ° 7'6.24 ″ E also indicates the current US territory as "north". If you extend the line from St. Isaac's Cathedral further, then all three lines will intersect at one point in Nebraska near the city of Lexington at coordinates 40 ° 37'23.34 ″ N 99 ° 44'55.03 ″ W.
To estimate the probability that 3 random lines will intersect at a distance of a couple of tens of thousands of kilometers at one point, try to draw such lines by eye in Google Earth. Tired of aiming. This cannot happen by chance.
This is how it looks on the map:
Needless to say, traces of powerful glaciers are evident in Nebraska. Here is a quote from the reference book: “Geologically, Nebraska is divided into two regions: the Dismembered Plains and the Great Plains. The eastern part of the state lies in the Dismembered Plains zone, which was formed before the retreat of the glacier and is an area with characteristic gentle hills."
It turns out that St. Isaac's Cathedral is the same age as the pyramids in Sudan and the pyramids in China. About St. Isaac's Cathedral and about St. Petersburg in general in the following posts, this is a separate and very interesting story. In short, the entire official history of Peter's founding is a complete lie. This city was one of the centers of antediluvian civilization.
According to the new data, the position of the North Pole was found to be even farther south than previously assumed. If you look at Greenland now, the glaciers are located at a distance of 3300 km from the pole. That is, all of North America from the northern coast of Canada to Nicaragua (a circle with a radius of 3300 km around the found point) was under a 3-kilometer layer of ice, like Antarctica is now. Land area of North America: 9,826,630 km² (USA) + 9,093,507 km² (Canada) + 1,972,550 km² (Mexico) = 20892687 km² according to Wikipedia. The area of Antarctica is 14,000,000 km², almost one and a half times less. It turns out that even according to the most rough estimates, the glacier in North America was in area, and therefore in mass, one and a half times larger than the current glacier in Antarctica. The ice that was stored there lowered the sea level by 90 m according to modern data,as water from the ocean moved to land in the form of ice. That is, the land area for the glacier was probably even larger, which is remarkably seen on the Piri Reis map. where the coastline of South America and Antarctica protrudes significantly into the ocean beyond modern boundaries. By the way, the land of Queen Maud in Antarctica was located at a distance of about 6,000 km from the past South Pole, that is, it was approximately at the latitude of present Greece, which perfectly explains both the river beds under the glacier in Antarctica and the coal deposits. And the French Southern Territories were at a distance of only 1200 km from the South Pole, beyond the Arctic Circle, so the traces of the glacier on them are quite understandable.where the coastline of South America and Antarctica protrudes significantly into the ocean beyond modern boundaries. By the way, the land of Queen Maud in Antarctica was located at a distance of about 6,000 km from the past South Pole, that is, it was approximately at the latitude of present-day Greece, which perfectly explains both the river beds under the glacier in Antarctica and the coal deposits. And the French Southern Territories were at a distance of only 1200 km from the South Pole, beyond the Arctic Circle, so the traces of the glacier on them are quite understandable.where the coastline of South America and Antarctica protrudes significantly into the ocean beyond modern boundaries. By the way, the land of Queen Maud in Antarctica was located at a distance of about 6,000 km from the past South Pole, that is, it was approximately at the latitude of present Greece, which perfectly explains both the river beds under the glacier in Antarctica and the coal deposits. And the French Southern Territories were at a distance of only 1200 km from the South Pole, beyond the Arctic Circle, so the traces of the glacier on them are quite understandable. And the French Southern Territories were at a distance of only 1200 km from the South Pole, beyond the Arctic Circle, so the traces of the glacier on them are quite understandable. And the French Southern Territories were at a distance of only 1200 km from the South Pole, beyond the Arctic Circle, so the traces of the glacier on them are quite understandable.
The coast of the Arctic Ocean was located at a distance of 5100 km to 8000 km, i.e. there was a very mild climate, the same as now on the northern coast of France (5100 km from the pole). On Taimyr (6800 km from the pole) it was as warm as in Sharm-El-Sheikh (the same 6800 km, only from the new pole). Is this why Egypt is so popular among Russians? Karelia, Murmansk were at a distance of 7300-7700 km from the pole, which corresponds to the latitude of the Dominican Republic, northern India, Taiwan. Historical evidence that pineapples grew on the Kola Peninsula confirms that the Dominican Republic is a large pineapple producer. Here is an excerpt from the description of this country:
“Needless to say, tropical pineapple also grows in the Dominican Republic?)) Surprisingly enough, pineapple is also a herb. And its fruits … again, "berries")). Pineapple is native to Latin America. Here it is found in nature in the wild. It is known that the ancient Indians not only collected wild pineapples for food, but already knew how to grow them. The Indians made wine and medicinal products from pineapples, and fabrics were made from the fibers of the leaves."
Petersburg was at a distance of 7900 km from the old pole - the latitude of today's Philippines and Haiti - summer all year round and no white nights. And here we read the evidence that St. Isaac's Cathedral was built for completely different climatic conditions than those that are observed in St. Petersburg now.
Obviously, if we take into account the version of the pole change, after moving from the tropics so far north, the building began to freeze. In other cathedrals built in St. Petersburg earlier, such problems were not observed, which means they knew how to build long ago, but, nevertheless, the official version of history claims that Isaac was built in this form according to plan and the freezing was a surprise. Oh well…
Several thousand kilometers of warm coastline is truly a golden age. It is understandable why the antique statues are barely covered with sheets. Clothing in this climate is needed more for protection from the sun, and not from the cold. What does antiquity and Peter have to do with it? The whole of St. Petersburg is solid antiquity. The sculpture of Alexander I is in the antique style. The Bronze Horseman, who is considered a monument to Peter I, rides a horse in shales, that is, almost barefoot, without pants, in a light cape and with a short Roman sword in a sheath.
But more on that in the following articles.
***
There is another pyramid that is oriented to the same place in Nebraska as St. Isaac's Cathedral, the Pyramids in Sudan and China - this is the Pyramid Mountain in Turkmenistan at coordinates 62 ° 22'24.67 ″ E 35 ° 13'26.72 ″ N, face which are also located towards the old North Pole.
We already have 4 confirmations that the last North Pole was exactly at this point.
A system of pyramids is seen at the same distance from the old North Pole. The distance from the old pole to the Sudanese pyramids is 11800 km, to the Chinese pyramid is 11200 km, to the Turkmen pyramid is 11400 km.
This is how all the found buildings look, oriented to the old North Pole.
Is it possible that, at such distances and in completely different cultures, structures were built that were oriented to the same point (spread no more than 30 km at a distance of 8-11 thousand kilometers) by chance?
Chance is practically excluded, most likely the exact position of the poles was found before the flood.
Another curious detail: the Red Sea and the Apennine Peninsula (Italy) stretch almost exactly from the old north to the old south. Another coincidence?
When the pole moved from the center of America to its present location, the entire coast of the Arctic Ocean moved to the ocean. That is, traces of flooding on the coast and masses of frozen sea water on the land surface that did not have time to leak back into the ocean should be visible. And we find such traces. And exactly where it is most expected - on the northernmost islands, where the temperature drop was maximum.
Such traces of the change of poles are especially clearly visible on Novaya Zemlya, the Novosibirsk Islands (Sannikov Land). Here is an article where these tracks are detailed. I will give the brightest photos here.
Here are photos from the Novosibirsk Islands: It can be seen that the water stream freezes, not having time to drain down from the surface, that is, within seconds. The lower layer is sea water, the upper layer is fresh.
There are many photos from the New Siberian Islands following the link
With the movement of the poles, this is quite possible, when land approaches the ocean, ocean water splashes onto land and, moving far to the north, freezes in flight for a short time.
It is easy to explain the layer of fresh water in the air: when a heated and humid land moves abruptly to the north, that is, it is blown by very cold and therefore relatively dry air, colossal ascending currents of moist air heated from the land arise over a huge area, which, rising, falls back into the form of rain. The grandiose picture of the disaster is difficult to imagine, when the most powerful thunderstorm fronts, probably from a tornado, rain down millions of tons of water on the flooded and freezing land. According to the testimony of people from the New Siberian Islands, the upper frozen fresh layer of water, tens of centimeters in size, contains numerous air bubbles - evidence that the rain was very heavy.
Here is the find of Alexandra fow Lorenz, quoted from this article:
That is, this is another direct confirmation of the rapid movement of the northern coast of Siberia very far to the north as a result of the pole change, as a result of which there was a sharp decrease in temperature and humidity over the warm and moist soil surface, moving from south to north and, as a result, powerful evaporation, cloud formation and heavy rains, which led to the formation of bubbles in the permafrost.
But in the photo the black soil on Novaya Zemlya, of course, is now useless for plants, but obviously formed in a completely different climate than the one on Novaya Zemlya now.
***
St. Basil's Cathedral on Red Square (coordinates 55 ° 45'9.26 ″ N 37 ° 37'23.35 ″ E) is also oriented to the old pole, though not as accurately as other buildings, but with a shift of about 250 kilometers at a distance of 8600 km. This corresponds to a deviation of about 1.6 degrees. The orientation accuracy is high enough.
Moreover, the so-called place of execution, a round pedestal in front of St. Basil's Cathedral, is located in the old north, and even in alignment with a central dome and two domes located in front and behind. It turns out one line, which is directed to the old north pole, passing through the three domes of the Cathedral and the center of the site, now called the place of execution. This is how it looks on the map.
I have always wondered why this beautiful cathedral stands as if it had been erected quite by accident, not paying attention to either the cardinal points or the city's layout. And now it became clear for what reason.
Now let's compare St. Isaac's Cathedral in St. Petersburg and St. Basil's Cathedral in Moscow.
We see that St. Isaac's Cathedral also has a so-called "place of execution", where the Bronze Horseman is now located, which is considered a monument to Peter I. And at St. Basil's Cathedral there is no monument on the "place of execution". Although both "places of execution" are strictly on the line "old north - old south", if viewed from the center of both "places of front" to the middle of the central dome.
Something tells me that in front of St. Basil's Cathedral there used to be some kind of huge monument, a statue, or an obelisk similar to the Alexandrian Column in St. Petersburg.
Another oddity around St. Isaac's Cathedral: the base of the Bronze Horseman in the form of an oval or Ellipse and the monument itself stand along the axes strictly in the direction of the old north - old south, which corresponds to the orientation of St. Isaac's Cathedral. The square around the base of the Bronze Horseman is oriented differently.
This is how it looks on the map:
That is, there are two options: either the Bronze Horseman was placed crookedly, or the square around it was marked crookedly, which seems absurd when you look at the accuracy of how St. Isaac's Cathedral was built. Or this square was deliberately marked along other axes to emphasize that the bronze horseman has nothing to do with St. Isaac's Cathedral. Indeed, according to the official version, the Bronze Horseman was built by Catherine II on August 18), 1782. Isaac's Cathedral was allegedly built in 1858. Well, the Bronze Horseman himself stands exactly on the same axes as Isaac, so the attempt to hide the connection between the Bronze Horseman and Isaac's Cathedral has failed. The question arises: why are there so many lies around these two buildings ???
Another interesting coincidence:
If you look closely at the Piri Reis map of 1513 (see the figure below), we will see two bold straight lines on it, which at first glance do not carry any information. But if you look closely, the angle between the lines is exactly the same as between the meridians before the pole shift and after the pole shift.
The figure below shows the directions to the old and new poles in Google - Planet Earth and on the Piri Reis map.
It is clear that the directions coincide, that is, the 1513 Piri Reis map shows the directions to both poles - the one in Nebraska, USA, and the one in the Arctic Ocean. Found another direct indication of the old North Pole. The map compiler obviously knew both the pole shift and their exact location both before and after the pole shift.
The question remains whether Piri Reis himself drew up the map that bears his name, or whether he copied the old map and already on this copy put his signature as the author. If the Map was compiled by Piri Reis himself, then the pole shift should have occurred no earlier than 1513, which seems at first glance absurd, but no more than everything that is written above in this post.
***
On the left is the Piri Reis map itself from 1513. On the right is a globe in projection and scale, roughly corresponding to the map.
If you look at the points marked on the map, then in an amazing (for our opponents) way they correspond to the intersection points of key points of two coordinate systems - the past antediluvian with the zero meridian in St. Petersburg and the poles in Nebraska, USA and the current one with the zero meridian in London and the pole in Northern Arctic Ocean.
These points are the intersection of the present equator and the past southern tropic, as well as the present equator and the past northern tropic. And also the intersection of the past northern tropic and the parallel, which is 23 degrees from the present northern tropic. This distance between the equator and the tropic in any coordinate system is determined by the tilt of the Earth's axis.
It is quite obvious to us that the authors of the map knew where the past tropic was, the past equator, the past pole, as well as the present ones.
I wonder if he (Piri Reis) was the only one so smart, or were there still people who knew about the shift and the exact location of the previous and future pole? As one very successful politician once said: "There is such a party!" And these people did not live in Rome, not in Athens, not in Babylon, not in Carthage. They lived… they lived…. If I say where, you still won't believe it, so look with your own eyes.
These are Sofia Square and Mikhailovskaya Square in Kiev, coordinates 50 ° 27'10.35 ″ N 30 ° 30'51.43 ″ E. Are the square area markings oriented where you think they are? In the same direction as the St. Sophia Cathedral on this square - to the last pole.
Now let's take a close look at the Sofia Square in Kiev. There is a monument to Bohdan Khmelnitsky on it.
And this monument is oriented how would you think ?? To the last pole? Nope. Didn't guess. See for yourself, He is looking exactly at the pole before last in Greenland.
He is looking exactly at the pole before last in Greenland. That is, in the center of Kiev, on the Sofiyskaya and Mikhailovskaya squares, there is an abbreviated stone map of Piri Reis, only the stone map in Kiev indicates the directions to the poles before last and to the past, and not to the past and to the present, like Piri Reis. There was such a tradition. On December 31, go to the bathhouse with friends immediately after the shift to mark the directions of the old and new meridians on stone, leather and, probably, other maps. It turns out that Mikhailovskaya and Sofia squares are older than the Piri Reis map, which is dated 1513. According to Wikipedia, Bohdan Khmelnitsky was born on December 27, 1595, 90 years later than the appearance of the Piri Reis map. That is, on this pedestal, where the monument to Khmelnitsky now flaunts, there was clearly some other monument. So,the story of the Bronze Horseman in St. Petersburg is repeated in Kiev. The king is not real !!!))) After all, the pedestal was clearly erected even when the pole was not even in America, but in Greenland, that is, two shifts back !!! And pedestals in the city center are usually not empty. Although not, in front of St. Basil's Cathedral in Moscow, the so-called Execution Ground is just such an empty pedestal without a monument. All mixed up in this world. Monuments to no one knows who, empty pedestals on the main square of the capital … You can't figure it out without a bottle.in front of St. Basil's Cathedral in Moscow, the so-called Execution Ground is just such an empty pedestal without a monument. All mixed up in this world. Monuments to no one knows who, empty pedestals on the main square of the capital … You can't figure it out without a bottle.in front of St. Basil's Cathedral in Moscow, the so-called Execution Ground is just such an empty pedestal without a monument. All mixed up in this world. Monuments to no one knows who, empty pedestals on the main square of the capital … You can't figure it out without a bottle.
Here is a general view from space on the orientation of Mikhailovskaya Square and the monument to Bogdan Khmelnitsky in Kiev.
The curtain. Stormy and prolonged applause.
Oh yeah, one more thing, I almost forgot. If someone knows why the square was lined in one direction, and the monument was erected in another, please share your revelations and secret meanings. We are all looking forward to a simple explanation without any shifts and other nonsense.
By the way, the pedestal of the Monument to Bohdan Khmelnitsky is laid with polygonal masonry. Have you noticed? The same as in Machu Picchu, Kronstadt and other "ancient" cities. Here's another break in the template.
Now take a deep breath. Do you think there can be something in common between St. Petersburg, Kiev and Luxor? Can! See for yourself. This is how the squares of these cities look like.
After such a comparison, I personally cannot believe that there is a temporary gap of several thousand years between these cities. And why are their buildings and areas so similar in style and even in processing technology. Is it because they were in the same country?
I ran a little ahead here, about the pole before last will be in the second part..) Well, sorry, I got carried away). It is interesting how it was possible not to notice such simple facts that stand right in front of the noses of millions of people in the centers of the capitals. I include myself in these millions in the first place, so that who does not think that I have a bearish star fever). I also walked like a lamb, read about Peter, about Khmelnitsky, about Egypt. And in-e-e-e-e-eril that all this is b-e-e-e-e-z deception). What is it. Just like in a child's adage: "I am standing on the asphalt with my skis on, or the skis do not go, then I'm … not quite okay."
And now let's continue about the last pole.
Another interesting point: the distance between the old and new poles (5500 km) is almost equal to the distance between the northern and southern tropics (5200 km). Perhaps this could somehow suggest a mechanism for triggering the pole shift.
***
Another interesting coincidence: the oldest and largest cemetery not only in Paris, but in the whole of France in the Pantin area, coordinates 48 ° 54'21.92 ″ N 2 ° 24'38.84 ″ E, the original name is Cimetière parisien de Pantin, oriented exactly towards the "old south "-" old north ".
According to the information from the English-language Wikipedia, this is one of the least known cemeteries in Paris, although it is the oldest and the largest. Strange, isn't it? Again, is someone trying to hide something?
Another oldest cemetery in Paris - Cimetière parisien de Bagneux - is also oriented towards the old pole - but with an offset of the same 250 km or 1.6 degrees as St. Basil's Cathedral in Moscow.
Moreover, both of these cemeteries are located strictly symmetrically relative to the center of Paris. And the axis of symmetry is again the direction to the old pole, that is, the old meridian. This is how it looks on the map.
If Paris is a relatively old city, a quote from Wikipedia: “Paris grew up on the site of the settlement of Lutetia (Latin dwelling among the water), founded by the Gallic tribe of Parisia in the 3rd century BC. BC , and both cemeteries were founded quite recently, in 1886, which is why the direction to the same point was so precisely chosen as in the case of the construction of Isaac, Petersburg (officially opened in 1858), St. Basil's Cathedral, Moscow (officially opened in 1561) and other objects, dating of which is absent but in appearance they are at least several hundred years old.
Are there too many coincidences?
From what hangover did the planners expose both cemeteries with an accuracy of 1.6 degrees in a random direction, and even positioned them symmetrically about a line in the same direction passing through the center of Paris? And this despite the fact that the distance between them is more than 13 kilometers, it is over the horizon, out of sight. If during the construction of both cemeteries this direction corresponded to the north, then everything becomes clear, in any other case, it becomes necessary to come up with all sorts of outlandish versions of why the planners decided to do such a strange thing.
***
An interesting version about the change of poles was put forward in the article: "The Myth of the Flood: Calculations and Reality".
Putting all the facts together, we can conclude that the pole shift was relatively recent. The way the fact of the shift is being carefully concealed suggests that the pole shift is a fairly frequent occurrence on our planet and has occurred repeatedly. Otherwise, it is completely incomprehensible why spend so much effort on concealing an event that occurs once every ten thousand years, who can care? The question arises: who or what is shifting the poles of our planet and washing away highly developed civilizations and why? Is it not in order to stop the development of mankind, so that it does not have time to understand the source of such disasters? And if this source is some kind of third party? So far, there are no unequivocal answers to all these questions; those who hide them have done their job very well.
***
Another interesting coincidence: If the version is correct that there was a pole shift from the present USA, Nebraska to the present position and even at a high speed, then the highest mountains should theoretically be on the "old field-new pole" axis. Indeed, the highest mountains on the planet - the Himalayas - are located on this very axis. This is how it looks on the map.
The distance between the axis and Everest is 700 kilometers. If we take into account that the Earth rotates from west to east, that is, if you look at the drawing, from left to right, then everything is logical - the Himalayas rose during the turn and remained mostly to the right of the axis, the old pole - the new pole. There is a study by two geologists, according to which in order for the towering Himalayas to form, the plates must collide at a speed of 90 meters per second, which is quite consistent with the version of the pole shift. I couldn't find a link to this study, maybe someone can help? According to the official version of geologists, the Himalayas are about 30 million years old. The fact that mountains have not turned into hills over millions of years is rather strange, given the glaciers, winds, precipitation, temperature fluctuations and other factors causing erosion. While the version about the position of the old pole, about a rapid shift, as well as aboutthat the shift occurred recently is confirmed.
I will try to put forward a version about the time during which the pole shift took place. To do this, assume the Himalayas were formed at the time of the shift. Since the Earth rotates, the Himalayas were formed on an axis, which also shifted due to the rotation of the Earth. The length of the Himalayas is known, the speed of rotation of the Earth is also known, let's calculate how long it takes for the Earth to turn at an angle in order to travel a length equal to the length of the Himalayas. On Google Earth, the length of the Himalayas from west to east is about 3000 kilometers. The latitude of the Himalayas at the old pole in the state of Nebraska, USA is 8 °, one thousand kilometers from the equator. The path of a point at this latitude for the same time will differ from the path of a point at the equator by 1%. For simplicity, calculations can be ignored. The rotation speed of a point at the equator is 40,000 km in 24 hours or 1667 kilometers per hour.3000 kilometers (the width of the Himalayas) the Earth will spin in 1.8 hours or in an hour 48 minutes. This is the approximate duration of the turn itself, according to the most rough estimate. At this time, both the frozen mammoths and the seawater frozen on the fly that did not have time to drain from the New Siberian Islands fit quite well. On trawlers, fish are frozen by shock freezing in 150 minutes, or 1.8 hours! Coincidence again?
If this estimate is correct, then this means that 5000 kilometers (the distance between the old and new poles) the lithosphere passed in 2 hours, the average speed on the axis of movement is 2500 kilometers per hour or 700 meters per second, 2 times the speed of sound. The atmosphere also has inertia, which means that at the moment of movement on the surface along the "old pole - new pole" axis, supersonic winds were blowing, which blew everything from the earth's surface in general: forests, buildings, animals, and people. Petersburg remained intact only because it was relatively far from the axis along which the pole moved. Instant freezing of animals and trees is also understandable: when the surface is blown by cold air with temperatures of -20 -50 degrees Celsius and a speed of 700 meters per second, everything freezes for not even minutes, but seconds.
Here is a map of finds of well-preserved mammoths in Siberia. Here is an article describing some of these findings.
As you can see, all the findings of mammoths were made to the right of the 80th meridian of east longitude - the "old north-old south" axis along which the pole moved from America to its present position. As we remember, the Earth rotates from west to east, on the map - from left to right. That is, at the beginning of the movement, the axis of movement of the poles was to the right of the 80th meridian, then it began to move to the left and stopped in the extreme left position - at the 80th meridian. If the proposed version is correct, then the supersonic frosty winds, which froze all living creatures on the surface, should have blown to the right of the 80th meridian, which is very clearly correlated with the map of mammoth finds. Thus, another indirect confirmation of the correctness of the proposed version was found. According to the map of mammoth finds, it is possible to clarify the approximate time of the movement of the poles. Assuming that everywhere,where the surviving mammoths were found, a strong inertial wind was blowing, which provided shock freezing, it is easy to calculate the time it took for the Earth to turn at an angle that overlaps all the places where mammoths were found. We look at the map, we see that the found mammoths are located between the 80th and 160th degrees of east longitude. We count the time during which the Earth rotated 80 degrees, we get 5.33 hours or 5 hours 20 minutes. The distance traveled by the lithosphere when the pole moves from the old place to the new one is 5500 kilometers. The average speed of the poles is obtained as follows: 5500 km / 5.33 hours = 1031 kilometers per hour or 286 meters per second. The speed of movement of the lithosphere is equal to the speed of the wind on the surface, since the atmosphere is in place. It turns out that the wind speed on the axis during the shift was 286 meters per second. This is still the speed of a passenger liner, which is more than enough to cool all finds by the method of shock freezing and thus keep them intact to this day. After all, the movement of Siberia was towards the north, that is, it was a wind at an air temperature of up to minus 50 degrees Celsius. Here is a quote from Wikipedia: “At the northernmost point of the Taimyr Peninsula - Cape Chelyuskin - the average annual air temperature is −19.7 ° C, the average temperature in January is −39.3 ° C, in July - −0.1 ° C, the absolute minimum temperature is −52 degrees. »From this map, it becomes clear why there is instantly frozen sea water on the surface on the New Siberian Islands, but not on Novaya Zemlya. The New Siberian Islands came under the influence of inertial winds with maximum speed, and inertial tidal waves with maximum height,which, according to some sources, could reach 3000 meters, since they were on the axis of the movement of the poles, that is, between the 80th and 160th meridians. New Earth, on the other hand, lies to the west (to the left of the map) of the 80th meridian, that is, outside the area where the axis of displacement of the poles was located and there the speed of inertial winds and the height of the tidal inertial wave were much lower, which again fits perfectly into the version under consideration …which again fits perfectly into the version in question.which again fits perfectly into the version in question.
A tidal wave came to St. Petersburg, the height of which is visible, for example, in a photograph of the Hermitage.
The modified photograph shows how the Hermitage looked like before the pole shift and subsequent flooding.
The height of the incoming tidal wave was no more than 4-5 meters, if we assume that the height of the brought soil was approximately equal to the height of the water level. It was as a result of the passage of this tidal wave that both the Hermitage and St. Isaac's Cathedral were flooded and later covered with silt and all sorts of garbage. they never swept it, and therefore a so-called "cultural layer" was formed around the Hermitage, and in Russian - a layer of debris and soil at least 3 meters high, or immediately after completion the builders buried the Hermitage up to the very windows of the first floor. Skeptics can choose whichever they like best.
For those who are not satisfied with the Hermitage, I suggest taking a walk along the English Embankment in St. Petersburg. We observe the same thing on the Admiralteyskaya embankment, where the bricked-up windows of the former first floor are clearly visible. And here is the Hermitage from the side of the Neva, right in front of your eyes, a half-buried DOOR, which used to be on the first floor, which was also obviously filled up.
The wave came to St. Petersburg after it swept across Scandinavia, Finland and the shallow Gulf of Finland. It is thanks to such a successful arrangement for Peter that we observe the most beautiful ancient architecture of the antediluvian civilization.
It also becomes clear why immediately after the alleged construction, but in fact the restoration and restructuring of St. Isaac's Cathedral, it was subjected to long drying. If there were no flooding, there would have been problems with humidity to this day, since, according to the official version, they were due to the swampy terrain and design features of the Cathedral. The terrain has remained the same, the design has not changed either, and moisture problems have disappeared. Now Isaac has no problems with water and moisture.
If St. Isaac's Cathedral was flooded by a tidal wave, and then restored, then everything falls into place. The cathedral was dried up once after flooding and this problem did not arise again.
Here are some more facts that support the version of the pole shift according to the scenario described in this post:
frozen mammoths are found only in Eastern Siberia and are not found in, for example, Canada. In Canada, Mexico and the United States, only skeletons and tusks are found, which agrees very well with the version under consideration, since America moved south, and everything melted there, and did not freeze. Siberia, on the other hand, moved to the north, and that is why frozen, not thawed animals are found in Siberia.
Another interesting feature of the North and Baltic Seas can be easily explained in our version: the coasts of the Baltic and North Sea are covered with a thick layer of silt, although there are no rivers that usually cause silt to the coast. Within the framework of our version, this fact is quite natural and even absolutely necessary, since the wave that swept through Scandinavia and Finland washed away everything from there, including the soil, and brought it all to the European shores. In the same way, a 30-kilometer shoal was formed in the Gulf of Finland between Kronstadt and St. Petersburg, which brought so much anxiety and expense to merchants of the time of Peter I, who said that it was cheaper to bring goods from Holland to Kronstadt than to transfer them from Kronstadt to St. Petersburg by small boats. …
An interesting feature of the Black Sea is easily explained by the shifting of the poles: the water in the Black Sea, starting from a depth of several hundred meters, is very rich in hydrogen sulfide. If the Black Sea was formed during the pole shift due to the fact that ocean water splashed into the Black Sea lowland, then naturally, along with sea water, a huge amount of organic matter got into this lowland: trees, animals, washed away from huge areas by the wave. And this organic matter sank to the bottom and there safely decomposed, releasing a huge amount of hydrogen sulfide, which had nowhere to go, except to stay in the bottom layers of water, since the Black Sea is an isolated reservoir. The Black Sea, perhaps because it was called black, was flooded with streams of mud and was exactly black in color immediately after the flood.
***
But the information from Fursov, which directly confirms the version of the upcoming pole shift, including the date of possible sharp changes, Fursov speaks of 2030.
at the forum of young scientists in Togliatti, lecture by Andrey Fursov 14.10.2013.
He speaks, among other things, of a report from the Brookins Institute.
In November 2011, the Brookings Institution and the London School of Economics published the Internal Displacement Project report. It is about the movement of large masses of the population from the North Atlantic to northern Eurasia. That is, exactly from where the new pole will be to where it will be safe to be after moving. I recommend watching this lecture in its entirety.
Here is a quote from Fursov from an interview with Komsomolskaya Pravda on 2013-28-03.
“In short, the transfer of large masses of people in the event of a sharp freeze in North America (USA) and Western Europe to Russia is not excluded. Naturally, these are only plans. There is a lot of fog in the open version of Project. But the fact that there are such plans raises serious concerns. After all, the "Project" was not engaged in Sharashkin's offices, but very serious institutions, considered in the West as the leading analytical centers on foreign policy and the world economy. President of the Brookings Institution Strobe Talbott is a former US deputy secretary of state who was in charge of relations with Russia under Clinton. He once stated: "One of our most challenging and challenging tasks is to identify early and serious unresolved issues that the United States and the world will have to deal with in the future." It is also symptomatic thatthat London and Washington have joined forces on The Displacement Project. It is believed that in the event of a geoclimatic catastrophe, the United States and Britain will be the most affected. For them, a sudden cold snap will indeed be a disaster. They are used to living in comfortable conditions, not straining."
But this is already serious. After all, it is these countries that will suffer according to the version of the pole shift, we put forward in this blog.
There are also a couple of remarkable accidents. In the summer of 2011, the overwhelming majority of crop circles around the world were dedicated to comet Elenin, which crop circle painters predicted on circles in England a few months before its discovery by earthly astronomers. And in November 2011, a report of the Brookins Institution "The Internal Displacement Project" appears in the public domain. And on January 31, 2011, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is gathering American diplomats from all over the world for a closed meeting in Washington.
Link.
There have never been such large-scale meetings of ALL US diplomats. This is an absolutely extraordinary event that has been greatly underestimated in the world. And if you try to search for this news in Google - get worn out. It is pushed very far in the tail of the search results. It is in Yandex immediately.
Something with this comet is not as it appears to official science. Read more about it on the tag "Elenin's comet in crop circles 2011"
- Part 2 -